Abstract
In this paper, we project future changes in the hydrodynamics of Lake Tanganyika under a high emission scenario using the three-dimensional (3D) version of the Second-generation Louvain-la-Neuve Ice-ocean Model (SLIM 3D) forced by a high-resolution regional climate model. We demonstrate the advantages of 3D simulation compared to 1D vertical models. The model captures the seasonal variability in the lake, with seasonal deep mixing and surfacing of the thermocline. In a simulation of current conditions, the thermocline in the south of the lake moves upward from a depth of 75 m until it reaches the lake surface during August and September. We compare the current conditions with an end-of-the-century simulation under a pessimistic emission scenario (RCP 8.5) showing that surface water temperature increases on average by 3 ± 0.5 °C. Because deeper water warms less, the stratification increases in the upper 150 m of the water column. This temperature-induced stratification reduces mixing and prevents the outcropping of the thermocline, eventually shutting down the ventilation of deep water in the south basin. Our results highlight the extreme changes likely faced by Lake Tanganyika if global greenhouse gas emissions are not curbed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In recent decades, climate change has impacted ecosystems and societies on all continents as well as the global ocean, highlighting their sensitivity to a changing climate. Climate change has also affected the functioning of inland water bodies. In this study, we focus on the impact of climate change on the hydrodynamics of Lake Tanganyika, a meromictic lake (see Sect. 2.4) located between Burundi, DR Congo, Tanzania and Zambia (Fig. 1a). Lake Tanganyika is the second oldest, second deepest lake in the world. Despite the vital importance of Lake Tanganyika as a food source for local communities and the reported effects of climate change on its ecosystem functioning, water quality and fish availability, the potential impacts of future climate change on the functioning of this lacustrine system have not been addressed. The countries surrounding Lake Tanganyika being relatively poor, their inhabitants strongly depend on local resources for their basic needs. The lake fulfils an essential role in this supply, mainly because of the intensive fishery [40]. Roughly 25–40% of the protein diet of approximately 1,000,000 people living around the lake comes from these fisheries [30]. The main fishery is on pelagic clupeids (sardines) which for their diet strongly depend on plankton productivity. In turn plankton depends on nutrient supply by vertical mixing between deeper and shallower water layers and an efficient carbon transfer from plankton to fish [50, 62]. However, stratification of the water column reduces exchanges between the nutrient-poor epilimnion and the nutrient-enriched hypolimnion [6, 32], limiting primary productivity [57].
a Location of Lake Tanganyika (3°20ʹS–8°48ʹS; 29°12ʹE–31°12ʹE), surrounded by Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and DR Congo; b Bathymetric map with basins A: Kigoma, B: Kungwe, C: Kipili (adapted from [7]
Past climate change has already influenced stratification and the functioning of Lake Tanganyika. Long-term changes reported include a rise in surface water temperature and increased stability of the water column [21]. The enhancement of stratification by atmospheric warming, resulting in reduced vertical mixing, has led to significant changes in the nutrient supply to the epilimnion [20, 57, 23, 59, 61]. Primary productivity has decreased as indicated by increased water transparency, reduced uptake of dissolved silica by diatoms and decreased phytoplankton biomass [57]. Historical records suggest a 30% decrease in fish production due to climate change [30]. Also, reduced vertical mixing may result in a shallower oxycline with anoxic water closer to the surface, which could result in more frequent fish kills [3] by nearshore upwelling of anoxic hypolimnetic water. Deep vertical mixing may occur less frequently in the future, but may have greater impact when it does happen [22].
However, there is no study of how Lake Tanganyika will respond to projected future climate change. In this study, we compare the present-day variability with projected future conditions in the hydrodynamics of Lake Tanganyika. We (i) assess the advantage of a 3D hydrodynamic lake model [7] compared to a set of 1D (vertical) lake models [37] which ignore horizontal transport, (ii) examine the effect of present-day seasonal atmospheric variability on lake hydrodynamics by a short-term simulation, and (iii) examine future climate change effects on the lake hydrodynamics. To this end, we use high-resolution dynamical downscaling of reanalysis products and a global climate model (GCM) as input for the 3D version of our hydrodynamic model, i.e., the Second-generation Louvain-la-Neuve Ice-ocean Model (SLIM 3D, https://www.slim-ocean.be/, the acronyms are listed in Table 1 along with their meaning).
2 Background
2.1 Lake Tanganyika
Lake Tanganyika has a surface area of 32,900 km2, a maximum length of 673 km, an average width of 50 km, an average depth of 570 m and a maximum depth of 1470 m. The catchment covers an area of 231,000 km2, which means it drains an area equivalent to almost the entire United Kingdom. It is the second oldest lake in the world (after Lake Baikal, Russia). Its three basins were formed during different time periods. The oldest (central) basin, began to form 9–12 million years ago, shortly followed by the northern basin (7–8 million years ago), and the southern basin more recently (2–4 million years ago). It is the second deepest lake in the world and holds the second largest anoxic volume of water (total volume of 18,900 km3 or 16% of the world’s surface freshwater, 60–70% of this volume is anoxic) in the world, after the Black Sea. The lake is located in a deep narrow trough of the western branch of the Rift Valley of East Africa, and it stretches from 3°20ʹ to 8°48ʹ S and 29°5ʹ to 31°15ʹ E (Fig. 1a). The three basins are Kigoma (1310 m deep), Kungwe (885 m deep) and Kipili (1470 m deep) (Fig. 1b). The shoreline has an approximate length of 1800 km at an altitude of 773 m and is mainly surrounded by steep mountains.
The location of the lake ensures—thanks to the low latitude, high temperatures and abundant light availability year-round—favourable conditions for fish productivity. The planning, management and development of the local fisheries is challenged by the fluctuations in fish catches and differences in species composition between each catch [35].
Lake Tanganyika has been classified as pseudo-eutrophic (i.e. holding both eutrophic and oligotrophic characteristics) due to the relatively high productivity of the lake, combined with high water transparency, low nutrient concentrations in the epilimnion and low phytoplankton densities.
Air temperature at Lake Tanganyika followed the global trend according to O’Reilly et al. [30]. However, air temperature over the lakes may have increased faster than the global mean [30, 57]. After relatively little change from 1945 to the 1970s, lake warming accelerated from the late 1970s onward, coinciding with the timing of regional precipitation and air temperature changes [30].
The Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX; [11]) provides regional climate projections for Africa under various future Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). The results are obtained by downscaling information from Global Climate Models participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5, [46]). Under RCP8.5 (the “business as usual” scenario, where 8.5 stands for a radiative forcing of 8.5 W/m2 at the end of the twenty-first century), the CORDEX ensemble projects an increase in precipitation towards the coast, whereas more inland, the climate evolves to drier conditions. Over Lake Tanganyika, which is approximately 1000 km inland, the ensemble projects a decrease in precipitation [43]. Finally, due to climate change, a southward shift in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) is observed. If this shift were to continue, the effect of the southern wind is expected to decrease in the area of the lake, leading to further reduced mixing 51. Apart from long-term climate change, the effects of climate variability on the lake should also be considered, as annual to multi-decadal climate variability in the region contains strong cyclic patterns.
2.2 Orography and climate
As most of the lake is surrounded by mountainous areas, orography exerts a strong effect on the local climate conditions [41, 42]. Wind speed and direction over Lake Tanganyika are strongly affected by the surrounding orography. Orographic effects include both dynamic effects, in which mountains affect the large-scale wind field, and thermodynamic effects, in which heating or cooling of mountain-slope surfaces generates flow.
In the centre of the lake, greater wind speeds occur, explained by a channelling effect along the mountain valleys and the lower drag coefficient over water compared to land.
While the seasonal migration of the intertropical convergence zone determines seasonality, regional factors like lakes, vegetation and topography modulate the large-scale pattern [9, 15, 47].
Most of the area surrounding Lake Tanganyika experiences a single rainfall season, with slight variation in the amount and timing of the precipitation. In the northern part of the lake, rain occurs (120–170 mm per month) mainly from December to May. Around Tabora (central area), rain intensity varies the most (60–220 mm per month). In the southern part of Lake Tanganyika, the wet season runs from December to April with an average precipitation of 100–150 mm per month, whereas from June to October, it hardly ever rains [13, 43].
At Lake Tanganyika, the beginning of the rain season is driven by the southward migration of the ITCZ, which starts around September/October and lasts until December. At the north end of the lake this period is characterized by ‘short’ rains, whereas, after a brief period of decreased rainfall (January–February), longer rains occur around the boreal spring (March–May), driven by the northward migration of the ITCZ. The interannual variability of these events are linked to atmospheric processes, which determine surface temperature, monsoons, trade winds, and (anti)cyclones. The short rains are especially subject to variability associated with the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) [38]. The Southern Oscillation is the driving force behind fluctuations in the atmospheric pressure and monsoon rainfall. The warm ENSO events are usually linked to a higher amount of precipitation in East Africa, whereas the colder ENSO events tend to result in below-average rainfall [15, 27]. However, the impact of ENSO varies substantially across the region, and notably west of Lake Tanganyika, the ENSO index and precipitation are anticorrelated [15]. Vegetation growth in the area west of Lake Tanganyika is therefore reduced during warm ENSO events [15, 36].
2.3 Lake-atmosphere interactions
While meteorological conditions drive lake hydrodynamics, the presence of lakes in turn influences the local climate in several ways. Because water has a high heat capacity, lakes can act as a buffer while the atmosphere transitions between warmer and colder periods. This effect explains coastal areas’ milder winters, but is also present in regions with a relative high proportion of lake surface. The minimum winter temperatures will be higher, and maximum summer temperatures lower than they would be without the presence of a large lake surface. The magnitude of this effect depends on the size of the lake [17, 18]. When the lake is in a mountainous area, like Lake Tanganyika, it will also significantly enhance precipitation in its vicinity [10, 17]. Wind speed is also affected by the presence of the lake, and the presence of the ITCZ [41]. Simulations have shown that the lake’s influence on the wind speed is stronger early in the morning, and that the (daytime) lake and (night-time) land breezes, induced by the presence of the lake, are enhanced by south-easterly trade winds [47, 56]. However, Docquier et al. [9] also shows that the influence of orography on wind speed’s spatial variability has a bigger impact than the lake-land breeze system.
Lastly, the surface energy balance, the balance of exchanges of heat by sensible and latent heat flux and radiation, interacts with the stability of the atmospheric boundary layer above the lake surface and the lake-atmosphere interactions [54, 55]. The surface energy balance determines the seasonal changes in heat content in the lake and affects its thermal structure. The components of the surface energy balance can be compared to results from regional climate modelling.
2.4 Hydrodynamics
Lake Tanganyika is a meromictic lake with an anoxic monimolimnion (lower, dense layer of the lake). It is meromictic, meaning it never completely mixes vertically, in part because of the continuous presence of a thermocline. The thermocline is subject to an internal seiche, governed by topography, atmospheric pressure and wind stress [9, 55]. During the dry season, southerly winds cool the surface water in the south of the lake by driving high heat loss through evaporation. As a result, isotherms come to the surface at the south end and reduced stratification allows deep seasonal convective mixing [55]. Advection moves cool water from the south end to the north at the depth of the metalimnion, and a return current in the upper water layer carries relative warm water from north to south [7, 55]. The wind events follow a cyclic pattern, with a period of 3–4 weeks, which is close to the first free mode of oscillation of the lake, resulting in a quasi-resonance of the internal wave [12, 28, 29].
3 Methods
3.1 SLIM
The 3D component of the Second-generation Louvain-la-Neuve Ice-Ocean Model (SLIM 3D, www.slim-ocean.be) is a baroclinic model, that solves the hydrostatic flow equations under the Boussinesq approximation by means of a discontinuous Galerkin finite element method, on an unstructured grid [19]. It has been applied to coastal waters, such as the Burdekin plume in the Great Barrier Reef [8], the Columbia River region of freshwater influence [52], the Congo estuary [53] and Lake Tanganyika [7].
In this study, SLIM 3D is applied to Lake Tanganyika in exactly the same setup as that of Delandmeter et al. [7], in which the model is comprehensively described. The only external forcings to the model are the surface wind stress and surface heat flux. The first is prescribed using simulated data from the regional climate model COSMO-CLM2 (see below). The second is parameterized using a relaxation term towards the 2-m air temperature, which is also available from COSMO-CLM2. The use of the relaxation term requires only the near-surface air temperature as input and has the advantage of simplicity and numerical stability. Other parameterizations require more input data and, being more complex, can potentially lead to lake model instabilities, especially when spatial or temporal scales differ between the lake model and surface model. The relaxation is controlled by two parameters: zr, the depth below the surface above which it is applied and τ, the relaxation time. zr is set to 12 m, which is used as a proxy to the water column affected by solar radiation and other fluxes. After calibration, τ is set to 10 days [7].
3.2 COSMO-CLM2
COSMO-CLM2 is a comprehensive and frequently updated regional climate model. The first building blocks of the model were a joint effort of the Consortium for Small-scale Modelling (COSMO) and the Climate Limited-area Modelling Community (CLM-community), resulting in a 3D, non-hydrostatic regional climate model COSMO-CLM [39]. In COSMO-CLM2, [5] the default land surface parameterisation module in COSMO-CLM, TERRA-ML, has been replaced by the Community Land Model v. 3.5 (CLM3.5, [31]).
The community land model CLM is a merging between a community-developed land model focused on biogeophysics and an expansion of the NCAR Land Surface Model (NCAR LSM) to include the carbon cycle, vegetation dynamics, and river routing. To represent land heterogeneity in CLM, a subgrid hierarchy has been established, where each cell gets a certain land unit assigned, which can be glacier, wetland, vegetated, lake or urban. In the land unit sublevel, the soil properties are defined, including colour, texture, depth and thermal conductivity. To every land unit, a second sub-grid level is assigned, called the column, which captures the variability of the soil and snow state variables. The third sub-grid level is called the plant functional type (PFT) and can assign up to 4 out of the 15 possible types to a certain column. The added value of COSMO-CLM2 compared to the default COSMO-CLM configuration regarding the representation of the near-surface climate has been established for several domains including Europe [4, 5] and Sub-Saharan Africa [1, 47].
In this work, we use three high-resolution simulations with COSMO-CLM2, conducted by Thiery et al. [47, 48] over the African Great Lakes region to force SLIM 3D. The first regional climate simulation, termed EVAL, consists of a reanalysis downscaling for a 10-year period (1999–2008). Results from the EVAL simulation represent the ‘best guess’ of the recent regional climate and may be employed for model evaluation purposes and analysis of present-day spatio-temporal patterns.
The second COSMO-CLM2 simulation represents a 30-year historical (HIS) integration (1980–2009) using information from the Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Earth System Model running on low resolution grid global climate model (MPI-ESM-LR GCM) as global boundary conditions. The third COSMO-CLM2 simulation was obtained by downscaling MPI-ESM-LR for a future (FUT) 30-year period 2070–2099 under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5. Comparison of the HIS and FUT simulations enables assessment of the projected future changes in climate under a high emission scenario without mitigation (see Table 2 for details on these simulations).
Each COSMO-CLM2 simulation was conducted at a horizontal resolution of ~ 7 km (0.0625°) and is nested within a COSMO-CLM simulations run at ~ 50 km (0.44°) resolution in the framework of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX; [33]). As such, COSMO-CLM2 is used to downscale global-scale information from a reanalysis or GCM to the African Great lakes region via a continental-scale intermediate nesting step. The final nesting step has been tailored to the region by (i) applying COSMO-CLM in its tropical configuration [33], (ii) implementing a high horizontal resolution providing pioneering representation of the local topography and (iii) using a 1D lake model aimed at representing tropical lake surface water temperatures [47].
After pre-processing, the COSMO-CLM2 output was arranged in a well-defined order, such that it could be used as input for SLIM 3D. Three runs were performed (Table 2), EVAL, HIS and FUT. The evaluation simulation (EVAL) was run over a 10-year period to validate the model and investigate the effects of interseasonal meteorological variations on the lake’s hydrodynamics. The historical simulation (HIS) was run over a 30-year period, where the results were used both to evaluate the difference between the ERA-interim and GCM downscaling, and as a reference for the future simulation (FUT). The latter was also run for a 30-year period, but with a simulation start date 90 years after that of HIS. While a single transient simulation covering the entire 21th century would enable the study of changes in deep layers characterized by strong inertia, meteorological forcing with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution is unfortunately not available for this region, hence the choice for two time slice simulations using available high-resolution meteorological forcing.
3.3 FLake
To evaluate the benefits of a 3D model we compare results with the 1D model FLake. This model was interactively coupled at the subgrid-scale level to COSMO-CLM2. FLake simulates a single-column water temperature profile in every COSMO-CLM2 grid cell with non-zero lake area fraction. This approach enables the study of horizontal water temperature variations caused by spatially-varying meteorological conditions, but ignores horizontal water and heat transfers below the surface. The meteorological input fields of the FLake model are similar to that of SLIM; however, in contrast to SLIM, the integral energy budget is computed by the model. The model considers two layers, i.e., a surface mixed layer, and a thermocline just below. The mixed layer is assumed to be thermally homogenous, whereas temperature decreases with depth in the thermocline [47].
As a widely-used parameterization scheme in numerical weather prediction systems (e.g. [2, 26]), climate models (e.g. [25, 26]) and climate reanalyses [16, 60], FLake encompasses a relatively detailed representation of the surface energy budget. This enabled the model to become a reference tool for large-scale climate change impact assessments on lake temperatures and mixing regimes [23, 60, 61]. FLake has been proven to be comparable to other 1D lake models for different lake types and climatic conditions [1, 14, 34, 44, 45]. Besides this, there have been offline tests for several African Great Lakes, concluding that FLake performs well in the estimation of lake surface temperatures [49].
3.4 ARC lake
The Along-Track Scanning Radiometers Reprocessing for Climate applied to Lakes (ARC Lake; [24]) provides satellite-based observations of lake surface water temperatures of major lakes for 1991 until 2010 (http://www.laketemp.net/home_ARCLake/). All radiometers considered by ARC Lake are part of the European Space Agency’s Earth Observing missions. A previous analysis of ARC Lake data over Lake Tanganyika highlighted the very close agreement between the ARC Lake satellite product and multi-year in situ lake surface temperature observations at two locations in the lake [49], demonstrating that the ARC Lake product represents a reliable observational reference product for this lake. The lake surface water temperatures given by ARC Lake are therefore used to assess the skill of both the SLIM 3D (EVAL simulation, see below) and the FLake model.
4 Results
4.1 Model evaluation
For both the 3D model SLIM 3D (EVAL) and 1D model Flake, the difference in surface water temperature compared with data from ARC Lake was calculated. In Fig. 2a1–a3), the average difference of the 1D model is shown per season. The most marked deviations occurred during the dry season (June to August), when there was a strong underestimation of the temperature in the central and southern part of the lake. During the later part of the wet season (February to April), temperatures were overestimated, especially at the northern and southern ends, while during October–December a warm difference occurred mainly in the northern region.
Seasonal surface water temperature difference between the Flake (a1–a3) and EVAL (b1–b3) against the ARC Lake reference product (simulation—reference) for the months February–April (FMA), June–August (JJA) and October-December (OND) and the relative differences between the EVAL and the Flake simulation analysis (c1–c3)
The difference between the SLIM 3D EVAL results and the ARC Lake data were consistently smaller (see Fig. 2b1–b3) than the difference between Flake’s result and the ARC Lake data. The cool temperature difference seen in the Flake simulation in the south and centre during the dry season was absent from the SLIM 3D simulation. The small warm temperature difference in the southern tip during the wet season was smaller and the yearlong warm temperature difference in the north was reduced (although still present).
Based on these results, we hypothesize that the lake reacts faster than expected to seasonal meteorological changes. This leads to a stronger heating or cooling effect. The difference in the 1D-model results may be explained by insufficient heat storage in the model, since this model underestimated the thermocline depth. A second explanation might be the higher wind velocities in the centre of the lake, leading to higher water velocities, which are accounted for in the 3D model. In the 3D model, a certain buffer is apparent, resulting in a slight delay in heating effects, but cooling effects are still strongly represented. It may therefore be that the breakdown of the stratification is better simulated than re-stratification by SLIM. The relaxation function to represent the surface heat flux [7], which includes a delay compared to changes in meteorological variables, may also contribute to the cold temperature difference at the centre of the lake compared to the 1D model. However, in general, SLIM 3D improves the simulation of the lake surface water temperature compared to FLake (1D), underlining the importance of accounting for 3D hydrodynamics (Fig. 2c1–c3)). The effect of a better 3D circulation in SLIM is clearly of greater importance than the better simulated surface heat flux in FLake. Further development is needed to improve the heat flux representation in SLIM, since this could enhance the quality of the model results.
4.2 Interseasonal variation
The annual variation of water temperatures in the top 150 m of the water column, resulting from the HIS simulation, is displayed in Fig. 3 (panels a1 and a2). The top 150 m was selected because below this depth there are no seasonal effects on the temperature [58]. Figure 3 shows the extremes of the dry and wet season, and monthly plots are in Fig. S1.
Monthly water temperature cross-sections (as defined in Fig. 1b) obtained by the HIS-simulation (a1, a2) and FUT-simulation (b1, b2)
The magnitude of the seasonal temperature fluctuations is expected to differ from north to south [20], as also seen in our results. The northern part of Lake Tanganyika is surrounded by mountains, resulting in lower wind speeds, which explains why the highest surface water temperatures along the lake can be found here (Fig. 4).
The southern part of the lake has greater surface cooling and deeper mixing due to the effect of the strong southerly winds during the cool season. As a result, the minimum surface water temperature is lower at the southern end of the lake.
In general, according to Naithani et al. [28, 29], wind and air temperature have little to no influence below 100 m depth. This corresponds to the thermocline never being below 75 m (Fig. 3). Lake evaporation is on average stronger in the dry season because of higher wind speeds from the southeast (trade winds), resulting in cooling of the surface water and a position of the thermocline closer to the surface, although the latter is not replicated by SLIM. The dry season period is also colder, contributing to lower surface water temperature.
4.3 Model evaluation—30-year simulation
This section concerns the longer simulations (HIS and FUT), forced with meteorological data from the GCM downscaling without reanalysis. A major difference is that for EVAL the data originated from a downscaling of the reanalysis ERA interim. In the longer simulations, the quality has been improved by corrections in the output every six hours, based on all available measurements. Another difference is in the runtime of the simulation, as it has never been tested whether one or two years of spin-up are enough to obtain equilibrium in the model. Fig. S2 shows the difference in average seasonal surface water temperature between the EVAL and HIS simulations (for their entire periods, averaged for FMA, JJA and OND), where almost no difference (variations smaller than ± 0.5 °C) can be observed. This implies that replacing the meteorological forcing of the highest quality (i.e. a reanalysis downscaling) with a lower-quality forcing (i.e. a GCM downscaling) has only limited effect on the SLIM 3D simulation quality. Therefore, the GCM downscaling is appropriate as meteorological input to drive SLIM 3D under present-day and, hopefully, future climate conditions.
Figure 5 shows the monthly lake-wide mean temperatures for the HIS and FUT simulations, with the interquartile range (IQR) of the spatial variation calculated from the monthly surface water temperature averaged over the full lake area, for each month, averaged over the 30 years of simulation period. Then, the same calculation was done for each point on the surface, and the IQR was calculated based on the variation between these results, and their spatial average. At any point in time, the coldest locations were warmer in the FUT simulation than the warmest locations in the HIS simulation.
4.4 Climate change simulation—30-year simulation
The comparison between the FUT (Fig. 3b1, b2 and 4d–f) and HIS (Fig. 3a1, a2 and 4a–c) simulations shows uniform warming. The surface water temperature increases over the entire lake, over the entire year by 3 ± 0.5 °C. In the FUT simulation the location of the maximum surface temperature moved more distinctly from south to north between the warm (January to April) and the dry cool to early warm season. This suggests relative more warming in the north in the dry and early warm season and may reflect changes in the horizontal circulation, which has been described to occur in the lake [7, 55]. However, since the average temperature difference is small, it might be an artefact.
A second important observation is the strengthening of the stratification during the dry season, as shown by comparing Fig. 3 panels b1 and b2 with panels a1 and a2. Whereas in the current situation, during June to November, the thermocline surfaced from the south end to the centre of the lake, this occurred only in July to October in the FUT scenario, resulting in longer duration of stratification (Figs. S1 and S3).
The difference in average temperature between the HIS and FUT simulations (Fig. S4 in the supplement), plotted over the depth, shows that the gradient overall increases, with a maximum at the surface level, resulting in a much stronger stratification of the lake. Water quality and the renewal of nutrients from deep water are linked to the strength of the stratification. Increased stratification results in a severe reduction of the mixing, and thus potentially in a strong decrease in nutrient supply to the ecosystem and eventually to the fish population.
The fact that relative humidity is not accounted for in the model might affect modelled water temperatures, perhaps depending on the season. If the seasonal cycle becomes more pronounced, the dry season becomes drier, resulting in more evaporation and lower surface water temperatures, and if the warm wet season becomes more humid, the surface water temperature may increase even more. SLIM may benefit from a better representation of the surface heat flux.
5 Discussion
Our results suggest that unabated climate change will induce important changes in the lake’s mixing regime, with potentially severe implications for its ecosystem. This is because the input of nutrients in the upper layer is likely to be drastically reduced, thereby impacting phytoplankton growth and, hence, the whole food web.
The conclusions of this paper are based on numerical simulations, for which input data and calibration are provided by other models or remote sensing. A comprehensive evaluation of the model system with in-situ measurements has been performed by Delandmeter et al. [7], and our additional validation confirms that the model can be used for climate change projections.
FLake is a numerical model designed specifically to have a very low computational cost, and a key strength of the model is the balance between physical realism and very low computational resource demand. For a single lake, it can simulate hundreds of years in a matter of seconds on a personal computer. SLIM 3D, on the other hand, displays high numerical accuracy and has the ability to capture complex hydrodynamic processes, including for example Kelvin waves. This accuracy however comes at a higher computational cost, which requires the model to be run a high-performance computing (HPC) system. However, SLIM 3D offers opportunities for improvement, such as implementation of an improved surface heat flux representation and accounting for the effect of relative humidity. The input data were also obtained from only one regional climate simulation, linked to SLIM 3D. Other climate simulations may generate somewhat different outcomes. Moreover, this study considered only one climate change scenario (the high-emission scenario RCP 8.5), not accounting for lower greenhouse gas concentration scenarios. With lower emission scenarios, the simulated effects are expected to be less strong.
Together with suggested improvements in future simulation work, a major effort should be put towards testing the sensitivity of results for a range of representative concentration pathways and GCM/RCM combinations.
6 Conclusions
The hydrodynamics of Lake Tanganyika are driven by the interaction between the lake and climate. External forcing by wind, temperature and relative humidity induce variations in the water temperature and circulation patterns. While modelling studies of Lake Tanganyika exist, this is the first analysis of the effects and consequences of future climate change on the lake hydrodynamics.
One goal of this work has been to compare SLIM 3D to a 1D model, as used previously in modelling Lake Tanganyika’s hydrodynamics, interactively coupled to COSMO-CLM2 (FLake), and to assess the accuracy of the output by comparing it to satellite surface water temperature data (ARC Lake). To this end, SLIM was forced by a reanalysis downscaling with the regional climate model COSMO-CLM2 for the period 1980–1999. The overall performance of SLIM 3D was better than that of Flake (up to 2 °C difference in relative surface water temperature, see Fig. 2). However, comparison of the surface water cooling and warming shown in the ARC Lake data with the changes in thermocline depth simulated by SLIM 3D, suggests that the simulation of the thermocline can be improved. Nevertheless, as expected a 3D circulation model is a major improvement compared to a 1D water column model. Suggested future work includes the implementation of more realistic surface heat flux simulation in SLIM 3D, as this might improve the simulation of the thermocline. However, studies have shown that the surface heat fluxes will only be properly represented, when local values of air density, kinematic air viscosity and latent heat of vaporization are included in the model [54].
The second goal of the study was the analysis of the results of a simulation using SLIM 3D. A 10-year simulation showed a strong response to climate seasonality, especially in the southern part of the lake. As the centre of the lake is surrounded by mountains, winds speeds are highest there, leading to enhanced mixing. The north of the lake remained warmest, mainly as a result of lower wind speeds.
A third goal of this paper was to use a new atmospheric dataset to force SLIM 3D, obtained by downscaling a global climate model (GCM) with COSMO-CLM2. The consistency of the SLIM simulation output forced by the reanalysis and by GCM downscaling was tested first. This comparison showed almost no difference.
The final projection was 30 years under a high-emission scenario (RCP 8.5), starting in 2070, which was compared to a historical reference simulation starting in 1980. Our main conclusion is that the surface water warmed by 3 °C, averaged across seasons and the entire lake. The period in which the thermocline surfaces during the dry season was reduced in the future simulation, and stratification in Lake Tanganyika will be stronger. The longer persistence of the thermocline through the year has two causes. First, the depth of the thermocline overall increases. Second, the temperature gradient in the top layer and thermocline increases, which results in a more stable thermocline. Both effects make the thermocline more resistant to mixing, given similar wind speeds. Increased stability of the thermocline is the main finding of our study, suggesting that reduced mixing may decrease the productivity of the lake ecosystem further than it has already done during the past century [30, 57].
References
Akkermans T, Thiery W, van Lipzig NPM (2014) The regional climate impact of a realistic future deforestation scenario in the congo basin. J Clim 27(7):2714–2734. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00361.1
Balsamo G, Salgado R, Dutra E, Boussetta S, Stockdale T, Potes M (2012) On the contribution of lakes in predicting near-surface temperature in a global weather forecasting model. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 64(1):15829. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.15829
Coulter GW (1963) Hydrological changes in relation to biological production in southern Lake Tanganyika. Limnol Oceanogr 8(4):463–477. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1963.8.4.0463
Davin EL, Maisonnave E, Seneviratne SI (2016) Is land surface processes representation a possible weak link in current regional climate models? Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074027
Davin EL, Stöckli R, Jaeger EB, Levis S, Seneviratne SI (2011) COSMO-CLM 2: a new version of the COSMO-CLM model coupled to the community land model. Clim Dyn 37:1889–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1019-z
De Wever A, Muylaert K, Van der Gucht K, Pirlot S, Cocquyt C, Descy JP, Plisnier PD, Vyverman W (2005) Bacterial community composition in lake tanganyika: vertical and horizontal heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5029–5037. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5029-5037.2005
Delandmeter P, Lambrechts J, Legat V, Vallaeys V, Naithani J, Thiery W, Remacle JF, Deleersnijder E (2018) A fully consistent and conservative vertically adaptive coordinate system for SLIM 3D v0.4 with an application to the thermocline oscillations of Lake Tanganyika. Geosci Model Dev 11:1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1161-2018
Delandmeter P, Lewis SE, Lambrechts J (2015) The transport and fate of riverine fine sediment exported to a semi-open system Estuarine. Coast Shelf Sci 167:336–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.10.011
Docquier D, Thiery W, Lhermitte S, van Lipzig NPM (2016) Multi-year wind dynamics around Lake Tanganyika Multi - year wind dynamics around Lake Tanganyika. Clim Dyn 47:3191–3202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3020-z
Gau Q, Chen S, Kimirei IA, Zhang L, Mgana H, Mziray P, Wang Z, Yu C, Shen Q (2018) Wet deposition of atmospheric nitrogen contributes to nitrogen loading in the surface waters of Lake Tanganyika, East Africa: a case study of the Kigoma region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:11646-11660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1389-4
Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar G (2009) Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. World Meteorol Organ (WHO) Bull 58:175–183
Gourgue O, Deleersnijder E, Legat V, Marchal E, White L (2011) Free and forced thermocline oscillations in Lake Tanganyika. In: Alpert P, Sholokhman T (eds) factor separation in the atmosphere: applications and future prospects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 146–162
Griffiths JF (1958) Climatic zones of East Africa. East Afr Agric J 23(3):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670074.1958.11665143
Guseva S, Bleninger T, Jöhnk K, Polli BA, Tan Z, Thiery W, Zhuang Q, Rusak J, Yao H, Lorke A, Stepanenko V (2020) Multimodel simulation of vertical gas transfer in a temperate lake. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 24:697–715. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-697-2020
Hawinkel P, Thiery W, Lhermitte S, Swinnen E, Verbist B, Van Orshoven J, Muys B (2016) Vegetation response to precipitation variability in East Africa controlled by biogeographical factors. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 121(9):2422–2444. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003436
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Abdalla S, Abellan X, Balsamo G, Bechtold P, Biavati G, Bidlot J, Bonavita M, De Chiara G, Dahlgren P, Dee D, Diamantakis M, Dragani R, Flemming J, Forbes R, Fuentes M, Geer A, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hogan RJ, Hólm E, Janisková M, Keeley S, Laloyaux P, Lopez P, Lupu C, Radnoti G, de Rosnay P, Rozum I, Vamborg F, Villaume S, Thépaut JN (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146(730):1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hostetler SW, Giorgi F, Bates GT, Bartlein PJ (1994) Lake-atmosphere feedbacks associated with Paleolakes Bonneville and Lahontan. Science 263:665–668. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.665
Huziy O, Sushama L (2017) Lake–river and lake–atmosphere interactions in a changing climate over Northeast Canada. Clim Dyn 48(9–10):3227–3246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3260-y
Kärnä T, Legat V, Deleersnijder E (2013) A baroclinic discontinuous Galerkin finite element model for coastal flows. Ocean Model 61:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.09.009
Kraemer BM, Hook S, Huttula T, Kotilainen P, O’Reilly CM, Peltonen A, Plisnier PD, Sarvala J, Tamatamah R, Vadeboncoeur Y, Wehrli B, McIntyre PB (2015) Century-long warming trends in the upper water column of Lake Tanganyika. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132490
Kraemer BM, Seimon A, Adrian R, McIntyre PB (2019) Worldwide lake level trends and responses to background climate variation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 470:1–29. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-470
Lau MP, Valerio G, Pilotti M, Hupfer M (2020) Intermittent meromixis controls the trophic state of warming deep lakes. Sci Rep 10:12928. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69721-5
Maberly SC, O’Donnell RA, Woolway RI, Cutler MEJ, Gong M, Jones ID, Merchant CJ, Miller CA, Politi E, Scott EM, Thackeray SJ, Tyler AN (2020) Global lake thermal regions shift under climate change. Nat Commun 11:1232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15108-z
MacCallum SN, Merchant CJ (2012) Surface water temperature observations of large lakes by optimal estimation. Can J Remote Sens 38(1):25–45. https://doi.org/10.5589/m12-010
Martynov A, Sushama L, Laprise R, Winger K, Dugas B (2012) Interactive lakes in the Canadian regional climate model, version 5: the role of lakes in the regional climate of North America. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 64(1):16226. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.16226
Mironov D, Heist E, Kourzeneva E, Ritter B, Schneider N (2010) Implementation of the lake parameterisation scheme FLake into the numerical weather prediction model COSMO. Boreal Environ Res 15(2):218–230
Mutai CC, Ward MN (2000) East African rainfall and the tropical circulation/convection on intraseasonal to interannual timescales. J Clim 13(22):3915–3939. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3C3915:EARATT%3E2.0.CO;2
Naithani J, Deleersnijder E (2003) Analysis of wind-induced thermocline oscillations of Lake Tanganyika. Environ Fluid Mech 3:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021116727232
Naithani J, Deleersnijder E, Plisnier P (2002) Origin of intraseasonal variability in Lake Tanganyika. Geophys Res Lett 29(23):2–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015843
O’Reilly CM, Alin SR, Plisnier PD, Cohen AS, McKee BA (2003) Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Nature 424:766–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01833
Oleson KW, Dai Y, Bonan G, Bosilovich M, Dickinson R, Dirmeyer P, Hoffman F, Houser P, Levis S, Niu GY, Thornton P, Vertenstein M, Yang ZL, Zeng X (2004) Technical description of the community land model (CLM).
Paerl HW, Richards RC, Leonard RL, Goldman CR (1975) Seasonal nitrate cycling as evidence for complete vertical mixing in Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada. Limnol Oceanogr 20:1–8. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1975.20.1.0001
Panitz HJ, Dosio A, Büchner M, Lüthi D, Keuler K (2014) COSMO-CLM (CCLM) climate simulations over CORDEX-Africa domain: analysis of the ERA-Interim driven simulations at 0.44° and 0.22° resolution. Clim Dyn 42(11–12):3015–3038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1834-5
Perroud M, Goyette S, Martynov A, Beniston M, Annevillec O (2009) Simulation of multiannual thermal profiles in deep Lake Geneva: a comparison of one-dimensional lake models. Limnol Oceanogr 54(5):1574–1594. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.5.1574
Plisnier PD, Chitamwebwa D, Mwape L, Tshibangu K, Langenberg V, Coenen E (1999) Limnological annual cycle inferred from physical-chemical fluctuations at three stations of Lake Tanganyika. In: Lindqvist OV, Mölsä H, Salonen K, Sarvala J (eds) From limnology to fisheries: Lake Tanganyika and other large lakes. Developments in hydrobiology. Dordrecht, Springer, pp 45–58
Plisnier PD, Serneels S, Lambin EF (2000) Impact of ENSO on East African ecosystems: a multivariate analysis based on climate and remote sensing data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9(6):481–497. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00208.x
Plisnier PD, Kayanda R, MacIntyre S, Obiero K, Okello W, Vodacek A, Cocquyt C, Abegaz H, Achieng A, Akonkwa B, Albrecht C, Balagizi C, Barasa J, Bashonga RA, Bishobibiri AB, Bootsma H, Borges AV, Chavula G, Dadi T, De Keyzer ELR, Doran PJ, Gabagambi N, Gatare R, Gemmell A, Getahun A, Haambiya LH, Higgins SN, Hyangya BL, Irvine K, Isumbisho M, Jonasse C, Katongo C, Katsev S, Keyombe J, Kimirei I, Kisekelwa T, Kishe M, Koding SOA, Kolding J, Kraemer BM, Limbu P, Lomodei E, Mahongo SB, Malala J, Mbabazi S, Masilya PM, McCandless M, Medard M, Ajode ZM, Mrosso HD, Mudakikwa ER, Mulimbwa N, Mushagalusa D, Muvundja FA, Nankabirwa A, Nahimana D, Ngatunga BP, Ngochera M, Nicholson S, Nshombo M, Ntakimazi G, Nyamweya C, Nyeko JI, Olago D, Olbamo T, O’Reilly CM, Pasche N, Phiri H, Raasakka N, Salyani A, Sibomana C, Silsbe GM, Smith S, Sterner RW, Thiery W, Tuyisenge J, Van der Knaap M, Van Steenberge M, van Zwieten PAM, Verheyen E, Wakjira M, Walakira J, Wembo ON, Lawrence T (2022) Need for harmonized long-term multi-lake monitoring of African Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.016
Rasmunsson EM, Wallace JM (1983) Meteorological aspects of the El Niño/Southern oscillation. Science 222(4629):1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.222.4629.1195
Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17(4):347–348. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309
Sarvala J, Salonen K, Järvinen M, Aro E, Huttula T, Kotilainen P, Kurki H, Langenberg V, Mannini P, Peltonen A, Plisnier PD, Vuorinen I, Mölsä H, Lindqvis OV (1999) Trophic structure of Lake Tanganyika: carbon flows in the pelagic food web. from limnology to fisheries: Lake Tanganyika and other large lakes. In: Lindqvist OV, Mölsä H, Salonen K, Sarvala J (eds) Developments in hydrobiology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 149–173
Savijärvi H (1997) Diurnal winds around Lake Tanganyika. Q J R Meteorol Soc 123(540):901–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354006
Savijärvi H, Järvenoja S (2000) Aspects of the Fine-scale climatology over Lake Tanganyika as resolved by a mesoscale model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 73:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007030050066
Souverijns N, Thiery W, Demuzere M, van Lipzig NPM (2016) Drivers of future changes in East African precipitation. Environ Res Lett 11:114011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114011
Stepanenko VM, Goyette S, Martynov A, Perroud M, Fang X, Mironov D (2010) First steps of a Lake Model intercomparison project: LakeMIP. Boreal Environ Res 15:191–202
Stepanenko VM, Martynov A, Jöhnk KD, Subin ZM, Perroud M, Fang X, Beyrich F, Mironov D, Goyette S (2013) A one-dimensional model intercomparison study of thermal regime of a shallow, turbid midlatitude lake. Geosci Model Dev 6:1337–1352. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1337-2013
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteor Soc 93(4):485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
Thiery W, Davin EL, Panitz HJ, Demuzere M, Lhermitte S, van Lipzig NPM (2015) The impact of the African Great Lakes on the regional climate. J Clim 28(10):4061–4085. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00565.1
Thiery W, Davin E, Seneviratne S, Bedka K, Lhermitte S, van Lipzig NPM (2016) Hazardous thunderstorm intensification over Lake Victoria. Nat Commun 7:12786. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12786
Thiery W, Stepanenko VM, Fang X, Jöhnk KD, Li Z, Martynov A, Perroud M, Subin ZM, Darchambeau F, Mironov D, van Lipzig NPM (2014) LakeMIP Kivu: evaluating the representation of a large, deep tropical lake by a set of one-dimensional lake models. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.21390
Tierney JE, Russell JM, Eggermont H, Hopmans EC, Verschuren D, Sinninghe Damsté JS (2010a) Environmental controls on branched tetraether lipid distributions in tropical East African lake sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74(17):4902–4918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.06.002
Tierney JE, Russell JM, Huang Y (2010b) A molecular perspective on Late Quaternary climate and vegetation change in the Lake Tanganyika basin. East Afr Quat Sci Rev 29(5–6):787–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.11.030
Vallaeys V, Kärnä T, Delandmeter P, Lambrechts J, Baptista AM, Deleersnijder E, Hanert E (2018) Discontinuous Galerkin modeling of the Columbia River’s coupled estuary-plume dynamics. Ocean Model 124:111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.02.004
Vallaeys V, Lambrechts J, Delandmeter P, Pätsch SA, Hanert E, Deleersnijder E (2021) Understanding the circulation in the deep, micro-tidal and strongly stratified Congo River estuary. Ocean Model 167:101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101890
Verburg P, Antenucci JP (2010) Persistent unstable atmospheric boundary layer enhances sensible and latent heat loss in a tropical great lake: Lake Tanganyika. J Geophys Res Atmos 115(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012839
Verburg P, Antenucci JP, Hecky RE (2011) Differential cooling drives large-scale convective circulation in Lake Tanganyika. Limnol Oceanogr 56(3):910–926. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.3.0910
Verburg P, Hecky RE (2003) Wind patterns, evaporation, and related physical variables in Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. J Great Lakes Res 29(2):48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70538-3
Verburg P, Hecky RE, Kling H (2003) Ecological consequences of a century of warming in Lake Tanganyika. Science 301:505–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084846
Verburg P, Hecky RE (2009) The physics of the warming of Lake Tanganyika by climate change. Limnol Oceanogr 54(62):2418–2430. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2418
Woolway RI, Kraemer BM, Lenters JD, Merchant CJ, O’Reilly CM, Sharma S (2020) Global lake responses to climate change. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1:388–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0067-5
Woolway RI, Maberly SC (2020) Climate velocity in inland standing waters. Nat Clim Chang 10:1124–1129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0889-7
Woolway RI, Merchant CJ (2019) Worldwide alteration of lake mixing regimes in response to climate change. Nat Geosci 12:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0322-x
Yvon-Durocher G, Caffrey JM, Cescatti A, Dossena M, del Giorgio P, Gasol JM, Montoya JM, Pumpanen J, Staehr PA, Trimmer M, Woodward G, Allen AP (2012) Reconciling the temperature dependence of respiration across timescales and ecosystem types. Nature 487:472–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11205
Acknowledgements
The computational resources were provided by the universities that are part of the “Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles” (Federation Wallonia-Brussels), under the consortium CÉCI (“Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif”—Consortium of intensive calculation equipment). The authors like to thank Jean-Pierre Descy for his insights. ED is an honorary research associate with Belgium’s Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS) and this research work was initiated when he was a part-time professor with the Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics (Delft University of Technology, Netherlands). Verburg P. was funded by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment program C01X2205 (A coupled climate-catchment-lake mixing model to protect New Zealand’s iconic deep lakes).
Funding
The authors have no financial or non-financial interests, which may be affected by publication of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KS wrote the main manuscript text with contributions of all other authors. Specifically, WT and PD contributed mainly to Sect. 3. ED and PV contributed mainly to Sects. 5 and 6. KS and JL prepared the figures. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sterckx, K., Delandmeter, P., Lambrechts, J. et al. The impact of seasonal variability and climate change on lake Tanganyika’s hydrodynamics. Environ Fluid Mech 23, 103–123 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09908-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09908-8