Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamic evolution of the Greek regional net fixed capital time series

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of different depreciation methods on the dynamic characteristics of the Greek regional net fixed capital series. Using annual data over the period from 1974 to 2006, Karpetis and Zikos (Int J Econ Res 11(2):333–354, 2014) constructed the series of nominal net fixed capital in the case of the thirteen administrative regions of Greece, applying four different depreciation methods of capital. In the context of the present analysis, these series were initially deflated, using the country’s G.D.P. deflator (2005 = 100), and subsequently were exploited to investigate their dynamic characteristics through estimation of the best fitted ARIMA(p,d,q) models and determination of the roots of the characteristic polynomials. The statistical findings reveal, firstly, the impact of the employed depreciation methods of capital on the evolutionary pattern (monotonic or sinusoidal) of the series and secondly, the slow convergence of the Greek regional net fixed capital towards its long-run equilibrium value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. [1] Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (E.M.T.), [2] Central Macedonia (C.M.), [3] Western Macedonia(W.M.), [4] Thessaly (TH.), [5] Epirus (EP.), [6] Ionian Islands (I.I.), [7] Western Greece (W.G.), [8] Central Greece (C.G.), [9] Attica (ATT.), [10] Peloponnese (PEL.), [11] Northern Aegean Islands (N.A.I.), [12] Southern Aegean Islands (S.A.I.), [13] Crete (CR).

  2. At 5% significance level, the use of the KPSS unit root test and the visual examination of the series’ ACF correlograms, result in the determination of the same number of unit roots in the 69.23,& 53.84% of the cases when using the sld & ohs depreciation methods respectively, and in the 76.92% of the cases when using the ddb & syd methods.

  3. See Enders (1995), ch. 1, pp. 1–61.

References

  • Boskin MJ, Robinson MS, Huber ΑM (1987) New estimates of state and local government tangible capital and net investment, N.B.E.R. Working Paper Series, No 2131. http://www.nber.org/papers/w2131

  • Coen RM (1975) Investment behavior, the measurement of depreciation, and tax policy. Am Econ Rev 65(1):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadkhah KM, Zahedi F (1986) Simultaneous estimation of production function and capital stocks for developing countries. Rev Econ Stat 68(3):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean G, Irwin JO (1964) The stock of fixed capital in the United Kingdom in 1961. J R Stat Soc 127(3):327–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Domar ED (1953) The case for accelerated depreciation. Q J Econ 67(4):493–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4):813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders W (1995) Applied econometric time series, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garafalo GA, Yamarik S (2002) Regional convergence: evidence from a new state by state capital stock series. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georganta Ζ, Κotsis K, Kounaris Ε (1994) Measurement of Total Factor Productivity in the manufacturing sector of Greece, 1980–1991, Discussion Paper, 35. Centre of Planning and Economic Research, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulten CR, Wykoff FC (1981) The estimation of economic depreciation using vintage asset prices: an application of the Box–Cox power transformation. J Econom 15(3):367–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamps C (2006) New estimates of government net capital stocks for 22 OECD countries 1960–2001. IMF Staff Pap 53(1):120–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpetis C, Zikos S (2014) Fixed capital formation in regional level: the case of Greece. Int J Econ Res 11(2):333–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econom 54(1–3):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanne M, Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P (2002) Comparison of unit root tests for time series with level shifts. J Time Ser Anal 23(6):667–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Huang CJ, Shin Y (1997) On stationary tests in the presence of structural breaks. Econ Lett 55(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart PB (1970) Some analytical results on tax depreciation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 1(1):82–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (1994) Standardized estimates of fixed capital stock: a six country comparison. Institute of Economic Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas M, Perez F, Uriel E (2000) Estimation of the stock of capital in Spain. Rev Income Wealth 46(1):103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melachroinos K, Spence N (2000) Constructing a manufacturing fixed capital stock series for the regions of Greece. Eur Plan Stud 8(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin Ε (1963) The life of capital assets: an empirical approach. Oxf Econ Pap 15(3):228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfern P (1955) Net investment in fixed assets in the United Kingdom, 1938–1953. J R Stat Soc 118(2):141–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Skountzos T, Mattheou G (1991) Measurement of the capital stock of the Greek economy. Centre of Planning and Economic Research, Internal Document, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Musgrave JC (1980) Estimation of capital stock in the United States, in the measurement of capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyriakos Emmanouilidis.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 6, 7, and 8 and Fig. 1.

Table 6 Estimation results calculated from the regression \(Y_{j,t} = c + \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{p} {(a_{i} Y_{j,t - i} ) + u_{j,t} } + \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{q} {(a_{i} u_{j,t - i} )}\), where \(Y_{j,t} = \Delta^{d} (nk_{j,t} )\) with j = 1, …., 13
Table 7 Descriptive statistics of the regional net fixed capital series
Table 8 Lanne et al. (2002) unit root test results
Fig. 1
figure 1

Greek regional series of net fixed capital (at constant prices, 2005 = 100 & billions of drachmas)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emmanouilidis, K., Karpetis, C., Varelas, E. et al. The dynamic evolution of the Greek regional net fixed capital time series. Econ Change Restruct 50, 211–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-017-9209-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-017-9209-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation