Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the interpretations children share from their reading of an almost wordless picture book during independent reading time

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shares findings from part of a larger project exploring students’ interpretations of children’s literature during independent reading time. Examined in this paper are interpretations by students in Grade 4 (aged 9–10 years) about the messages conveyed in the almost wordless picture book Mirror by author and artist Jeannie Baker. Mirror shares a multicultural perspective on life through its portrayal through collage of the lives of two families living in different countries. Data were collected as semi-structured interviews and observations recorded as field notes. Chambers’ (1994) ‘Tell Me’ framework informed the question schedule of the semistructured interviews, which were designed to promote opportunities for students to share their interpretations following independent reading time. Emerging themes from data analysis are considered through critical literacy lens (Janks, 2010). Further, implications for the use of almost wordless picture books in classroom reading experiences are identified in connection with the development of children’s cultural awareness and sensitivity (Short, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allington, R.L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36 (6), 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R.L. (2002). What I’ve learned about effective reading instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 740–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizpe, E. (2013). Meaning-making from wordless (or nearly wordless) picturebooks: What educational research expects and what readers have to say. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43 (2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizpe, E., Farrell, M. & McAdam, J. (2013). Opening the door to children’s literature: A review of research. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber & L. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning and culture. (pp. 241–257). UK: John Wiley and Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Australian Curriculum (English). Version 3.0. Australian Curriculum and Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/English/Rationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. (2010). Mirror. London: Walker Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards (BOSTES). (2012). Suggested texts for the English K–10 Syllabus. Retrieved from http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/assets/global/files/english-k10-suggested-texts.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Callow, J. (2013). The shape of text to come: How image and text work. Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, A. (1994). Tell Me: Children, reading and talk. Newtown, Australia: Thimble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri, A. & Teale, W.H. (2013). Stories of multiracial experiences in literature for children, ages 9–14. Children’s Literature in Education, 44 (4), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (2013). Schools as meeting places: Critical and inclusive literacies in changing local environments. Language Arts, 90 (5), 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J.M. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13 (1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jonga, P.F. & Shareb, D.L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11 (1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, V. (2013). A similarity or different: The problem of Race in Australian picture books. Bookbird, 51 (2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, J.T., Skinner, C.H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, C.E. & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37 (5), 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galda, L. (2013). Learning from children reading books: Transactional Theory of the teaching of literature. Journal of Children’s Literature, 39 (2) 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garan, E.M. & DeVoogd, G. (2008). The benefits of Sustained Silent Reading: Scientific research and common sense converge. The Reading Teacher, 62 (4), 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. & Murris, K. (2012). Picturebooks, pedagogy and philosophy. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R.A. (2010). The BFG and the Spaghetti Book Club: A case study of children as critics. Children’s Literature in Education, 41 (3), 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollindale, P. (1988). Ideology and the children’s book. Oxford, UK: Thimble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P. (1999). What the authors tell us. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding children’s literature. 2nd Ed. (pp. 190–205). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalongo, M.R., Dragich, D., Conrad, N.K. & Zhang, A. (2002). Using wordless picture books to support emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29 (3), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2012). The importance of critical literacy. English Teaching Practice and Critique, 11 (1), 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2014). Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. & Clausen-Grace, N. (2006), R5: The sustained silent reading makeover that transformed readers. The Reading Teacher, 60 (2), 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, B. (2008). What is a picture book, anyway? The evolution of form and substance through the postmodern era and beyond. In R.S. Lawrence & S. Panteleo (Eds.), Postmodern picturessbooks: Play, parody and self-referentiality (pp. 9–21). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd Ed). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2012). Critical Literacy: Foundational Notes. Theory into Practice, 51 (1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, J. & Kervin, L. (2014). Interpreting the images in a picture book: Students make connections to themselves, their lives and experiences. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13 (2), 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, K.E. (2011). Reading Pictures: Developing visual literacy for greater comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 63 (3), 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleo, S. (2005). ‘Reading’ young children’s visual texts. Early Childhood Research and Practice 7 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleo, S. (2013). Revisiting Rosenblatt’s aesthetic response through The Arrival. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36 (3), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L.M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and Response. Theory into Practice, 21 (4), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L.M. (1986). The Aesthetic Transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20 (4), 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarland, C. (1999). Critical tradition and ideological positioning. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding children’s literature. 2nd Ed. (pp. 30–49). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini, F. (2014). Exploring Wordless Picture Books. The Reading Teacher, 68 (1), 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.G. (2003). Exploring a curriculum that is international. IBO World. Retrieved September 21, 2009 from http://uacoe.arizona.edu/short/Publications/A%20curriculum%20that%20is%20international.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.G. (2009). Critically reading the word and the world: Building intercultural understanding through literature. Bookbird, 47 (2), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.G. (2011). Reading literature in elementary classrooms. In S.A. Wolf, K. Coats, P. Enciso and C.A Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of research on children’s and young adult literature. (pp. 48–62). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.G. & Kauffman, G. (2004). Examining prejudice through children’s responses to literature and the arts. Democracy and Education, 15 (3/4), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.G. & Thomas, L. (2011). Developing intercultural understandings through global children’s literature. In R.J. Meyer and K.F. Whitmore (Eds.). Reclaiming reading: Teachers, students and researchers regaining spaces for thinking and action. (pp. 149–166). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, V., Tate, S. & Harste, J.C. (2013). Negotiating critical literacies with pre-service and in-service teachers. New York, N.Y.: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, A. (1994). Reading against the text: Developing critical literacy. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 1 (1), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, G., Johnston, R., Holliday, M., Ljungdahl, L. & March, P. (2010). Literacy: Reading, writing and children’s literature. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mantei, J., Kervin, L. Examining the interpretations children share from their reading of an almost wordless picture book during independent reading time. AJLL 38, 183–192 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651899

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651899

Navigation