Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acoustic signals in insects: A reproductive barrier and a taxonomic character

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In singing insects, the song is an important component of the specific mate recognition system (SMRS). In communities of sympatric singing species, there is a partitioning of communication channels, the so-called “acoustic niches.” Within one community, the songs of different species always differ in temporal or frequency characters, i.e. occupy different acoustic niches. However, conspecific songs do not always act as an interspecific reproductive barrier, despite always being a SMRS component. The species that do not communicate acoustically due to allopatry, different timing of vocalization, inhabiting different biotopes, or unmatched food specializations can produce similar songs while forming reproductively isolated communities. Individuals of different sexes need not only to recognize a conspecific mate but also to evaluate its “quality.” The close-range signal (courtship song) provides more opportunities for choosing the “best” male than does the distant signal (calling song). In many species of Orthoptera, courtship includes not only acoustic but also vibrational, visual, chemical, and mechanical signals. An analysis of cricket songs showed the courtship songs to be on average more elaborate and variable than the calling songs. At the same time, due to the difference in mating behavior between the two groups, the acoustic component of courtship is used for mate quality evaluation to a greater extent in grasshoppers than in crickets. The courtship songs of grasshoppers are generally more elaborate in temporal structure than cricket songs; moreover, they may be accompanied by visual displays such as movements of various body parts. Thus, song evolution in grasshoppers is more strongly driven by sexual selection than that in crickets. According to the reinforcement hypothesis, the premating barrier between hybridizing species becomes stronger in response to reduced hybrid fitness. However, our behavioral experiments with two groups of hybridizing grasshopper species did not confirm the reinforcement hypothesis. We explain this, firstly, by a low level of genetic incompatibility between the hybridizing species and secondly, by high hybrid fitness when attracting a mate. A high competitive capability of hybrids may be accounted for by attractiveness of new elements in hybrid courtship songs. When we divide similar forms based on their songs, we in fact distinguish biological species using the criterion of their reproductive isolation. Acoustic differences between species are usually greater than morphological ones. Therefore, song analysis allows one to determine the real status of doubtful species-rank taxa, to distinguish species in a medley of sibling forms, and to reveal cryptic species in the cases when morphological studies fail to provide a univocal result. At the same time, songs are subject to intraspecific variation the range of which is different in different groups. Therefore, it is necessary to study which degree of difference corresponds to the species level before interpreting the status of some forms based on song comparisons. Besides, song similarities cannot indicate conspecificity of acoustically isolated forms; on the other hand, song differences between these forms prove that they are full-rank species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J.W., Baird, S.J.E., et al., “Hybridization and Speciation,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, 229–246 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamo, S.A. and Hoy, R.R., “Mating Behavior of the Field Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and Its Dependence on Social and Environmental Cues,” Animal Behaviour 47, 857–868 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander, R.D., “Aggressiveness, Territoriality and Sexual Behaviour in Field Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae),” Behaviour 17, 130–223 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson, M., Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anufriev, G.A. and Emeljanov, A.F., “Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha),” in Keys to Insects of the Far East of the USSR, Vol. 2: Homoptera and Hemiptera (Nauka, Leningrad, 1988), pp. 12–495 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balakrishnan, R. and Pollack, G., “Recognition of Courtship Song in the Field Cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus,” Animal Behaviour 51, 353–366 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Balakrishnan, R. and Pollack G., “The Role of Antennal Sensory Cues in Female Responses to Courting Males in the Cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus,” Journal of Experimental Biology 200, 511–522 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton, N.H. and Hewitt, G.M., “Analysis of Hybrid Zones,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 113–148 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benediktov, A.A., “The Possibility of Computer Analysis of the Twilight Soundscape of the Orthopteran (Tettigoniidae, Gryllidae) Community, by the Example of an Agrocenosis in Eastern Bulgaria,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 94 (11), 1268–1275 (2015) [Entomological Review 95 (9), 1174–1181 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berger, D., The Evolution of Complex Courtship Songs in the Genus Stenobothrus Fischer, 1853 (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Gomphocerinae). D. Phil. Thesis (University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boldyrev, V.F., “On the Structure of Spermatophores and Specific Features of Mating in Locustodea and Grylloidea,” Trudy Russkogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva 41 (6), 1–245 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borkin, L.Ya., Litvinchuk, S.N., Rosanov, Yu.M., and Skorinov, D.V., “On Cryptic Species: the Example of Amphibians,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 83 (8), 936–960 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boulard, M., “Acoustic Signals, Diversity and Behaviour of Cicadas (Cicadidae, Hemiptera),” in Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Ed. by S. Drosopoulos and M.F. Claridge (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006), pp. 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bridle, J.R. and Butlin, R.K., “Mating Signal Variation and Bimodality in a Mosaic Hybrid Zone between Chorthippus Grasshopper Species,” Evolution 56, 1184–1198 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, W.D., “Mate Choice in Tree Crickets and Their Kin,” Annual Review of Entomology 44, 371–396 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bukhvalova, M.A., “Acoustic Signals and Specific Morphological Traits of Some Grasshoppers of the Chorthippus biguttulus Group (Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Russia and Adjacent Territories,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 72 (5), 55–65 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bukhvalova, M.A., “New Data on Taxonomy of Species of the Chorthippus biguttulus Group (Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Russia and Adjacent Territories,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 77 (10), 1128–1136 (1998) [Entomological Review 78 (7), 867–875 (1998)].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bukhvalova, M.A., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bukhvalova, M.A., “Partitioning of Acoustic Transmission Channels in Grasshopper Communities,” in Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Ed. by S. Drosopoulos and M.F. Claridge (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006), pp. 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bukhvalova, M.A. and Vedenina, V.Yu., “Contributions to the Study of Acoustic Signals of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) of Russia and Adjacent Countries. 1. New Recordings of the Calling Songs of Grasshoppers from Russia and Adjacent Countries,” Russian Entomological Journal 7 (3–4), 109–125 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bull, C.M., “The Function of Complexity in the Courtship of the Grasshopper Myrmeleotettix maculatus,” Behaviour 69, 201–216 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burk, T., “Male Aggression and Female Choice in a Field Cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus): The Importance of Courtship Song,” in Orthopteran Mating Systems: Sexual Competition in a Diverse Group of Insects, Ed. by D.T. Gwynne and G.K. Morris (Westview Press, Boulder, 1983), pp. 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Butlin, R., “What Do Hybrid Zones in General, and the Chorthippus parallelus Zone in Particular, Tell Us about Speciation?” in Endless Forms—Species and Speciation, Ed. by D.J. Howard and S.H. Berlocher (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998), pp. 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Claridge, M.F., “Species are Real Biological Entities,” in Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology, Ed. by F.J. Ayala and R. Arp (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009a), pp. 91–109.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Claridge, M.F., “Insect Species—Concepts and Practice,” in Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, Ed. by R.G. Foottit and P.H. Adler (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009b), pp. 381–395.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Cocroft, R.B., Rodrígues, R.L., and Hunt, R.E., “Host Shifts, the Evolution of Communication, and Speciation in the Enchenopa binotata Species Complex of Treehoppers,” in Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation—The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, Ed. by K.J. Tilmon (University of California Press, Berkeley, 2008), pp. 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coyne, J.A. and Orr H.A., Speciation (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dagley, J.R., Butlin, R.K., and Hewitt, G.M., “Divergence in Morphology and Mating Signals, and Assortative Mating among Populations of Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Evolution 48 (4), 1202–1210 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobzhansky, T., Genetics and the Origin of Species (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1937).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dobzhansky, T., “Speciation as a Stage in Evolutionary Divergence,” American Naturalist 74, 312–321 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doherty, J.A. and Howard, D.J., “Lack of Preference for Conspecific Calling Songs in Female Crickets,” Animal Behaviour 51, 981–990 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Drosopoulos, S. and Claridge, M.F. (Eds.), Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eiriksson, T., “Female Preference for Specific Pulse Duration of Male Songs in the Grasshopper, Omocestus viridulus,” Animal Behaviour 45 (3), 471–477 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Elsner, N., “Neuroethology of Sound in Gomphocerine Grasshoppers. I. Song Patterns and Stridulatory Movements,” Journal of Comparative Physiology 88, 72–102 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Elsner, N. and Popov, A., “Neuroethology of Acoustic Communication,” Advances in Insect Physiology 13, 229–335 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elsner, N. and Wasser, G., “Leg and Wing Stridulation in Various Populations of the Gomphocerine Grasshopper Stenobothrus rubicundus (Germar 1817). I. Sound Patterns and Singing Movements,” Zoology 98, 179–190 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Emeljanov, A.F., “Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha),” in Keys to Insects of the European Part of the USSR, Vol. 1 (1964), pp. 337–437 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  38. Finck, J., Kuntze, J., and Ronacher, B., “Chemical Cues from Females Trigger Male Courtship Behaviour in Grasshoppers,” Journal of Comparative Physiology 202, 337–345 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher, R.A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher, R.A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd ed. (Dover Press, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fitzpatrick, M.J. and Gray, D.A., “Divergence between the Courtship Songs of Gryllus texensis and G. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae),” Ethology 107, 1075–1086 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gerhardt, H.C., “Female Mate Choice in Treefrogs: Static and Dynamic Acoustic Criteria,” Animal Behaviour 42, 615–635 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gerhardt, H.C. and Huber, F., Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gogala, M., Drosopoulos, S., and Trilar, T., “Cicadetta montana Complex (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) in Greece—a New Species and New Records Based on Bioacoustics,” Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 55 (1), 91–100 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, M., “Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: a Role for Parasites?” Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Haskell, P.T., Insects Sounds (Witherby, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hedwig, B., “A Highly Sensitive Opto-Electronic System for the Measurement of Movements,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 100, 165–171 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Heller, K.-G., “Song Evolution and Speciation in Bush-Crickets,” in Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Ed. by S. Drosopoulos and M.F. Claridge (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006), pp. 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Helversen, O. von and Elsner, N., “The Stridulatory Movements of Acridid Grasshoppers Recorded with an Opto-Electronic Device,” Journal of Comparative Physiology 122, 53–64 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Helversen, O. von and Helversen, D. von, “Forces Driving Coevolution of Song and Song Recognition in Grasshoppers,” Fortschritte der Zoologie 39, 253–284 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Henry, C.S., “Acoustic Communication in Neuropterid Insects,” in Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Ed. by S. Drosopoulos and M.F. Claridge (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006), pp. 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S., and Blows, M.W., “Natural Selection and the Reinforcement of Mate Recognition,” Science 290, 519–521 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Howard, D.J., Reece, M., and Gregory, P.G., “The Evolution of Barriers to Fertilization between Closely Related Organisms,” in Endless Forms—Species and Speciation, Ed. by D.J. Howard and S.H. Berlocher (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998), pp. 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jiggins, C.D., Naisbit, R.E., Coe, R.L., and Mallet, J., “Reproductive Isolation Caused by Color Pattern Mimicry,” Nature 411, 302–305 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kirkpatrick, M. and Ryan, M.J., “The Evolution of Mating Preferences and the Paradox of the Lek,” Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Korsunovskaya, O.S., “Acoustic Signals in Katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Communication I,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 87, 1453–1471 (2008) [Entomological Review 88 (9), 1032–1050 (2008)].

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kortet, R. and Hedrick, A., “The Scent of Dominance: Female Field Crickets Use Odor to Predict the Outcome of Male Competition,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59, 77–83 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kriegbaum, G., “Female Choice in the Grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus,” Naturwissenschaften 76, 81–82 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kriegbaum, G. and Helversen, O. von, “Influence of Male Songs on Female Mating Behavior in the Grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Ethology 91, 248–254 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lang, F., “Acoustic Communication Distances of a Gomphocerine Grasshopper,” Bioacoustics 10, 233–258 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lukhtanov, V.A., “Dobzhansky’s Rule and Reinforcement of Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Zones of Secondary Contact of Populations,” Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 71 (5), 372–385 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lukhtanov, V.A., Kandul, N.P., Plotkin, J.B., Dantchenko, A.V., Haig, D., and Pierce, N.E., “Reinforcement of Pre-Zygotic Isolation and Karyotype Evolution in Agrodiaetus Butterflies,” Nature 436, 385–389 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mayr, E., Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist (Columbia University Press, 1942; Izdatelstvo Inostrannoi Literatury, Moscow, 1947) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mayr, E., Principles of Systematic Zoology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969; Mir, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mayr, E., Populations, Species, and Evolution (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1970; Mir, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  66. Meyer, J. and Elsner, N., “How Well are Frequency Sensitivities of Grasshopper Ears Tuned to Species Specific Song Spectra?” Journal of Experimental Biology 199, 1631–1642 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Naisbit, R.E., Jiggins, C.D., and Mallet, J., “Disruptive Sexual Selection against Hybrids Contributes to Speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268, 1849–1854 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Nocke, H., “Physiological Aspects of Sound Communication in Crickets (Gryllus campestris L.),” Journal of Comparative Physiology 80, 141–162 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Noor, M.A., “Speciation Driven by Natural Selection in Drosophila,” Nature 375, 674–675 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J., and Sandoval, C.P., “Reproductive Isolation Driven by the Combined Effects of Ecological Adaptation and Reinforcement,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270, 1911–1918 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Nosil, P., Harmon, L.J., and Seehausen, O., “Ecological Explanations for (Incomplete) Speciation,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 145–156 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ostrowski, T.D., Sradnick, J., Stumpner, A., and Elsner, N., “The Elaborate Courtship Behavior of Stenobothrus clavatus Willemse, 1979 (Acrididae: Gomphocerinae),” Journal of Orthoptera Research 18, 171–182 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Paterson, H.E.H., “The Recognition Concept of Species,” in Species and Speciation (Transvaal Museum Monograph, No. 4), Ed. by E.S. Vrba (Pretoria, 1985), pp. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Popov, A.V., Acoustic Behavior and Hearing in Insects (Nauka, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  75. Puissant, S. and Sueur, J., “A Hotspot for Mediterranean Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadidae): New Genera, Species and Songs from Southern Spain,” Systematics and Biodiversity 8 (4), 555–574 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Puissant, S. and Sueur, J., “Dimissalna, a Cicada Genus That Remained Unnoticed in France (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadidae),” Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 47 (3–4), 519–523 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ragge, D.R., “A Putative Hybrid in Nature between Chorthippus brunneus and C. biguttulus (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Systematic Entomology 1, 71–74 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ragge, D.R., “The Le Broc Grasshopper Population: Further Evidence of Its Hybrid Status (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Journal of Natural History 18, 921–925 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Ragge, D.R. and Reynolds, W.J., The Songs of the Grasshoppers and Crickets of Western Europe (Harley Books and Natural History Museum, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Riede, K., “Influence of the Courtship Song of the Acridid Grasshopper Gomphocerus rufus L. on the Female,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14, 21–27 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Riede, K., “Diversity of Sound-Producing Insects in a Bornean Lowland Rain Forest,” in Tropical Rainforest Research (Kluwer Acad. Publ., Netherlands, 1996), pp. 77–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  82. Savitsky, V.Yu., “Acoustic Signals, Ecological Features, and Reproductive Isolation of Grasshoppers of the Genus Dociostaurus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) in Semi-Desert,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 79 (10), 1168–1184 (2000) [Entomological Review 80 (8), 950–967 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  83. Savitsky, V.Yu., “New Data on Acoustic Communication of Grasshoppers of the Genera Omocestus Bol. and Myrmeleotettix Bol. (Orthoptera, Acrididae) in the South of European Russia and Their Taxonomic Significance,” Trudy Russkogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva 76, 92–117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Savitsky, V.Yu. and Lekarev, A.Yu., “New Data on Acoustic Communication and Sexual Behavior of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Semi-Deserts and Deserts of Russia and Adjacent Countries,” Russian Entomological Journal 16 (1), 1–38 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Shaw, K.L. and Herlihy, D.P., “Acoustic Preference Functions and Song Variability in the Hawaiian Cricket Laupala cerasina,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267, 577–584 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Shestakov, L.S. and Vedenina, V.Yu., “Broad Selectivity for Courtship Song in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus,” Ethology 121, 966–976 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Simmons, L.W., “Inter-Male Competition and Mating Success in the Field Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer),” Animal Behaviour 34, 567–579 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sobel, J.M., Chen, G.F., Watt, L.R., and Schemske, D.W., “The Biology of Speciation,” Evolution 64, 295–315 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Stumpner, A. and Helversen, O. von, “Recognition of a Two-Element Song in the Grasshopper Chorthippus dorsatus (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae),” Journal of Comparative Physiology 171, 405–412 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Stumpner, A. and Helversen, O. von, “Song Production and Song Recognition in a Group of Sibling Grasshopper Species (Chorthippus dorsatus, Ch. dichrous and Ch. loratus: Orthoptera, Acrididae),” Bioacoustics 6, 1–23 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Sueur, J. and Puissant, S., “Similar Look but Different Song: a New Cicadetta Species in the montana Complex (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadidae),” Zootaxa 1442, 55–68 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Thomas, M.L. and Simmons, L.W., “Male Dominance Influences Pheromone Expression, Ejaculate Quality, and Fertilization Success in the Australian Field Cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20 (5), 1118–1124 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Review of the Species of the Genus Macropsis Lewis, 1834 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) from the Russian Far East and Adjacent Territories of Transbaikalia,” Russian Entomological Journal 8 (2), 73–113 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Vibrational Communication in Aphrodinae Leafhoppers (Deltocephalinae auct., Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and Related Groups with Notes on Classification of Higher Taxa,” Russian Entomological Journal 9 (1), 1–66 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Review of the Species of the Genus Macropsis Lewis, 1834 (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Macropsinae) from European Russia and Adjacent Territories,” Russian Entomological Journal 11 (2), 123–184 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “A Contribution to the Taxonomy of Gargara genistae (Homoptera, Membracidae) and Related Species from Russia and Adjacent Territories,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 84 (2), 172–180 (2005) [Entomological Review 85 (1), 12–20 (2005)].

    Google Scholar 

  97. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Leafhoppers of the Genus Macropsidius (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Macropsinae) of European Russia,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 85 (4), 470–478 (2006a) [Entomological Review 86 (2), 230–239 (2006)].

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “On the Structure of Stridulatory Organs in Jumping Plant Lice (Homoptera: Psyllinea),” Russian Entomological Journal 15 (3), 335–340 (2006b).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Vibratory Communication in Psylloidea (Homoptera),” in Insect Sounds and Communication. Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, Ed. by S. Drosopoulos and M.F. Claridge (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton etc., 2006c), pp. 357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Acoustic Signals in the Communities of Bryodemini (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae): Segregation of Communication Channels through the Temporal Divergence of Acoustic Activity Peaks and the Emergence of the Dusk Chorus,” Russian Entomological Journal 19 (4), 257–265 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Calling Signals in Sympatric Species of the Far-Eastern Aphrophora (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Aphrophoridae): Regularities of Communication Channel Segregation,” Russian Entomological Journal 20 (1), 57–64 (2011a).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Do Different Species of Grass-Dwelling Small Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) Have Private Vibrational Communication Channels?” Russian Entomological Journal 20 (2), 135–139 (2011b).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Potential Cues for Conspecific Calling Signal Recognition in Leafhoppers of the Genus Doratura J. Sahlb. (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae),” Russian Entomological Journal 20 (4), 377–382 (2011c).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Vibrational Background Noise in Herbaceous Plants and Its Impact on Acoustic Communication of Small Auchenorrhyncha and Psyllinea (Homoptera),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 91 (10), 1179–1189 (2012) [Entomological Review 93 (5), 548–559 (2013)].

    Google Scholar 

  105. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “The Use of Bioacoustic Characters for Distinguishing between Cryptic Species in Insects: Potentials, Restrictions, and Prospects,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 92 (12), 1417–1436 (2013) [Entomological Review 94 (3), 289–309 (2014)].

    Google Scholar 

  106. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Review of Species of the Genus Macropsidius Ribaut, 1952 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) of Russia and Adjacent Territories,” Russian Entomological Journal 23 (3), 155–167 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Taxonomic study of Central Asian Species of the Genus Macropsis Lewis, 1836 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae). III: Descriptions of Two New Willow-Dwelling Species, New Synonym, Annotated Check-List, and Key to Species,” Zootaxa 3985 (1), 31–52 (2015a).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Tishechkin, D.Yu., “Contributions to the Study of the Genus Hephathus Ribaut, 1952 (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) of Russia and Adjacent Countries,” Zootaxa 3999 (4), 537–548 (2015b).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Tishechkin, D.Yu. and Bukhvalova, M.A., “New Data on Calling Signals of Gomphocerinae Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) from South Siberia and the Russian Far East,” Russian Entomological Journal 18 (1), 25–46 (2009a).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Tishechkin, D.Yu. and Bukhvalova, M.A., “Acoustic Communication in Grasshopper Communities (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Gomphocerinae): Segregation of Acoustic Niches,” Russian Entomological Journal 18 (3), 165–188 (2009b).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Tishechkin, D.Yu. and Burlak, N.A., “Pure-Tone Vibrational Signals in Small Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 92 (3), 278–299 (2013) [Entomological Review 93 (9), 1085–1106 (2013)].

    Google Scholar 

  112. Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V.L., and Butlin, R.K., “Patterns of Trait Divergence between Populations of the Meadow Grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus,” Evolution 54, 574–585 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Urbanelli, S. and Porretta, D., “Evidence of Reinforcement of Premating Isolation between Two Species of the Genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae),” Evolution 62, 1520–1527 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Vedenina, V.Yu., “Acoustic Communication and Sexual Selection,” Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 66 (4), 336–345 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Vedenina, V., “Variation in Complex Courtship Traits across a Hybrid Zone between the Grasshopper Species of the Chorthippus albomarginatus Group,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102, 275–291 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Vedenina, V.Yu., “Courtship Song Analysis in Two Hybrid Zones between Sibling Species of the Chorthippus albomarginatus Group (Orthoptera, Gomphocerinae),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 94 (2), 1–15 (2015) [Entomological Review 95 (2), 166–180 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  117. Vedenina, V.Yu. and Bukhvalova, M.A., “Contributions to the Study of Acoustic Signals of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Gomphocerinae) from Russia and Adjacent Countries. 2. Calling Songs of Widespread Species Recorded in Different Localities,” Russian Entomological Journal 10 (2), 93–123 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Vedenina, V.Yu. and Helversen, O. von, “A Re-Examination of the Taxonomy of the Chorthippus albomarginatus Group in Europe on the Basis of Song and Morphology (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 152, 65–97 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Vedenina, V.Yu. and Helversen, O. von, “Complex Courtship in a Bimodal Grasshopper Hybrid Zone,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 44–54 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Vedenina, V. and Mugue, N., “Speciation in Gomphocerine Grasshoppers: Molecular Phylogeny versus Bioacoustics and Courtship Behavior,” Journal of Orthoptera Research 20 (1), 109–125 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Vedenina, V.Y. and Pollack, G.S., “Recognition of Variable Courtship Song in the Field Cricket Gryllus assimilis,” Journal of Experimental Biology 215, 2210–2219 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Vedenina, V.Yu., Kulygina, N.K., and Panyutin, A.K., “Isolation Mechanisms in Closely Related Grasshopper Species Chorthippus albomarginatus and Ch. oschei (Orthoptera, Acrididae),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 86 (5), 537–546 (2007a) [Entomological Review 87 (3), 263–272 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  123. Vedenina, V.Y., Panyutin, A.K., and Helversen, O. von, “The Unusual Inheritance Pattern of the Courtship Songs in Closely Related Grasshopper Species of the Chorthippus albomarginatus-Group (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae),” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 260–277 (2007b).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Vedenina, V.Yu. and Shestakov, L.S., “Stable and Variable Parameters in Courtship Songs of Grasshoppers of the Subfamily Gomphocerinae (Orthoptera, Acrididae),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 92 (10), 1203–1221 (2013) [Entomological Review 94 (1), 1–20 (2014)].

    Google Scholar 

  125. Vedenina, V.Yu. and Zhantiev, R.D., “Recognition of Acoustic Signals in Sympatric Grasshopper Species,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 69 (2), 36–45 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Vedenina, V., Sradnick, J., Klöpfel, A., and Elsner, N., “A Narrow Hybrid Zone between the Grasshoppers Stenobothrus clavatus and S. rubicundus: Courtship Song Analysis,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 107, 383–397 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Vedenina, V., Fähsing, S., Sradnick, J., Klöpfel, A., and Elsner, N., “A Narrow Hybrid Zone between the Grasshoppers Stenobothrus clavatus and S. rubicundus (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae): Female Preferences for Courtship Songs,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108, 834–843 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Via, S., “Natural Selection in Action during Speciation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 16, R872–R873 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Willemse, F., Helversen, O. von, and Odé, B., “A Review of Chorthippus Species with Angled Pronotal Lateral Keels from Greece with Special Reference to Transitional Populations between Some Peloponnesian Taxa (Orthoptera, Acrididae),” Zoologische Mededelingen 83, 319–507 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Wolda, H., “Diel and Seasonal Patterns of Mating Calls in Some Neotropical Cicadas. Acoustic Interference?” Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 96 (3), 369–381 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Wu, C.-I., “The Genic View of the Process of Speciation,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 851–865 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Zahavi, A., “The Theory of Signal Selection and Some of Its Implications,” in Proceedings of International Symposium on Biology and Evolution (Adriatica Editrica, Bari, 1987), pp. 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Zhantiev, R.D., Insect Bioacoustics (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  134. Zhantiev, R.D. and Chukanov, V.S., “Response of the Hearing System of the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) to Intraspecific Acoustic Signals,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 51 (7), 983–993 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Zhantiev, P.D. and Dubrovin, N.N., “Acoustic Signals of Crickets (Orthoptera, Oecantidae, Gryllidae),” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 53, 345–358 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia

    D. Yu. Tishechkin

  2. Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 127994, Russia

    V. Yu. Vedenina

Authors
  1. D. Yu. Tishechkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Yu. Vedenina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Yu. Tishechkin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.Yu. Tishechkin, V.Yu. Vedenina, 2016, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2016, Vol. 95, No. 11, pp. 1240–1276.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tishechkin, D.Y., Vedenina, V.Y. Acoustic signals in insects: A reproductive barrier and a taxonomic character. Entmol. Rev. 96, 1127–1164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816090013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816090013

Search

Navigation