Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental Impact of Automatic Fire Sprinklers: Part 1. Residential Sprinklers Revisited in the Age of Sustainability

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent study on the environmental impact of automatic fire sprinklers is documented in a two part series. The current paper provides a background on residential sprinkler technology from its inception until the present, and analyzes the contribution of risk factors, such as fire, on the total lifecycle carbon emissions of one- and two-family dwellings and the reduction to that contribution achieved via the use of automatic fire sprinklers. The analysis shows that the risk of fire increases the carbon emissions of a building over its’ lifecycle. The results illustrate that sound risk management is necessary to achieving sustainability and avoiding unintended consequences. These findings are especially important as society seeks to design and build more energy- and resource-efficient, environmentally sustainable buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that gases other than CO2 are considered in terms of CO2 equivalents normalized in terms of global warming potential calculated according to the United Nations framework Convention on Climate Change. Greenhouse gases considered by Norman et al. were carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and chlorofluorocarbons [32].

  2. Hall [18] has analyzed the performance of automatic sprinklers in one- and two-family dwellings. He reports that, for the period of 2003 to 2006, fire damage was only reduced from an average of US $19,000 to US $14,000 as a result of automatic sprinklers. Hall comments that “only 1% of reported dwelling fires involve sprinklered properties, which means any loss estimate for sprinklered dwelling fires will tend to be statistically unstable” [18].

References

  1. Kung H-C, Spaulding RD, Hill EE, Symonds AP (1982) Field evaluation of residential prototype sprinkler—Los Angeles Fire Test Program. Technical Report J.I. 0E0R3.RA(1). Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA

  2. Bill Jr R. G., Kung H.-C., Anderson S. K., Ferron, R (2002) “A New Test to Evaluate the Fire Performance of Residential Sprinklers”. Fire Technology 38: 101-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bill Jr. R. G., Kung H.-C., Brown W. R., Hill Jr. E. E.,Spaulding, R. D (1991) “Predicting the Suppression Capability of Quick Response Sprinklers in a Light Hazard Scenario, Part 1: Fire Growth and Required Delivered Density Measurements”. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 3: 81-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NFPA 13D: Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes, 1984 edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  5. FM Approvals Standard Class Number 2030: Approval standard for residential automatic sprinklers for fire protection, 1983 edn. FM Approvals, Norwood, MA

  6. UL 1626: Proposed first edition of the standard for residential sprinklers for fire protection service, 1986 edn. Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL

  7. UL 1626: Standard for residential sprinklers for fire protection service, 2008 edn. Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL

  8. FM Approvals Standard Class Number 2030: Approval standard for residential automatic sprinklers for fire protection, 2009 edn. FM Approvals, Norwood, MA

  9. NFPA 13D: Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes, 2010 edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  10. FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheet 2–5: Installation guidelines for automatic sprinklers in residential occupancies, 2009 edn. FM Global, Johnston, RI

  11. Gritzo LA, Doerr W, Bill R, Ali H, Nong S, Krasner L (2009) The influence of risk factors on sustainable development. FM Global, Johnston, RI. http://www.fmglobal.com/researchreports

  12. Wieczorek CJ, Ditch B, Bill R (2010) Environmental impact of automatic fire sprinklers: Part 2. Experimental study. Fire Technol. doi:10.1007/s10694-010-0192-7

  13. Wieczorek CJ, Ditch B, Bill R (2010) Environmental impact of automatic fire sprinklers. FM Global, Johnston, RI

  14. Cote A (1986) Assessing the magnitude of the fire problem. Fire protection handbook, sect 1, chap 1, 16th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  15. United State Fire Administration, FEMA: Residential structure fires. http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/statistics/national/residential.shtm

  16. Madrzykowski D, Fleming RP (2008) Residential sprinkler systems. Fire protection handbook, sect 16, chap 6, vol II, 20th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  17. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Housing Reports, Series H150/07 (2008) American Housing Survey for the United States: 2007. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20401. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs07/ahs07.html

  18. Hall JR Jr (2009) U.S. experience with sprinklers and other automatic fire extinguishment equipment. NFPA Fire Analysis and Research Division, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  19. Weatherby S (2009) Benefits of residential fire sprinklers: Prince George’s county 15-year history with its single-family residential dwelling fire sprinkler ordinance. Home Fire Sprinkler Coalition. http://www.firesprinklerinitiative.org/assets/files//PrinceGeorgesCountyReport.pdf

  20. NFPA 1: Fire Code, 2006 edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  21. NFPA 101: Life Safety Code, 2006 edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  22. NFPA 5000: Building Construction and Safety Code, 2006 edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  23. Cade GB (2008) A message from the U.S. fire administrator about residential sprinklers. United States Fire Administration, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Emmetsburg, MD

  24. http://www.residentialfiresprinklers.com/blog/icc-approves-residential-fire-sprinklers-in-the-international-residential-code. Accessed 7 Jan 2010

  25. FM Approvals: The Approval Guide. FM Approvals, Norwood, MA. http://www.fmglobal.com/page.aspx?id=50040000

  26. Underwriters Laboratories: UL Online Certifications Directory. Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook, IL. http://www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/industries/buildingmaterials/sprinklersystems/

  27. Madrzykowski D, Fleming R (2002) Review of residential sprinkler systems: research and standards. NISTIR 6941, National Institute of Standards and Technology, revised Dec 2002

  28. Fire Protection Equipment Directory (1998) Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL

  29. U.S. Green Building Council: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Brochure. Washington, DC. http://www.usgbc.org

  30. U.S. EPA Climate Leaders Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol, May 2005. http://www.epa.gov/statply/resourses/design.htlm

  31. Brown M (2008) The residential energy and carbon footprint of the 100 larger U.S. metropolitan areas. Working paper #39. Ivan Allen College, Georgia Tech. http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/22228

  32. Norman J, MacLean HL, Kennedy CA (2006) Comparing high and low residential density: life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. J Urban Plan Dev 132:1

    Google Scholar 

  33. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Housing Reports, Series H-150-99: American Housing Survey National Tables: 1999. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs99/ahs99.html

  34. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Housing Reports, Series H150/01 (2002) American Housing Survey for the United States: 2001. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs01_2000wts/ahs01_2000wts.html

  35. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Housing Reports, Series H150/03 (2004) American Housing Survey for the United States: 2003. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs03/ahs03.html

  36. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Housing Reports, Series H150/05 (2006) American Housing Survey for the United States: 2005. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs05/ahs05.html

  37. The U.S. Fire Problem (2009) Fire statistics, NFPA fire analysis and research. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA. http://www.nfpa.org/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=953&itemID=23858&URL=Research/Fire%20statistics/The%20U.S.%20fire%20problem

  38. Davoodi A (2008) Confinement of fire. Fire protection handbook, sect 18, chap 1, vol II, 20th edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  39. Tewarson A (2002) Generation of heat and chemical compounds in fires. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, sect 3, chap 4, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, pp 3-82–3-161

  40. http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2009/03/30/yrb_516386.shtml. Accessed 3 Mar 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Wieczorek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gritzo, L.A., Bill, R.G., Wieczorek, C.J. et al. Environmental Impact of Automatic Fire Sprinklers: Part 1. Residential Sprinklers Revisited in the Age of Sustainability. Fire Technol 47, 751–763 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0191-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0191-8

Keywords

Navigation