Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy preorders: conditional extensions, extensions and their representations

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The crisp literature provides characterizations of the preorders that admit a total preorder extension when some pairwise order comparisons are imposed on the extended relation. It is also known that every preorder is the intersection of a collection of total preorders. In this contribution we generalize both approaches to the fuzzy case. We appeal to a construction for deriving the strict preference and the indifference relations from a weak preference relation, that allows to obtain full characterizations in the conditional extension problem. This improves the performance of the construction via generators studied earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Contrary to our notation, Georgescu calls transitive consistent to those fuzzy relations such that \(R^T\) is a compatible extension of R.

  2. This proof partially replicates the proof of Theorem 2 in Alcantud and Díaz (2015). At the risk of being reiterative, we present all the steps for the sake of completeness. We insist that the formulae used here and in Alcantud and Díaz (2015) to obtain the indifference and strict preference relations are different.

  3. This implication was studied by Dasgupta and Deb (2001) and Díaz et al. (2008, 2010) for constructions unrelated to Eq. (6).

  4. We are very grateful to an anonymous referee for pointing out this stimulating possibility for research.

References

  • Alcantud, J. C. R. (2009). Conditional ordering extensions. Economic Theory, 39, 495–503.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantud, J. C. R., & Díaz, S. (2015). Conditional extensions of fuzzy preorders. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 278, 3–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Belohlavek, R. (2002). Fuzzy relational systems: foundations and principles. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press (Vol. 20 of IFSR International Series on Systems Science and Engineering), New York.

  • Bodenhofer, U., & Klawonn, F. (2004). A formal study of linearity axioms for fuzzy orderings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 145, 323–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W. (1999). Intersection quasi-orderings: An alternative proof. Order, 16, 221–225.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, M., & Deb, R. (2001). Factoring fuzzy transitivity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 489–502.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets, B., & Fodor, J. (2003). Additive fuzzy preference structures: the next generation. In B. De Baets & J. Fodor (Eds.), Principles of fuzzy preference modelling and decision making (pp. 15–25). Ghent: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, S., De Baets, B., & Montes, S. (2008). On the compositional characterization of complete fuzzy pre-orders. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159, 2221–2239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, S., De Baets, B., & Montes, S. (2010). General results on the decomposition of transitive fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 9, 1–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D., & Weymark, J. A. (1998). A quasiordering is the intersection of orderings. Journal of Economic Theory, 78, 382–387.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dushnik, B., & Miller, E. W. (1941). Partially ordered sets. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 600–610.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu, I. (2008). Compatible extensions and consistent rationalizability: A fuzzy approach. In TUCS Technical Reports 881, Turku Centre for Computer Science.

  • Georgescu, I. (2003). Compatible extensions of fuzzy relations. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12, 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu, I. (2007). Fuzzy choice functions: A revealed preference approach. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu, I. (2008). Fuzzy Szpilrajn theorem through indicators. International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, III(4), 336–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu, I. (2015). On indicators of fuzzy relations. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 9(4), 553–571.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottwald, S. (1993). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B. (1968). Choice structures and preference relations. Synthese, 18, 443–458.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, U., & Blanchard, N. (1985). Partial ordering in L-underdeterminate sets. Information Sciences, 35, 133–144.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Szpilrajn, E. (1930). Sur l’éxtension de l’ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 16, 386–389.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 3, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. (1971). Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Information Sciences, 3, 177–200.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Both authors acknowledge financial support by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, the first one under Project ECO2015-66797-P, the second one under Project TIN2014-59543-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Díaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alcantud, J.C.R., Díaz, S. Fuzzy preorders: conditional extensions, extensions and their representations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 15, 371–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9230-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9230-3

Keywords

Navigation