Abstract
Energy innovations are critical to combating global warming and climate change. In this context, we focus on the impact of energy research–development (R&D) expenditures, which are the input of energy innovations, on CO2 emissions. For this purpose, we investigate the effect of disaggregated energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission in 19 high-income OECD countries over the period 2003–2015. The dynamic panel data method is followed for empirical analysis. The results of the study show that R&D expenditures for energy efficiency and fossil energy have an increasing effect on CO2 emissions. Contrary to expectations, there is no significant relationship between renewable energy R&D expenditures and CO2 emissions. Remarkably, there is strong evidence that the power and storage R&D expenditures have a reducing effect on CO2 emissions. In light of the empirical findings, policy implications and recommendations to potential readers and authorities are further discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017a) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009
Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017b) Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
Amri F (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development , and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia. pp 33691–33701
Anderson TR, Hawkins E, Jones PD (2016) CO2, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today’s earth system models. Endeavour 40:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENDEAVOUR.2016.07.002
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68:29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4881–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3
Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing. Stata J 3:1–31
Bernardi L, Morales L, Lühiste M, Bischof D (2018) The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environ Polit 27:42–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
Bilgili F, Ulucak R (2018) The nexus between biomass – footprint and sustainable development. In: Reference module in materials science and materials engineering. Elsevier
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Sualp MN (2016a) How did the US economy react to shale gas production revolution? An advanced time series approach. Energy 116:963–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.056
Bilgili F, Öztürk İ, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Pamuk Y, Muğaloğlu E, Bağlıtaş HH (2016b) The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19043–19061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7094-2
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Kuşkaya S (2017) Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development? Renew Sust Energ Rev 71:830–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.109
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87:115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Chen W, Xu R (2010) Clean coal technology development in China. Energy Policy 38:2123–2130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.06.003
Cheng Z, Li L, Liu J (2017) The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools. J Clean Prod 149:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.105
Cho JH, Sohn SY (2018) A novel decomposition analysis of green patent applications for the evaluation of R&D efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from fossil fuel energy consumption. J Clean Prod 193:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.060
Croissant Y, Millo G et al (2008) Panel data econometrics in {{R}}: {{The}} plm package. J Stat Softw 27:1–43
Danish KN, Baloch MA et al (2018) The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:22850–22860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2
Das T, Krishnan V, McCalley JD (2015) Assessing the benefits and economics of bulk energy storage technologies in the power grid. Appl Energy 139:104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2014.11.017
de Sisternes FJ, Jenkins JD, Botterud A (2016) The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector. Appl Energy 175:368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.014
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth on JSTOR. Science (80- ) 171:1212–1217
EIA (2012) Annual Energy Outlook 2012: With Projections to 2035
EIA (2017) International Energy Agency, Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2017. https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2018/march/global-energy-demand-grew-by-21-in-2017-and-carbon-emissions-rose-for-the-firs.html. Accessed 10 June 2018
Ellabban O, Abu-Rub H, Blaabjerg F (2014) Renewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39:748–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113
Fan Y, Liu L-C, Wu G, Wei Y-M (2006) Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2005.11.007
Fantazzini D (2016) The oil price crash in 2014/15: was there a (negative) financial bubble? Energy Policy 96:383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2016.06.020
Fernández FY, López FMA, Blanco OB (2018) Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 172:3459–3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
Garrone P, Grilli L (2010) Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy 38:5600–5613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.057
Grafton RQ, Kompas T, Van LN, To H (2014) US biofuels subsidies and CO2 emissions: an empirical test for a weak and a strong green paradox. Energy Policy 68:550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.11.006
Gu X, Huang B (2014) Does inequality lead to a financial crisis? Revisited. Rev Dev Econ 18:502–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12099
Hall PJ, Bain EJ (2008) Energy-storage technologies and electricity generation. Energy Policy 36:4352–4355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.037
Hayakawa K (2018) Alternative over-identifying restriction test in the GMM estimation of panel data models. Econ Stat. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSTA.2018.06.002
Herring H, Roy R (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation 27:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2006.11.004
Huhtala A, Remes P (2017) Quantifying the social costs of nuclear energy: perceived risk of accident at nuclear power plants. Energy Policy 105:320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.052
Ibrahim H, Ilinca A, Perron J (2008) Energy storage systems—characteristics and comparisons. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12:1221–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2007.01.023
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018) World energy outlook
Jevons WS (1865) On the variation of prices and the value of the currency since 1782. J Stat Soc London 28:294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2338419
Jin L, Duan K, Shi C, Ju X (2017) The impact of technological progress in the energy sector on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121505
Kahouli B (2018) The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy 145:388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.136
Keen S, Ayres RU, Standish R (2019) A note on the role of energy in production. Ecol Econ 157:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2018.11.002
Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Shakouri B (2018) The renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: VAR model. Energy Sour B Econ Plan Pol 13:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1403499
Kilian L (2016) The impact of the shale oil revolution on U.S. oil and gasoline prices. Rev Environ Econ Policy 10:185–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew001
Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:790–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2
Kwon DS, Cho JH, Sohn SY (2017) Comparison of technology efficiency for CO2 emissions reduction among European countries based on DEA with decomposed factors. J Clean Prod 151:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.065
Lantz V, Feng Q (2006) Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecol Econ 57:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.006
Lee KH, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
Li W, Wang W, Wang Y, Qin Y (2017) Industrial structure, technological progress and CO2 emissions in China: analysis based on the STIRPAT framework. Nat Hazards 88:1545–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2932-1
Lin S, Wang S, Marinova D, Zhao D, Hong J (2017) Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. J Clean Prod 166:952–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.107
Luo X, Wang J, Dooner M, Clarke J (2015) Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Appl Energy 137:511–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081
Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
Munasinghe M (2002) The sustainomics trans-disciplinary meta-framework for making development more sustainable: applications to energy issues. Int J Sustain Dev 5:125. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2002.002563
Najam A, Cleveland CJ (2003) Energy and sustainable development at global environmental summits: an evolving agenda. Environ Dev Sustain 5:117–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025388420042
Ockwell DG, Haum R, Mallett A, Watson J (2010) Intellectual property rights and low carbon technology transfer: conflicting discourses of diffusion and development. Glob Environ Chang 20:729–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.009
Oikonomou V, Flamos A, Grafakos S (2010) Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments always desirable? Energy Policy 38:4186–4195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.046
Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30708–30719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6
Prest BC (2018) Explanations for the 2014 oil price decline: supply or demand? Energy Econ 74:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.029
Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency
Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J, Sommerville M (2009) Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: a review. Energy Policy 37:1356–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.026
Tang E, Peng C, Xu Y (2018) Changes of energy consumption with economic development when an economy becomes more productive. J Clean Prod 196:788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.06.101
Tokic D (2015) Working Paper n°: 2015-107-02. p 85
World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators (WDI). https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators. Accessed 12 July 2018
York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46:351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5
Zhang YJ, Peng HR, Liu Z, Tan W (2015) Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: a dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Energy Policy 87:303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.022
Zhou Z, Ye X, Ge X (2017) The impacts of technical progress on sulfur dioxide Kuznets curve in China: a spatial panel data approach. Sustain 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040674
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Muhammad Shahbaz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: List of countries and descriptive statistics
Appendix: List of countries and descriptive statistics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koçak, E., Ulucak, Z.Ş. The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 14328–14338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2