Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of sustainability using multi-grade fuzzy approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to report a research that has been carried out for assessing the sustainability of an organization using multi-grade fuzzy approach. Sustainability refers to the capability of an organization to maintain environmental safety and minimise resource utilisation. A sustainability model incorporated with multi-grade fuzzy approach has been designed. Subsequently, data gathered from a manufacturing organization has been substituted in the model and the improvement areas for enhancing the sustainability of the organization have been derived. The implementation study revealed that the organization is sustainable. But still, scope exists for improving sustainability of the organization. The usage of the model contributed in this project indicates the sustainability of the organization as well as the actions required to enhance its sustainability level. This process will accelerate the absorption of the sustainability characteristics of the modern organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afgan NH, Darwish M, Carvalho MG (1999) Sustainability assessment of desalination plants for water production. Desalination 124:19–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amekudzi AA, Khisty CJ, Khayesi M (2009) Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems. Transp Res 43:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto LD, Klemes J (2009) The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process. J Clean Prod 17:900–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner N, Starkl M (2004) Decision aid systems for evaluating sustainability: a critical survey. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:441–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderon EJ (2000) An applied method for the assessment of sustainability of urban pilot projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen ZM, Zhou Y, Zhou JB, Chen GQ (2009) Emergy as embodied energy based assessment for local sustainability of a constructed wetland in Beijing. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 14:622–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi ACK, Kaebernick K, Lai WH (1997) Manufacturing processes modelling for environmental impact assessment. J Mater Process Technol 70:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaebernic H, Kara S, Sun M (2003) Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 19:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YJ, Huang CM (2007) Sustainability index for Taipei. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:505–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg LY (2007) Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Design 28:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R (2008) Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. J Clean Product 16(17):1838–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2005) Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble BF (2002) The Canadian experience with SEA and sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope J, Annandale D, Saundersb AM (2004) Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Pulselli FM, Bastianoni S (2007) Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy Build 39:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz J (2000) Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert K-H (2000) Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? J Clean Prod 8:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ticehurst JL, Newham LTH, Rissik D, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2007) A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Model Softw 22:1129–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Divinagracia L, Divinagracia R (2009) Evaluating firm’s sustainable production indicators in uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 57:1393–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugwua OO, Haupt TC (2007) Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability—a South African construction industry perspective. Build Environ 42:665–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Binder CS (2005) Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:589–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K, Halada K (2001) Materials development for a sustainable society. Mater Design 22:143–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Vinodh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinodh, S. Assessment of sustainability using multi-grade fuzzy approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13, 509–515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0333-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0333-1

Keywords

Navigation