Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contributions for the use of qualitative indicators: an analysis of Itaipu Power Plant’s Sustainability Program

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, we have been witnessing a change in the impact and repercussions sustainability issues have on society. For governments and corporations alike, sustainability is a high priority theme connected to strategy. Biodiversity conservation is considered a national security matter by many countries. In this perspective and due to its complexity, the concern with the evaluation of sustainability programs becomes increasingly implicit. There is a growing trend toward the advocacy of participative governance, which takes into account the perceptions of people affected by programs and actions, including that of communities, in decision-making. In this context, the objective of this study is to analyze some environmental programs based on Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant’s strategic sustainability plan, considering existing quantitative indicators, and proposing complementary qualitative ones. This program was analyzed using a qualitative research approach, including interviews, analysis of reports, and technical visits (in situ observation). It was observed that the program includes permanent and integrated actions for the protection of regional biodiversity, operating based on a participatory management system, involving both governmental bodies and civil society. From the point of view of results, we could identify separable tangible results and proposed qualitative indicators which will contribute to a more complete evaluation of the program, such as: involvement of local population, improvement of the ecosystem and biodiversity, and empowerment of aforementioned population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: prepared by the authors based on the Bell and Morse model (2001)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo (Edição revista e actualizada) (p. 70). Lisboa: Edições.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environment, 6(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2011). Sustainable development indicators: The Tyranny of methodology revisited. The Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 222–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohringer, C., & Jochem, P. E. P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable: A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, P.M. (2008) Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue. S.A.P.I.EN.S, 1(1). http://sapiens.revues.org/166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. (2014) Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. In Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2023. Brasília: MME/EPE.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P., & Pinfield, L. T. (1998). As organizações e a biosfera: Ecologia e meio ambiente. In S. Clegg, et al. (Eds.), Handbook de estudos organizacionais. Atlas: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2001). Canibais com garfo e faca. São Paulo: Makron Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 2833–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2010). Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(4), 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, A. C. (2004). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social (6º ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: Introduction and reflection on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Katoch, S. S. (2014). Sustainability indicators for run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects in hydro rich regions of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35(3), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liern, V., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2018). Ranking corporate sustainability: A flexible multidimensional approach based on linguistic variables. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(3), 1081–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Zuo, G., Sun, Z., Zillante, G., & Chen, X. (2013). Sustainability in hydropower development—A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19(1), 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luis, J., Sidek, L. M., Desa, M. N., & Julien, P. Y. (2013). Sustainability of hydropower as source of renewable and clean energy. In 4th International conference on energy and environment (p. 1–4). IOP Publishing.

  • Meijers, M. H., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). RETRACTED: Me tomorrow, the others later: How perspective fit increases sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1(31), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MME. (2015). Ministério de Minas e Energia. Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2024. Brasília: MME/EPE. Retrived from: http://www.epe.gov.br/pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/Plano-Decenal-de-Expansao-de-Energia-2024.

  • Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Project Appraisal, 32(1), 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munck, L. (2013). Gestão da sustentabilidade nas organizações–Um novo agir frente à lógica das competências. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R., Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Simonetti, S., & Monzoni, M. (2015). Sustainability indexes: Why join in? A study of the ‘Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE)’ in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96(1), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Argueta, A., González-Zamora, A., & Contreras-Hernández, A. (2016). A framework and indicators for evaluating policies for conservation and development: The case of wildlife management units in Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poupart, J., Deslauriers, J. P., Groulx, L. H., Laperriere, A., Mayer, R., & Pires, A. (2014). A pesquisa qualitativa: Enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59, 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M., & Lee, H. (2001). Indicators of sustainability as a tool in agricultural development: Partitioning scientific and participatory processes. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 8(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triviños, A. N. (1997). A pesquisa qualitativa em educação: o positivismo, a fenomenologia, o marxismo. São Paulo: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S. (2011). Assessment of sustainability using multi-grade fuzzy approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13(3), 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenhals, S., Garner, W., Duckers, L., & Kuhn, K. (2014). Sustainability index with integrated indicator dependencies. Business, Management and Education, 12(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo. Porto Alegre: Planejamento e métodos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijp, M. C., Heijungs, R., Van Der Voet, E., Van De Meent, D., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Hollander, A., et al. (2015). An identification key for selecting methods for sustainability assessments. Sustainability, 7(1), 2490–2512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Itaipu Binacional, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, 80215901, Brazil

    Fabricio Baron Mussi

  2. Federal University of Maranhão, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, 80215901, Brazil

    Aline Alvares Melo

  3. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, R. Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, 80215901, Brazil

    Ubiratã Tortato

Authors
  1. Fabricio Baron Mussi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aline Alvares Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ubiratã Tortato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabricio Baron Mussi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mussi, F.B., Melo, A.A. & Tortato, U. Contributions for the use of qualitative indicators: an analysis of Itaipu Power Plant’s Sustainability Program. Environ Dev Sustain 20 (Suppl 1), 109–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0196-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0196-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation