Abstract
This study investigates the representation of diversity in STEM picture books for the primary grades. Research suggests that the inclusion or exclusion of various identities contributes to how children view their potential and sense of belonging, which can shape their STEM identity. Children often view books with the lens of understanding what role they can and cannot inhabit based on the characters they see represented within the pages of a book. Results indicated that primary STEM books had an absence of cultural specificity across all categories examined, showing relative invisibility for many groups of individuals. The authors conclude that there needs to be more intentionality related to culturally responsive pedagogy, pairing books with additional research that diversifies the curriculum and stimulates STEM dispositions in students, building bridges between cultures, teaching, and learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achieve Inc. (2013). Next-generation science standards for states, by states: The standards—Arranged by disciplinary core ideas and by topics (Vol. 1). National Academies Press.
Adukia, A., Eble, A., Harrison, E., Runesha, H. B., & Szasz, T. (2021). What we teach about race and gender: Representation in images and text of children’s books (No. w29123). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bintz, W. P. (2011). “Way-in” books encourage exploration in middle grades classrooms. Middle School Journal, 42(3), 34–45.
Bishop, R. S. (1990, March). Windows and mirrors: Children’s books and parallel cultures. In California State University Reading Conference: 14th Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 3–12).
Bishop, R. S. (1992). Children’s books in a multicultural world: A view from the USA. Reading Against Racism, 19–38.
Bosma, J. (2010, October 7). Picturebooks are no longer a staple for children. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/08/us/08picture.html.
Burke, A., & Peterson, S. S. (2007). A multidisciplinary approach to literacy through picturebooks and drama. The English Journal, 96, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047299
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.
Carr, R. L., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2012, June). Change in elementary student conceptions of engineering following an intervention as seen from the Draw-an-Engineer Test. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25–299).
Caswell, L. J., & Duke, N. K. (1998). Non-narrative as a catalyst for literacy development. Language Arts, 75(2), 108–117.
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 469–491.
Chua, L. & Rajaratnam, R. (2016). What Makes a Good Picturebook?. National Library Board Singapore. https://www.ecda.gov.sg/growatbeanstalk/Documents/Community%20Partners/NLB/2016%20expert%20series%20workshops/What%20Makes%20a%20Good%20Picture%20Book_Web%20Version.pdf.
Crisp, T. (2015). A content analysis of Orbis Pictus award-winning non-fiction, 1990–2014. Language Arts, 92(4), 241–255.
Crisp, T., & Hiller, B. (2011). “Is this a boy or a girl?”: Rethinking sex-role representation in Caldecott Medal-winning picturebooks, 1938–2011. Children’s Literature in Education, 42(3), 196–212.
Crisp, T., Knezek, S. M., Quinn, M., Bingham, G. E., Girardeau, K., & Starks, F. (2016). What’s on our bookshelves? The diversity of children’s literature in early childhood classroom libraries. Journal of Children’s Literature, 42(2), 29–42.
Cullinan, B. (1989). Literature and the child. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.
Dorie, B. L., & Cardella, M. (2011). Integrating Children’s Literature into Occupational Learning about Engineers. In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 22–899).
Dubosarsky, M., John, M. S., Anggoro, F., Wunnava, S., & Celik, U. (2018). Seeds of STEM: The development of a problem-based STEM curriculum for early childhood classrooms. In Early Engineering Learning (pp. 249–269). Springer.
Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Spotlight on Statistics, 1–35. https://www.wqed.org/sites/default/files/education/iqsp/webcasts/iqsp_resource_STEM_Occupations.pdf.
Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60–73.
Gilmore, N., & Burnett, M. (2014). Crunching numbers at the Nielsen children’s book summit. Publishers Weekly.
Gilton, D. L. (2007). Multicultural and ethnic children’s literature in the United States. Scarecrow.
Gomillion, S. C., & Giuliano, T. A. (2011). The influence of media role models on gay, lesbian, and bisexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(3), 330–354.
Governor’s Advisory Council for Excellence in STEM. (2019). Alabama’s road map for STEM success a strategic plan for STEM education. Retrieved from https://governor.alabama.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ACES-STEM-Roadmap-2019.pdf.
Hefflin, B. R., & Barksdale-Ladd, M. A. (2001). African American children’s literature that helps students find themselves: Selection guidelines for grades K-3. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 810–819.
Holbrook, A., Panozza, L., & Prieto, E. (2009). Engineering in children’s fiction-Not a good story? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 723–740.
Kiefer, B. Z. (1995). The potential of picturebooks: From visual literacy to aesthetic understanding. Prentice-Hall.
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004, June). Draw an Engineer: Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9–482).
Lampley, S. A., Dyess, S. R., Benfield, M. P., Davis, A. M., Gholston, S. E., Dillihunt, M. L., & Turner, M. W. (2022). Understanding the conceptions of engineering in early elementary students. Education Sciences, 12(1), 43.
Leung, E., & Adams-Whittaker, J. (2022). Content analysis of LGBTQ picturebooks for elementary education through an intersectional lens. Frontiers in Education, 6, 769769. https://doi.org/10.3389/Leduc
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP]. (2019). The Nation’s Report Card: 2019 mathematics state snapshot report. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2019/pdf/2020014AL4.pdf.
Noonan, R. (2017). STEM Jobs: 2017 Update. ESA Issue Brief# 02-17. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED594354.
Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2007, October). Young children’s perceptions of engineers before and after a summer engineering outreach course. In 2007 37th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports (pp. S2B-3). IEEE.
Pantoya, M. L., Aguirre-Munoz, Z., & Hunt, E. M. (2015). Developing an engineering identity in early childhood. American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2), 61–68.
Park, M. H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D. Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275–291.
PCAST, President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s Future. Executive Office of the President.
Prince, A. M., & Hayden, H. E. (2021). Repositioning disability in children’s picturebooks through classroom read-alouds. Teaching Exceptional Children, 00400599211038299.
Robnett, R. (2013). The role of peer support for girls and women in STEM: Implications for identity and anticipated retention. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 232–253.
Routman, R. (2000). Conversations: Strategies for teaching, learning, and evaluating. Heinemann.
Short, K. G. (2018). What’s trending in children’s literature and why it matters. Language Arts, 95(5), 287–298.
Singer, A., Montgomery, G., & Schmoll, S. (2020). How to foster the formation of STEM identity: Studying diversity in an authentic learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–12.
Sotirovska, V., & Kelley, J. (2020). Anthropomorphic characters in children’s literature: Windows, mirrors, or sliding glass doors to embodied immigrant experiences. The Elementary School Journal, 121(2), 337–355.
Sumara, D. J. (1998). Fictionalizing acts: Reading and the making of identity. Theory into Practice, 37(3), 203–210.
Swift, T. M., & Watkins, S. E. (2004). An engineering primer for outreach to K-4 education.
Tank, K. M., Moore, T. J., Dorie, B. L., Gajdzik, E., Terri Sanger, M., Rynearson, A. M., & Mann, E. F. (2018). Engineering in early elementary classrooms through the integration of high-quality literature, design, and STEM+ C content. In Early engineering learning (pp. 175–201). Springer.
Vaughn, M., Sotirovska, V., Darragh, J. J., & Elhess, M. (2022). Examining agency in children’s non-fiction picturebooks. Children’s Literature in Education, 53(1), 33–51.
Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–12.
Weale, S. (2016). Gendered toys could deter girls from career in engineering, report says. The Guardian, 7.
Wilson, S. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
STEM Picturebook List
Alling, N. (2014). When I build with blocks. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Beaty, A. (2013). Rosie Revere, engineer. Abrams Books for Young Readers.
Beaty, A. (2016). Ada Twist, scientist. Abrams Books for Young Readers.
Burleigh, R. (2013). Look Up!: Henrietta Leavitt. Simon and Schuster.
Cornwall, G. (2020). Jabari tries. Candlewick.
Diehn, A. (2019). Human-computer: Mary Jackson. Nomad Press.
Ferry, B. (2021). Marsha is magnetic. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Fliess, S. (2018). Mary Had a Little Lab. Albert Whitman & Company.
Gehl, L. (2019). Always looking up: Nancy Grace Roman Astronomer. Albert Whitman & Co.
Harris, A. (2013). I wonder. Four Elephants Press.
Harris, R. (2018). CRASH! BOOM! A math tale. Candlewick.
Howes, K. (2019). Be A maker. Candlewick.
Jones, P. (2019). Izzy Gizmo and the invention convention. Peachtree Publishers Company Inc.
Jones, P. (2018). Izzy Gizmo. Peachtree Publishers Company Inc.
Lawrence, K. (2018). Robot to the rescue. Kane Press Inc.
Lovell, P. (2012). Have fun Molly Lou Mellon. Putnam’s Sons Books for Young Readers.
Mayer, L. (2013). Newton and me. Arbordale Publishing.
Riggs, S. (2019). Meet the gears a family of engineers. Independently published.
Spires, A. (2013). The most magnificent thing. Kids Can Press.
Spiro, R. (2018). Made by Maxine. Dial Books for Young Readers.
Tougas, C. (2012). Mechanicals. Orca Book Publishers.
Van Dusen, C. (2019). If I built a school. Dial Books.
Vegara, S. (2018). Ada Lovelace: Little people, big dreams. Frances Lincoln Children’s Books.
Winter, J. (2008). Wangari’s trees of peace. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Yolen, J., & Sheban, C. (2016). What to do with a box. Creative Edition.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardullo, V., Burton, M. Picturebooks in the Primary Grades: Representation and the Stories Shared About Who Belongs in STEM. Early Childhood Educ J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01379-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01379-2