Skip to main content
Log in

A smeared crack modeling framework accommodating multi-directional fracture at finite strains

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generic smeared crack modeling framework predicated on the deformation gradient decomposition (DGD) approach is proposed for use in dynamic fracture problems at finite strains, accommodating failure along multiple mutually orthogonal fracture planes embedded within an independently defined bulk material model. Within this constitutive framework, the traction equilibrium conditions imposed at each failure surface are used to determine the associated crack displacements stored as internal state variables. In general, the enforcement of interfacial equilibrium entails the implicit solution of a non-linear system of equations within the constitutive update procedure. However, if inertial effects arising due to the relative motion of the fractured material are incorporated within the model, the traction equilibrium conditions are shown to give rise to corresponding dynamic equations of motion governing the time-evolution of the crack opening displacements. For dynamic problems, an explicit time-integration procedure is devised to efficiently update the material state, subject to a set of internal frictionless contact constraints to prevent material inversion. The efficacy of the proposed modeling framework is investigated through several benchmark dynamic fracture problems run within the explicit finite element code DYNA3D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambroziak A, Kłosowski P (2007) Survey of modern trends in analysis of continuum damage mechanics. Task Q 10(437–454):01

    Google Scholar 

  • Armero F, Linder C (2008) New finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities in the finite deformation range. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(33):3138–3170

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Armero FJC, Linder C (2009) Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture using finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Int J Fract 160:119–141

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Armero F, Oller S (2000) A general framework for continuum damage models. I. infinitesimal plastic damage models in stress space. Int J Solids Struct 37(48):7409–7436

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bergan AC, Leone FA (2016) A continuum damage mechanics model to predict kink-band propagation using deformation gradient tensor decomposition. In: 31st American Society for composites technical conference

  • Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:77–95

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33(20):2899–2938

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera M, Chiumenti M (2006) Smeared crack approach: back to the original track. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30(12):1173–1199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chin EB, Bishop JE, Garimella RV, Sukumar N (2018) Finite deformation cohesive polygonal finite elements for modeling pervasive fracture. Int J Fract 214(2):139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias da Costa D, Alfaiate J, Sluys LJ, Júlio E (2009) A discrete strong discontinuity approach. Eng Fract Mech 76(9):1176–1201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–1342

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez F, Rodriguez J, Sánchez V (1997) Tensile strength measurements of ceramic materials at high rates of strain. Le J Phys IV 7(C3):C3-151

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofacker M, Miehe C (2013) A phase field model of dynamic fracture: robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(3):276–301

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalthoff JF, Winkler S (1987) Failure mode transition at high rates of shear loading. In: Chiem CY, Kunze HD, Meyer LW (eds) International conference on impact loading and dynamic behavior of materials, vol 1, pp 185–195

  • Kim J, Armero F (2017) Three-dimensional finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the analysis of solids at failure in the finite deformation range. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 317:890–926

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EH (1969) Elastic-plastic deformation at finite strains. J Appl Mech 36(1):1–6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leone FA (2015) Deformation gradient tensor decomposition for representing matrix cracks in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos A 76(334–341):09

  • Lu X, Ridha M, Tan VBC, Tay TE (2019) Adaptive discrete-smeared crack (a-disc) model for multi-scale progressive damage in composites. Compos A 125:105513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubliner J (1972) On the thermodynamic foundations of non-linear solid mechanics. Int J Non-Linear Mech 7(3):237–254

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lubliner J (1973) On the structure of the rate equations of materials with internal variables. Acta Mech 17(1):109–119

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1996) From damage to fracture mechanics and conversely: a combined approach. Int J Solids Struct 33(20):3327–3342

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69(7):813–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver J, Cervera M, Manzoli O (1999) Strong discontinuities and continuum plasticity models: the strong discontinuity approach. Int J Plast 15(3):319–351

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(9):1267–1282

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulia KD, Sam C-H, Vavasis SA (2003) Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(5):679–701

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Paulino GH (2011) Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Appl Mech Rev. doi 10(1115/1):4023110

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence TJ, Gou K (2015) On compressible versions of the incompressible Neo-Hookean material. Math Mech Solids 20(2):157–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid YR (1968) Ultimate strength analysis of prestressed concrete pressure vessels. Nucl Eng Des 7(4):334–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1982) Dynamic crack-tip stresses under stress wave loading—a comparison of theory and experiment. Int J Fract 20:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: I. Crack initiation and arrest. Int J Fract 25:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR et al (1968) Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture. Fracture 2:191–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J, Navarro C, Sanchez-Galvez V (1994) Splitting tests: an alternative to determine the dynamic tensile strength of ceramic materials. Le J Phys IV 4(C8):C8-101

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots J (1988) Computational modeling of concrete fracture. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft

  • Rots JG, Blaauwendraad J (1989) Crack models for concrete, discrete or smeared? fixed, multi-directional or rotating? HERON 34(1):1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Rots JG, Nauta P, Kuster GMA, Blaauwendraad J (1985) Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete. Stevin-Laboratory of the Department of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Heron

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz G, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (2000) Three-dimensional finite-element simulation of the dynamic Brazilian tests on concrete cylinders. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(7):963–994

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC, Hughes TJR (2000) Computational inelasticity, vol 7. Springer, New York

  • Xu X-P, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397–1434

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C (2001) Three-dimensional cohesive modeling of impact damage of composites. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu RC, Ruiz G, Pandolfi A (2004) Numerical investigation on the dynamic behavior of advanced ceramics. Eng Fract Mech 71(4):897–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Li X, Zou Y, Jiang Y, Li G (2014) Dynamic Brazilian tests of granite under coupled static and dynamic loads. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(2):495–505

  • Zywicz E, Giffin B, DeGroot AJ, Zoller M (2021) DYNA3D: a nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics user manual–version 21. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), USA under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 (Release: LLNL-JRNL-826739). The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Giffin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A simplified evaluation of integral products of Heaviside functions

A simplified evaluation of integral products of Heaviside functions

Recall From Eq. (26) the expression for the total internal kinetic energy of the cracked continuum idealization, restated below:

$$\begin{aligned} T^d = \frac{\rho }{8} \sum _{a,b=1}^{N_{\text {cracks}}} (\dot{\tilde{{\mathbf {u}}}}_a \cdot \dot{\tilde{{\mathbf {u}}}}_b) \frac{1}{|\varOmega |} \int _{\varOmega } {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_a) {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_b) \, dV. \end{aligned}$$
(70)

The primary difficulty in evaluating the above concerns the computation of the integrals \(\int _{\varOmega } {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_a) {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_b) \, dV\) containing products of Heaviside functions. Herein, the aforementioned integral products are evaluated approximately by assuming an idealized geometric distribution of material within the RVE domain \(\varOmega \).

In particular, consider the case where \(\varOmega \) is approximated as an ellipsoidal domain obtained through an affine mapping \({\mathbf {J}}\) from a reference sphere with unit volume. Let the volume of the ellipsoidal domain correspond to \(| \varOmega | = \det ({\mathbf {J}})\). The directed area \(d {\mathbf {a}}_c = {\mathbf {n}}_c \, da\) of any medial crack plane passing through the reference sphere with circular area \(da = \root 3 \of {\frac{9 \pi }{16}}\) and unit normal \({\mathbf {n}}_c\) is transformed via Nanson’s relation into the directed area \(d {\mathbf {A}}_c = {\mathbf {N}}_c \, dA_c\) of a corresponding medial crack plane passing though the ellipsoidal domain with area \(dA_c = | \varGamma _c |\) and normal \({\mathbf {N}}_c\), i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} d {\mathbf {A}}_c = \text {cof} ({\mathbf {J}}) \cdot d {\mathbf {a}}_c . \end{aligned}$$
(71)

Referring to Fig. 13, the volume of an ellipsoidal wedge (denoted \(|W_{12}|\)) formed by the intersection of \(\varOmega \) with two half spaces \({\mathbf {X}} \cdot {\mathbf {N}}_1 \ge 0\) and \({\mathbf {X}} \cdot {\mathbf {N}}_2 \ge 0\) may be computed as the transformed volume of the corresponding spherical wedge defined in the reference sphere, such that

$$\begin{aligned} |W_{12}| = \frac{\pi - \cos ^{-1} ({\mathbf {n}}_1 \cdot {\mathbf {n}}_2)}{2 \pi } \, |\varOmega |, \end{aligned}$$
(72)

A reasonable approximation to the above over the complete range of values for the inner product \({\mathbf {n}}_1 \cdot {\mathbf {n}}_2 \in \left[ -1,+1\right] \) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} |W_{12}| \approx \frac{1 + {\mathbf {n}}_1 \cdot {\mathbf {n}}_2}{4} \, |\varOmega |. \end{aligned}$$
(73)
Fig. 13
figure 13

Two-dimensional depiction of the ellipsoidal idealization for \(\varOmega \) with principal semi-diameters \(r_i\); the ellipsoidal wedge \(W_{12}\) is defined by the two unit normals \({\mathbf {N}}_1\) and \({\mathbf {N}}_2\), such that a corresponding spherical wedge may be defined between \({\mathbf {n}}_1\) and \({\mathbf {n}}_2\) in the reference sphere

Given the chosen idealization for the RVE domain, the Heaviside integral products may be directly evaluated via

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\varOmega } {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_a) {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_b) \, dV = 4 |W_{ab}| - |\varOmega |. \end{aligned}$$
(74)

Exploiting the approximation given by equation (73), the above reduces to a bilinear product expressed in terms of the metric tensor \({\mathbf {G}}\) defined in Sect. 2.1:

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\varOmega } {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_a) {\mathscr {H}} ({\mathbf {N}}_b) \, dV \approx \frac{16}{9} \frac{{\mathbf {N}}_a}{\ell _a} \cdot {\mathbf {G}} \cdot \frac{{\mathbf {N}}_b}{\ell _b} \, |\varOmega |. \end{aligned}$$
(75)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giffin, B.D., Zywicz, E. A smeared crack modeling framework accommodating multi-directional fracture at finite strains. Int J Fract 239, 87–109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00665-9

Keywords

Navigation