Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Differences in Managerial Attitudes Towards Unearned Privilege and Favoritism in the Retail Sector

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the concepts of unearned privilege and favoritism and tests if there are differences in managerial attitudes towards the use of these behaviors based on respondent gender. Respondents included 180 managers employed with a large retail organization located in the southern part of the United States. The results indicate that female managers more strongly disapproved of the use of unearned privilege in making promotion decisions and more strongly disapproved of the decision to use favoritism in decision making related to customer relations. The results also indicated that male managers were less likely to disapprove of the use of unearned privilege when they had greater years of management experience. In addition, the most experienced female managers reported disapproval levels for the use favoritism in decision making related to customer relations equal to that of the most experienced male managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie & Fitch (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility News: $40 million payment, detailed plan for diversity in employment discrimination suit against retail giant Abercrombie & Fitch. Business Wire, New York. Retrieved on February 12, 2009 from: http://www.csrwire.com/News/3244.html, November 17.

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. A. (1980). Business ethics, social responsibility and business students: an empirical comparison of Clark’s study. Akron Business and Economic Review, 11(3), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2006). Organizational level as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 705–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 329–354). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The gender pay gap: have women gone as far as they can? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., & Kleiner, B. H. (1999). Sex discrimination in hiring: the glass ceiling. Equal Opportunities International, 18(2–4), 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C. (2007). Licensed to curb a retail leviathan. Financial Times, pp. 11 (London – UK), February 10.

  • Carrell, M. R., & Dittrich, J. E. (1978). Equity theory: the recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1997). Confessions of an affirmative action mama. In M. Fine, L. Weise, L. C. Powerll, & L. Mun Wong (Eds.), Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (pp. 179–186). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEOC (2008). Sterling jewelers sued for sex discrimination. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retrieved on December 01, 2008 from: www.eeoc.gov/press/9-24-08.html.

  • ERA (2008). Retail discrimination project: Duke v. Wal-Mart Stores. Equal Rights Project. Retrieved on 11, 30, 2008 from: www.equalrights.org/professional/retail.asp.

  • Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., & Styhre, A. (2008). Overcoming the glass barriers: reflection and action in the ‘Women to the Top’ programme. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(2), 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, K. (1998). Ambulance purchase delayed after complaints of favoritism. The New York Times, December 03, 1998. Retrieved on February 03, 2009 from: http://query.nytimes.com.

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, C., & Wright, B. (1999). Sex, roles and justice: a study of gender as a predictor of fairness in decision making. Women in Management Review, 14(3), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellatly, I. R. (1995). Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(5), 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: an organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W., & Hale, J. M. S. (2005). How can justice be used to improve employee selection practices? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 411–438). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, E. H. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 702–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). Justice and organizational citizenship: a commentary on the state of the science. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A., & Steward, A. J. (1997). Through the looking glass: implications for studying whiteness for feminist methods. In M. Fine, L. Weise, L. C. Powerll, & L. Mun Wong (Eds.), Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (pp. 297–311). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C. A. (1990). Furnishings 2000 Inc. agrees to settle class action lawsuit. Business Wire, New York, Sec. 1.

  • Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, power and difference (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2009). Contemporary management (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J. R., Neuman, G., Parker, C., & Finkl, J. (2001). Settling the score: the role of organizational justice in the relationship between psychological contract breach and anticitizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(2), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: the role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laker, D. R., & Williams, M. L. (2003). Nepotism’s effect on employee satisfaction and organizational commitment: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3(3), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, H. K., Tata, J., & Kwesiga, E. (2009). A model for predicting outcomes of sexual harassment complaints by race and gender. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 21(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, D., & Bagher, M. (2010). Diversity training in organisations: an introduction. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(6), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. (2002). Government funding of rad-hard suppliers raises accusations of favoritism. Military & Aerospace Electronics, the PennWell Corporation. Retrieved on February 03, 2009 from: http://mae.pennet.com/artciles, October.

  • McIntosh, P. (2010). White privilege and male privilege. In M. L. Anderson & P. Hill Collins (Eds.), Race, class and gender: An anthology (7th ed., pp. 99–104). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan-Capehart, A., & Richard, O. (2005). Organisational justice and perceived fairness of hiring decisions related to race and gender: affirmative action reactions. Equal Opportunities International, 24(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehuis, S. (2005). Helping white students explore white privilege outside the classroom. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(3), 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, B. J., & Weathington, B. L. (2006). Beyond the business case for diversity in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(4), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2004). Keeping it “all in the family:” does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(2), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasztor, A. (1989). Navy, amid criticism, adopts rules to hone computer-supply competition. Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition), pp 1, New York, N.Y., June 26, 1989.

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. H., & Roy, F. C. (2004). An empirical analysis of favoritism during business training. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 238–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Reactions to the glass cliff: gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, T. H. (1992). Subtle gender bias in the assessment of managerial potential. Sex Roles, 27(9–10), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S., & Singer, A. E. (1991). Justice in preferential hiring. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snipes, R. L., Oswald, S. L., & Caudill, S. B. (1998). Sex-role stereotyping, gender biases, and job selection: the use of ordinal logit in analyzing likert scale data. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 11(2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldan, Z. (2009). Does management walk the talk? Study of employee perceptions. Journal of Diversity Management, 4(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., Asada, H., & Lott, J. (2001). Student acceptance of a multicultural education: exploring the role of a social work curriculum, demographics, and symbolic racism. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 10, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougas, F., Joly, S., Beaton, A. M., & St.-Pierre, L. (1996). Reactions of beneficiaries to preferential treatment: a reality check. Human Relations, 49(4), 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273–300). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C. M., Ensher, E. A., Hendricks, F. M., & Harris, C. (2004). Gender-based vicarious sensitivity to disempowering behavior in organizations: exploring an expanded concept of hostile working environment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16(3), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (2004). Judge grants suit against Wal-Mart Class-Action status. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, 1, June 23.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randi L. Sims.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mujtaba, B.G., Sims, R.L. Gender Differences in Managerial Attitudes Towards Unearned Privilege and Favoritism in the Retail Sector. Employ Respons Rights J 23, 205–217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9162-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9162-y

Key words

Navigation