Aaltonen, I., Niemelä, M., & Tammela, A. (2017). Please call me?: Calling practices with telepresence robots for the elderly. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vienna, Austria, pp. 55–56.
Agich, G. (2003). Dependence and autonomy in old age. An ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Anderson, J., & Honneth, A. (2005). Autonomy, vulnerability, recognition, and justice. In J. Christman & J. Anderson (Eds.), Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism: New essays (pp. 127–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Anttonen, A., & Häikiö, L. (2011). Care ‘going market’: Finnish elderly-care policies in transition. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2, 71–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Atkins, K. (2006). Autonomy and autonomy competencies: A practical and relational approach. Nursing Philosophy,7(4), 205–215.
Article
Google Scholar
Ball, M. M., Perkins, M. M., Whittington, F. J., Connell, B. R., Hollingsworth, C., King, S. V., et al. (2004). Managing decline in assisted living: The key to aging in place. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,59(4), 202–212.
Article
Google Scholar
Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. (2015). Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: What activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assistive Technology,27(2), 88–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Benzidia, S., Ageron, B., Bentahar, O., & Husson, J. (2018). Investigating automation and AGV in healthcare logistics: A case study based approach. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications,22(3), 273–293.
Article
Google Scholar
Blackford, R. (2012). Robots and reality: A reply to Robert Sparrow. Ethics and Information Technology,14(1), 41–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Brooker, D. (2004). What is person-centered care in dementia? Reviews in Clinical Gerontology,13, 215–222.
Article
Google Scholar
Brownie, S., & Nancarrow, S. (2013). Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: A systematic review. Clinical Interventions in Aging,8, 1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Bush, E. (2001). The use of human touch to improve the well-being of older adults a holistic nursing intervention. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 19(3), 256–270.
Article
Google Scholar
Collopy, B. J. (1988). Autonomy in long-term care: Some crucial distinctions. The Gerontologist, 28(Suppl), 10–17.
Article
Google Scholar
Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Tiberio, L. (2016). Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: Methodology and ecological case study. International Journal of Social Robotics,8(3), 421–441.
Article
Google Scholar
Chapin, R., & Dobbs-Kepper, D. (2001). Aging in place in assisted living: Philosophy versus policy. The Gerontologist,41(1), 43–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R., & Vaupel, J. W. (2009). Ageing populations: The challenges ahead. The Lancet,374(9696), 1196–1208.
Article
Google Scholar
Christman, J. (2014). Relational autonomy and the social dynamics of paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,17(3), 369–382.
Article
Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Are emotional robots deceptive? IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,3(4), 388–393.
Article
Google Scholar
Dick, H. V. (2014). “Every time you deal with a death you think, ‘One day’…”: The emotional and spiritual effects of dealing with aging, dying, and death for staff in a residential aged care facility. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging,26(2–3), 173–185.
Article
Google Scholar
Eyers, I., Arber, S., Luff, R., Young, E., & Ellmers, T. (2012). Rhetoric and reality of daily life in English care homes: the role of organised activities. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 7(1), 53–78.
Google Scholar
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging,13(4), 531–543.
Article
Google Scholar
Garner, T. A., Powell, W. A., & Carr, V. (2016). Virtual carers for the elderly: A case study review of ethical responsibilities. Digital Health,2, 1–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Giannakouris, K. (2008). Ageing characterises the demographic perspectives of the European societies. Statistics in Focus,72, 1–12.
Google Scholar
Goeldner, M., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2015). The emergence of care robotics—A patent and publication analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,92, 115–131.
Article
Google Scholar
Goher, K. M. (2016). A reconfigurable wheelchair for mobility and rehabilitation: Design and development. Cogent Engineering,3(1), 1261502. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1261502.
Article
Google Scholar
Government of British Columbia. (2018). Considering seniors’ assisted living. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/accessing-health-care/finding-assisted-living-or-residential-care/assisted-living-residences/seniors-assisted-living/considering-seniors-assisted-living.
Gustafsson, C., Svanberg, C., & Müllersdorf, M. (2015). Using a robotic cat in dementia care: A pilot study. Journal of Gerontological Nursing,41(10), 46–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Hennala, L., Koistinen, P., Kyrki, V., Kämäräinen, J-K., Laitinen, A., Lanne, M., Lehtinen, H., Leminen, S., Melkas, H., Niemelä, M., Parviainen, J., Pekkarinen, S., Pieters, R., Pirhonen, J., Ruohomäki, I., Särkikoski, T., Tuisku, O., Tuominen, K., Turja, T., & Van Aerschot, L. (2017). Robotics in care services: A finnish roadmap. Retrieved October 9, 2019, from http://roseproject.aalto.fi/images/publications/Roadmap-final02062017.pdf.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15(9), 1277–1288.
Article
Google Scholar
Hutson, S., Lim, S. L., Bentley, P. J., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., & Bowling, A. (2011). Investigating the suitability of social robots for the wellbeing of the elderly. In S. D’Mello, A. Graesser, B. Schuller, & J. C. Martin (Eds.), Affective computing and intelligent interaction. ACII 2011. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6974, pp. 578–587). Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H., & Laitinen, A. (2010). Esteem for contributions to the common good: The role of personifying attitudes and instrumental value. In M. Seymour (Ed.), The plural states of recognition (pp. 98–121). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Kachouie, R., Sedighaedeli, S., Koshia, R., & Chu, M. T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed methods systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,30(5), 369–393.
Article
Google Scholar
Karunarathne, D., Morales, Y., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2018). Will older adults accept a humanoid robot as a walking partner? International Journal of Social Robotics,11(2), 343–358.
Article
Google Scholar
Koceski, S., & Koceska, N. (2016). Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems,40, 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0481-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Kontos, P. C. (2004). Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing & Society,24(6), 829–849.
Article
Google Scholar
Kontos, P. C. (2005). Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer’s disease: Rethinking person-centred care. Dementia,4(4), 553–570.
Article
Google Scholar
Laitinen, A., Niemelä, M., & Pirhonen, J. (2016). Social robotics, elderly care, and human dignity: A recognition theoretical approach. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov, & S. Andersen (Eds.), What social robots can and should do (pp. 155–163). Washington, DC: IOS Press.
Google Scholar
Lidz, C. W., Fischer, L., & Arnold, R. M. (1992). The erosion of autonomy in long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Lloyd, L., Calnan, M., Cameron, A., Seymour, J., & Smith, R. (2014). Identity in the fourth age: Perseverance, adaptation and maintaining dignity. Ageing & Society,34(1), 1–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Matthews, F. E., & Dening, T. (2002). Prevalence of dementia in institutional care. The Lancet,360(9328), 225–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Melkas, H., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S., & Kyrki, V. (2020). Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions. International Journal of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104041.
Article
Google Scholar
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2018). Quality recommendation to guarantee a good quality of life and improved services for older persons 2017–2019. Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 1/2018, Helsinki. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-3906-6.
Mitchell, J. M., & Kemp, B. J. (2000). Quality of life in assisted living homes a multidimensional analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B,55(2), 117–127.
Article
Google Scholar
Mitzner, T. L., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. International Journal of Social Robotics,6(2), 213–227.
Article
Google Scholar
Morgan, L. A., Rubinstein, R. L., Frankowski, A. C., Perez, R., Roth, E. G., Peeples, A. D., et al. (2014). The facade of stability in assisted living. The Journals of Gerontology Series B,69(3), 431–441.
Article
Google Scholar
Morgan, S., & Yoder, L. H. (2012). A concept analysis of person-centered care. Journal of Holistic Nursing,30(1), 6–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: A feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatrics,14(1), 7.
Article
Google Scholar
Niemelä, M., & Melkas, H. (2019). Robots as social and physical assistants in elderly care. In M. Toivonen & E. Saari (Eds.), Human-centered digitalization and services (pp. 177–197). Singapore: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Niemelä, M., van Aerschot, L., Tammela, A., Aaltonen, I., & Lammi, H. (2019). Towards ethical guidelines of using telepresence robots in residential care. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00529-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Noro, A., & Alastalo, H. (Eds.). (2014). Vanhuspalvelulain 980/2012 toimeenpanon seuranta. Tilanne ennen lain voimaantuloa vuonna 2013. [Implementation of the Act for Elderly Care and Services in Finland (980/2012)—The situation before the law came into force in 2013]. Tampere: Juvenes Print—Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy.
Pekkarinen, S., & Melkas, H. (2017). Digitalisation in health care and elderly care services: From potholes to innovation opportunities. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change,8(1), 24–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., Kuosmanen, P., Karisto, A., & Valve, R. (2013). Towards a more social orientation in Gerontechnology: Case study of the “Reminiscence Stick”. Journal of Technology in Human Services,31(4), 337–354.
Article
Google Scholar
Perkins, M., Ball, M. M., Whittington, F. J., & Hollingsworth, C. (2012). Relational autonomy in assisted living: A focus on diverse care settings for older adults. Journal of Aging Studies,26(2), 214–225.
Article
Google Scholar
Pirhonen, J. (2017). Good human life in assisted living for older people: What the residents are able to do and be. Tampere: Suomen Yliopistopaino—Juvenes Print Oy.
Google Scholar
Pirhonen, J., Ojala, H., Lumme-Sandt, K., & Pietilä, I. (2016). Old but not that old: Finnish community dwelling people aged 90+ negotiating their autonomy. Ageing & Society,36(8), 1625–1644.
Article
Google Scholar
Pirhonen, J., & Pietilä, I. (2016). Perceived resident-facility fit and sense of control in assisted living. Journal of Aging Studies,38, 47–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2007). Robo sapiens Japanicus: Humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Critical Asian Studies,39(3), 369–398.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., & Broadbent, E. (2014). The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. International Journal of Social Robotics,6(4), 575–591.
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2013). The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,14(9), 661–667.
Article
Google Scholar
Roger, K., Guse, L., Mordoch, E., & Osterreicher, A. (2012). Social commitment robots and dementia. Canadian Journal of Aging,31(1), 87–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Roth, E. G., & Eckert, J. K. (2011). The vernacular landscape of assisted living. Journal of Aging Studies,25(3), 215–224.
Article
Google Scholar
Sale, P., Franceschini, M., Waldner, A., & Hesse, S. (2012). Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine,48(1), 111–121.
Google Scholar
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology,16(1), 63–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2011). Children, the elderly, and interactive robots: Anthropomorphism and deception in robot care companionship. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine,18(1), 32–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology,14(1), 27–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Sherwin, S., & Winsby, M. (2010). A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults residing in nursing homes. Health Expectations,14(2), 182–190.
Article
Google Scholar
Shiomi, M., Iio, T., Kamei, K., Sharma, C., & Hagita, N. (2015). Effectiveness of social behaviors for autonomous wheelchair robot to support elderly people in Japan. PLoS ONE,10(5), e0128031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128031.
Article
Google Scholar
Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., et al. (2014). Domestic robots for older adults: Attitudes, preferences, and potential. International Journal of Social Robotics,6(2), 229–247.
Article
Google Scholar
Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2014). Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics and Information Technology,16, 183–195.
Article
Google Scholar
Sparrow, L., & Sparrow, R. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines,16(2), 141–161.
Article
Google Scholar
Street, D., Burge, S., Quadagno, J., & Barrett, A. (2007). The salience of social relationships for resident well-being in assisted living. The Journals of Gerontology Series B,62(2), 129–134.
Article
Google Scholar
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship,33(3), 253–258.
Article
Google Scholar
Turja, T., Rantanen, T., & Oksanen, A. (2017). Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): Development and validation of a new measure. AI & Society,34(1), 137–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(2), 407–433.
Article
Google Scholar
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., & Gastmans, C. (2017a). The use of robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics,74, 15–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., & Gastmans, C. (2017b). How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging & Mental Health,22(2), 149–167.
Article
Google Scholar
Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots—Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics,23(5), 972–980.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, R. H., Sudhama, A., Begum, M., Huq, R., & Mihailidis, A. (2017). Robots to assist daily activities: Views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics,29(1), 67–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Werner, C., Ullrich, P., Geravand, M., Peer, A., Bauer, J. M., & Hauer, K. (2018). A systematic review of study results reported for the evaluation of robotic rollators from the perspective of users. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology,13(1), 31–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolinsky, F. D., Callahan, C. M., Fitzgerald, J. F., & Johnson, R. J. (1993). Changes in functional status and the risks of subsequent nursing home placement and death. Journal of Gerontology,48(3), 94–101.
Google Scholar
Zamir, S., Hennessy, C. H., Taylor, A. H., & Jones, R. B. (2018). Video-calls to reduce loneliness and social isolation within care environments for older people: An implementation study using collaborative action research. BMC Geriatrics,18, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0746-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, S., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Sloane, P. D., Eckert, J. K., Hebel, J. R., Morgan, L. A., et al. (2003). Assisted living and nursing homes: Apples and oranges? The Gerontologist,43(2), 107–117.
Article
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P. D., Eckert, J. K., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Morgan, L. A., Hebel, J. R., et al. (2005). How good is assisted living? Findings and implications from an outcomes study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B,60(4), 195–204.
Article
Google Scholar