Skip to main content
Log in

Post-fire Structural Properties of Hot-Rolled and Cold-Rolled Duplex Stainless Steel Reinforcing Bar

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the behaviour of duplex stainless steel reinforcing bar following exposure to elevated temperatures from a fire followed by subsequent cooling. The study focuses on duplex grade 1.4362 reinforcing bar, and includes both hot-rolled and cold-rolled variants. Grade 1.4362 duplex stainless steel reinforcement has become a popular choice for reinforced concrete owing to its excellent combination of outstanding mechanical behaviour and corrosion resistance as well as cost-effectiveness. There is no information on the post-fire performance of duplex 1.4362 reinforcing bar available, despite being necessary for an engineer that may wish to study the structural integrity of a relevant structure following a fire. To address this gap in the existing knowledge, this paper presents a detailed discussion and analysis based on a series of laboratory experiments comprising mechanical and metallurgical testing. It is shown that grade 1.4362 duplex stainless steel reinforcing bars perform unlike any other types of carbon steel or austenitic stainless steel rebars, owing to the austenite-ferrite grain boundary, and the associated instabilities. Based on the results presented in this paper, a series of recommendations are proposed for the post-fire mechanical property retention factors that can be used in assessment and design. Finally, this paper aims to highlight the potential for rehabilitation and salvage of existing reinforced concrete structures following a fire, and aid in the prevention of unnecessary demolition and replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Adapted from [8]

Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

f u :

Ultimate tensile stress

f 0.2p :

0.2% Proof stress

ε f :

Total strain at failure

ε u :

Percentage total elongation at maximum force

E :

Modulus of elasticity

References

  1. Steel-Sci (2021) Properties of Stainless Steel Rebar. https://www.stainlesssteelrebar.org/stainless-properties/.Accessed 18 May 2021

  2. Government of Canada (2021) Pont Samuel-De Champlain—Foire aux questions. https://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/nbsl-npsl/faq-fra.html#q1. Accessed 18 May 2021

  3. worldstainless.org (2019) Samuel De Champlain Bridge—ISSF Stainless Steel in Bridges, worldstainless.org

  4. worldstainless.org (2016) River Delta Crossing—ISSF Stainless Steel in Infrastrucutre, worldstainless.org

  5. Mondal R, Rajapgopal A, Bonagani S, Prakash A, Fuloria D, Sivaprasad P, Chai G, Kain V, Samajdar I (2020) Solution annealing of super duplex stainless steel: correlating corrosion performance with grain size and phase-specific chemistry. Metall Mater Trans 51:2480–2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso JL, Pacheco MS, Araujo A, Riberio J (2018) Stainless steel rebar for marine environment: study of galvanic corrosion with carbon steel rebars used in the same concrete structure

  7. Bertolini L, Gastaldi M (2011) Corrosion resistance of low-nickel duplex stainless steel rebars. Mater Corros 62(2):120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner L, Bu Y, Francis P, Baddoo NR, Cashell KA, McCann F (2016) Elevated tempreture material properties of stainless steel reinforcing bar. Constr Build Mater 114:977–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rehman F, Cashell KA, Anguliano L (2022) Experimental study of the post-fire mechanical and material response of cold-worked austenitic stainless steel reinforcing bar. Materials 15:1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Felicetti R, Gambarova PG, Meda A (2009) Residual behavior of steel rebars and R/C sections after a fire. Constr Build Mater 23:3546–3555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao Z, Wang X-Q, Hassan MK, Song T-Y, Xie L-A (2018) Behavior of three types of stainless steel after exposure to elevated temperatures. J Constr Steel Res 152:296–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pramanik BA, Kumar A (2015) Stainless steel: microstructure, mechanical properties and methods of application, Nova

  13. Beddos J, Parr JG (1999) Introduction to Stainless Steel, 3rd edn. ASM International, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Stainless Steel Forum (2020) The Stainless Steel Family. ISSF

  15. BS EN 10088-1 (2014) Stainless Steel Part 1: List of stainless steels. British Standards Institute

  16. Rodrigues DG, Maria GGB, Viana BAL, Santos DB (2019) Effect of low cold-rolling strain on microstructure, texture, phase transformation, and mechanical properties of 2304 lean duplex stainless steel. Mater Charact 150:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Danieli Group (2021) SN Longos reconfirms its confidence in Danieli Rebar-in-Coil Technology, Accessed 25 Nov 2015. https://www.danieli.com/en/news/news-events/sn-longos-reconfirms-its-confidence-danieli-rebar-coil-technology_37_18.htm. Accessed 2021

  18. BS 6744:2016 (2016) Stainless Steel Bars—Reinforcement of concrete—requirements and test methods. British Standard Institute

  19. Twilt L (1988) Strength and deformation properties of steel at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf J 13:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. BS 6892-1:2016 (2016) Metallic materials—Tensile testing, Part 1: method of test at room temperature. British Standard Institute

  21. Bruker (2021) The Swiss Army Knife of the X-ray Diffractionist. https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/diffractometers-and-scattering-systems/x-ray-diffractometers/diffrac-suite-software/diffrac-eva.html. Accessed Oct 7 2021

  22. Hansen N (2004) Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scripta Mater 51(8):801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alinejad H, Abbasi M (2021) Effects of precipitated phases on the magnetic properties of 2304 duplex stainless steel. J Magn Magn Mater 537:168244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dehghan-Manshadi A, Barnett MR, Hodgson PD (2013) Microstructure evolution during hot deformation of duplex stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol 23(12):1478–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eurocode 2 (2004) Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, CEN

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stainless UK and Acerinox for providing the test specimens used for testing and the Experimental Techniques Centre at Brunel University for providing access to the resources used for the metallurgical investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fazal-ur Rehman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

To whom it may concern, the authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work presented in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rehman, Fu., Cashell, K.A. & Anguilano, L. Post-fire Structural Properties of Hot-Rolled and Cold-Rolled Duplex Stainless Steel Reinforcing Bar. Fire Technol 58, 2283–2311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01261-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01261-y

Keywords

Navigation