Abstract
Climate change and natural resource depletion have reinvigorated the relevance of technical advancements in energy efficiency, which has been emphasized by the Paris Climate Accord that includes a framework for carbon neutrality. In that effort, the governments have been allocating a considerable amount of budget shares to research and development relating to energy efficiency and green energy. Thus, this study primarily examines the impact and effectiveness of research and development on energy efficiency and energy sources (renewables and fossil fuels) on CO2 emissions in the European region using a novel Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR). Our data cover annual observations of 9 EU countries, including Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden, based on the period 1990–2021. Our empirical findings confirm that the U-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve occurs across all quantiles at 1% significance levels. The findings reveal that energy consumption increases CO2 emissions across the lower to higher quantiles. We discover that (i) R&D on renewable energy cuts CO2 emissions just at the median and higher quantiles, (ii) R&D on Fossil Fuels decreases CO2 emissions just at the lower quantile, and (iii) R&D on Energy efficiency lowers CO2 emissions at both the median and higher quantiles. Therefore, empirical findings suggest that policymakers should maintain their incentives for energy efficiency R&D and renewable R&D to achieve sustainable development goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Xin et al. (2021)
Source: International Renewable Energy Agency (2022)
Source: Prepared by authors
Source: Prepared by authors
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on reasonable request.
References
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
Alnour, M., & Hayriye, A. (2022). The dynamic effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth and environmental quality in Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, 30(52), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.02.11
Alola, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890
Álvarez-Herránz, A., Balsalobre, D., Cantos, J. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: Fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 101, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
Awan, A., Alnour, M., Jahanger, A., & Chukwuma, O. J. (2022). Do technological innovation and urbanization mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from the transport sector? Technology in Society, 71(June), 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102128
Aydin, M., Degirmenci, T., & Yavuz, H. (2023). The influence of multifactor productivity, research and development expenditure, renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in G7 countries: Testing the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-023-09879-0
Balsalobre, D., Álvarez, A., & Cantos, J. M. (2015). Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 4881–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Driha, O. M., Leitao, N. C., & Murshed, M. (2021). The carbon dioxide neutralizing effect of energy innovation on international tourism in EU-5 countries under the prism of the EKC hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113513
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Ibáñez-Luzón, L., Usman, M., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renewable Energy, 185, 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.059
Bashir, M. A., Sheng, B., Dogan, B., Sarwar, S., & Shahzad, U. (2020). Export product diversification and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.09.002
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Gençoğlu, P., Kassouri, Y., & Majok Garang, A. P. (2021a). The co-movements between geothermal energy usage and CO2 emissions through high and low frequency cycles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 63723–63738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11000-x
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Khan, M., Awan, A., & Türker, O. (2021b). The roles of economic growth and health expenditure on CO2 emissions in selected Asian countries: A quantile regression model approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 44949–44972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13639-6
Bilgili, F., Nathaniel, S. P., Kuşkaya, S., & Kassori, Y. (2021c). Environmental pollution and energy research and development: An Environmental Kuznets Curve model through quantile simulation approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 53712–53727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14506-0
Bilgili, F., Zarali, F., Ilgün, M. F., Dumrul, C., & Dumrul, C. (2022). The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for sustainable development in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy-TOPSIS method. Renewable Energy, 189(2022), 1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.058
Bilgili, F., & Recep, U. R. (2020). The nexus between biomass—footprint and sustainable development, Editor(s): Saleem Hashmi, Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury. Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials, 2020, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10600-9
Boontome, P., Therdyothin, A., & Chontanawat, J. (2017). Investigating the causal relationship between non-renewable and renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Thailand. Energy Procedia, 138, 925–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.141
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Caglar, A. E., & Ulug, M. (2022). The role of government spending on energy efficiency R&D budgets in the green transformation process: Insight from the top-five countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(50), 76472–76484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21133-w
Cepoi, C.-O., Bran, M., & Dinu, M. (2020). Investigating the nexus between fuel ethanol and CO2 emissions. A panel smooth transition regression approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(6), 1774–1792. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13695
Charfeddine, L., & Kahia, M. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Chen, J., Huang, S., & Ajaz, T. (2022). Natural resources management and technological innovation under EKC framework: A glimmer of hope for sustainable environment in newly industrialized countries. Resources Policy, 79, 103016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103016
Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Lai, Z., Wang, Z., & Xia, H. (2019). Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO2 emissions: Evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renewable Energy, 140, 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.058
Cherni, A., & Jouini, S. E. (2017). An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42, 29056–29066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.072
CNC. (2020). Members of the carbon neutrality coalition. https://www.carbon-neutrality.global/members/
Doğan, B., Driha, O. M., BalsalobreLorente, D., & Shahzad, U. (2020a). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2125
Doğan, B., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020b). European commitment to COP21 and the role of energy consumption, FDI, trade and economic complexity in sustaining economic growth. Journal of Environmental Management, 273, 111146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111146
EEA. (2018). European Environment Agency. Renewable energy in Europe 2018: recent growth and knock-on effects. https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/renewable-energy-in-europe-2018
EIU Energy Report (2023). Global energy trends. https://www.eiu.com/
Fatima, T., Mentel, G., Doğan, B., Hashim, Z., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Investigating the role of export product diversifcation for renewable, and non-renewable energy consumption in GCC (gulf cooperation council) countries: Does the Kuznets hypothesis exist? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 8397–8417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01789-z
FernándezFernández, Y., FernándezLópez, M. A., & Olmedillas Blanco, B. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459–3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers (4th ed.). Oliver & Boyd.
Garrone, P., & Grilli, L. (2010). Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 38, 5600–5613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.057
Gençsü, I., Whitley, S., Trilling, M., & Worrall, L. (2020). Phasing out public financial flows to fossil fuel production in Europe. Climate Policy, 20(8), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1736978
Gu, W., Zhao, X., Yan, X., Wang, C., & Li, Q. (2019). Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117666
Hailemariam, A., Ivanovski, K., & Dzhumashev, R. (2022). Does R&D investment in renewable energy technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Applied Energy, 327, 120056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120056
Halkos G., & Gkampoura E-C. (2023). Assessing Fossil Fuels and Renewables’ Impact on Energy Poverty Conditions in Europe. Energies, 16(1), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010560
He, B.-J., Wang, J., Zhu, J., & Qi, J. (2022). Beating the urban heat: Situation, background, impacts and the way forward in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112350.
He, Z., Xu, S., Shen, W., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2017). Impact of urbanization on energy related CO2 emission at different development levels: Regional difference in China based on panel estimation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.155
Herzer, D. (2022). The impact on domestic CO2 emissions of domestic government-funded clean energy R&D and of spillovers from foreign government-funded clean energy R&D. Energy Policy, 168, 113126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113126
IEA. (2023). The Energy Technology RD&D Budgets database. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/energy-technology-rd-and-d-budget-database-2. Access October 20, 2022
IPCC (2023). Special report: global warming of 1.5 ºC. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-1/
Jiang, C., & Ma, X. (2019). The Impact of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: A Global Perspective. Sustainability, 11(19), 5241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195241
Jin, L., Duan, K., Shi, C., & Ju, X. (2017). The impact of technological progress in the energy sector on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121505
Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938278
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
Jörß, W., Jørgensen, B. H., Löffler, P., Morthorst, P. E., Uyterlinde, M., Sambeek, E., & Wehnert, T. (2003). Decentralized power generation in the liberalised EU energy markets. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05090-3
Kahouli, B. (2018). The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy, 145, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.136
Khan, S. A. R., Sharif, A., Golpîra, H., & Kumar, A. (2019). A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27, 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1958
Khezri, M., Heshmati, A., & Khodaei, M. (2021). The role of R&D in the effectiveness of renewable energy determinants: A spatial econometric analysis. Energy Economics, 99, 105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105287
Kocak, E., & Alnour, M. (2022). Energy R&D expenditure, bioethanol consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: Nonlinear analysis and political implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374(7), 133887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133887
Koçak, E., & ŞentürkUlucak, Z. (2019). The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: Estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 14328–14338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Kuang, H., Akmal, Z., & Li, F. (2022). Measuring the effects of green technology innovations and renewable energy investment for reducing carbon emissions in China. Renewable Energy, 197, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.091
Kuşkaya, S. (2022). Residential solar energy consumption and greenhouse gas nexus: Evidence from Morlet wavelet transforms. Renewable Energy, 192, 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.107
Kuşkaya, S., & Bilgili, F. (2020). The wind energy-greenhouse gas nexus: The wavelet-partial wavelet coherence model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118872
Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
Li, B., & Haneklaus, N. (2021). The role of renewable energy, fossil fuel consumption, urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in China. Energy Reports, 7, 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.194
Li, M., Zhang, K., Alamri, A. M., Ageli, M. M., & Khan, N. (2013). Resource curse hypothesis and sustainable development: Evaluating the role of renewable energy and R&D. Resources Policy, 81, 103283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103283
Li, W., Cao, N., & Xiang, Z. (2023). Drivers of renewable energy transition: The role of ICT, human development, financialization, and R&D investment in China. Renewable Energy, 206, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.027
Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019). Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.121
Liu, H., Khan, I., Zakari, A., & Alharthi, M. (2022). Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment. Energy Policy, 170, 113238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113238
Liu, X., Zhang, S., & Bae, J. (2017). The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.086
Machado, J. A. F., & Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
Mahou, Y., Ben Youssef, S., & Ben Jebli, M. (2022). Inspecting the influence of renewable energy and R&D in defending environmental quality: Evidence for California. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 88751–88762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21831-5
Mamkhezri, J., Bohara, A.K., & Islas Camargo, A. (2020). Air pollution and daily mortality in the Mexico city metropolitan area. Atm´osfera, 33(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.52557
Mamkhezri, J., Muhamad, G. M., & Khezri, M. (2022). Assessing the spatial effects of economic freedom on forest-products, grazing-land, and cropland footprints: The case of Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115274
Menegaki, A. N. (2011). Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Economics, 33, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.004
Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
Mentel, G., Tarczynski, W., Azadi, H., Abdurakmanov, K., Zakirova, E., & Salahodjaev, R. (2022). R&D Human Capital, Renewable Energy and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from 26 Countries. Energies, 15, 9205. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239205
Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy, 38, 2911–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.024
Mukhtarov, S., FuzuliAliyev, F., Aliyev, J., & Ajayi, R. (2023). Renewable energy consumption and carbon emissions: Evidence from an oil-rich economy. Sustainability, 15, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010134
Ni, X., Wang, Z., Akbar, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Natural resources volatility, renewable energy, R&D resources and environment: Evidence from selected developed countries. Resources Policy, 77, 102655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102655
Our World in Data. (2023). Co2 emissions, https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions. Access January 17, 2023
Pablo-Romero, M. P., Sanchez-Braza, A., & Gil-Perez, J. (2023). Is deforestation needed for growth? Testing the EKC hypothesis for Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics, 148, 102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102915
Pani, A., Shirkole, S. S., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2022). Importance of renewable energy in the fight against global climate change. Drying Technology, 40, 2581–2582. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2022.2119324
Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
Pata, U. K., & Kartal, M. T. (2023). Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55, 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.027
Payne, J. E., Diep Truong, H. H., Chu, L. K., Dogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2023). The effect of economic complexity and energy security on measures of energy efficiency: Evidence from panel quantile analysis. Energy Policy, 177, 113547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113547
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60, 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
Petrovic, P., & Lobanov, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187
Rabbi, M.F., Popp, J., Máté, D., & Kovács, S. (2022). Energy Security and Energy Transition to Achieve Carbon Neutrality. Energies, 15(21), 8126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1736978
Radmehr, R., Henneberry, S. R., & Shayanmehr, S. (2021). Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth nexus: a simultaneity spatial modeling analysis of EU countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 57, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.006
Rahman, M. M., Alam, K., & Velayutham, E. (2022). Reduction of CO2 emissions: The role of renewable energy, technological innovation and export quality. Energy Reports, 8, 2793–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.200
Saba, C. S. (2023). Nexus between CO2 emissions, renewable energy consumption, militarisation, and economic growth in South Africa: Evidence from using novel dynamic ARDL simulations. Renewable Energy, 205, 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.070
Sahoo, M., & Sahoo, J. (2020). Effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions in India: Empirical evidence from disaggregated data analysis. Journal Public Affairs., 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2307
Santra, S. (2017). The effect of technological innovation on production-based energy and CO2 emission productivity: Evidence from BRICS countries. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 9, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2017.1308069
Sarkodie, S. A., Adams, S., Owusu, P. A., Leirvik, T., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: The role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. Science of the Total Environment, 719, 137530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137530
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
Shahnazi, R., & Shabani, Z. D. (2021). The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU. Renewable Energy, 169, 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.016
Shahzadi, I., Yaseen, M. R., Khan, M. T. I., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Ali, Q. (2022). The nexus between research and development, renewable energy and environmental quality: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Renewable Energy, 190, 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.050
Shittu, W., Adedoyin, F. F., Shah, M. I., & Musibau, H. O. (2021). An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: Evidence from Asia. Resources Policy, 73, 102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102227
Shu, H., Wang, Y., Umar, M., & Zhong, Y. (2023). Dynamics of renewable energy research, investment in EnvoTech and environmental quality in the context of G7 countries. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106582
Su, H.-H., & Moaniba, I. M. (2017). Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.017
Paramati, S. R., Shahzad, U., & Dogan, U. (2022). The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111735
Sun, Y., Bao, Q., Siao-Yun, W., Islam, M., & ul, Razzaq, A. (2022). Renewable energy transition and environmental sustainability through economic complexity in BRICS countries: Fresh insights from novel Method of Moments Quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 184, 1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.003
Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
UNEP. (2019). Carbon Emissions Gap Report 2019. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2019
Wang, X., Zhang, T., Nathwani, J., Yang, F., & Shao, Q. (2022a). Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons’ Paradox in China’s iron & steel industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 176, 121471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121471
Wang, Z., Pham, T. H. L., Sun, K., Wang, B., Bui, Q., & Hashemizadeh, A. (2022b). The moderating role of financial development in the renewable energy consumption - CO2 emissions linkage: The case study of Next-11 countries. Energy, 254, 124386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124386
World Energy Outlook (2022). NET. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net
Xin, D., Ahmad, M., Lei, H., & Khattak, S. I. (2021). Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States? Technology in Society, 67, 101761.
Xin, Y., Ajaz, T., Shahzad, M., & Luo, J. (2023). How productive capacities influence trade-adjusted resources consumption in China: Testing resource-based EKC. Resources Policy, 81, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103329
Yang, Q., Huo, J., Saqib, N., & Mahmood, H. (2022a). Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 192, 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.123
Yang, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, L., & Zhou, D. (2022b). Can renewable energy investment reduce carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from scale and structure. Energy Economics, 112, 106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106181
Yazdi, S. K., & Shakouri, B. (2018). The effect of renewable energy and urbanization on CO2 emissions: A panel data. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1400607
Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2020). Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: The role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32683–32694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4
Zhao, M., Li, B., Ren, J., & Hao, Z. (2023). Competition equilibrium of ride-sourcing platforms and optimal government subsidies considering customers’ green preference under peak carbon dioxide emissions. International Journal of Production Economics, 255, 108679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108679
Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018
Funding
This research received no specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors declare that they have participated in the same proportion in the development of the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bilgili, F., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Kuşkaya, S. et al. Are research and development on energy efficiency and energy sources effective in the level of CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from EU data. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03641-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03641-y