Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A note on CO2 emissions using two new tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Recent research suggests that policies implementing structural change are required to alter the paths of carbon dioxide emissions in many nations. This note provides additional support for this view, allowing for smooth shifts in the deterministic part of the stochastic process. A Fourier wavelet unit root test indicates that in many countries, a temporary shock to emissions will have a permanent impact, whereas tests that examine fractional integration around a smooth break with de-trending indicate that a shock to emissions will have a transitory impact. Policies that induce structural changes are required to place emissions on a downward path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Shahbaz and Sinha (2019), Sephton (2020, 2022) among others.

  2. See Solarin et al (2022) and Fernandez-Amador et al. (2022) for examples.

  3. We thank an anonymous referee for suggesting we include a summary of the current literature: it is relegated to the Supplementary Appendix for brevity.

  4. See Erdogan and Solarin (2021).

  5. Here both the AIC and BIC are employed, with the maximum lag set following a revised version of Schwert (1989) given that the test is performed on the low-frequency component of the series which is half the length of the original variable (T). Hence the maximum lag was set as floor (12 ((T//2)/100)0.25).

  6. In the case of the t test on the Fourier term this is two tailed test that could be positive or negative with similar quantiles on either side of the distribution.

  7. For instance, Pata and Aydin (2022) examine G7 nations on a longer time span and find that CO2 emissions polices will have permanent effects in all nations. They also employ asymptotic critical values in their analysis which may also explain the differences. For brevity Table 1 only contains the bootstrapped probability values, extended information appears in the Supplementary Appendix.

References

  • Barassi M, Spagnolo N, Zhao Y (2018) Fractional integration versus structural change: testing the convergence of CO2 emissions. Environ Resource Econ 71:923–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden T, Marland G, Andres R (1999) Global, regional and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions (1751–2014) vol 2017. Carbon Dixoxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimates for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolado J, Gonzalo J, Mayoral L (2002) A fractional Dickey–Fuller test for unit roots. Econometrica 70:1963–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan S, Solarin S (2021) Stochastic convergence in carbon emissions based on a new Fourier-based wavelet unit root test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21887–21899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Amador F, Oberdabernig D, Tomberger P (2022) Do methane emissions converge? Evidence from global panel data on production- and consumption-based Emissions. Empir Econ 63:877–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omay T, Baleanu D (2021) Fractional unit-root tests allowing for a fractional frequency flexible Fourier form trend: predictability of Covid-19. Adv Differ Equ. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03317-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm F, Smeekes S, Urbain J (2011) Cross-sectional dependence robust block bootstrap panel unit root tests. J Econ 163:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata U, Aydin M (2022) Persistance of CO2 emissions in G7 countries: a different outlook from wavelet-based linear and non-linear unit root tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23284-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Avila D, Omay T (2022) Are CO2 emissions stationary after all? New evidence from nonlinear unit root tests. Environ Model Assess 27:621–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert W (1989) Tests for unit roots: a monte carlo investigation. J Bus Econ Statisics 7(2):147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sephton P (2020) Mean reversion in CO2 emissions: the need for structural change. Environ Resour Econ 75(4):953–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sephton P (2022) Further evidence of mean reversion in CO2 emissions. World Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sephton P (2023) Finite sample lag adjusted critical values and probability values for the Fourier wavelet unit root test. Comput Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10458-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environomental kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A Literature Survey. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin S, Erdogan S, Bello M (2022) Convergence analysis of ammonia emissions by sector and fuel source in OECD countries from 1750 to 2019 using a new Fourier-centric wavelet approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:74276–74293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21007-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sephton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Paul Raschky.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 890 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sephton, P., Omay, T. A note on CO2 emissions using two new tests. Empirica 50, 933–941 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-023-09584-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-023-09584-x

Keywords

Navigation