Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal variability in habitat structure may have shaped acoustic signals and repertoires in the black-capped and boreal chickadees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many songbird species have evolved multiple vocalizations, or repertoires, that function to communicate various biological signals. More diverse repertoires may have evolved in response to the effects of seasonal variation in habitat structure on signal transmission. Such changes in habitat necessarily occur for migrating species, but they also occur for resident species that occupy deciduous forests. The black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) possesses a chick-a-dee call and a fee-bee song, but the closely related boreal chickadee (P. borealis) lacks a song. Consistent with the habitat variability hypothesis, the black-capped chickadee possesses a larger repertoire and primarily occupies deciduous forests, whereas the songless boreal chickadee occurs more often in coniferous forests. We explored the ecological basis of this hypothesis by recording audio playbacks of two species in two habitat types during two seasons. Specifically, we played both songs and calls of the black-capped chickadee and calls of the boreal chickadee in deciduous and coniferous habitats, prior to and after leaf-out. We measured attenuation and degradation in re-recorded vocalizations. For black-capped chickadees, the song was less degraded than the call in post-leaf, deciduous forests. The boreal chickadee call attenuated more quickly in all treatments, but maintained its acoustic structure better than both black-capped chickadee vocalizations in coniferous forests. Our results support the hypothesis that variable habitats provided a seasonal transmission benefit for both song and call in the black-capped chickadee, but that the transmission benefit of song is lost in the less variant coniferous forests, which may underlie the absence of a song in the boreal chickadee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airey DC, Buchanan KL, Szekely T, Catchpole CK, DeVoogd TJ (2000) Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVC) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J Neurobiol 44(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avey MT, Quince AF, Sturdy CB (2007) Seasonal and diurnal patterns of black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) vocal production. Behav Process 77(2):149–155. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman K (2009) Signal reference guide. Version 4.04.29/5.04.29. Engineering Design, Berkeley

  • Benninghoff WS (1966) The relevé method for describing vegetation. Mich Bot 5:109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Boncoraglio G, Saino N (2007) Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct Ecol 21:134–142. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01207.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA (1982) The active space of red-winged blackbird song. J Comp Physiol A 147(4):511–522. doi:10.1007/BF00612017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TJ, Handford P (2000) Sound design for vocalizations: quality in the woods, consistency in the fields. Condor 102:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (1997) Female choice in the sedge warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 264(1381):521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoric approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charrier I, Bloomfield LL, Sturdy CB (2004) Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. I: the chick-a-dee call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Can J Zool 82:769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie PJ, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004) Pitch shifts and song structure indicate male quality in the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55(4):341–348. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0711-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pedersen SB (1993) Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. J Acoust Soc Am 93(4):2206–2220. doi:10.1121/1.406682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsten DL, Brennan LA, McCallum DA, Gaunt SL (2002) Chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/chbchi. doi:10.2173/bna.689

  • Ficken MS, Nocedal J (1992) Mexican chickadee (Poecile sclateri). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/mexchi. doi:10.2173/bna.8

  • Ficken MS, Ficken RW, Witkin SR (1978) Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee. Auk 1:34–48. doi:10.2307/4085493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficken MS, McLaren MA, Hailman JP (1996) Boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/borchi2. doi:10.2173/bna.254

  • Foote JR, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Smith SM (2010) Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/bkcchi. doi:10.2173/bna.39

  • Forrest TG (1994) From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. Am Zool 34(6):644–654. doi:10.1093/icb/34.6.644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ, Eens M (2004) Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res Rev 44(2–3):187–193. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17(3):133–141. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Slikas B, Sheldon FH (2005) Phylogeny of titmice (Paridae): II. species relationships based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-B gene. Auk 122(1):121–143. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0121:POTPIS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley A, Desrochers A (2008) Winter habitat use by boreal chickadee flocks in a managed forest. Wilson J Ornithol 120:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailman JP (1989) The organization of major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bull 101(2):305–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailman JP, Haftorn S (1995) Gray-headed chickadee (Poecile cinctus). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/gyhchi. doi:10.2173/bna.196

  • Hoeschele M, Moscicki MK, Otter KA, van Oort H, Fort KT, Farrell TM, Lee H, Robson SWJ, Sturdy CB (2009) Dominance signalled in an acoustic ornament. Anim Behav 79(3):657–664. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn AG, Leonard ML, Ratcliffe L, Shackleton SA, Weisman RG (1992) Frequency variation in songs of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Auk 109(4):847–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD, Sherry TW, Strong AM, Medori A (2005) Migrants in Neotropical bird communities: an assessment of the breeding currency hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 74(2):333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1976) Habituation and song repertoires in the great tit. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1(2):215–227. doi:10.1007/BF00299198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1977) The significance of song repertoires: the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav 25:475–478. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(77)90022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Kroodsma DE (1980) Repertoires and geographical variation in bird song. Adv Stud Behav 11:143–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs J, Ashcroft R, Webber M (1978) Song repertoires and territory defense in the great tit. Nature 271:539–542. doi:10.1038/271539a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2005) Acoustic features of song categories and their possible implications for communication in the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behaviour 142(8):1077–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lait LA, Burg TM (2013) When east meets west: population structure of a high-latitude resident species, the boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus). Heredity 111(4):321–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald IF, Kempster B, Zanette L, MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2006) Early nutritional stress impairs development of a song-control brain region in both male and female juvenile song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) at the onset of song learning. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 273:2559–2564. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum DA, Grundel R, Dahlsten DL (1999) Mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/mouchi. doi:10.2173/bna.453

  • McLaren MA (1975) Breeding biology of the boreal chickadee. Wilson Bull 87(3):344–354

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren MA (1976) Vocalizations of the boreal chickadee. Auk 93(3):451–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296(5569):873. doi:10.1126/science.296.5569.873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34. doi:10.1086/282971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscicki MK, Hoeschele M, Bloomfield LL, Modanu M, Charrier I, Sturdy CB (2011) Note types and coding in Parid vocalizations: the chick-a-dee call of the boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus). J Acoust Soc Am 129(5):3327–3340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mostrum AM, Curry RL, Lohr B (2002) Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/carchi. doi:10.2173/bna.636

  • Mougeot F, Bretagnolle V (2000) Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals. Anim Behav 60:647–656. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nottebohm F (2005) The neural basis of birdsong. PLoS Biol 3(5):e164. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki S, Searcy W, Peters S (2002) Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the “nutritional stress hypothesis”. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188(11):1003–1014. doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberweger K, Goller F (2001) The metabolic cost of birdsong production. J Exp Biol 204:3379–3388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patten MA, Rotenberry JT, Zuk M (2004) Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:2144–2155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podos J, Huber SK, Taft B (2004) Bird song: the interface of evolution and mechanism. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:55–87. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin DA, Crawford PW, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, MacDougall-Shackleton EA (2015) Song repertoire size, not territory location, predicts reproductive success and territory tenure in a migratory songbird. Can J Zool 93:627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe L, Weisman R (1985) Frequency shift in the fee bee song of the black-capped chickadee. Condor 87:555–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchison G (1995) Characteristics, use and possible functions of the perch songs and chatter calls of male common yellowthroats. Condor 97:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S, Hobson KA, Rohwer VG (2009) Migratory double breeding in Neotropical migrant birds. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 106(45):19050–19055

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shutler D, Weatherhead PJ (1990) Targets of sexual selection: song and plumage of wood warblers. Evolution 44(8):1967–1977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002) Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56:1849–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1997) Black-capped chickadee. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG, Reid FA (1979) Roles of the song repertoire in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5(3):279–290. doi:10.1007/BF00293676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu ET, Mazurek ME, Kuo Y (1994) Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches. J Neurosci 14(11):6924–6934

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3(1):69–94. doi:10.1007/BF00300047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound propagation and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa K (1981) Song and territory defense in the red-winged blackbird. Auk 98(1):185–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip DA, Bayne EM, Sólymos P, Campbell J, Proppe D (2017) Sound attenuation in forest and roadside environments: implications for avian point-count surveys. Condor 119(1):73–84. doi:10.1650/CONDOR-16-93.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was conducted under protocols approved by the University of Alberta Animal Care and Use Committee: Biosciences (680901). Funding was provided by an NSERC Discovery Grant (CBS). We would like to thank several volunteers that assisted in field data collection. We are indebted to the editor and two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Proppe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Apol, C.A., Sturdy, C.B. & Proppe, D.S. Seasonal variability in habitat structure may have shaped acoustic signals and repertoires in the black-capped and boreal chickadees. Evol Ecol 32, 57–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9921-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-017-9921-4

Keywords

Navigation