Skip to main content
Log in

The transitional stages in the PhD degree in mathematics in terms of students’ motivation

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents results of a longitudinal study in the transition to independent graduate studies in mathematics. The analysis of the data collected from 24 students doing a PhD in mathematics revealed the existence of three transitional stages within the PhD degree, namely Adjustment, Expertise and Articulation. The focus is on the first two transitional stages, since the data collection focused mainly on these. Based on the first two transitional stages and the students’ ways of dealing with them, which were called ‘survival strategies’, three types of students were identified. The importance of motivation for each transitional stage and the successful transition overall are considered as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Table 2 in the appendix gives the names of all the students who participated in this study.

  2. Almost every student mentioned their supervisor which gave me the opportunity to clarify the issue of the supervisor’s support during the transition.

  3. Bradley was the only student of group B that succeeded in becoming an independent mathematician and his case will be discussed in Section 7.

References

  • Alcock, L. J., & Simpson, A. P. (1999). The rigour prefix. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 2 (pp. 17–24).

  • Anderson, L. W., Jacobs, J., Schramm, S., & Splittgerber, F. (2000). School transitions: Beginning of the end or a new beginning? International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. G. (1985). Strategies of educational research: Qualitative methods. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. G.; Pole, C. J., & Hockey, J. (1994). Strategies for managing and supervising the social science PhD. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences. Processes and Products (pp. 13-33).

  • Carlson, M. P. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics graduate students: Influences leading to mathematical success. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFranco, T. C. (1996). A perspective on mathematical problem-solving expertise based on the performances of male Ph.D. mathematicians. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. II (pp. 195–213). Washington D.C: American Mathematical Society & Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, J., & Simpson, A. P. (2002). Encounters with independent graduate study: Changes in learning style. In A. D. Cockburn, E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th conference for the psychology of mathematics education, 2 pp. 305–312.

  • Duffin, J., & Simpson, A. P. (2005). Cognitive empathy and the transition to independent graduate study in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, J., & Simpson, A. (2006). The transition to independent graduate studies in mathematics. Issues in Mathematics Education, 13, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M., & Willcocks, J. (1983). Moving from the primary classroom. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Geraniou, E. (2007). The importance of motivation in independent graduate studies in mathematics. In E. P. Avgerinos, A. Gagatsis (Eds.), 5th Mediterranean conference on mathematics education (pp. 473-483).

  • Haggis, T., & Pouget, M. (2002). Trying to be motivated: perspectives on learning from younger students accessing higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(3), 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halmos, P. R. (1985). I want to be a mathematician. An autobiography. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A. H. (2002). Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 00, 1-36.

  • Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor’s role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M., & Thornley, G. (2001). ‘Experiences of doctoral students in mathematics in New Zealand. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2005). How to get a PhD. A handbook for students and their supervisors. UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, C. J., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R. C., & Lakin, E. (1997). Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: expectations and experiences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., III, & Hungwe, K. (1998). Conjecture and verification in research and teaching: conversations with young mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking. The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. (2003). Postgraduate research students: people in context? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 31(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., & Lodwick, R. (1989). The process of the PhD: a study of the first year of doctoral study. Research Papers in Education, 4(1), 22–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the valuable support from her two PhD supervisors at the University of Warwick, Mr. Adrian Simpson and Professor David Tall. Her PhD research project was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, Award No. R42200134200.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eirini Geraniou.

Additional information

The results presented in this paper are based on the research the author carried out during her studies towards a PhD degree in the field of Mathematics Education at the Institute of Education at the University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

APPENDIX—The groups of students

APPENDIX—The groups of students

  • GROUP A: Alan, Alex, Adrian, Adam, Arthur, Anthony (decided to drop to an MSc degree)

  • GROUP B: Ben, Barry, Brian, Bob, Bradley

  • GROUP C: Casey, Calvin, Carl, Chris, Clark, Colin

  • GROUP F: Frank (third), Fred (third), Fiona (fourth), Felicia (fifth), Floyd (third), Fidel (third), Felix (fourth)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geraniou, E. The transitional stages in the PhD degree in mathematics in terms of students’ motivation. Educ Stud Math 73, 281–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9205-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9205-1

Keywords

Navigation