Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the mechanisms among industrial agglomeration, environmental pollution and sustainable industrial efficiency: a case study in China

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial agglomeration (IA) has greatly promoted the improvement of industrial efficiency (IE), but it has also brought serious environmental pollution (EP), which in turn affects sustainable industrial development. Therefore, this study built a theoretical derivation model including pollution output and used a vector error correction model (VECM) and three-stage simultaneous equations (3SLS) to explore the mechanisms among IA, EP and sustainable IE. The following conclusions were reached: (1) The relationship between IA and EP presents an inverted U-shape and is located on the left side of the inverted U-shape curve. IA has increased emissions of industrial sulphur dioxide, industrial soot and industrial wastewater pollutants, but is conducive to IE. Increased EP will inhibit both IA and the level of IE. (2) Both IA and low EP can enhance the level of sustainable IE. (3) IE plays a mitigating role in IA and EP; it will weaken the inhibitory effect of EP on IA and strengthen the impact of IA on EP. In the future, China should continue its industrialization process to promote the scale of IA and strictly control the discharge of industrial pollutants to reduce EP. Simultaneously, the government should encourage industrial enterprises to improve technological innovation to promote IE. IA, EP and IE form a virtuous circle that promotes the development of the industrial economy and optimizes the environment. This approach can also be applied to other regions to provide decision support for the sustainable development of industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Ciccone and Hall (1996) established an economic agglomeration model in the paper "Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity". The model used production functions to show the effect of density on productivity, that is, the effect of agglomeration on efficiency.

  2. In Fig. 1, the solid line indicates the path of the influence, and the dashed line indicates the influence through the effect. Bolded places such as increase, constrain, reduce and decrease indicate greater impact.

  3. In Mainland China, there are three different names used for essentially the same administrative level: provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions. For comparative purposes, these are similar in scope to US states. Presently, there are 23 provinces, 5 autonomous regions, and 4 municipalities in China.

References

  • Aivazian, V. A., Callen, J. L., & Luke Chan, M. W. (1987). Economies of scale versus technological change in the natural gas transmission industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics., 69(3), 556–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Loof, H. (2011). Agglomeration and productivity: Evidence from firm-level data. The Annals of Regional Science., 46, 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, R. A., & Tsang, K. P. (2014). Credible Granger-causality inference with modest sample lengths: A cross sample validation approach. Econometrics., 2, 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu, S., Montasser, G. E. I., & Toumi, H. (2016). Testing the relationships between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in 24 African countries: A panel ARDL approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 23(7), 6563–6573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aznar-Márquez, J., & Ruiz-Tamarit, J. R. (2016). Environmental pollution, sustained growth, and sufficient conditions for sustainable development. Economic Modelling, 54, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloumi, M. (2009). Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: Cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy, 37, 2745–2753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a Slacks-based DEA Model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., & Taylor, M. (2010). The green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth., 15(2), 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M., & Mathys, N. A. (2008). Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics., 38, 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerina, F., & Mureddu, F. (2014). Is agglomeration really good for growth? global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth. Journal of Urban Economics., 84, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, C. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research., 12(1), 43–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. F., Sun, Y. W., Lan, Q. X., & Jiang, F. (2020). Impacts of industrial agglomeration on pollution and ecological efficiency-A spatial econometric analysis based on a big panel dataset of China’s 259 cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120721.

  • Cheng, Z. (2016). The Spatial correlation and interaction between manufacturing agglomeration and environ-mental pollution. Ecological Indicators., 61, 1024–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. H., Dai, S., & Ye, X. Y. (2016). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of industrial pollution in China. China Economic Review., 40, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, d. C., D'Haultfœuille, X. (2020). Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2964–2996.

  • Dhrymes, P.J. (1973). A simple proof of the asymptotic efficiency of 3SLS relative to 2SLS estimators. Economic Inquiry, 11(2), 187–190.

  • Du, W. J., & Li, M. G. (2019). Can environmental regulation promote the governance of excess capacity in China’s energy sector? The Market Exit of Zombie Enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production., 207, 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-Integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanishima, S., & Unander, F. (2006). Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34(5), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Lyu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, W. (2020). Industrial agglomeration externalities, local governments’ competition and environmental pollution: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123455.

  • Ikazaki, D., & Naito, T. (2009). Optimal environmental and industrial policies and imperfect agglomeration effects. Regional Science Policy and Practice., 1(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., Persaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics., 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., & Kim, I. S. (2021). On the use of two-way fixed effects regression models for causal inference with panel data. Political Analysis., 29(3), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iris, Ç., & Lam, J. S. L. (2019). A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 112, 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, S. Z., & Yu, Y. F. (2014). The pathways from industrial agglomeration to TFP growth—the experience of Chinese cities for 2001–2010. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy., 19(2), 310–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheder, S. B., & Zugravu, N. (2012). Environmental regulation and French fifirms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study. Ecological Economics., 77(3), 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy., 99(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1998). Space: The fifinal frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives., 12(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, A., & Quaas. M. F. (2007). Economic geography and the effect of environmental pollution on agglomeration. The B E Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 77(1):1724–1724.

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics., 108, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2019). How does environmental regulation affect different approaches of technical progress? -evidence from China’s industrial sectors from 2005 to 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production., 209, 572–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Fang, L., & He, L. (2019). How population and energy price affect China’s environmental pollution? Energy Policy, 129, 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X.H., Xu, Y.Y.,& Yao, X. (2020). Effects of industrial agglomeration on haze pollution: A Chinese city-level study. Energy Policy, 148, 111928.

  • Liu, J., Cheng, Z. H., & Zhang, H. M. (2017). Does industrial agglomeration promote the increase of energy efficiency in China? Journal of Cleaner Production., 164, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics., 61, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, A., Goto, M., & Sueyoshi, T. (2010). Industrial agglomeration effects in Japan: Productive efficiency, market access, and public fiscal transfer. Papers in Regional Science., 89(4), 819–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, X.L., Chen, J.Q., & Du, K.R. (2021). Energy efficiency performance of the industrial sector: From the perspective of technological gap in different regions in China. Energy, 214, 118865.

  • Parke, W.R. (1979). An algorithm for FLML and 3SLS estimation of large nonlinear models.

  • Ploeg, F., & Withagen, C. (2012). Is there really a green paradox? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management., 64, 342–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudra P. P, Mak B. Arvin, & Sahar Bahmani. (2018). Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 130–142.

  • Shao, Q., Wang, X., Zhou, Q., & Balogh, L. (2019). Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: A comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production., 227, 724–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaymal, H. C., & Emir M. (2020). Smoothed LSDV estimation of functional-coefficient panel data models with two-way fixed effects. Economics Letters, 192, 109239.

  • Siddiqui, S., & Sheikhn, S. P. (2016). Modelling the return of shariah with underlying indices of national stock exchange of India: A case of 3SLS and GMM estimation. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research., 4(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squartini, T., Fagiolo, G., & Garlaschelli, D. (2011). Rewiring world trade. Part I: A binary network analysis. LEM Papers Series 2011/08, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

  • Tao, F., Li, L., & Xia, X.H. (2012). Industry efficiency and total factor productivity growth under resources and environmental constraint in China. The Scientific Word Journal, 1–10.

  • Temin, P. (1966). Labor scarcity and the problem of American industrial efficiency in the 1850’s. The Journal of Economic History., 3, 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, E. T., & Nijkamp, P. (2002). Externalities in urban sustainability: Environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a single-sector monocentric Industrial City. Ecological Economics., 40(2), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning., 21(6), 459–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S., & Wang, J. (2019). Does industrial agglomeration facilitate environmental performance: New evidence from urban China? Journal of Environmental Management., 248, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Yuan, B. L. (2018). Air pollution control intensity and ecological total-factor energy efficiency: The moderating effect of ownership structure. Journal of Cleaner Production., 186, 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Zhou, D. Q. (2021). Spatial agglomeration and driving factors of environmental pollution: A spatial analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 1223839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P., Yan, W. L., Ma, D., & Zhang, C. L. (2018). Carbon emissions and optimal scale of China’s manufacturing agglomeration under heterogeneous environmental regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production., 176, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Fan, W. N., Liu, J., Wang, G., & Chai, W. (2020a). The effect of urbanization and spatial agglomeration on carbon emissions in urban agglomeration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 27, 24329–24341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Zhu, Y.M., & Yang, T.B. (2020b). The impact of transportation infrastructure and industrial agglomeration on energy efficiency: Evidence from China’s industrial sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118708.

  • Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) (2016). Environmental Performance Index, 2016-01-28, http://epi.yale.edu.

  • Yang, Y., Cai, W. J., & Wang, C. (2014). Industrial CO2 intensity, indigenous innovation and R&D spillovers in China’s provinces. Applied Energy., 131, 117–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. L., Zhang, W., & Zha, D. L. (2019). Industrial production: Pursuing scale expansion or pollution reduction? Judgment based on the Copeland-Toylor model. Journal of Cleaner Production., 216, 14–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, D. Z., & Zhao, L. X. (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management., 58, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. X., Chang, Y., Zhang, L. X., & Li, D. (2018). Do technological innovations promote urban green development? A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production., 182, 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Fan, Y., & Zhang, S.H. (2021). Assessment of efficiency improvement and emission mitigation potentials in China’s petroleum refining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124482.

  • Zheng, S. Q., & Kahn, M. E. (2013). Understanding China’s urban pollution dynamics. Journal of Economic Literature., 51(3), 731–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Z. Q., Peng, B. H., & Elahi, E. (2020). Spatial and temporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of energy– environmental efficiency: A case study of Yangtze River urban agglomeration in China. Energy and Environment., 32, 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editor and anonymous referees for their insightful and constructive comments. This work is supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Funding No. 21CJL015), the National Bureau of Statistics key project (Funding No. 2020LY064), the Chongqing serves the national major strategy to sing a good “tale of two cities” to build economic circle research (Funding No. 2020YBZX03), Chongqing Technology and Business University Highôlevel Talent Project (Funding No. 1955033). Especially, we would like to thank the experts who participated in the evaluation and improvement of this manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Funding No. 21CJL015), the National Bureau of Statistics key project (Funding No. 2020LY064), the Chongqing serves the national major strategy to sing a good “tale of two cities” to build economic circle research (Funding No. 2020YBZX03), Chongqing Technology and Business University High-level Talent Project (Funding No. 1955033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YR is responsible for conceptualization and supervision. YT analyses the theoretical basis of sustainable industrial development and is the main contributor to the manuscript. CZ searches for data, conducts empirical analysis and tests, and writes the original draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Tian.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, Y., Tian, Y. & Zhang, C. Investigating the mechanisms among industrial agglomeration, environmental pollution and sustainable industrial efficiency: a case study in China. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 12467–12493 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01971-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01971-3

Keywords

Navigation