Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Criteria for the assessment of sustainability of public constructions

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a context in which public constructions represent a significant portion of many countries' construction activities, assessing these works' sustainability plays a fundamental role in reducing social, economic, and environmental impacts and encouraging the use of more sustainable construction practices. There are currently several assessment systems and methods with different scopes and approaches. However, few consider the specificities of public works. This article proposes a structured set of indicators for assessing public works' sustainability, based on the criteria proposed by the leading researchers working on the topic and those covered by the LEED, SBTool, BREEAM, and Green Star assessment tools. After extensive and detailed bibliographic research, the criteria were categorized, reordered, and unified, resulting in a structure composed of nine categories that add 214 criteria, which can be adapted to the particularities of different types of work, to any region, and at any stage of the cycle of life. The proposed structure, being more comprehensive and flexible than the most used tools, increases public managers' capacity to assess the real situation, understand the right needs, establish changes, and direct their efforts to make their works more sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adjarko, H., Osei-Poku, G., & Ayarkwa, J. (2014). Challenges to the incorporation of environmental sustainability issues into construction procurement at the local government level of Ghana. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES), 3(11), 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbiyikli, R., Eaton, D., & Dikmen, S. U. (2012). Achieving sustainable construction within private finance initiative (PFI) road projects in the UK. Technological and Economic Devolepment of Economy, 18(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.677586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augenbroe, G. L. M., Pearce, A. R., Guy, B., & Kibert, C. K. (1998). Sustainable construction in the USA; a perspective to the year 2010. Sust. Dev. and the Future of Constr., vol. report, 225.

  • Ayirebi-Dansoh, J. A., & Amoah, P. (2010). Barriers to implementation of EMS in construction industry in Ghana. Int. J. Eng. Sci. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1268.

  • Bahaudin, A. Y., Elias, E. M., & Saifudin, A. M. (2014). A comparison of the green building’s criteria. ES Web of Conferences, 3, 01015. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20140301015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragança, L., & Guimarães, E. T. (2016). Introducing the Portuguese sustainability assessment tool for urban areas: SBTool PT-Urban Planning. In International Conference SBE16 Malta “Europe and the Mediterranean: Towards a Sust. Built Environ.” (pp. 353–360). Sbe Malta-Sust. Built Environ.

  • Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S., Robèrt, K. H., Broman, G., & Oldmark, J. (2013). Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 309–316.

  • BREEAM - Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method (2017) Technicbal Manual. Retrieved Nov 30 2017 from, Avaiable at https://www.breeam.com/.

  • Brenner R. (2015). A Construção Civil Sustentável e as Cidades. In: ISAE - Instituto Superior de Administração e Economia. Retrieved Aug 18, 2017 from Avaiable via: http://www.isaebrasil.com.br/artigo/construcao-civil-sustentavel-e-cidades.Accessed 18 Aug 2017

  • Bynum, P., Issa, R. R., & Olbina, S. (2012). Building information modeling in support of sustainable design and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E. S., Hon, A. H., Chan, W., & Okumus, F. (2014). What drives employees’ intentions to implement green practices in hotels? The role of knowledge, awareness, concern and ecological behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2014(40), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. H., Yang, L. R., & Lin, S. I. (2014). Quantifying Impact Factors of Sustainable Road Planning in Taiwan. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 7(1), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Okudan, G. E., & Riley, D. R. (2010). Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in Construction., 19(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia MC, Salgado MS, Bragança L (2016) The use of SBTool on public procurement: Challenges and opportunities SBE Series 16-Brazil & Portugal: Sustainable Urban Communities towards a Nearly Zero Impact Built Environ., 2, 867–876.

  • Czarnecki, L., & Kapron, M. (2010). Sustainable construction as a research area. International Journal of the Society of Materials Engineering for Resources, 17(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.5188/ijsmer.17.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, V. G. (2006). Indicadores de sustentabilidade de edifícios: Estado da arte e desafios para desenvolvimento no Brasil. CEP, 13083, 852.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Dutra, C. T., Rohan, U., Branco, R. R., Chinelli, C. K., de Araujo, A. J. V. B., & Soares, C. A. P. (2017). Barriers and challenges to the sustainability requirements implementation in public procurement of engineering works and services. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2017.71001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Pereira, S. C. F., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2018). Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018(134), 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction - The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to sustainable construction In the ghanaian construction industry: Consultants perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Devolepment, 7(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n1p134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastofski, D. C., González, M. A. S., & Kern, A. P. (2017). Sustainability analysis of housing developments through the Brazilian environmental rating system Selo Casa Azul. Habitat International, 67, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandia, J. (2016). Finding the missing link: Examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016(124), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019). Sustainable public procurement: The impact of ability, motivation, and opportunity on the implementation of different types of sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11(19), 5215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. Y., & Hsu, W. T. (2011). Framework development for state-level appraisal indicators of sustainable construction. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 28(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2010.502964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, X., Ann, T. W., & Wu, Z. (2017). A comparative analysis of site planning and design among green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2015). Pesquisa Anual da Industria da Construção - PAIC. Retrieved Apr 18, 2018 from, Avaiable athttps://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas-novoportal/economicas/industria/9018-pesquisa-anual-da-industria-da-construcao.html?edicao=15591&t=resultados

  • Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais - IPRI (2017). As 15 maiores economias do mundo. Retrieved Feb 22, 2018 from, Avaiable athttp://www.funag.gov.br/ipri/index.php/indicadores/47-estatisticas/94-as-15-maiores-economias-do-mundo-em-pib-e-pib-ppp

  • Illankoon, I. C. S., Tam, V. W., Le, K. N., & Shen, L. (2017). Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M., & Hewage, K. (2017). Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3592–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnava, S. M., Rostami, R., Valipour, A., Ismail, M., & Rahmat, A. R. (2016). Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibwami, N., & Tutesigensi, A. (2016). Enhancing sustainable construction in the building sector in Uganda. Habitat International, 57, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEED - Lidership in Energy and Environmental Design - (2017) Retrieved Nov 29, 2017 from, Avaiable athttps://new.usgbc.org/leed/

  • Medineckiene, M., Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Sustainable construction taking into account the building impact on the environment. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 18(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2010.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mélon, L. (2020). More than a nudge? Arguments and tools for mandating green public procurement in the EU. Sustainability, 2020(12), 988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicament, 6(7), e1000097.

  • Nguyen, B. K., & Altan, H. (2011). Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Engineering, 21, 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmujoki, A., ParikkaAlhola, K., & Ekroos, A. (2010). Green public procurement: Analysis on the use of environmental criteria in contracts. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 19(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00681.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, O., Chowdhury, N., & Goswami, A. (2007). State of play in sustainable public procurement. Winnipeg.

  • Pero, M., Moretto, A., Bottani, E., & Bigliardi, B. (2017). Environmental collaboration for sustainability in the construction industry: An exploratory study in Italy. Sustainability, 9(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, O., de la Fuente, A., & Aguado, A. (2016). The use of MIVES as a sustainability assessment MCDM method for architecture and civil engineering applications. Sustainability, 8(5), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: Challenges and benefits. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(6), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: Current practices, drivers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rwelamila, P. D., Talukhaba, A. A., & Ngowi, A. B. (2000). Project procurement systems in the attainment of sustainable construction. Sust. Dev., 8(1), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBTool - Sustainable Built Tool (2017). Retrieved Nov 2, 2017 from, Avaiable athttp://www.iisbe.org/sbmethod/

  • Sourani, A. (2008). Realising sustainable construction through procurement stratergies (Doctoral dissertation, © Amr Sourani). Dissertation, Loughborough University, UK.

  • SOURANI, A. and SOHAIL, M., (2011). Barriers to addressing sustainable construction in public procurement strategies. Proceedings of the Inst. of Civ. Eng.: Eng. Sustainability, 164 (4), pp. 229 - 237. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2011.164.4.229

  • Green Star - Green Building Council Australia (2017). Retrieved Dec 9, 2017 from, Avaiable at https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/.

  • Stival, C. E., & da Silva Sottoriva, P. R. (2016). Sistema de Avaliação Ambiental para Projetos de Edificações Públicas (SAAPE): análise dos critérios de sustentabilidade de três projetos de edificações elaborados para a Universidade Federal do Paraná. Desenvolv. e Meio Ambiente. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v36i0.42963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, C. M., Tam, V. W., & Tsui, W. S. (2004). Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribunal de Contas da União -TCU (2014). Obras Públicas - Recomendações Básicas para a Contratação e Fiscalização de Obras de Edificações Públicas - 4ª edição. Retrieved Jan 25, 2018 from Avaiable at http://portal.tcu.gov.br/biblioteca-digital/

  • Van der Heijden, J., & Van Bueren, E. (2013). Regulating sustainable construction in Europe: An inquiry into the European Commission’s harmonization attempts. International Journal of Law in the Built Environments, 5(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451311312793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnäs, A., Balfors, B., & Faith-Ell, C. (2009). Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(13), 1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilhena, J. M. (2007). Diretrizes para a sustentabilidade das edificações. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, 2(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.4237/gtp.v2i1.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangel, J., Wallhagen, M., Malmqvist, T., & Finnveden, G. (2016). Certification systems for sustainable neighbourhoods: What do they really certify? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Chau, K. W., Lu, W., Shen, L., Shuai, C., & Chen, J. (2018). Decoupling relationship between economic output and carbon emission in the Chinese construction industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 71, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2020). Construction of bid evaluation index system in Government Public Project Green procurement in China based on D-S evidence theory. Sustainability, 2020(12), 651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, X., & Moon, S. (2014). Hierarchical evaluation of on-site environmental performance to enhance a green construction operation. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 31(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2012.749871

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Fluminense Federal University (Universidade Federal Fluminense),, Rua Passos da Pátria 156 – São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, CEP, 24210-240, Brazil

    Rogério Moreno Perlingeiro, Mayra Soares Pereira Lima Perlingeiro & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares

Authors
  1. Rogério Moreno Perlingeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mayra Soares Pereira Lima Perlingeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogério Moreno Perlingeiro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 9 Structure of criteria for the assessment of sustainability in public works
Full size table

9 and

Table 10 Summary of assessment by type of construction
Full size table

10

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perlingeiro, R.M., Perlingeiro, M.S.P.L. & Soares, C.A.P. Criteria for the assessment of sustainability of public constructions. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 15450–15493 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01306-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01306-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation