Skip to main content
Log in

Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Acoustic communication requires not only detection of the signal but also discrimination of differences among signals by the receiver. Attenuation and degradation of acoustic signals during transmission through the atmosphere will impose limits on acoustic communication. Attenuation of sound during atmospheric transmission results primarily from atmospheric absorption, ground attenuation, scattering of a sound beam, and deflection of sound by stratified media. For maximum range of detection, therefore, animals should favor optimal positions in their habitat and optimal weather conditions. Frequency-dependent attenuation seems not to differ consistently among major classes of terrestrial habitats, such as forests and fields. Increased scattering of higher frequencies from vegetation in forests is in part matched by scattering from micrometerological heterogeneities in the open.

  2. 2.

    In addition to frequency-dependent attenuation, two kinds of degradation during atmospheric transmission will limit a receiver's ability to resolve differences among acoustic signals: the accumulation of irregular amplitude fluctuations from nonstationary heterogeneities, often atmospheric turbulence, and reverberation. Both types of degradation affect temporal patterns of amplitude or intensity modulation more than patterns of frequency modulation. Both effects should increase with carrier frequency, as they depend on the relationship between wavelength and the dimensions of scattering heterogeneities. Irregular amplitude fluctuations are more severe in open habitats and primarily mask low frequencies of amplitude modulation; reverberations are more severe in forested habitats and primarily mask high frequencies of amplitude modulation and rapid, repetitive frequency modulation. This difference between forested and open habitats could explain previous reports that birds in the undergrowth of tropical forests avoid rapid frequency modulation in their long-range vocalizations.

  3. 3.

    Maximum range of detection is probably not the primary selection pressure on many animal vocalizations, even for territorial advertisement, except perhaps in tropical forests. Instead, acoustic signals might incorporate features that degrade predictably with range to permit a receiver to estimate the signaler's distance. Future investigations might explore the propagation of animal vocalizations in relation to the usual spacing of animals in their habitat. Features that encode different kinds of information, such as individual and species identity, might propagate to different distances.

  4. 4.

    Measurements of the transmission of sound in natural environments have often not controlled several important parameters. First, the effects of gound attenuation and scattering are not linear with range; consequently measurements of excess attenuation over different ranges in the same environment might differ. Second, the directionality of speakers and microphones will affect measurements of attenuation and reverberations in scattering environments. Third, as stationary waves shift with frequency, any single microphone placement will lie in a null for some frequencies and in a maximum for others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R.D.: Acoustical communication in arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 12, 495–526 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S.A.: The structure of primate social communication. In: Social communication among primates (ed. S.A. Altmann), pp. 325–362. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylor, D.: Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 197–205 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynton, H.: The penetration and diffusion of a fine aerosol in a tropical rain forest. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan (1963)

  • Beranek, L.L. (ed.): Noise and vibration control. New York: McGraw-Hill 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappuis, C.: Un exemple de l'influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des oiseaux: l'évolution des chants en forêt équatoriale. Terre et Vie 118, 183–202 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov, L.A.: Wave propagation in a random medium. New York: McGraw-Hill 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, C.: On human communication. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier, B.: The physical characteristics of sound emission in Arthropoda. In: Acoustic behavior of animals (ed. Busnel). Amsterdam: Elsevier 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Embleton, T.F.W.: Sound propagation in homogeneous deciduous evergreen woods. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 35, 119–1125 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyring, C.F.: Jungle acoustics. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 18, 257–270 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R.: The climate near the ground. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1950

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, S.E.: Auditory temporality. In: Introduction hearing science (ed. S.E. Gerber), Chapter 8. Philadelphia: Saunders 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Givens, M.P., Nyborg, W.L., Schilling, H.K.: Theory of the propagation of sound in scattering and absorbing media. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 18, 284–295 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D.R.: The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim. Behav. 19, 55–61 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, W.L.: Hearing: physiology and psychophysics. New York: Wiley 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, A.J., Corbet, P.S.: Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. II. Observations on certain environmental factors at different levels. Trans. roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 113, 257–269 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, A.J., Gillett, J.B., Highton, R.B.: The mosquitoes of Bwamba County, Uganda. V. The vertical distribution and biting cycle of mosquitoes in rain forest with further observations on microclimate. Bull. ent. Res. 37, 301–330 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckert, L.: Die klimatischen Verhältnisse in Laubwäldern. Z. Meteor. 13, 211–223 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingard, U.: On the reflection of a spherical sound wave from an infinite plane. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 23, 329–335 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingard, U.: A review of the influence of meteorological conditions on sound propagation. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 25, 405–411 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jilka, A., Leisler, B.: Die Einpassung dreier Rohrsängerarten (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, A. scirpaceus, A. arundinaceus) in ihre Lebensräume in Bezug auf das Frequenzspektrum ihrer Reviergesänge. J. Orn. 115, 192–212 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsler, L.E., Frey, A.R.: Fundamentals of acoustics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, P., Hatch, J.J.: Experimental considerations. In: Animal communication (ed. T.A. Sebeok), pp. 31–43. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, V.O.: The propagation of sound in the atmosphere-attenuation and fluctuations. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 18, 90–96 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, M.: Locatable and nonlocatable acoustic signals for barn owls. Amer. Nat. 107, 775–785 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens, H.F., Martens, M.J.M., Hendricksen, H.J.G.M., Roestenberg-Sinnige, A.M., Brouwers, W.A.J.M., van der Staak, A.L.H.C., Strik-Jansen, A.M.J.: The acoustic climate of plant communities. Oecologia (Berl.) 23, 165–177 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, T.S.: Physics of the ear. London: Pergamon 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, R.H.: Propagation of environmental noise. Science 179, 1083–1090 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P.: Colobus guereza: territoriality and group composition. Science 163, 93–95 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P.: Vocalizations of East African monkeys. II. Black and white colobus. Behaviour 42, 175–197 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P.: A comparison of vocalizations of red-tailed monkeys and blue monkeys, Cercopithecus ascanius and C. mitis, in Uganda. Z. Tierpsychol. 33, 223–247 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K., Marler, P.: Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 271–290 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K., Quine, D., Marler, P.: Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 291–302 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, A., and Nocke, H.: Biophysical aspects of sound communication in insects. Advanc. Insect Physiol. 10, 247–296 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, P.M., Ingard, K.U.: Theoretical acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E.S.: Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University 1970

  • Morton, E.S.: Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Amer. Nat. 109, 17–34 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A.P.G., Gross, Jr., E.E.: Handbook of noise measurement, 7th ed. Concord, Mass.: General Radio Co. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridmore-Brown, D.C., Ingard, U.: Sound propagation into the shadow zone in a temperaturestratified atmosphere above a plane boundary. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 36–42 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisbeck, G.: Information theory. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P.W.: The tropical rain forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1952

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E.G.: The fine structure of atmospheric turbulence in relation to the propagation of sound over the ground. Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. A 203, 149–164 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, I.: Fluctuations in intensity of an acoustic wave transmitted through a turbulent heated lamina. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 19, 202–204 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G.B.: The serengeti lion. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleidt, W.M.: Tonic communication: continual effects of discrete signs in animal communication systems. J. theor. Biol. 42, 359–386 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzkopff, J.: Mechanoreception. In: The physiology of Insecta (ed. M. Rockstein), pp. 273–352. New York: Academic 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University illinois Press 1949

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, I., Clay, C.S.: Ocean acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P., Waser, M.S.: Experimental studies of primate vocalization: specializations for long-distance propagation. Z. Tierpsychol. 43, 239–263 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.J., White, R.E.C.: Individual voice production in gannets. Behaviour 37, 40–54 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, F.M., Keast, D.N.: Experimental study of the propagation of sound over ground. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 31, 724–733 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.H.: Communication and spatial relationships in a colony of common grackles. Anim. Behav. 24, 570–584 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A.B.: Acoustics. New York: Dover 1966

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiley, R.H., Richards, D.G. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3, 69–94 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300047

Keywords

Navigation