Skip to main content

Leaching and degradation of 13C2-15N-glyphosate in field lysimeters

Abstract

Glyphosate (GLYP), the globally most important herbicide, may have effects in various compartments of the environment such as soil and water. Although laboratory studies showed fast microbial degradation and a low leaching potential, it is often detected in various environmental compartments, but pathways are unknown. Therefore, the objective was to study GLYP leaching and transformations in a lysimeter field experiment over a study period of one hydrological year using non-radioactive 13C2-15N-GLYP labelling and maize cultivation. 15N and 13C were selectively measured using isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (IR-MS) in leachates, soil, and plant material. Additionally, HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was used for quantitation of GLYP and its main degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in different environmental compartments (leachates and soil). Results show low recoveries for GLYP (< 3%) and AMPA (< level of detection) in soil after the study period, whereas recoveries of 15N (11–19%) and 13C (23–54%) were higher. Time independent enrichment of 15N and 13C and the absence of GLYP and AMPA in leachates indicated further degradation. 15N was enriched in all compartments of maize plants (roots, shoots, and cobs). 13C was only enriched in roots. Results confirmed rapid degradation to further degradation products, e.g., 15NH4+, which plausibly was taken up as nutrient by plants. Due to the discrepancy of low GLYP and AMPA concentrations in soil, but higher values for 15N and 13C after the study period, it cannot be excluded that non-extractable residues of GLYP remained and accumulated in soil.

Introduction

Glyphosate (GLYP) is an important herbicide in the world, annually > 1 million tonnes are applied (Richmond 2018). GLYP reaches the soil either by direct spraying or indirectly by release through plant roots (Neumann et al. 2006; Laitinen et al. 2007). Rapid microbial degradation has been reported in soil, leading to the most predominant degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). This pathway has been documented extensively and was reviewed by Borggaard and Gimsing (2008). Degradation products can further react to CO2 and NH4+. Degradation rates for GLYP vary significantly and half-life values from 2 to 180 days have been reported (Borggaard and Gimsing 2008; Tang et al. 2019). GLYP can interact strongly with organic and inorganic molecules at a variety of binding sites such as (i) the soil organic matter, e.g., peptides, carbohydrates, or phenolic structures (Gros et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2018) or (ii) mineral surfaces, e.g., goethite or montmorillonite, as has been demonstrated in laboratory experiments and quantum chemical modeling (Morillo et al. 1997; Ahmed et al. 2017). These interactions lead to strong and high sorption, as has been shown in laboratory batch sorption experiments (Dion et al. 2001; Okada et al. 2016; Gros et al. 2017). Although strong sorption and degradation are antagonistic effects, both are supported under normal or low tillage soil management and should prevent GLYP from distributing through soil (Kjær et al. 2005; Bergström et al. 2011). Contrary to this assumption, GLYP frequently has been detected in ground and surface water (Coupe et al. 2012) even above the regulatory limit of 0.1 μg L−1 in the EU (Van Stempvoort et al. 2014; Skeff et al. 2015). The mechanisms of GLYP translocation from place of application through the drainage system into waterways and estuaries are still unclear but need to be understood for preventing these undesired translocations.

Lysimeters are suitable research facilities that enable monitoring and assessing of nutrient or pollutant balances in disturbed or undisturbed soil columns (Führ et al. 1998). Only a few field lysimeter experiments have been conducted with non-labeled GLYP (Malone et al. 2004), where leachate waters were analyzed through fluorescence detection after derivatization of the analyte. In the laboratory, lysimeter experiments with GLYP often have been conducted using non-stable, radioactive 14C isotopic labelling, which provides advantages of sensitive quantitation and recovery by scintillation (e.g., Al-Rajab et al. 2008). Safety restrictions for the use of radioactively labeled substances make it necessary to evaluate experimental data from laboratory experiments under more practically relevant field conditions. Utilization of 13C2-15N-GLYP (GLYPi), which contains stable isotopes, combines the advantages of non-radioactive GLYP for field studies with the sensitivity of labelling (in analogy to 14C-GLYP) for environmental monitoring in laboratory experiments (Muskus et al. 2019). Using that non-radioactively labeled GLYPi enables the detection using isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (IR-MS) complementary to high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) for environmental measurements of extractable residues of GLYPi and AMPAi. This experimental approach has not been applied in field lysimeter studies so far. Therefore, we hypothesize that the methodological approach with GLYPi, IR-MS, and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS enables to study the fate and possible translocation of GLYP under field conditions.

Material and methods

The leaching experiment was set up in two field lysimeters (non-weighing zero tension), which were installed in the Lysimeter Station at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ (Falkenberg, Germany; 52°51′ N, 11°48′ E). These lysimeters were constructed in 1981 in sheet steel vessels with cuboid shape of 1 × 1 m surface area and 1.25 m depth. The lysimeters were filled with sandy loam (0–30 cm topsoil: 74% sand, 14% silt, 12% clay, pH 4.8, organic C = 1.1%; 30–100 cm subsoil: 75% sand, 17% silt, 8% clay, pH 5.6, organic C = 0.2%) and an additional 25 cm-drainage layer composed of three sublayers (sand, gravel, and coarse gravel) at the bottom. The soil texture is representative for the river Elbe valley in the Federal State Saxony-Anhalt. Conventional agricultural management was oriented according to best management practice. In 2017, maize was planted which was embedded in a regionally typical crop rotation of sugar beets-winter wheat-potatoes-winter barley-maize. Details on the lysimeter site and management history have been published previously (Meissner et al. 2010; Rupp et al. 2018). The present study investigated a period of one hydrological year starting in the hydrological summer semester in May 2017. Any weeds were removed mechanically, followed by GLYPi application (2017/24/04) via spraying as a worst-case scenario. Application rate was equivalent to maximum allowed annual for Germany (3.6 kg ha−1 a−1) with practical concentration of GLYP formulations (480 g kg−1) (360 mL GLYPi, dissolved in 750 mL H2O). Drift by air flow was prevented by temporally fencing the application area with a ring of steel (1 m in height). Three days after GLYPi application, 5 L of the conservative KBr tracer solution was applied at a rate corresponding to 40 kg KBr ha−1 to each of the lysimeters to provide information on the movement of water through the soil column. Lysimeters were cultivated with maize (9 plants per lysimeter, equally spaced). No fertilizers or treatments for weeding were executed during the study period.

Sampling of leachates, soil, and plant material

Lysimeter soils were sampled from 0 to 5 cm depth (5 spots equally spaced in each lysimeter) at 4 dates over the study period (before and directly after application, 165 and 360 days after application). Soil sampling before application characterizes the basic level of GLYPi concentration, whereas the sample directly after application represents 100% of initial GLYPi. To keep the soil column intact, samples from the whole topsoil (0–30 cm) and the subsoil (30–60 cm) were taken only at the end (day 360 after application) of the study period. Soil samples were air dried and sieved (2 mm). Subsamples of the sieved soils were finely ground for further measurement with IR-MS. Residues of GLYPi and AMPAi were extracted from 5 g of the sieved soil in 40 mL of a 1 M KOH solution (shaking overnight and centrifugation for 10 min at 1558 g) and stored at − 20 °C until quantitation via HPLC-ESI-MS/MS.

Leachates were collected weekly in polyethylene canisters and volumes were recorded. Subsamples of 150 mL were taken and stored in a freezer at − 20 °C in 3 × 50 mL centrifuge tubes for further measurements with ion chromatography (IC) and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. A total of 50 mL of each sample were lyophilized to dryness (− 50 °C, 0.025 mbar; Christ Alpha 1-4, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, D-37250 Osterode, Germany) and solid residue amounts were weighed back and stored for measurements with isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (IR-MS).

Mature maize plants (roots, shoots, and cobs) were harvested in September 2017 from the two treated lysimeters and one untreated neighboring plot as reference. Subsamples of 3 plants per lysimeter were harvested for further measurements of plant biomass. Moist weight was determined followed by drying at 60 °C and measuring of dry matter weight. Plant compartment samples (root, shoot, and cobs) were shredded and subsequently finely ground separately and stored until further measurements with IR-MS.

Sample analyses

Conservative tracer and isotope ratio analyses

Br tracer analysis in the leachate was performed using ion chromatography (column: Metrosep A SUPP 5150 × 4.0 mm, pre-column: Metrosep A SUPP 4/5 Guard, eluent: 0.3 mM Na2CO3 and 1.0 mM NaHCO3, flow: 0.7 mL min−1, separation mode: isocratic; Metrohm, D-70794 Filderstadt, Germany).

Isotopic ratios for 15N/14N and 13C/12C in soil, plant compartments, and lyophilized leachate samples were measured through the elemental analyzer (Eurovector EA, Via F.lli Cuzio 42, 27100 PAVIA, Italy; IR-MS GV-Isoprome, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Elementar-Straße 1, 63505 Langenselbold, Germany) in the Institute for Nutritional Sciences, University of Gießen, Germany. For this purpose, finely ground soil and plant samples from the two treated sites and one untreated site (reference) were measured in triplicates. Lyophilized leachate samples from lysimeter leachates were measured in duplicates. Equations 1 and 2 show the calculation of δ15N and δ13C derived from isotopic ratios of the sample in relation to defined standard isotopic ratios from air for N and Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) for C; values are generally given in ‰.

$$ {\delta}^{13}C=\left(\frac{{\left({}^{13}C/{}^{12}C\right)}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{\left({}^{13}C/{}^{12}C\right)}_{\mathrm{PDB}}}-1\right) $$
(1)
$$ {\delta}^{15}N=\left(\frac{{\left({}^{15}N/{}^{14}N\right)}_{\mathrm{sample}}}{{\left({}^{15}N/{}^{14}N\right)}_{\mathrm{air}}}-1\right). $$
(2)

GLYPi and AMPAi analyses

Soil extracts and leachate samples were analyzed for GLYPi and AMPAi with HPLC-ESI-MS/MS after derivatization with fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl), as described in Wirth et al. (2019). The utilized system was composed of an LC-2040C Nexera-i and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer LCMS-8060 (Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) equipped with a heated ESI-source. The FMOC derivatives were separated on a Gemini 3 μm NX-C18 column (Column 1: 150 × 2 mm, Aschaffenburg, Phenomenex, Germany).

Non-isotope-labeled GLYP (LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) was used as internal standard for GLYPi (Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) quantitation. Since AMPAi is not commercially available as a standard substance, no HPLC-ESI-MS/MS-optimization and, thus, no calibration could be carried out for this compound. Therefore, AMPAi was determined only qualitatively. Analytes were detected in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The MRM transitions were determined and optimized utilizing standard compounds (Table 1). However, as AMPAi is not commercially available, instrumental MRM optimization for AMPAi-FMOC could not be performed. Therefore, the settings for the MRM transitions for this compound were chosen as follows: optimization was carried out for 13C-15N-AMPA-FMOC and AMPA-FMOC (LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) and their fragmentation patterns were utilized to derive the expected masses of the precursor and product ions for 15N-AMPA-FMOC (AMPAi-FMOC). Further parameters of the MRM transitions were set by averaging values for 13C-15N-AMPA-FMOC and AMPA-FMOC (Table 1).

Table 1 Measurement modes for identification and quantitation of 13C2-15N-glyphosate and 15N-aminomethylphosphonic acid using high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS)

To further verify that the targeted and detected compound was the 15N-AMPA-FMOC, a selection of samples was additionally separated on a different LC-column (Column 2: Kinetex 2.6 μm EVO C18 100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany). The proposed AMPAi-FMOC was eluted from both columns at similar retention times as AMPA-FMOC (Table 1) which confirms its presence. Due to the lack of an AMPAi-FMOC calibration, these data could be evaluated only semi-quantitatively. Quantitation of GLYPi was carried out through weighting with the glyphosate internal standard signal.

Results and discussion

Precipitation and leachate analysis

The study period from May 2017 to April 2018 was characterized by overall high amounts of precipitation that exceeded the monthly 30-year mean values (1981–2010) for this region, except for the months May, September, and February. Especially, June and July were characterized by heavy rainfall events that summed up to 123 and 125 mm per month precipitation, greatly exceeding the mean values of 57 ± 22 mm (June) and 61 ± 32 mm (July). These events resulted in large amounts of leachate in July 2017 (60.4 and 66.3 L). Weekly leachate amounts, collected from May 2017 until July 2017 to December 2017 until April 2018, had a mean volume of 5.1 L per week. For the period from August 2017 to November 2017, no leachates were received although precipitation occurred, most likely because of transpiration and water uptake by plants. Total volumes of leachates for the two lysimeters were 203 and 215 L over the study period. The Br-breakthrough started in week 10 after application, where 35 and 37 L of leachate were received in the two tested lysimeters. Residues from the conservative tracer KBr were detected later on in all leachates. Due to the occurrence of Br in the leachates after 10 weeks and its slowly increasing concentrations over the following weeks along with continually received leachates, the main transport mechanism through the soil column can be assumed as matrix flow for the studied period.

For the natural 15N background representing the ratio of 15N/14N of the air nitrogen, the δ15N has been set to 0 (Fig. 1a). Discrepancies towards higher values indicate an enrichment of 15N. In the first 2 weeks after application, a strong decrease of leachate δ15N to negative values was detected, indicating an enrichment of 14N. In the following weeks 3 to 10, the δ15N in the leachate was constant between 0 and 1.7‰, and it increased over time from week 11 after GLYPi application. After the period with no leachates, the trend of δ15N had a sigmoidal shape with an assumed maximum limit of about 50‰ for the last 10 weeks of the experimental period. This maximum level corresponds to a mass rate of about 10 μg 15N week−1 of leached GLYPi active ingredient equivalent or its N-containing degradation products.

Fig. 1
figure 1

δ15N (a) and δ13C (b) values for lyophilized leachates over the one-year study period in lysimeter 1 (Lys1) and lysimeter 2 (Lys2) and mean values (continuous line)

Values for δ13C started at about − 8‰ and fluctuated between − 12 and − 6‰ for the first 10 weeks before they strongly increased and reached values of − 2.6 and − 0.5‰ in the two lysimeters (Fig. 1b). After the period with no leachates, the δ13C started at lower levels of − 8.9 and − 2.1 in lysimeters 1 and 2, respectively. The trend of increasing δ13C values starting at − 5.5‰ went on and ended at −2.3‰ for the remaining 20 weeks of the study, although with a less steep slope than in the first experimental phase.

Trends of 13C and 15N originating from GLYPi in the leachate (Fig. 1) did not correlate, which may be an indication for an independent movement of these isotopes through the soil column. Also, IR-MS cannot distinguish between GLYPi and its degradation products, but simultaneous occurrence and parallel trend would be an indication for a displacement of intact GLYPi, which appears unlikely from these data. The analyses for GLYPi and AMPAi using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS in the leachates showed no occurrence of residues of these compounds above detection limits (0.1 μg L−1). Therefore, the leached 15N and 13C residues are most likely no constituents of intact GLYPi or AMPAi but originated from further degradation products.

Soil analyses

The concentrations of GLYPi, 15N and 13C in the lysimeter soils derived from HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and IR-MS, respectively, were normalized and set to 100% since GLYPi was not detectable in soil extracts sampled before GLYPi application (data not shown) (Fig. 2a). The δ15N decreased within 165 days after application to 24 and 29% of the initial value and decreased further to 11 and 19% until the end of the study period. This indicates that amounts of the added artificial 15N isotopes in soil decreased over time. The same was true for δ13C which decreased down to 30 and 66% compared with the initial value and ended at 23 and 54% in the two lysimeters (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Development of δ15N (a), δ13C (b), and 13C2-15N-glyphosate (c) in topsoil samples compared with initial values (set to 100%) over the studied period in lysimeter 1 (Lys1) and lysimeter 2 (Lys2)

Measurement of the GLYPi residues through HPLC-ESI-MS/MS showed that about 4 and 6% of the initial GLYPi concentration remained in the soil after 165 days and the recovery decreased further down to 1 and 3% in the two lysimeters until the end of the study (Fig. 2c). AMPAi was detected in the topsoil extracts of all samples after application (Suppl. Fig. S1), and GLYPi and AMPAi were not detected in the subsoil (results not shown). This indicates that AMPAi had not been formed, and GLYPi was already decomposed by microorganisms or scarcely displaced from surface into subsoil. Therefore, leaching of GLYPi or AMPAi can be considered as insignificant in this experiment and rapid degradation to further products most likely happened. This confirms Borggaard and Gimsing (2008) who reported a fast GLYP degradation and limited leaching through soil. Nevertheless, it is still possible that strongly bound non-extractable, and therefore non-detected residues of GLYPi or AMPAi could have remained in soil too, partly explaining the higher amounts of 13C and 15N after 165 and 360 days (Fig. 2a and b).

Plant material analyses

15N was enriched highly significantly (p < 0.01) in all sampled plant compartments (root, 39 ± 10‰ and 54 ± 16; shoot, 28 ± 13‰ and 51 ± 16‰; cob, 34 ± 12‰ and 51 ± 14‰) compared with reference plant parts from a lysimeter that was not treated with GLYPi (root, 2.5 ± 1.6‰; shoot, 2.0 ± 0.9‰; cob, 4.0 ± 1.9‰) (Fig. 3). By comparison, 13C was highly significantly enriched only in the plant roots from the two lysimeters treated with GLYPi (− 12.75 ± 0.07‰ and − 12.84 ± 0.06‰) compared with maize roots from the lysimeter with no herbicide treatment (− 13.03 ± 0.08‰). In contrast, 13C was significantly depleted (p < 0.01) in the cob material of plants from lysimeters with GLYPi treatment (− 23.24 ± 0.18‰ and − 24.06 ± 0.96‰) compared with those with no treatment (− 22.84 ± 0.25‰). There was not a significant difference in the shoots between the treated (− 13.69 ± 0.06‰ and − 13.58 ± 0.05‰) and non-treated lysimeters (− 13.56 ± 0.45‰).

Fig. 3
figure 3

δ15N and δ13C mean values in plant material of roots, shoots, and cobs of maize plants of the tested lysimeter 1(Lys1), lysimeter 2 (Lys2), and a reference lysimeter (LysRef)

The enrichment of 15N in roots, shoots, and cobs can result only from uptake from the soil and distribution through the plant. Since 15N is bound in GLYPi or its 15N containing degradation products (Fig. 4), those degradation products must have acted as plant nutrients. Furthermore, as plants do not take up organic substances like GLYPi or AMPAi over the root system, the occurrence of 15N can be plausibly explained only by an uptake of mineral 15N (15NH4+ and/or 15NO3) as mineralized degradation products from GLYPi, which are formed by microbial degradation in the rhizosphere (Duke et al. 2012).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Degradation pathways of isotopic labeled 13C2-15N-glyphosate (GLPi) and its main degradation product 15N-aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPAi) with indicated positions of labelling (modified from Giesy et al. 2000)

The enrichment of 13C in the roots compared with plants from the non-treated lysimeter may either be a result of uptake or attachment to this plant compartment. The possibility of 13C uptake should be excluded, since neither organic substances like GLYPi or AMPAi can be taken up by plant roots, nor were these substances further distributed into other plant compartments. Also, mineralized species of 13C like 13CO2 originating from GLYPi degradation cannot be taken up by the roots. Therefore, enrichment of 13C species is explained by attachment, possibly due to mycorrhizal fungi associated with the maize roots (Bott et al. 2011) that utilize organic substances as nutrients for growth.

In summary, since (i) 15N has been taken up by the maize roots and distributed into all plant compartments and (ii) 13C is only associated with the plant roots, the interaction of these labeled atoms with the plants most plausibly resulted from the independent interaction of the inorganic degradation products of GLYPi. 13CO2 and 15NH3 as the inorganic end-products of the degradation process can be emitted via the air path. This was shown for 14C labeled GLYP (Grundmann et al. 2008). But since (i) 15NH3 is water-soluble and forms 15NH4+ in soil solution and (ii) 15N was taken up by plants, it is rather unlikely for inorganic N to be emitted into the air.

Summarizing discussion

Comparing the present approach with an overview of most important published GLYP-lysimeter studies, the compilation in Table 2 shows that most experiments have been conducted with radioactive labelling of GLYP (n = 6) in the laboratory or with non-labeled GLYP (n = 3). Among the latter studies, only two reflected field conditions. Filtered leachates for GLYP residues have been analyzed in all studies, but only four (Al-Rajab et al. 2008; Grundmann et al. 2008; Klier et al. 2008; Bergström et al. 2011) additionally analyzed extracted GLYP residues or its degradation products in soil. Thus, the present study was designed in detail so that field conditions are reflected and also all relevant compartments are considered.

Table 2 Literature data of methods for lysimeter studies using glyphosate of different labelling

In the present study, concentrations of extracted GLYPi-residues were low in soil at the end of the study period compared with the initial concentrations at the beginning. But fractions of 15N and 13C above extracted GLYPi-residues indicate that either non-extractable GLYPi is still left and/or further degradation products accumulated in soil. The latter explanation agrees with Al-Rajab et al. (2008), Grundmann et al. (2008), and Klier et al. (2008), who found low amounts of GLYP that remained in soil due to degradation of GLYP. Residues of GLYP and AMPA remained in topsoil (Bergström et al. 2011) and were either accumulated by organisms in the rhizosphere with low risk of leaching (Grundmann et al. 2008; Klier et al. 2008) or have been sorbed to soil particles with a risk of leaching (Al-Rajab et al. 2008).

The 13C and 15N are signals of leachates (Fig. 1), but absence or low concentrated (< LOD) residues of GLYPi and AMPAi indicate that further degradation products have been leached through the soil column, which partly confirms De Jonge et al. (2000), Fomsgaard et al. (2003), and Dousset et al. (2004). In contrast, leaching of GLYP and AMPA in lysimeters was reported for tilled soils and explained by particle transport (Fomsgaard et al. 2003; Malone et al. 2004; Kjær et al. 2005). This contradiction may result from different experimental designs, soil properties, and management measures that support or suppress particle-bound GLYP transport (Fomsgaard et al. 2003). Furthermore, the methods applied differ in their sensitivity to detect particle-bound GLYP or AMPA in leachates or soil extracts (Table 2). For instance, HPLC only provides information on the concentration of free or extractable amounts of GLYP or AMPA (Malone et al. 2004), since filtration is mandatory before HPLC-MS/MS measurements of liquid samples. However, HPLC cannot distinguish between bound (non-extractable) GLYP and further degradation products, since only free and recoverable GLYP can be detected. Most of the lysimeter studies complied in Table 2 used single 14C labelling (radioactive), which can be assigned to GLYP or AMPA in leachates or extracts by its retention time and molecular mass and/or radioactive signal when measured by HLPC in combination with mass spectrometry and/or scintillation detection. However, molecule identification only by scintillation of solid samples is not possible, since the signal of a labeled C-atom originate come from intact GLYP or degradation products, even if the position of the labelling in the initial GLYP molecule is known. Therefore, the multi-labelling of GLYP with 15N and 13C in the present field lysimeter study, by avoiding disadvantages of previous studies, has shown (time-) independent occurrence of GLYPi decomposition products. The noncorrelated appearance of 13C and 15N signals in leachates (Fig. 1) makes the degradation pathway B in Fig. 4 rather unlikely, in agreement with Borggaard and Gimsing (2008). Instead, pathway A in Fig. 4 is supported by the noncorrelated appearance of 13C and 15N signals in leachates, among which 13C can originate from glyoxylic acid and 15N from detected AMPAi or further degradation products, such as methylamine and ammonium ions (Fig. 4). Along with small concentrations of extracted GLYPi (Fig. 2c) under practically optimal leaching conditions in the very wet hydrological year 2017/2018, the present findings indicate that rapid degradation most likely is the best explanation for the absence of concentrations below LOD of GLYPi and AMPAi in leachates, which confirms previous findings as referenced in Table 2.

Conclusions

Isotopic ratios of 13C/12C and 15N/14N and resulting changes of δ13C and δ15N from isotopically labeled glyphosate (GLYPi) and its degradation products were successfully quantified using isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (IR-MS) in different compartments (leachates, soil, and plant material) of a field lysimeter. Therefore, this experimental approach was well suited to trace GLYPi under practice-near experimental conditions.

Since (i) the great decline of GLYPi content down to < 3% of initial amounts in soil during the one-year study period and (ii) a lower decline of 13C (< 60%) and 15N (< 20%), we conclude that either further degradation products had been formed and/or non-extractable and, therefore, strongly bound GLYPi remained in soil and accumulated. The disparate increase of δ13C and δ15N values in leachates and plant material is explained plausibly by (i) rapid degradation of GLYPi within one vegetation period and, also (ii) the selective uptake of mineralized 15N species from degraded GLYPi as plant nutrient, most likely NH4+ or NO3. These findings from a wet hydrological year support the assumption that the risk of leaching of applied GLYP to other waterbodies can be considered to be low under central European climatic conditions. Accumulation in soil may enhance the risk of further distribution in the environment by soil erosion.

References

  • Ahmed, A. A., Leinweber, P., & Kühn, O. (2017). Unravelling the nature of glyphosate binding to goethite surfaces by ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20, 1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. A., Gros, P., Kühn, O., & Leinweber, P. (2018). Molecular level investigation of the role of peptide interactions in the glyphosate analytics. Chemosphere, 196, 129–134.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rajab, A. J., Amellal, S., & Schiavon, M. (2008). Sorption and leaching of 14C-glyphosate in agricultural soils. Agronomy of Sustainable Development, 28, 419–428.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, L., Börjesson, E., & Stenström, J. (2011). Laboratory and lysimeter studies of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in a sand and a clay soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borggaard, O. K., & Gimsing, A. L. (2008). Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review. Pest Management Science, 64, 441–456.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bott, S., Tesfamariam, T., Kania, A., Eman, B., Aslan, N., Römheld, V., & Neumann, G. (2011). Phytotoxicity of glyphosate soil residues re-mobilised by phosphate fertilisation. Plant and Soil, 342, 249–263.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, R. H., Kalkhoff, S. J., Capel, P. D., Gregoire (2012). Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins. Pest Management Science, 68, 16–30.

  • de Jonge, H., de Jonge, L. W., & Jacobsen, O. H. (2000). [14C]glyphosate transport in undisturbed topsoil columns. Pest Management Science, 56, 909–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, H. M., Harsh, J. B., & Hill Jr., H. H. (2001). Competitive sorption between glyphosate and inorganic phosphate on clay minerals and low organic matter soils. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 249, 385–390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dousset, S., Chauvin, C., Durlet, P., & Thévenot, M. (2004). Transfer of hexazinone and glyphosate through undisturbed soil columns in soils under Christmas tree cultivation. Chemosphere, 57, 265–272.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, S. O., Lydon, J., Koskinen, W. C., Moorman, T. B., Chaney, R. L., & Hammerschmidt, R. (2012). Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate resistant crops. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 10375–10397.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fomsgaard, I. S., Spliid, N. H., & Fielding, G. (2003). Leaching of pesticides through normal-tillage and low-tillage soil—a lysimeter study: II. Glyphosate. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, 38, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Führ, F., Hance, R. J., Plimmer, J. R., & Nelson, J. O. (1998). The lysimeter concept: environmental behaviour of pesticides (Vol. 699). ACS Symposium Series, Washington.

  • Giesy, J. P., Dobson, S., & Solomon, K. R. (2000). Ecotoxicological risk assessment for roundup® herbicide. In G. W. Ware (Ed.), Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (Vol. 167). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, P., Ahmed, A. A., Kühn, O., & Leinweber, P. (2017). Glyphosate binding in soil as revealed by sorption experiments and quantum-chemical modelling. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 527–535.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S., Dörfler, U., Ruth, B., Loos, C., Wagner, T., Karl, H., Munch, J. C., & Schroll, R. (2008). Mineralization and transfer processes of 14C-labeled pesticides in outdoor lysimeters. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8, 177–185.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, J., Olsen, P., Ullum, M., & Grant, R. (2005). Leaching of glyphosate and amino-methylphosphonic acid from Danish agricultural field sites. Journal of Environmental Qualilty, 34, 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klier, C., Grundmann, S., Gayler, S., & Priesack, E. (2008). Modelling the environmental fate of the herbicide glyphosate in soil lysimeters. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8, 187–207.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen, P., Rämö, S., & Siimes, K. (2007). Glyphosate translocation from plants to soil-does this constitute a significant proportion of residues in soil? Plant and Soil, 300(1–2), 51–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, R. W., Shipitalo, M. J., Wauchope, R. D., & Sumner, H. (2004). Residual and contact herbicide transport through field lysimeters via preferential flow. Journal of Environmental Qualilty, 33, 2141–2148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, R., Rupp, H., Seeger, J., Ollesch, G., & Gee, G. W. (2010). A comparison of water flux measurement: passive wick-samplers versus drainage lysimeters. European Journal of Soil Science, 61(4), 609–621.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, E., Undabeytia, T., & Maqueda, C. (1997). Adsorption of glyphosate on the clay mineral montmorillonite: effect of Cu(II) in solution and adsorbed on the mineral. Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 3588–3592.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muskus, A. M., Krauss, M., Miltner, A., Hamer, U., & Nowak, K. M. (2019). Effect of temperature, pH and total organic carbon variations on microbial turnover of 13C3 15N-glyphosate in agricultural soil. The Science of the Total Environment, 658, 697–707.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, G., Kohls, S., Landsberg, E., Stock-Oliveira Souza, K., Yamada, T., & Römheld, V. (2006). Relevance of glyphosate transfer to non-target plants via the rhizosphere. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 963–969 ISSN 1861-4051.

  • Okada, E., Costa, J. L., & Bedmar, F. (2016). Adsorption and mobility of glyphosate in different soils under no-till and conventional tillage. Geoderma, 263, 78–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, M. E. (2018). Glyphosate: a review of its global use, environmental impact, and potential health effects on humans and other species. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8, 416–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, H., Meissner, R., & Leinweber, P. (2018). Plant available phosphorous in soil as predicted for leaching potential: insights from long-term lysimeter studies. Ambio, 41(suppl. 1), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeff, W., Neumann, C., & Schulz-Bull, D. E. (2015). Glyphosate and AMPA in the estauries of the Baltic Sea method optimization and field study. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 100(1), 577–585.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. H. M., Jeffries, T. C., Vervoort, R. W., Conoley, C., Coleman, N. V., & Maggi, F. (2019). Microcosm experiments and kinetic modelling of glyphosate biodegradation in soils and sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 105–115.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort, D. R., Roy, J. W., Brown, J., & Bickerton, G. (2014). Residues of the herbicide glyphosate in riparian groundwater in urban catchments. Chemosphere, 95, 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M. A., Sievers, M., Habedank, F., Kragl, U., Schulz-Bull, D. E., & Kanwischer, M. (2019). Electrodialysis as a sample processing tool for bulk organic matter and target pollutant analysis of seawater. Marine Chemistry, 217, 103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103719.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Evelyn Bolzmann from the Department Soil Physics at the University of Rostock for her support in IC measurements of Br-, Melitta Stratschka from the lysimeter station Falkenberg for the support in the management and cultivation of the test sites and also Prof. Silvia Rudloff and Dr. Christian Borsch from the University of Gießen (Department of Nutritional Sciences) for their supporting measurements through IR-MS. This research was conducted within the scope of the Leibniz ScienceCampus Phosphorus Research Rostock.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL. Peter Gros acknowledges a PhD grant from the state of Mecklenburg-Western Pommerania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Gros.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1

Chromatograms of the standard substance aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA, dotted line, transition 334.2 m/z -> 178.15 m/z) from analytical standard sample and 15N-aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPAi, straight line, transition 335.2 m/z -> 178.15 m/z) from a topsoil sample extract for identification (retention time 9.47 min, vertical dashed line. (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gros, P., Meissner, R., Wirth, M.A. et al. Leaching and degradation of 13C2-15N-glyphosate in field lysimeters. Environ Monit Assess 192, 127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8045-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8045-4

Keywords

  • Pesticide
  • Fate
  • IR-MS
  • HPLC-MS/MS
  • Stable isotopes
  • Environmental detection