Skip to main content
Log in

Natural hybridization between an outcrossing and a selfingPhlox (Polemoniaceae): The maternal species of F1 hybrids

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural F1 hybrids between the outcrossingPhlox drummondii and the predominantly selfingP. cuspidata were examined to ascertain the proportion of hybrid individuals mothered by each species. Species-specific restriction fragment patterns (both nrDNA and cpDNA) were established as markers, and synthetic hybrids of known parentage were utilized to determine that the chloroplast genome is maternally inherited. Of 89 mature natural hybrids examined, approximately two thirds were mothered byP. drummondii, the outcrosser. That the outcrosser should mother most hybrids is expected since it is dependent upon incoming pollen for fertilization, and hybrids may result when heterospecific pollen is received. The fact that the highly selfingP. cuspidata mothered nearly one third of the hybrids is surprising, and may be related to both pre-zygotic and post-zygotic factors. Which species mothers hybrids has important implications for the potential for introgression as well as its direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson E. (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M. L. (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corriveau J. L., Coleman A. W. (1988) Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for 200 angiosperm species. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1445–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruzan M. B., Arnold M. L., Carney S. E., Wollenberg K. R. (1993) cpDNA inheritance in interspecific crosses and evolutionary inference in Louisiana irises. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 344–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nettancourt D. (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Burke M. A., Hamrick J. L., Price R. A. (1997) Frequency and direction of hybridization in sympatric populations ofPinus taeda andP. echinata (Pinaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 879–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand N. C., Whitkus R., Rieseberg L. H. (1996) Distribution of spontaneous hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 5090–5093.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe L., Turner B. L. (1962) A biosystematic study of thePhlox cuspidata — Phlox drummondii complex. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 67: 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V. (1956) The genetic structure of races and species inGilia. Advances Genet. 8: 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grun P. (1976) Cytoplasmic genetics and evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder L. D., Cruzan M. B., Thomson J. D. (1993) Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination forErythronium americanum andErythronium albidum (Liliaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 71: 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J. L., McNaughton I. H. (1960) The inheritance of dormancy in inter- and intraspecific hybrids ofPapaver. Heredity 15: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S. A., Ingram R. (1991) Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. Taxon 40: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B. J., Darby L. A. (1955) Unilateral hybridization. Nature 176: 982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock S. J., Dickinson H. G. (1993) Unilateral incompatibility within theBrassicaceae: further evidence for the involvement of the self-incompatibility (S)-locus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 744–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1967) Hybridization between annual species ofPhlox: population structure. Amer. J. Bot. 54: 1122–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1975a) Interspecific hybridization, heterozygosity and gene exchange inPhlox. Evolution 29: 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1975b) Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1976) Consequences of long-term artificial selection, inbreeding, and isolation inPhlox: I. The evolution of cross-incompatibility. Evolution 30: 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1978) Genetic variation in annualPhlox: self-compatible vs. self-incompatible species. Evolution 32: 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D., Crowe L. K. (1958) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder C. R., Taha I., Seiler G. J., Snow A. A., Rieseberg L. H. (1998) Long-term introgression of crop genes into wild sunflower populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan B. G. (1992) Is organelle DNA strictly maternally inherited? Power analysis of a binomial distribution. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1325–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason J. D., Ellstrand N. C., Arnold M. L. (1992) Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead R. G., Palmer J. D. (1992) A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of theSolanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J. D. (1986) Isolation and structural analysis of chloroplast DNA. Meth. Enzymol. 118: 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L. H., Ellstrand N. C. (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? C. R. C. Crit. Rev. Pl. Sci. 12: 213–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L. H., Linder C. R., Seiler G. J. (1995) Chromosomal and genic barriers to introgression inHelianthus. Genetics 141: 1163–1171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L. H., Whitton J., Linder C. R. (1996) Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and phylogenetic trees. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof M. A., Soliman K. M., Jorgensen R. A., Allard R. W. (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 8014–8018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. (1989) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D. M., Levin D. A. (1967) Karyotypes of eastern North AmericanPhlox. Amer. J. Bot. 54: 324–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins L., Levin D. A. (1990) Outcrossing rates as related to plant density inPhlox drummondii. Heredity 65: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry E. T. (1955) The genusPhlox. Morris Arbor. Mongr. III, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse E. (1945) AnnualPhlox species. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 34: 388–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn J. Ferguson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, C.J., Levin, D.A. & Jansen, R.K. Natural hybridization between an outcrossing and a selfingPhlox (Polemoniaceae): The maternal species of F1 hybrids. Pl Syst Evol 218, 153–158 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01087043

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01087043

Key words

Navigation