Introduction

In Egypt, tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum, Mill) are very popular vegetables which are utilized for both local consumption and exportation (Rakha, 2014). Tomato is one of the richest sources of minerals, vitamins and carbohydrates (Ibrahim et al., 2010). There are about 159 countries globally that produce tomatoes commercially. China is one of the biggest producers of tomato with over 59 million tons in 2017 followed by Turkey, USA, Egypt, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Nigeria, Brazil and Russia (Ong et al., 2020).

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are a serious disease/pest which parasitize the roots of tomato plants causing damages leading to significant yield losses (Abd El-Monem et al., 2016; Niu et al., 2020).

Farmers depend on synthetic nematicides to manage nematodes. Such nematicides can impact on human healthy and the environment. Nanotechnology is increasingly being investigated for use in agriculture, food industry, pharmaceuticals and medicine (Giongo et al., 2016; Alfy et al., 2020). A Nanoparticle has a size range from 1 to 100 nm and many are investigated for their ability to manage pests and diseases (Sun et al., 2014; Alfy et al., 2020).

Chitosan is a natural biopolymer which is formed by chitin deacetylation that exists in the outer shell of shrimp, shellfish, lobster or crab, as well as infungal cell walls. It was discovered in 1811 by Henri Braconnot (Chakraborty et al., 2020). Chitosan is an eco-friendly and biodegradable material (Park et al., 2008; Khalil, 2016), is cheap and easy to work with (Anitha et al., 2014; Malerba & Cerana, 2016). Moreover, chitosan is able to control viruses, bacteria, fungi, insects, plant nematodes and other pests locally and systemically (Abd El-Aziz & Khalil, 2020; Alfy et al., 2020).

Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) is a positive-sense single stranded RNA virus in the genus Tobamovirus and known as one of the most stable viruses (Silva et al., 2011; Hashemi et al., 2014; Ong et al., 2020). TMV causes severe economic losses in several crops included tomato (Abo-Zaid et al., 2020). The management of TMV is difficult because it is easily dispersed, it is transmitted mechanically, and symptoms are appearing 7 to 14 days after infction (Ara et al., 2012).

Therefore, in this study we aimed to investigate the impact of nano-chitosan on the presence of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) and Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) or their combination. We also studied their effect on morphological and physiological characteristics of tomato plants under greenhouse conditions.

Materials and methods

Nematode inoculum

The egg inoculum of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) was isolated from egg-plant roots (cv. Balady). The roots were cut into small segments (1–2 cm long), and shaken for 3 min in sodium hypochlorite (5%). The suspension was passed through 200 and 400 mesh sieves to obtain free eggs (Hussey & Barker, 1973). The eggs were washed several times with water and then counted under a stereo-microscope. The species of root-knot nematode (M. incognita) was identified by using the perineal patterns method according to Taylor and Nelscher (1974).

Source of tobacco mosaic virus inoculum

Leaf samples of tomato plants showing mosaic symptoms (Fegla et al., 2000; Aghamohammadi et al., 2011) were collected separately in plastic bags from locations in Alexandria governorate during the 2019–2020 growing seasons. Virus inoculum was prepared by grinding infected leaf tissues 1:10 (w/v) with a mortar and pestle in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), containing 0.5% of 2-mercaptoethanol. To identify TMV, the leaves of healthy Nicotiana glutinosa plants in the seedling stage were first dusted with carborundum (600 mesh) and then inoculated with a freshly prepared viral inoculum using the forefinger method, and kept in an insect proof greenhouse (Hamza et al., 2018).

Diagnostics of tobacco mosaic virus

Hosts and symptomology test

Chenopodium amaranticolor, Datura metal, Nicotiana rustica, N. glutinosa and Solanum lycopersicum (Abd El-Aziz, 2000) and Solanum melongena (Aghamohammadi et al., 2011) were used to confirm the identification of isolated virus because they give distinct symptoms. Plantlets (five replicates for each host) of each plant species were mechanically inoculated with TMV and kept under greenhouse conditions. Plants were assessed daily for about 4 weeks for symptoms expression. Inoculated plants which didn’t show any symptoms were checked for latent infection by back-inoculation to the indicator host N. glutinosa (Fegla et al., 2001).

Serological diagnostic test

Serological diagnostics was used to confirm the identification of TMV by indirect ELISA according to Abd El-Aziz and Younes (2019). Antiserum of Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) used in the serological diagnosis was supplied by the Lab. of Prof. Fath-Allah Mervat (Plant Pathology Institute, Agricultural Research Center). This Antiserum was used to discriminate Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV) and TMV (Abd El-Aziz & Younes, 2019).

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (indirect ELISA) was carried out as described by Abd El-Aziz, 2019 and Abd El-Aziz and Younes (2019). The infected and healthy leaves of tomato plants, 20 and 40 days of infection, were extracted to detect the infection by TMV. The obtained values of ELISA (Sunrise ELISA plat reader™ instrument) were expressed as absorbance at 405 nm. The absorbance values considered positive when the value was at least twice that in uninfected plants. In each set of tests, wells lacking antigen (coating buffer only) were included as controls (Abd El-Aziz, 2019).

Nano-chitosan source, preparation and SEM

Chitosan was obtained from ChitoLytic, Canada with deacetylation of 88.3% and a viscosity 70 (at 20 °C). The nanoparticles of chitosan were prepared according to the method described by Qi et al. (2004). The SEM of nano-chitosan was carried out in the electron microscopy unit of the Faculty of Science, Alexandria University. The solution of nano-chitosan was prepared by dissolving 0.225 g nano-chitosan in 150 ml distilled water blended with 0.1% glacial acetic acid (Khan et al., 2021).

The efficacy of nano-chitosan on some parameters related to induced resistance against Meloidogyne incognita, Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) and their mixture in the tissue of tomato plants

Total soluble phenol contents determination

The total soluble phenol content of tomato leaves, was extracted as described by Slinkard and Singleton (1997). The absorbance was carried out on 765 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Tuner, model 390). Total soluble phenol content was standardized against tannic acid and absorbance values were converted to μg of phenols per gram fresh weight of tomato leaves. Each value reported was the average of three replicates. The results were expressed as tannic equivalents according to the following equation:

μg tannic acid/g fresh weight = (((OD/K) ∗ (10/0.2)/0.5))

Where: OD = absorbance at 765 nm, K = the extension coefficient = 0.016898 μg-1.

Protein content

Total soluble protein was extracted from tomato leaves according to Dixon (1985) and determined according to Lowry et al. (1951). The blue color was measured at 700 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Tuner, model 390). The reading was related to standard curve prepared from known concentration of bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein.

mg protein/g fresh weight = ((OD/K) *100)/0. 5)/1000), Where: OD = the absorption at 700 nm, K = 0.0383.

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)

Polyphenol oxidase activity (expressed as OD/mg protein), was determined according to Gauillard et al. (1993). The samples were repeated three times and absorbed on 420 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Tuner, model 390).

Peroxidase (POD)

Peroxides activity (expressed as OD / mg protein), was determine according to Murage and Masuda (1997) with some modification. The reaction mixture contained 200 μl of enzyme extract, 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.1, 1.5 ml of 20% H2O2 and 1.5 ml of catechol 0.04 M). The initial rate of increase in absorbance was measured within 1 min at 470 nm determined by using a spectrophotometer (Tuner, model 390).

The experimental design

A pot experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions to evaluate the performance of nano-chitosan against M. incognita, Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) and their combination on tomato plants. All plastic pots (15 cm diameter) were filled with 1 kg of autoclaved loamy sand soil. A single plantlet of S. lycopersicum L. (cv. 086) of 40 days old was transplanted in each pot. The nano-chitosan was applied as foliar and soil application (drench) 5 days before infection as well as at the same time of infection. Each pot received 5000 nematode eggs by pouring the nematode suspension into holes made 2–4 cm below the soil surface around the base of the plants. All pots including controls (inoculated and uninoculated plants) were replicated four times and arranged in a completely randomized design on a bench under greenhouse conditions. During the course of the experiment, irrigation and fertilization were applied as needed. After 47 days, plants were uprooted and the roots were washed free of soil. The shoot and root lengths, in addition to their fresh weights were recorded. Furthermore, the number of galls / root system and number of J2 / 250 g soil were estimated at the end of the experiment. The second stage juveniles (J2) were extracted from the soil by using sieving and the Baermann plate technique (Ayoub, 1980) and then counted. Meanwhile, to inoculate TMV, the leaves of the tomato plants were dusted with carborundum (600 mesh) and then inoculated with a freshly prepared viral inoculum using forefinger method (Hamza et al., 2018).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was carried out using Costat (2005) version 6.303. Statistically significant differences between means were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the least significant differences (LSD) and P-values at 0.05 probability.

Results

Nematicidal impact of nano-chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita, alone or in the combination with TMV on tomatoes

Application of nano-chitosan (ranged from 19.11 upto 22.79 nm, Fig. 1) was effective against the root-knot nematode (M. incognita) singly or in the coexist of Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) as soil and foliar application on tomato plants under greenhouse conditions (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM micrograph of chitosan nanoparticles used as viricide and nematicide

Full size image
Table 1 The influence of nano-chitosan against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) alone or in the presence of Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) in tomato plants under greenhouse conditions
Full size table

The results indicate that nano-chitosan as soil drench suppressed the second stage juveniles (J2) in the soil by 64.50 to 58.28%. While, foliar applicatios showed a reduction of 55.23 and 46.62%, respectively, without significant differences. For the infection with M. incognita and TMV the soil application of nano-chitosan decreased J2 density by 66.61 and 45.89%, and while foliar application 61.61 and 57.50% when applied after or before infection, respectively.

Root gall density was reduced with soil application of nano-chitosan by 67.87 and 56.40% pre and post infection, respectively, without significance difference. The foliar application showed a significant reduction of galls by 40.45 and 26.07% post and pre infections, respectively (Table 1). In dual infections (M. incognita + TMV), nano-chitosan decreased root gall density by 50.79 and 30.71% as soil application pre and post infection, respectively. Foliar application showed a reduction by 29.53 and 10.63% post and pre infections, respectively.

Serological detection of tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV)

The TMV used in this study was isolated from naturally infested tomato plants collected from various locations in the Governorate of Alexandria. TMV was isolated from tomato plants showing mosaic, severe mosaic and yellowing with vein clearing (Fig. 2b) and yellowing mosaic on Nicotiana gluca (Fig. 2a). Necrotic local lesions induced after mechanical inoculations with TMV on S. melongena, C. amaranticolor, Datura metal and N. glutinosa were shown (Fig. 3). To identify the infection of TMV serologically specific antisera and indirect ELISA tests were utilized (Table 2). The obtained results showed that with antiserum of TMV the optical density of infected plants was 0.554 while healthy plants had an optical density of 0.196. Meanwhile, with antiserum of CMV, the optical density was 0.319 and healthy plant gave 0.280, this means that the recognized virus was TMV only and there is no CMV contamination.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Mosaic and yellowing on N. gluca induced by TMV, b symptoms caused by TMV on tomato plants cv. 086 leaves showing mosaic, blisters and leaf let narrowing after mechanical inoculations

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

a Necrotic local lesion (NLL) induced on Solanum melongena by TMV, b Reddish necrotic local lesion (RLL) on Chinopodium amaranticolor inoculated leaf induced by TMV, c Necrotic local lesion (NLL) caused by TMV on inoculated leaf of Datura metal d Necrotic local lesion (NLL) on inoculated leaf of Nicotiana glutinosa by TMV

Full size image
Table 2 Reaction of infected tomato plants extract against antisera specific to TMV and CMV as determined by indirect ELISA
Full size table

Efficacy of nano-chitosan on TMV alone or in the presence of M. incognita

Table 3 shows the impact of nano-chitosan as soil and foliar applications before and 5 days after infection in the presence of TMV alone or combined with the root-knot nematode (M. incognita). Healthy plants (uninfected untreated control) recorded natural density of plant fractions estimated by 0.16 (at 20 days of infection) and 0.18 (at 40 days of infection). In plants infected with TMV alone or in the presence of M. incognita (untreated controls) the densities of virus reached up to 0.78 and 0.80 (at 20 days of infection), and up to 0.73 and 0.73 (at 40 days of infection), respectively.

Table 3 activity of nano-chitosan on densities of TMV alone or mixed with root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) after 20 and 40 days of infection
Full size table

After 20 days of infections, in the case of dual infection results showed that nano-chitosan as soil application recorded reduction in virus densities by 50 and 10%, while foliar application recorded 16.67 and 21.79% with and before infections, respectively. However, soil application of nano-chitosan against TMV alone decreased the virus densities in leaves tissues by 45.00 and 65.00% with and before infections, respectively. Suppression in virus densities were noticed in foliar application by 12.50 and 40.00% with and before infections, respectively.

In respect to the dual infection after 40 days, results indicated that application of nano-chitosan with infection as soil drench minimized the density of virus by 42.47%, while application before infection recorded increasing in virus density by 5.48%. Meanwhile, foliar application with infection recorded a reduction by 13.70%, whereas the application prior infection showed no suppression. In the presence of TMV only, soil application showed reductions by 28.77 and 58.90%, with and prior infections, consecutively. The implementation of nano-chitosan as foliar achieved reductions in virus densities estimated by 15.07 and 21.92% with and prior infections, respectively.

Impact of nano-chitosan on the morphogenesis of tomato plants

Data shown in Table 4 revealed the impact of soil (drench) and foliar applications of nano-chitosan with and without infection of root-knot nematode (M. incognita) and Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) singly or in combination on the vigor of tomato plants. The healthy plants showed increases in all plant indices in comparison to untreated controls (inoculated plants). The use of nano-chitosan as soil application showed increases in shoot height by 4.34, 9.45 and 9.95%, while foliar application recorded 8.50, 23.01 and 1.91% in the presence of M. incognita alone, M. incognita + TMV and TMV alone, respectively. With respect to shoot weight, soil application of nano-chitosan achieved a mean increase by 25.84, 12.50 and 14.80%, whilst foliar application gave 23.17, 24.97 and 24.49% in the presence of M. incognita alone, M. incognita + TMV and TMV alone, respectively.

Table 4 The impact of nano-chitosan and infection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) alone or in the presence of Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) on morphogenesis of tomato plants
Full size table

On the other hand, the lengths of the root system was affected by soil application of nano-chitosan showing a mean increase of 18.77, 37.61 and 34.33%, while foliar application recorded 18.19, 43.46 and 21.17%, in the presence of M. incognita alone, M. incognita + TMV and TMV alone, respectively. In the same context, soil application of nano-chitosan recorded chanes in root weight by 26.13, 68.21and 10.76%, in addition to foliar application recorded general mean enhancement by 29.08, 75.66 and 14.71%, in the presence of M. incognita alone, M. incognita + TMV and TMV alone, respectively.

The effect of nano-chitosan on some parameters related to induced resistance

The efficacy of Nano-chitosan on total soluble protein and phenol content of tomato leaves

The efficacy of nano-chitosan as soil and foliar application on total soluble protein was estimated in fresh tissues of tomato leaves after 20 and 40 days of infection with M. incognita, TMV or their mixture (Table 5). Soil application of nano-chitosan showed a mean increase in the total soluble protein (TSP) by 3.65 and 9.97% after 20 days of infection with M. incognita and TMV alone, respectively, while the mixture of M. incognita + TMV reduced the level of TSP by 0.71%. Also, the foliar application of nano-chitosan increased the levels of TSP by 0.56 and 9.88%, in the presence of TMV alone and M. incognita + TMV, respectively, whilst TSP decreased by 4.05% in the presence of M. incognita alone. Similar trends hold for the infection after 40 days (Table 4).

Table 5 The effectiveness of nano-chitosan and infection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) or their mixture on Total soluble proteins and phenol in leaves of tomato plants
Full size table

Total soluble phenol (TSN) content of the tissue of tomato leaves was affected by the application of nano-chitosan (Table 5). The soil application of nano-chitosan after 20 days of infection gave general mean increasing in the levels of TSN estimated by 6.51 and 6.27% in the presence of M. incognita + TMV and TMV alone, respectively, while a reduction by 8.41% was recorded in the presence of M. incognita alone. Also, the foliar application of nano-chitosan increased the levels of TSN by 9.19 and 5.67%, in the presence of M. incognita + TMV and M. incognita alone, respectively. Application of nano-chitosan in the presence of TMV alone diminished TSN level by 11.67% in tomato leaves. Similar trends hold for the infaction after 40 days (Table 5).

The effect of nano-chitosan on polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activity

The impact of nano-chitosan on the levels of Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) after 20 and 40 days of infection with M. incognita, TMV and their mixture was shown in Table 6. The soil application of nano-chitosan after 20 days of infection by M. incognita alone and M. incognita + TMV increased the levels of PPO by 11.61 and 4.67%, respectively, while a reduction (6.16%) was noticed in the presence of TMV alone. Foliar application of nano-chitosan showed an increase by 15.31 and 20.79% in the presence of M. incognita and TMV alone, respectively, while a decrease was recorded in PPO levels of 1.56% in the presence of M. incognita + TMV. Similar trends hold for the infection after 40 days (Table 6).

Table 6 Efficacy of nano-chitosan and the infection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus (TMV) alone or in combination on PPO and POD enzymes of tomato plants
Full size table

The levels of Peroxides (POD) were affected by application of nano-chitosan after 20 and 40 days of infection in the presence of M. incognita, TMV or their mixture (Table 6). The soil application of nano-chitosan after 20 days of infection augmented the levels of POD by 6.76 and 23.17% in the presence of M. incognita alone and M. incognita + TMV, respectively, while in the presence of TMV alone the POD level was decreased by 16.59%. Meanwhile, applied nano-chitosan as foliar increased the levels of POD by 10.17 and 8.71% in the presence of both M. incognita and TMV alone, respectively. Nano-chitosan in the presence of binary mixture of M. incognita + TMV minimized the level of POD by 8.42%. Similar trends were found for the infection after 40 days (Table 6).

DISSCUSION

Our results indicate that nano-chitosan was very effective against the plant parasitic nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) singly or in the presence of TMV. The results of the present study are in agreement with a recent study by Alfy et al. (2020) who found that nano-chitosan at 500 to 2000 mg/l induced a mortality in juveniles of the root-knot nematode (M. incognita) ranging from 85.2 to 97.5% after 72 hours of exposure, and inhibited egg hatching by 73 to 95.3%. Meanwhile, the pot experiment under greenhouse conditions revealed that nano-chitosan at 2000 mg/l recorded suppression in galls, egg masses and juveniles/250 g soil by 90, 78 and 98%, respectively. The low, medium and high molecular weights of chitosan decreased the soil population at range of 37.67 to 68.60%, and from 70.30 to 83.33% in root galls (Khalil & Badawy, 2012). Similalry, high and low molecular weights of chitosan were minimized root galls by 90 and 93%, respectively (El-Sayed & Mahdy, 2015). da Silva et al. (2014) found that using chitosan in different molecular weights suppressed the severity of the pine wilt disease caused by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

The action of chitosan as soil application against plant parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are assumed to be linked with its stimulation of the reduplication of chitinolytic microorganisms which degrade chitin in organs of the PPNs, in addition to suppressing egg hatching and the viability of larvae and adults for both root-knot and cyst nematodes (Kalaiarasan et al., 2006; El-Sayed & Mahdy, 2015; Westerdahl et al., 1992). The parasitism by Pochonia chlamydosporia of the eggs of Meloidogyne javanica was increased by chitosan (El-Sayed & Mahdy, 2015). Meanwhile, chitosan has a high nitrogen content which releases ammonia causing toxicity to PPNs (Fan et al., 2020). Chitosan and its derivatives induce systemic acquired resistance in plants against a range of pathogens, in addition to root-knot nematode M. incognita (Chakraborty et al., 2020). Also, several reports mentioned that glucanase, chitinase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, polyphenol oxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase were triggered with the application of chitosan or its derivatives in certain crops (Burkhanova et al., 2007; Eilenberg et al., 2009; Yin et al., 2010; Chang & Kim, 2012; Orzali et al., 2014; Xing et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016). The levels of protein and some secondary metabolites linked to the protection from pathogens, such as phenolics and phytoalexins, were increased in treated plants (Lin et al., 2005; Hadwiger, 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). The positive charge of chitosan molecules may be linked with negative charges on the surfaces of wide array pathogens and causing damage in cell structure (Chakraborty et al., 2020).

Viral diseases such as; alfalfa mosaic alfamovirus, peanut stunt cucumovirus, potato virus X potexvirus, tobacco mosaic tobamovirus, Tobacco necrosis alphanecrovirus and cucumber mosaic cucumovirus are affected by chitosan applications (Nagorskaya et al., 2014; Jia et al., 2016). TMV has a range of effects on fruit crops including the fall of flowers or failure of flowering leading to decreased production (El Shafie et al., 2005). The efficacy of chitosan as anti-viral agent may be due to chitosan being able to inducing hypersensitive response in infected plants (Chirkov, 2002). In addition, the antiviral activity of chitosan depends on the average polymerization frequency, degree of N-deacetylation, quality of positive charge, and character of the molecule’s chemical modifications (Chakraborty et al., 2020).

Our study revealed that application of nano-chitosan in the presence of root-knot nematode or TMV alone and in combination improved plant growth (shoot and root heights and weights) significantly which is in agreement with previous studies of Alfy et al. (2020) and Khalil and Badawy (2012). The enhancement in plant vigor with nano-chitosan or its derivatives may be linking to certain necessary nutrients, trace elements and improved index of photosynthesis (Chakraborty et al., 2020). However, chitosan can invigorate cell elongation, the division of root cells via stimulation plant hormones including auxin and cytokinin (John et al., 1997; Amin et al., 2007; Dzung et al., 2011). The positive charge of nano-chitosan can easily penetrate plant cell walls’ or adhere to plant surfaces and enhance seed germination and biophysical properties. Also, crop yield was increased substantially by enhancing stomatal function and chlorophyll content (Chakraborty et al., 2020).

Different physiological processes in plants such as nutrient uptake, enzymatic activation and synthesis of protein that can eventually lead to increase yield are affected by chitosan applications (Chakraborty et al., 2020). Chitosan influenced the soil biodiversity positively (Hassan & Chang, 2017). Chitosan can also be utilized as natural plant elicitor of defense responses and as a tool to combat pathogenic diseases post-harvest (Wang et al., 2017). Functionally, chitosan is working as antifungal (Sathiyabama & Charles, 2015), antibacterial (Sathiyabama et al., 2014), antiviral (Kulikov et al., 2006), and antinematodal agent (Khalil & Badawy, 2012; da Silva et al., 2014; Abd El-Aziz & Khalil, 2020).

Foliar applications of chitosan enhanced plant growth parameters, yield and improved the production of some important metabolites e.g. polyphenolics, flavonoids, lignin and phytoalexins (Emami et al., 2017; Xoca-Orozco et al., 2017). Chitosan and its derivatives induced the activity of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), chitinase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), tyrosine ammonialyase (TAL) and catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase in orange, tomato, cucumber, table grapes, strawberries, sweet cherries and pears (Romanazzi, 2010; Chang & Kim, 2012; Xing et al., 2015), in addition to sugar and proline concentration (Guan et al., 2009). Furthermore, the level of peroxidase (POD) which is responsible for scavenging of reactive oxygen species in plants was enhanced significantly with chitosan application (Ahmad et al., 2013). The structural barriers in root tissues of tomato plants as defense mechanism were induced with chitosan application (Benhamou et al., 1998).