Skip to main content
Log in

Are Inductive Teaching Methods Compatible with Cognitive Load Theory?

  • Essay
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since Bruner’s introduction of discovery learning in the 1960s, there has been an ongoing and intensive debate on the value of inductive teaching methods (e.g., problem-solving followed by instruction, such as in problem-based learning and productive failure) compared to deductive teaching methods (instruction followed by problem-solving, such as direct instruction). Although it has been strongly argued that problem-first inductive methods are incompatible with human cognitive architecture as perceived by cognitive load theory, the main goal of this position paper is to appeal to broaden cognitive load research on inductive and deductive methods, and especially, their orchestration in educational programs of longer duration. We describe eight possible sequences of problem-solving and instruction and conclude that, when well designed, at least six of these sequences can be compatible with cognitive load theory, including productive failure and problem-based learning. We suggest that rather than comparing inductive with deductive methods, future research should also include inductive methods that use different types of supported problem-solving in combination with expository and inquisitory instruction. We propagate a design perspective, looking for the instructional goals, learner characteristics, and other conditions that make selected teaching methods effective, efficient, and attractive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

A data availability statement is applicable for this paper.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie Costley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

In memory of Jeroen van Merriënboer

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Sequencing problem-solving and instruction (i.e., information and examples)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorbunova, A., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. & Costley, J. Are Inductive Teaching Methods Compatible with Cognitive Load Theory?. Educ Psychol Rev 35, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09828-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09828-z

Keywords

Navigation