Abstract
This paper seeks to explore the notion of risk as an organisational logic within schools, the impact of contemporary accountability regimes on managing risk and then, in turn, to posit a systems-based process of risk management underpinned by a positive logic of risk. It moves through a number of steps beginning with the development of an understanding of risk, the risk society and the logic of risk derived from the seminal work of Douglas (1992, Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory, London: Sage), Beck (1992, Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage) and Giddens (1990, The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press). Second, the paper juxtaposes this understanding of risk with the rise of accountability imperatives and an “audit culture” [Strathern (1997) European Review, 5(3), 305–321] in public institutions, including schools. It then moves to consider how a systems-based approach to risk management, drawing on Reason’s (1990, Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press) model of human error minimisation, could be usefully developed for schools. Such an approach would be built on a positive risk logic which maintains the flexibility, innovativeness and adaptability so necessary in education and avoids the more deleterious effects of many current forms of accountability and risk management which reflect avoidance, conformity and rigidity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett R. (2000).Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham, The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press
Barthes R. (1978). A lover’s discourse: fragments. Translated by Richard Hurley. New York, Hill and Wang
Beck U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London, Sage
Beck, U. (2001). The cosmopolitan state: towards a realistic utopia. Eurozine May: http:www.eurozine.com/article/2001-12-05-beck-en.html.
Beck U. (1997).The reinvention of politics. Cambridge, Polity Press
Bessant J., Hil R., Watts R. (2003). Discovering risk: social research and policy making. New York, Peter Lang
Douglas M. (1992). Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London, Sage
Ericson R.V., Haggerty K.D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Toronto, University of Toronto Press
Foucault M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York, Pantheon
Gewirtz S. (1999). Efficiency at any cost: The post-welfarist education policy context. In: Symes C., Meadmore D (eds). The extra-ordinary school: parergonality and pedagogy. New York, Peter Lang, pp. 129–147
Giddens A. (2000). Runaway world: how globalization is reshaping our lives. New York, Routledge
Giddens A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press
Gigerenzer G. (2002). Reckoning with risk: learning to live with uncertainty. London, Penguin
Hood, C. C., Jones, DX.C., Pidgeon, B. A., Gibson, R., et al. (1992). Risk analysis, perception and management (pp. 135–201). Hertfordshire: The Royal Society.
Hoskin K. (1996). The ‘awful idea of accountability’: inscribing people into the measurement of objects. In: Munro R., Mouritsen J. (eds) Accountability: power, ethos and the technologies of managing . London, International Thomson Business Press, pp. 265–282
Jones A. (2001). Touchy subject: teachers touching children. Dunedin, Otago University Press
Lingard, R. et al. (2002). Addressing the educational needs of boys. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
MCEEYTA (1999) National goals for schooling, http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/ policy_initiatives_reviews/ national_goals_for_schooling_in_the_twenty_first_century.htm.
McIntyre, M. E. (2000). Audit, education, and Goodhart’s Law: or, taking rigidity seriously, http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/people/mem/papers/LHCE/dilnot-analysis.html, pp. 1–6.
McWilliam E. (2003). The vulnerable child as a pedagogical subject. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 19(2): 35–44
McWilliam E. et al. (2005). Silly, soft and otherwise Suspect: doctoral education as risky business. Australian Journal of Education 49(2): 214–227
McWilliam E., Jones A. (2005). An unprotected species? On teachers as risky subjects. British Journal of Educational Research 31(1): 109–120
McWilliam E., Singh P. (2004). Safety in numbers? Teacher collegiality in the risk-conscious school. Journal of Educational Enquiry 5(1): 22–33
Munro E. (2005). Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem. Children and Youth Services Review 27(4): 375–391
Reason J. (1990). Human error. New York, Cambridge University Press
Reason J. (2000). Human error: models and management. British Medical Journal 320(7230): 768–770
Richardson P.D. (2000). Audit culture and anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6(4): 721–722
Shore C., Wright S. (2001). Reply to Maguire. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(4): 760–763
Stewart D.J., Knott A.E. (2002). Schools, courts and the law. Prentice Hall, Frenchs Forest, NSW
Strathern, M. (2000a). Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment or: e for ethnography. Virtual Society? Get Real! conference.
Strathern M. (2001). Blowing hot and cold. Anthropology Today 17(1): 1–2
Strathern M., (1997). ‘Improving ratings’ audit in the British university system. European Review 5(3): 305–321
Strathern M. (2000b). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 310–323
Thompson K. (1998). Moral panics. London, Routledge
Tsoukas, H. (1994). Introduction: from social engineering to reflective action in organizational behaviour. In H. Tsoukas (Ed.), New thinking in organizational behaviour (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
Tsoukas H. (1997). The tyranny of light: the temptations and paradoxes of the information society. Futures 29, 827–843
van Swaaningen R. (1997). Critical criminology. London, Sage
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, LA. Risk, error and accountability: improving the practice of school leaders. Educ Res Policy Prac 5, 149–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-006-9002-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-006-9002-x