Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of inflation targeting in retrospect

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both inflation and inflation expectations declined considerably in the inflation targeting countries during the past two decades. The questions of whether this decline has actually been an outcome of inflation targeting solely and whether inflation targeting has been successful in stabilizing other macroeconomic variables though remain. This study considers these questions on the basis of 16 inflation targeting countries and 21 non-targeting ones using a difference-in-difference approach. With regard to the baseline period of 1996–1999 during which neither of the groups was implementing inflation targeting, a difference-in-difference approach was employed to assess the effects of inflation targeting on inflation, output growth, real exchange rates, inflation volatility and real exchange rate volatility during moving 4-year periods between 2007 and 2015. Our estimates suggest that inflation targeting was superior in terms of harnessing inflation as well as inflation volatility. In terms of economic growth, however, inflation targeting seems to be neutral and in terms of real exchange rates it seems not to be stabilizing, if not de-stabilizing. A hybrid version of inflation targeting, namely the conventional inflation targeting augmented by an improved capacity to deliver macro-prudence as in the post-Lehman economic climate, can therefore be viewed as the best available policy alternative for the upcoming decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The inflation targeting countries with their years of adoption are as follows: New Zealand (1990), Canada (1991), United Kingdom (1992), Sweden (1993), Australia (1993), Czech Republic (1997), Israel (1997), Poland (1998), Brazil (1999), Chile (1999), Colombia (1999), South Africa (2000), Thailand (2000), South Korea (2001), Mexico (2001), Iceland (2001), Norway (2001), Hungary (2001), Peru (2002), Philippines (2002), Guatemala (2005), Indonesia (2005), Romania (2005), Turkey (2006), Serbia (2006), Ghana (2007) and the Euro area countries, common monetary policy of which is conducted by the European Central Bank.

  2. From a technical point of view, inflation targeting central banks announce official inflation targets and their mandates attribute topmost priority to those targets. Everyday conduct of monetary policy, though, is based on continuous surveillance of economic data and periodic forecasts which function as a dynamic compass for monetary authorities. Svensson (1997, 1998) and Svensson and Woodford (2003) can be seen for technicalities of inflation-forecast targeting.

  3. For an overview of alternative monetary policy frameworks Blinder (1998) can be seen. Dotsey (2006) provides a neat review of inflation targeting in the developed economies; for an assessment of inflation targeting in emerging economies see Batini et al. (2005) and Gonçalves and Salles (2008).

  4. As a minor note, in the cases of monetary aggregates and reserve requirements, what was called ‘unconventional’ has been nothing but the ‘conventional’ of the mid-twentieth century macroeconomics.

  5. The assumption that the two groups start at identical points slightly complicates the graphical exposition, but the logic remains essentially the same.

References

  • Ball L, Sheridan N (2005) Does inflation targeting matter? In: Bernanke BS, Woodford M (eds) The inflation-targeting debate. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 249–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Batini N, Kuttner K, Laxton D (2005) Does inflation targeting work in emerging markets? IMF—World Economic Outlook, Chapter 4

  • Bernanke BS, Laubach T, Mishkin FS, Posen AS (1999) Inflation targeting: lessons from the international experience. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (1998) Central banking in theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno M (1990) High inflation and the nominal anchors of an open economy. NBER Working Paper Series 3518

  • Cecchetti SG, Flores-Lagunes A, Krause S (2006) Has monetary policy become more efficient? A cross-country analysis. Econ J 116:408–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotsey M (2006) A review of inflation targeting in developed countries. Fed Reserve Bank Phila Bus Rev Third Quarter:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman C (2005) Inflation targeting: some history and some issues. In: Presentation at the Central Bank of Turkey, 2 June 2005

  • Gonçalves CE, Salles JM (2008) Inflation targeting in emerging economies: what do the data say? J Dev Econ 85(1–2):312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1999) The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Rev Econ Stat 81(4):594–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DR (2002) The effect of inflation targeting on the behavior of expected inflation: evidence from an 11 country panel. J Monet Econ 49(8):1521–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumhof M (2002) A critical view of inflation targeting: crises, limited sustainability and aggregate shocks. In: Loayza N, Soto R (eds) Inflation targeting: design, performance, challenges. Central Bank of Chile, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin AT, Natalucci FM, Piger JM (2004) The macroeconomic effects of inflation targeting. Fed Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 86(4):51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Shu, Ye Haichun (2007) Does inflation targeting really make a difference? Evaluating the treatment effect of inflation targeting in seven industrial countries. J Monet Econ 54(2007):2521–2533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Shu, Ye Haichun (2009) Does inflation targeting make a difference in developing countries? J Dev Econ 89(2009):118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin FS, Schmidt-Hebbel K (2007) Does inflation targeting make a difference. In: Mishkin F, Schmidt-Hebbel K (eds) Monetary policy under inflation targeting, vol XI. Banco Central de Chile, Santiago, pp 291–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulin G (2006) Credibility with flexibility: the evolution of inflation-targeting regimes, 1990–2006. Bank Can Rev 2006(Summer):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger S (2010) Inflation targeting turns 20. Finance Dev 2010:46–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger S, Restrepo J, Garcia C (2009) Hybrid inflation targeting regimes. IMF Working Paper 09/234

  • Sherwin M (1999) Inflation targeting: 10 years on. In: Speech to the New Zealand Association of Economists Conference, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Rotorua, 1 July

  • Stock JH (1991) Confidence Intervals for the largest autoregressive root in U.S. macroeconomic time series. J Monet Econ 28(3):435–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson LEO (1997) Inflation forecast targeting: implementing and monitoring inflation targets. Eur Econ Rev 41(6):1111–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson LEO (1998) Inflation targeting as a monetary policy rule. NBER Working Paper Series 6790

  • Svensson LEO, Woodford M (2003) Implementing optimal policy through inflation-forecast targeting. NBER Working Paper Series 9747

  • Vega M, Winkelried D (2005) Inflation targeting and inflation behavior: a successful story? Int Cent Bank 1(3):153–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeliz Yalcin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kose, N., Yalcin, Y. & Yucel, E. Performance of inflation targeting in retrospect. Empirica 45, 197–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9357-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9357-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation