Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cargo-specific accidental release impact zones for hazardous materials: risk and consequence comparison for ammonia and hydrogen fluoride

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impacts of hazardous material releases during transport depend on the characteristics of the cargo, incident location and time, weather conditions (i.e., wind direction and speed), and land use. The objectives of this research were to characterize the dispersion characteristics of two hazardous materials (ammonia and hydrogen fluoride) in relation to meteorological parameters, land use, and cargo characteristics; and evaluate the health risks associated with the exposure after accidental releases. The magnitudes of the impact zones were compared in relation to atmospheric stability and exposure levels. Impact zones were estimated by areal locations of hazardous atmospheres software and imported to ArcGIS. For ammonia, the areas impacted by exposure levels over 1100 ppm Acute Exposure Guideline Level 3 (AEGL-3) were limited to less than 0.3 miles downwind from the incident location under unstable atmospheric conditions, which favor high vertical mixing and rapid dilution, and extended further downwind to distances between 0.5 and 0.7 miles under stable atmospheric conditions. For hydrogen fluoride, the AEGL-3 impact zone (exposure levels over 44 ppm) extended between 0.6 and 0.9 miles directly downwind from the incident location under unstable conditions, and reached approximately 2.0 miles directly downwind from the incident location under stable atmospheric conditions. The results were compared with the Emergency Response Guideline (ERG 2012) and showed agreement. The multilevel analysis of impacts after hazardous material releases during transport (i.e., type of material, geographical data, dispersion profile, meteorological information) can be used for implementing appropriate response and mitigation measures for accidental releases of hazardous cargo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battelle (2001) Comparative risks of hazardous materials and non-hazardous materials truck shipment accidents/incidents: final report. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

  • Branscomb L, Fagan M, Auerswald PE, Ellis RN, Barcham R (2010) Rail transportation of toxic inhalation hazards: policy responses to the safety and security externality. J.F.K. School of Government, Harvard University, RPP-2010-01

  • Craft R (2004) Crashes involving trucks carrying hazardous materials. Federal motor carrier safety administration. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Publication No. FMCSA-RI-04–024

  • Dandrieux A, Dusserre G, Ollivier J (2002) Small scale field experiments of chlorine dispersion. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiano B, Curro F, Palazzi E, Pastorino R (2002) A framework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation. J Hazard Mater 93(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gharabagh MJ, Asilian H, Mortasavi SB, Zarringhalam Mogaddam A, Hajizadeh E, Khavanin A (2009) Comprehensive risk assessment and management of petrochemical feed and product transportation pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(4):533–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin RD (2006) Principles of air quality management, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna SR, Briggs GA, Hosker RP Jr (1982) Handbook on atmospheric diffusion. Atmospheric turbulence and diffusion laboratory national oceanic and atmospheric administration, Information Centre, LI. U.S. Department of Energy, p 299

  • HCM (2000) Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC

  • HSM (2000) Highway safety manual. AASHTO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Inanloo B, Tansel B (2015) Explosion impacts during transport of hazardous cargo: GIS-based characterization of overpressure impacts and delineation of flammable zones for ammonia. J Environ Manag 156:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen SS, Berkowicz R, Hansen HS, Hertel O (2001) A Danish decision-support GIS tool for management of urban air quality and human exposures. Transp Res D Transp Environ 6(4):229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang XP, Xu ZH, Deng YY (2006) Development in risk study on hazardous chemical materials road transportation. J Catastrophology 21:94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Leelőssy Á, Mészáros R, Lagzi I (2011) Short and long term dispersion patterns of radionuclides in the atmosphere around the Fukushima nuclear power plant. J Environ Radioact 102(12):1117–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Sun L, Li J, Li C, Hu X (2012) An approach to the real-time risk analysis for hazardous material transportation. Intell Decis Technol Smart Innov Syst Technol 15:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margai FL (2001) Health risks and environmental inequity: a geographical analysis of accidental releases of hazardous materials. Prof Geogr 53(3):422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTSB (1977a) Highway accident report, transport company of texas tractor-semitrailer (Tank) Collision with bridge column and sudden dispersal of anhydrous ammonia cargo I-610 at Southwest Freeway. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/summary/HAR7701.htm. 15 May 2013a

  • NTSB (1977b) Hazardous materials accident brief, tank car failure and release of corrosive and poisonous liquid. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/fulltext/HZB9804.htm. Accessed 15 May 2013

  • NTSB (2001) Highway accident report, release and ignition of hydrogen following collision of a tractor-semitrailer with horizontally mounted cylinders and a pickup truck near Ramona, Oklahoma. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/summary/HZM0202.html. 15 May 2013

  • NTSB (2013) Hazardous materials accident reports. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/reports_hazmat.html. Accessed on 10 Oct 2013

  • PHMSA (2010) Pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety, Building Safe Communities: Pipeline Risk and its Application to Local Development Decisions. http:/primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/publications/PIPA/PIPA-PipelineRiskReport-Final-20101021.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2013

  • PHMSA (2012) Pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration. U.S. Department of Transportation, Emergency Response Guidebook

  • Rakas J, Teodorović D, Kim T (2004) Multi-objective modeling for determining location of undesirable facilities. Transp Res D Transp Environ 9(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccomanno FF, Shortreed JH (1993) Hazmat transport risks: societal and individual perspectives. J Transp Eng 119(2):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer AB, Colonna GR (2003) NFPA pocket guide to hazardous materials. Jones and Bartlett Learning, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DB (1994) Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) (2012) Pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration. Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG)

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2015) 2012 Commodity flow survey. Tech rep. U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/econ/cfs/2012/ec12tcf-us-hm.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015

  • US EPA (1993) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Hydrogen Fluoride Study: Report to Congress, Section 112(n)(6) Clean Air Act as Amended; Final Report

  • US DOE (2004) United States. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, Safety and Health, ALOHA Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis. http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/qa/sqa/central_registry/ALOHA/Final_ALOHA_Guidance_Reportv52404.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2013

  • US DOT (2010) Research and innovative technology administration: bureau of transportation statistics. http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics. Accessed 25 May 2015

  • US EPA (2013) United States Environmental Protection Agency, http:/www.epa.gov. Accessed 1 Oct 2013

  • US DOT (2015) Risk assessment. Federal Highway Administration, Office of International Programs. http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/riskassess/risk_hcm06_03.cfm. Accessed 3 Jun 2015

  • Verma M (2011) Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: a conditional exposure approach to minimize transport risk. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 19(5):790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward JL (2010) Estimating the flammable mass of a vapor cloud: a CCPS concept book, 1st edn. Wiley-AIChE, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZZ, Duo YQ, Liu M (2004) A study on the method of risk assessment of hazardous materials during road transportation. J Basic Sci Eng 12:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Hodgson J, Erkut E (2000) Using GIS to assess the risks of hazardous materials transport in networks. Eur J Oper Res 121(2):316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Partial funding for this research has been provided by Southeastern Transportation Research, Innovation, Development and Education Center (STRIDE), University of Florida, as well as the Florida International University Graduate School Dissertation Year Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Engineering Center, Miami, FL, 33174, USA

    Bahareh Inanloo, Berrin Tansel, Xia Jin & Anna Bernardo-Bricker

Authors
  1. Bahareh Inanloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Berrin Tansel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xia Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Bernardo-Bricker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahareh Inanloo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inanloo, B., Tansel, B., Jin, X. et al. Cargo-specific accidental release impact zones for hazardous materials: risk and consequence comparison for ammonia and hydrogen fluoride. Environ Syst Decis 36, 20–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9576-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9576-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation