Ambuehl, S., Ockenfels, A., & Stewart, C. (2018). For they know not what they do: Selection through incentives when information is costly. Working paper, University of Toronto.
Andersson, O., Tyran, J. R., Wengström, E., & Holm, H. J. (2016). Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preferences or noise? Journal of the European Economic Association,
Arthur, W., & Day, D. (1994). Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices test. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Baillon, A., Huang, Z., Selim, A., & Wakker, P. P. (2013). Ambiguity attitudes under time pressure. Working paper, Erasmus University.
Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2013). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association,
Ben-Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica,
Bernardi, R. A. (1997). The relationships among self-control, perceptions of stress, and performance. Journal of Applied Business Research,
Bors, D. A., & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Buckert, M., Oechssler, J., & Schwieren, C. (2017). Imitation under stress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
Buckert, M., Schwieren, C., Kudielka, B., & Fiebach, C. J. (2014). Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8, article 82.
Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
Byrne, K. A., Silasi-Mansat, C. D., & Worthy, D. A. (2015). Who chokes under pressure? The Big Five personality traits and decision-making under pressure. Personality and Individual Differences,
Cappelen, A. W., Nielsen, U. H., Tungodden, B., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Fairness is intuitive. Experimental Economics,
Casari, M., Ham, J. C., & Kagel, J. H. (2007). Selection bias, demographic effects, and ability effects in common value auction experiments. American Economic Review,
Chan, K. B. (1977). Individual differences in reactions to stress and their personality and situational determinants: Some implications for community mental health. Social Science and Medicine,
Chandler, J. J., & Pronin, E. (2012). Fast thought speed induces risk taking. Psychological Science,
Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2017). A review of time management literature. Personnel Review,
Conte, A., Scarsini, M., & Sürücü, O. (2016). The impact of time limitation: Insights from a queueing experiment. Judgment and Decision Making,
De Paola, M., & Gioia, F. (2016). Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology,
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? American Economic Review,
Dror, I. E., Basola, B., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1999). Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models. Memory and Cognition,
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal,
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics,
Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Gabaix, X., Laibson, D., Moloche, G., & Weinberg, S. (2006). Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. American Economic Review,
Ganster, D. C. (2005). Executive job demands: Suggestions from a stress and decision-making perspective. Academy of Management Journal,
Gawryluk, K., & Krawczyk, M. (2017). Probability weighting under time pressure: Applying the double-response method. Working paper, University of Warsaw.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality,
Gough, H. G. (1957). California psychological inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association,
Haji, A. E., Krawczyk, M., Sylwestrzak, M., & Zawojska, E. (2016). Time pressure and risk taking in auctions: A field experiment. Working paper, University of Warsaw.
Hu, Y., Wang, D., Pang, K., Xu, G., & Guo, J. (2015). The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making. Journal of Risk Research,
Huber, O., & Kunz, U. (2007). Time pressure in risky decision making: Effect on risk defusing. Psychology Science,
Kandasamy, N., Hardy, B., Page, L., Schaffner, M., Graggaber, J., Powlson, A. S., et al. (2014). Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Kirchler, M., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Johannesson, M., Sørensen, E. Ø., Stefan, M., et al. (2017). The effect of fast and slow decisions on risk taking. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Kocher, M. G., Pahlke, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2013). Tempus fugit: Time pressure in risky decisions. Management Science,
Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2006). Time is money: Time pressure, incentives, and the quality of decision-making. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
Kuhnen, C. M., & Melzer, B. (2014). Non-cognitive abilities and loan delinquency. UNC working paper.
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology,
Madan, C. R., Spetch, M. L., & Ludvig, E. A. (2015). Rapid makes risky: Time pressure increases risk seeking in decisions from experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology,
Maruping, V., Venkatesh, V., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2015). Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal,
Matthews, G., & Campbell, S. E. (1998). Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting,
Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica,
Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal,
Nursimulu, A. D., & Bossaerts, P. (2013). Risk and reward preferences under time pressure. Review of Finance,
Omar, A., & List, J. A. (2015). Do natural field experiments afford researchers more or less control than laboratory experiments? American Economic Review,
Ordóñez, L., & Benson, L., III. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Novak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature,
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 4: The advanced progressive matrices. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Reid, E., & Ramarajan, L. (2016). Managing the high intensity workplace. Harvard Business Review,
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,
Saqib, N. U., & Chan, E. Y. (2015). Time pressure reverses risk preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
Shelton, J. T., Elliott, E., Matthews, R., Hill, B., & Gouvier, W. (2010). The relationships of working memory, secondary memory, and general fluid intelligence: Working memory is special. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review,
Spiliopoulos, L., & Ortmann, A. (2017). The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics. Experimental Economics,
Sugden, R., Wang, M., & Zizzo, D. (2015). Take it or leave it: Experimental evidence on the effect of time-limited offers on consumer behaviour. Working paper UEA.
Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., & Strauß, S. (2003). Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game. Economics Letters,
Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Böttinger, H., Josephson, C., Lundgren, G., et al. (2013). Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature,
Trautmann, S. T. (2014). Risk taking under stress: The role(s) of self-selection. A comment on Buckert et al. (2014). Frontiers in Neuroscience, article 197.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Wheatley, R. (2000). Taking the strain: A survey of managers and workplace stress. London: Institute of Management.
Yates, A. J. (1966). Level, speed and personality factors in the intellectual performance of young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
Young, D. L., Goodie, A. S., Hall, D. B., & Wu, E. (2012). Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,