Abstract
The following response to the discussion of the above mentioned paper is divided into two parts: (1) a response to the issue of our comparison of the ‘apparent period of specimen oscillation’, τ, and the natural vibration period of a cracked specimen, T, and (2) a verification of the applicability of our model to ‘short time-to-fracture’ tests, which Rokach has questioned, due to a lack of knowledge of Hopkinson bar techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rokach, I.V. (2004). Discussion on the paper ‘Analysis of the dynamic response for a pre-cracked three-point bend specimen’ by Fengchun Jiang, Aashish Rohatgi, Kenneth S. Vecchio and Justin L. Cheney, International Journal of Fracture (accepted).
Jiang Fengchun Rohatgi Aashish S. Vecchio Kenneth L. Cheney Justin (2004) ArticleTitleAnalysis of the dynamic response for a pre-cracked three-point bend specimen International Journal of Fracture 127 147–165
J.G. Williams G.C. Adams (1987) ArticleTitleThe analysis of instrumented impact tests using a mass-spring model International Journal of Fracture 33 209–222
P.R. Marur (1994) ArticleTitleOn the effects of higher vibration modes in the analysis of three point bend testing International Journal of Fracture 77 367–379
A.G. Dutton R.A.W. Mines (1991) ArticleTitleAnalysis of Hopkinson pressure bar loaded instrumented Charpy test using inertial modeling technique International Journal of Fracture 51 187–206
C.H. Popelar C.E. Anderson SuffixJr. A. Nagy (2000) ArticleTitleAn experimental method for determining dynamic facture toughness Experimental Mechanics 40 401–407
W.G. Guo Y.L. Li Y.Y. Liu (1997) ArticleTitleAnalysis and experimental determination of dynamic impact stress intensity factor for 40Cr steel Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 26 29–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, F., Rohatgi, A., Vecchio, K.S. et al. Response to the discussion by I.V. Rokach of the paper entitled: “Analysis of the dynamic responses for a pre-cracked three-point bend specimen”. Int J Fract 131, 301–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-004-7140-9
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-004-7140-9