Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Understandings of Instructional Theory: Finding the Instructional ‘Sweet Spot’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and Leadership

  • 1055 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the contemporary understanding of instruction verified by the accumulation of generations of scientific work and looks at finding the instructional ‘Sweet Spot’ where teachers can design instruction that is fun, efficient, and rigorous. Two instructional models are interrogated, the Constructivist Learning Theory and the Cognitive Load Theory, by reviewing empirically based literature and exploring the key ideas that surround the salient variables implicated in instruction. The chapter challenges the misconceptions and benefits associated with each of the two models and an argument is put forward, based on empirical research, highlighting that instructional models that produce substantial learning effects occur when the instruction is clear, short, unelaborated, does not overload the mind, and learners are provided with a supply of worked examples. Specific empirical evidence is unpacked that asserts that students who are exposed to teachers who employ directive teaching methods increase their achievement scores, which challenges the current paradigm of some educational practices. While evidence suggests that direct instruction has many benefits, the chapter explores that, at times, non-direct instruction may have some place in teaching and that the instructional ‘Sweet Spot’ may be a blend of both direct and non-direct instruction. The chapter concludes by providing strategies, based on evidentiary research, for creating instructional tasks designed using cognitive load principles and non-direct instruction techniques to help educators find the elusive instructional ‘Sweet Spot’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2019). The Australian curriculum mathematics version 8.1. Australian curriculum assessment and reporting authority. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2019). Australian professional standards for teachers (1st ed., pp. 1–7). [ebook] Melbourne: AITSL. Retrieved November 21, 2019, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/apstresources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf.

  • Aldridge, S., & Bobis, J. (2003). Implementing beliefs, knowledge and practices: A beginning teacher’s story. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), MERINO—Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., 1, 65–71. Geelong: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, W. S. (1973). Learning to discover rules by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 325–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(11), 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, B., & Sieben, R. (2019). Cognitive load theory: An adjunct to constructivist learning theory not an alternative. Australian Educational Leader, 41(1), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, B., & Yates, G. C. R. (2017). Facilitating proportional reasoning through worked examples: Two classroom-based experiments. Cogent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Mulligan, J., & Lowrie, T. (2009). Mathematics for children: Challenges children to think mathematically (3rd ed.). French’s Forrest: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (2012). Assessment & reporting: Celebrating student achievement (4th ed.). French’s Forrest: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, R., Godinho, S., Johnson, N. F., Keddie, A., Letts, W., Lowe, K., et al. (2019). Teaching: Making a difference (4th ed.). Milton: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 4, 125–210).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1991). Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 25–32). Genoa, Italy: Universita di Genova, Dipartimento di Mathematica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph, 4, 31–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema acquisition and sources of cognitive load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 48–64). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., & Hsu, C. (2019). What should students do first when learning how to solve a physics problem. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 209–220). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. (2019, September 9). ‘It’s a disaster’: Teachers under fire as PISA results leave parents fuming. The News Daily. Retrieved from https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2019/12/04/pisa-results-atar/.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem solving based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching, learning and assessment: Steps towards creative practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). How to measure effects of self-regulated learning with checklists on the acquisition of task selection skills. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 66–79). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2019). Load reduction instruction (LRJ): Sequencing explicit instruction and guided discovery to enhance student’s motivation, engagement, learning, and achievement. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 66–79). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. (2014). Forty years of teacher education in Australia: 1074–2014. Journal of Education for Teaching, International Research and Pedagogy, 40(5), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Jossey-bass higher and adult education series. Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). WIley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Park, B. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Historical development in relation to other theories. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cogntive load theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, R., Rodriguez, C., Araujo, J., Shaqlaih, A., & Moss, G. (2013). Constructivism—Constructivist learning theory. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of educational theories (pp. 169–183). IAP Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 4, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 results combined executive summaries volume I, II & III. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019b). Future of education and skills 2030 concept note. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–772). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out examples principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229–245). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., & Atkinson R. K. (2010). Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 91–108). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reys, R., & Lindquist, M. (2007). Helping children learn mathematics (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshire, B. V. (2009). The empirical support for direct instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction success or failure?. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupley, W. H., Blair, T. R., & Nichols, W. D. (2009). Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25, 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, VC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2011a). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Ayers, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011b). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Craik, I.M. (2000). Encoding and retrieval of information. In E. Tulving (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 92–104). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visontay, E. (2019, December 4). Aussie kids years behind China peers. The Australian, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel-Walcut, J.J., Gebrim, J.B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2010). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons, 86(3), 161–172. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from www.jstor.org/stable/42923724.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2019). The effects of transient information and element interactivity on learning from instructional animations. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 209–220). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Michael Colbung for his critical review of the book chapter. Thanks are also due to Associate Professor Mathew White and Professor Faye McCallum for their technical editing of the manuscript. A draft of this chapter was presented at the 2019 Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    Brendan Bentley

Authors
  1. Brendan Bentley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Bentley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Mathew A. White

  2. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Faye McCallum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bentley, B. (2020). New Understandings of Instructional Theory: Finding the Instructional ‘Sweet Spot’. In: White, M.A., McCallum, F. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and Leadership. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6667-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6667-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6666-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6667-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation