Skip to main content
Log in

Absence of temporal pattern in courtship signals suggests loss of species recognition in gecko lizards

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the concept of ritualization, acquisition of signal function (i.e., species recognition) leads to formalization of specific signal structure (i.e., species-specific pattern). By contrast, loss of species recognition may result in specific pattern collapse of the signal, from a temporally regular pattern to an irregular form. Several studies have reported the loss of species recognition driven by release from selective pressure against hybridization under isolation from close relatives, but no study has reported collapse of a regular signal pattern that serves in species recognition. In nocturnal lizards of the genus Gekko, several species pairs hybridize when brought together, whereas other species pairs never hybridize, despite being sympatric. I investigated the relationship between the existence of natural hybridization, courtship call similarity and species recognition ability in eight species of Gekko. I found that males of all eight species court using calls, and four of these species have species-specific regular patterns in the courtship calls, whereas the other four have no temporal patterns. In playback experiments, females of the species-specific pattern call species discriminated species by the call. On the other hand, in the patternless call species, females did not discriminate species by the call, suggesting that natural hybridization has resulted from the loss of species recognition ability in the patternless call species. In insular Gekko isolated from congeners, acoustic species recognition might have been lost, followed by pattern collapse of the courtship calls. This unique example of the signal pattern collapse would provide a key to answer basic questions concerning the causes and consequences of signal evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Behm JE, Ives AR, Boughman JW (2010) Breakdown in postmating isolation and the collapse of a species pair through hybridization. Am Nat 175:11–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Jono T, Cui J, Yue X, Tang Y (2016) The acoustic properties of low intensity vocalizations match hearing sensitivity in the webbed-toed gecko, Gekko subpalmatus. PLoS ONE 11:e0146677

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Croucher PJ, Jones RM, Searle JB et al (2007) Contrasting patterns of hybridization in large house spiders (Tegenaria atrica group, Agelenidae). Evolution 61:1622–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am Nat 74:312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing AW (1989) Arthropod bioacoustics: neurobiology and behavior. Comstock, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng J, Han D, Bauer AM, Zhou K (2007) Interrelationships among gekkonid geckos inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Zool Sci 24:656–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg E (1974) Vocalization of males of three geographical forms of Ptyodactylus from Israel (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkoninae). J Herpetol 8:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg E (1982) Vocal behavior of the Mediterranean house gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus. Copeia 1982:770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugère V, Krahe R (2010) Electric signals and species recognition in the wave-type gymnotiform fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Exp Biol 213:225–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in Insects and Anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC, Klump GM (1988) Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: a limitation on mate choice. Anim Behav 36:1247–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbitts TJ, Whiting MJ, Stuart-Fox DM (2007) Shouting the odds: vocalization signals status in a lizard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1169–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76:633–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hödel G, Gerhardt HC (2003) Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 57:894–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR et al (2005) Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ (1993) Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG (ed) Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 46–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeuchi I (2004) Male and female reproductive cycles of the Japanese gecko, Gekko japonicus, in Kyoto, Japan. J Herpetol 38:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jono T (in press) Observations of reproductive behavior of Gekko hokouensis and G. vertebralis in captivity. Akamata

  • Jono T, Inui Y (2012) Secret calls from under the eaves: acoustic behavior of the Japanese house gecko, Gekko japonicus. Copeia 2012:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro KY (1980) Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34:437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro KY (1983) Sexual selection and direction of evolution in the biosystematics of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Annu Rev Entomol 28:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR (2010) Reinforcement in chorus frogs: lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 64:1748–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maenosono T, Toda M (2007) Distributions and terrestrial reptiles in the Ryukyu Archipelago: a review of published records. Akamata 18:28–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcellini DL (1974) Acoustic behavior of the gekkonid lizard, Hemidactylus frenatus. Herpetologica 30:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcellini DL (1978) The acoustic behavior of lizards. In: Greenberg N, MacLean PD (eds) Behavior and neurobiology of lizards: an interdisciplinary colloquium. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, pp 287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo T (2005) Amphibians and reptiles in Nagasaki Prefecture. Nagasaki Sinbun-Sya, Nagasaki

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Gavrilets S (2006) The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morita T (1990) The study of Gekko on Satsuma Peninsula and several neighboring islets. Shizen-Aigo 16:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada S, Toda M (1998) New records of Gekko tawaensis from southwest Japan. Hibakagaku 189:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada S, Izawa M, Ota H (2002) Growth and reproduction of Gekko hokouensis (Reptilia: Squamata) on Okinawajima Island of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. J Herpetol 36:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord TJ, Peters RA, Clucas B et al (2007) Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1057–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ota H, Tanaka S (1996) Gekkonidae and Eublepharidae. In: Sengoku S, Matsui M, Nakata N (eds) The encyclopaedia of animals in Japan 5, amphibians, reptiles, chondrichthyes. Heibonsya, Tokyo, pp 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig KS, Ryan MJ (2006) Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1361–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps SM, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2006) A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. Am Nat 167:28–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price JJ (2013) Why is birdsong so repetitive? Signal detection and the evolution of avian singing modes. Behaviour 150:995–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Regalado R (2003) Roles of visual, acoustic, and chemical signals in social interactions of the tropical house gecko (Hemidactylus mabouia). Carib J Sci 39:307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Paterson HE (1982) Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 1982:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sætre GP, Moum T, Bures S et al (1997) A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JL, Kawahara AY, Skevington JH et al (2010) The evolutionary origins of ritualized acoustic signals in caterpillars. Nat Commun 1:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Seehausen O, van Alphen JJ, Witte F (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277:1808–1811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio MR, Noor MA (2003) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:339–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibaike Y, Takahashi Y, Arikura I et al (2009) Chromosome evolution in the lizard genus Gekko (Gekkonidae, Squamata, Reptilia) in the East Asian islands. Cytogenet Genome Res 127:182–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata Y (1983) Two species in ‘Japanese gecko’. Nat Study 29:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Zhuang L, Wang Z (2001) Advertisement calls and their relation to reproductive cycles in Gekko gecko (Reptilia, Lacertilia). Copeia 2001:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinghitella RM, Zuk M (2009) Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal. Evolution 63:2087–2098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M (2008) External characters useful to discriminate Gekko hokouensis and its cryptic undescribed species of the Okinawa Group, Japan: a preliminary report. Akamata 19:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda M (2011) Natural hybridization among Gekko species in insular East Asia. Bull Herpetol Soc Jpn 2011:76–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Hikida T (2011) Possible incursions of Gekko hokouensis (Reptilia: Squamata) into non-native area: an example from Yakushima Island of the northern Ryukyus, Japan. Curr Herpetol 30:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Hikida T, Ota H (2001a) Discovery of sympatric cryptic species within Gekko hokouensis (Gekkonidae; Squamata) from the Okinawa Island, Japan, by use of allozyme data. Zool Scr 30:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Okada S, Ota H et al (2001b) Biochemical assessment of evolution and taxonomy of the morphologically poorly diverged geckos, Gekko yakuensis and G. hokouensis (Reptilia: Squamata) in Japan, with special reference to their occasional hybridization. Biol J Linn Soc 73:153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Hikida T, Okada S et al (2003) Contrasting patterns of genetic variation in the two sympatric geckos Gekko tawaensis and G. japonicus (Reptilia: Squamata) from western Japan, as revealed by allozyme analyses. Heredity 90:90–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Okada S, Hikida T et al (2006) Extensive natural hybridization between two geckos, Gekko tawaensis and Gekko japonicus (Reptilia: Squamata), throughout their broad sympatric area. Biochem Genet 44:1–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toda M, Sengoku S, Hikida T et al (2008) Descriptions of two new species of the genus Gekko (Squamata, Gekkonidae) from the Takara and Amami Island Groups in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Copeia 2:452–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga S (1988) A gecko of the genus Gekko from Taka-shima Island, Hirado, Nagasaki, Japan (Reptilia: Lacertilia). Jap J Herpetol 12:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Uy JAC, Endler JA (2004) Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays. Behav Ecol 15:1003–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellenreuther M, Tynkkynen K, Svensson EI (2009) Simulating range expansion: male species recognition and loss of premating isolation in damselflies. Evolution 64:242–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner YL, Chernis E, Granot R (2008) The call of the Sri Lankan golden gecko Calodactylodes illingworthorum, ecological parallel of the fan-toed geckos, genus Ptyodactylus (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkonidae). Bioacoustics 18:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 1983:155–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1983) The evolution of communication: information and manipulation. Anim Behav 2:156–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (2006) Signal detection and animal communication. Adv Stud Behav 36:217–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 132–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollerman L, Wiley RH (2002) Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog. Anim Behav 63:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q Rev Biol 73:415–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella RM (2006) Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett 2006:521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank A. Mori, M. Toda, H. Numata, M. Hasegawa and T. Morisaka for invaluable comments on data analysis and the manuscript. I also thank A. H. Savitzky and A. M. Bauer for reviewing the manuscript; Y. Tang, I. Ikeuchi and D. Muramatsu for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, and Y. Koizumi for assistance in maintaining geckos. Geckos were handled under Guideline for Animal Experiments of Kyoto University. This work was supported in part by the Global COE Program (A06) to Kyoto University, the JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists (No. 231388) to T.J. and the Fellowship for Young International Scientists of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y4J3011100) to T.J.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teppei Jono.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jono, T. Absence of temporal pattern in courtship signals suggests loss of species recognition in gecko lizards. Evol Ecol 30, 583–600 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9829-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9829-4

Keywords

Navigation