Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptions of span in linear algebra: from textbook examples to student responses

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using Balacheff’s (2013) model of conceptions, we inferred potential conceptions in three examples presented in the spanning sets section of an interactive linear algebra textbook. An analysis of student responses to two similar reading questions revealed additional strategies that students used to decide whether a vector was in the spanning set of a given set of vectors. An analysis of the correctness of the application of these strategies provides a more nuanced understanding of student responses that might be more useful for instructors than simply classifying the responses as right or wrong. These findings add to our knowledge of the textbook’s presentation of span and student understanding of span. We discuss implications for research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Most research on student understanding of spans includes linear (in)dependence. See for example, Rasmussen and Wawro (2017) and Stewart et al. (2019) who provide a comprehensive review of these topics.

References

  • Balacheff, N. (2013). cK¢, a model to reason on learners’ conceptions. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–15). University of Illinois at Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2009). Modeling students’ conceptions: The case of function. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/016/08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N., & Margolinas, C. (2005). Modele de connaissances pour le calcul de situations didactiques [Model of conceptions in didactic situations]. In Balises pour la didactique des mathématiques (pp. 1–32). La Pensée Sauvage.

  • Beezer, R. (2021). A first course in linear algebra. http://linear.ups.edu/

  • Beezer, R., Judson, T., Farmer, D., Morrison, K., Mesa, V., & Lynds, S. (2018). Undergraduate teaching and learning in mathematics with open software and textbooks (UTMOST) (National Science Foundation, DUE 1821706,1821329,1821509,1821114) [Grant].

  • Bouhjar, K., Andrews-Larson, C., & Haider, M. Q. (2021). An analytical comparison of students’ reasoning in the context of inquiry-oriented instruction: The case of span and linear independence. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 64, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo, A., Fortuny, J., & Fuentealba, C. (2018). The emergent models in linear algebra: An example with spanning set and span. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 37(4), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo, A., Fortuny, J., & Gómez, V. (2017). Mathematical modelling and the learning trajectory: Tools to support the teaching of linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1241436

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo, A., Gómez, V., & Fortuny, J. (2016). Mathematical modelling in engineering: A proposal to introduce linear algebra concepts. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. (1993). Teaching linear algebra: Must the fog always roll in? The College Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1993.11973503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, E., Mali, A., & Mesa, V. (2022). University students’ engagement with digital mathematics textbooks: A case of linear algebra. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2147104

  • Conway, J. R., Lex, A., & Gehlenborg, N. (2017). UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics, 33(18), 2938–2940. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 275–282). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2013). Emphasizing language and visualization in teaching linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(4), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.756545

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2016). Developing conceptual understanding and definitional clarity in linear algebra through the three worlds of mathematical thinking. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 35(4), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G. (1989). Applying the principle of multiple embodiments in teaching linear algebra: Aspects of familiarity and mode of representation. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G. (2000). Three principles of learning and teaching mathematics: Particular reference to linear algebra-old and new observations. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 177–189). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191–207). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontorovich, I. (2020). Theorems or procedures? Exploring undergraduates’ methods to solve routine problems in linear algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00272-3

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lex, A., Gehlenborg, N., Strobelt, H., Vuillemot, R., & Pfister, H. (2014). UpSet: Visualization of intersecting sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 1983–1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 371–409). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E. (2000). Student understanding of span, linear independence, and basis in an elementary linear algebra class [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Northern Colorado.

  • Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: An empirical approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V. (2010). Strategies for controlling the work in mathematics textbooks for introductory calculus. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, 235–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V., & Goldstein, B. (2016). Conceptions of angles, trigonometric functions, and inverse trigonometric functions in college textbooks. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3, 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0042-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L., Beezer, R. A., & Farmer, D. W. (2018). A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 50(5), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0959-8

  • Parker, C. F. (2010). How intuition and language use relate to students’ understanding of span and linear independence in an elementary linear algebra class [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Northern Colorado.

  • Payton, S. (2019). Fostering mathematical connections in introductory linear algebra through adapted inquiry. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01029-9

  • Plaxco, D., & Wawro, M. (2015). Analyzing student understanding in linear algebra through mathematical activity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroz, C., Gerami, S., & Mesa, V. (2022). Student utilization schemes of questioning devices in undergraduate mathematics dynamic textbooks. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 12) (pp. 4030–4037). ERME / Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., & Wawro, M. (2017). Post-calculus research in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 551–581). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Examining individual and collective level mathematical progress. Education Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9583-x

  • Sellers, M. E., Roh, K. H., & Parr, E. D. (2021). Student quantifications as meanings for quantified variables in complex mathematical statements. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 100802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. T., Yamashita, M., Prihar, E., Heffernan, N., Wu, X., Graff, B., & Lee, D. (2021). Mathbert: A pre-trained language model for general nlp tasks in mathematics education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07340. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.07340

  • Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2019). Linear algebra teaching and learning: Themes from recent research and evolving research priorities. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51, 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01104-1

  • Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. (2007). Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701573335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. (2009). A framework for mathematical thinking: The case of linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390903200984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wawro, M. (2014). Student reasoning about the invertible matrix theorem in linear algebra. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 46, 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0579-x

  • Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C. L., Zandieh, M. J., Sweeney, G. F., & Larson, C. (2012). An inquiry-oriented approach to span and linear independence: The case of the magic carpet ride sequence. Primus, 22(8), 577–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.667516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program and to the Research on Teaching in Undergraduate Settings lab at the University of Michigan.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Awards IUSE 1624634, 1821509, 1625223, 1626455, and 1821329.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saba Gerami.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerami, S., Khiu, E., Mesa, V. et al. Conceptions of span in linear algebra: from textbook examples to student responses. Educ Stud Math (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10306-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10306-8

Keywords

Navigation