Skip to main content
Log in

Pollen competition and environmental effects on hybridization dynamics between Phlox drummondii and Phlox cuspidata

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollen competition between species strongly influences hybridization dynamics in plants. By performing single- and mixed-donor pollinations, we show that soil Ca alters the outcome of interspecific pollen competition in the annual Phlox hybrid system of Phlox cuspidata and P. drummondii. In the absence of interspecific pollen competition, heterospecific pollen siring success of both species was influenced most strongly by the maternal growth environment, such that hybridization was facilitated when heterospecific pollen was deposited on stigmas of maternal plants growing in high Ca soils. When heterospecific pollen was forced to compete against conspecific pollen, however, the maternal growth environment did not influence hybridization, but the environmental origin of heterospecific pollen did, and this effect depended on the maternal species. Pollen of P. drummondii was more effective at outcompeting P. cuspidata pollen and preventing hybridization in P. drummondii dams when P. cuspidata pollen was derived from low Ca. Pollen competition within pistils of P. cuspidata was unaffected by pollen Ca environment. In situations in which P. cuspidata grows in lower soil Ca than P. drummondii, as has been documented in one population, these results suggest that the competitive ability of heterospecific pollen will be diminished by environmental effects of soil Ca. Thus, the environment in which pollen develops can influence interspecific pollen competition and hybridization frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradshaw HD Jr, Schemske DW (2003) Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chichiriccò G, Ragnelli AM, Aimola P (2002) Ovary-ovule transmitting tract in Crocus (Iridaceae), structure and calcium distribution. Plant Syst Evol 235:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH (1993) Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe L, Turner BL (1962) A biosystematic study of the Phlox cuspidata-Phlox drummondii complex. Am Midl Nat 67:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CJ, Levin DA, Jansen RK (1999) Natural hybridization between an outcrossing and a selfing Phlox (Polemoniaceae): the maternal species of F1 hybrids. Plant Syst Evol 218:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant V, Grant KA (1965) Flower pollination in the Phlox family. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1938) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular 347. University of California, College of Agriculture, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway-Clarke TL, Hepler PK (2003) Tansley review: Control of pollen tube growth: role of ion gradients and fluxes. New Phytol 159:539–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1967) Hybridization between annual species of Phlox: population structure. Evolution 29:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1970) The exploitation of pollinators by species and hybrids of Phlox. Evolution 24:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1975) Interspecific hybridization, heterozygosity and gene exchange in Phlox. Evolution 29:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1978) Genetic variation in annual Phlox: self-compatible versus self incompatible species. Evolution 32:245–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 68:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1985) Reproductive character displacement in Phlox. Evolution 39:1275–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1989a) Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Phlox. Evolution 43:1417–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1989b) Proximity-dependent cross-compatibility in Phlox. Evolution 43:1114–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1968) Local gene dispersal in Phlox. Evolution 22:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Schaal BA (1970) Corolla color as an inhibitor of interspecific hybridization in Phlox. Am Nat 104:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Diggle PK (2001) Mechanisms of differential pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 88:242–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas JP, Machlis L (1962) Chemotropic response of Antirrhinum majus pollen to calcium. Nature 196:292–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas JP, Machlis L (1964) Chemotropic response of the pollen of Antirrhinum majus to calcium. Plant Physiol 39:70–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo AM (1992) Relative success of self and outcross pollen comparing mixed- and single-donor pollinations in Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 46:1181–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon ES (1964) Edaphic responses of Lupinus texensis and Lupinus subcarnosus. Ecology 45:459–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada M, Bollman K, Stephenson AG (1995) Leaf damage decreases pollen production and hinders pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Ecology 76:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey J, Bradshaw HD Jr, Schemske DW (2003) Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520–1534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg LH, Carney SE (1998) Tansley Review No. 102: Plant hybridization. New Phytol 140:599–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane LG, Donohue K (2007) Environmental effects on pollen–pistil compatibility between Phlox cuspidata and P. drummondii (Polemoniaceae): implications for hybridization dynamics. Am J Bot 94:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers SE (1999) Pollen performance of plants in recently burned and unburned environments. Ecology 80:2427–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HJ, Stanton ML (1990) Influence of environmental quality on pollen competitive ability in wild radish. Science 248:1631–1632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to J. and B. Allbright, J. and P. Burns, D. and C. Griffen, R. and G. Holder, D. Levin, D. Ruane, R. Stomberg, and everyone in Wequaquet Heights. Funding was provided by an NSF Graduate Student Fellowship to L.R. and by the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren G. Ruane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruane, L.G., Donohue, K. Pollen competition and environmental effects on hybridization dynamics between Phlox drummondii and Phlox cuspidata . Evol Ecol 22, 229–241 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9174-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9174-8

Keywords

Navigation