Skip to main content
Log in

Stability Analysis and Design of Cantilever Retaining Walls with Regard to Possible Failure Mechanisms: An Upper Bound Limit Analysis Approach

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a new algorithm for design of cantilever retaining walls based on the proposed failure mechanisms and considers the effects of wall geometric parameters using an upper-bound limit analysis approach. All previous work on this subject has only focused on the optimum design of the retaining walls assuming constant forces, irrespective of the total stability and critical conditions of failure mechanisms. In the present study, the upper-bound limit analysis method was used to determine the shape of the critical failure mechanisms for a retaining wall simultaneously with its optimal dimensions. The safety factors against overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity failure were assessed by the limit analysis approach. The current results show good agreement with the results obtained using the limit equilibrium methods and finite element analyses. The results obtained based on the proposed failure mechanism show that the geometry and dimensions of the wall affect its stability safety factors, the shape of the critical failure mechanisms and the active pressure on the wall; therefore, the process of determining the shape of the critical failure mechanisms, checking the stability of the wall and the procedure of finding its optimal dimensions should be performed simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aashto L (2012) LRFD bridge design specifications. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI Committee 318 (2005) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari F, Momeni Roghabadi M, Farzaneh O (2011) Seismic active pressure on retaining walls (technical note). Civ Eng Infrastruct J 45:329–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique 5:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caltabiano S, Cascone E, Maugeri M (2012) Static and seismic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding retaining walls under different surcharge conditions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 37:38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Akin A (2011) Design of retaining walls using big bang–big crunch optimization. J Struct Eng 138:438–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceranic B, Fryer C, Baines R (2001) An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining structures. Comput Struct 79:1569–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Chen W-F (1981) Lateral earth pressures on rigid retaining walls subjected to earthquake forces. School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University

  • Chen W-F, Liu X (2012) Limit analysis in soil mechanics, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF, Rosenfarb JL (1973) Limit analysis solutions of earth pressure problems. Soils Found 13(4):45–60

  • Finn WD (1967) Applications of plasticity in soil mechanics. J Soil Mech Found Div 93(5):101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibagahi K, Ghahramani A (1979) Zero extension line theory of earth pressure. J Geotech Eng Div 105:881–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London A on mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 1033. The Royal Society, pp 281–297

  • James R, Bransby PL (1970) Experimental and theoretical investigations of a passive earth pressure problem. Geotechnique 20:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Behnam A (2013) Charged system search algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Arab J Sci Eng 38:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, El-Shafie A, Eslami M (2010) Economic design of retaining wall using particle swarm optimization with passive congregation. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4:5500–5507

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, El-Shafie A, Eslami M (2011) Modified particle swarm optimization for optimum design of spread footing and retaining wall. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 12:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Su L, Wu Y, He S (2015) Seismic stability of gravity retaining walls under combined horizontal and vertical accelerations. Geotech Geol Eng 33:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern N, Price VE (1965) The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique 15:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2015) Parameters optimization of geotechnical problem using different optimization algorithm. Geotech Geol Eng 33:1235–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe S (1926) General theory of earth pressure. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 12:311

    Google Scholar 

  • OptumG2 (2016) Optum computational engineering, version: 2016.09.25. Newcastle, Australia

  • Plaxis 8.2 (2002) Plaxis finite element code for soil and rock analysis, user’s manual Plaxis 8.2 V. Delft, Netherlands

  • Pourbaba M, Talatahari S, Sheikholeslami R (2013) A chaotic imperialist competitive algorithm for optimum cost design of cantilever retaining walls. KSCE J Civ Eng 17:972–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankine WM (1856) On the mathematical theory of the stability of earth-work and masonry. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series I. 8:60–61

  • Richards J, Rowland Huang C, Fishman KL (1999) Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:771–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahab MG, Toropov VV, Gandomi AH (2013) A review on traditional and modern structural optimization: problems and techniques. Metaheuristic Applications in Structures and Infrastructures: 25–47

  • Sheikholeslami R, Khalili BG, Sadollah A, Kim JH (2016) Optimization of reinforced concrete retaining walls via hybrid firefly algorithm with upper bound strategy. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(6):2428–2438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif MA, Fang Y-S (1984) Dynamic earth pressures on walls rotating about the top. J Soil Mech Found 24(4):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskii VV (1965) Statics of granular media. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Talatahari S, Sheikholeslami R (2014) Optimum design of gravity and reinforced retaining walls using enhanced charged system search algorithm. KSCE J Civ Eng 18:1464–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalba P, Alcalá J, Yepes V, González-Vidosa F (2010) CO2 optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. In: 2nd international conference on engineering optimization, pp 6–9

  • Yepes V, Alcala J, Perea C, González-Vidosa F (2008) A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Eng Struct 30:821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navid Ganjian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranjbar Karkanaki, A., Ganjian, N. & Askari, F. Stability Analysis and Design of Cantilever Retaining Walls with Regard to Possible Failure Mechanisms: An Upper Bound Limit Analysis Approach. Geotech Geol Eng 35, 1079–1092 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0164-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0164-5

Keywords

Navigation