Skip to main content
Log in

Kindergarten and First-Grade Students’ Understandings and Representations of Arithmetic Properties

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 November 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

We present a study that explores Kindergarten and first-grade students’ understandings and representations of arithmetic properties. The 16 students participated in a classroom teaching experiment designed to explore children’s algebraic understandings, including their understandings and symbolic representations of three arithmetic properties: additive identity, additive inverse, and commutativity. We characterized students’ understandings in terms of Skemp’s framework of instrumental (rules without reason) and relational (knowing what to do and why) understandings. Following Vergnaud, we analyzed the types of additive relationships (transformation, comparison, or combination) and representations used by students. Our findings show that students’ understandings developed in sophistication over time. We observed the least sophisticated understandings for the commutative property, particularly among Kindergarten students who exhibited instrumental understandings even after instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Baroody, A. J., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Young children’s understanding and application of subtraction-related principles. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2017). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra and the Elementary Classroom: Transforming Thinking, Transforming Practice. Portsmouth, NA: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., Brizuela, B., Gardiner, A., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015a). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. (2011). Developing essential under-standing of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3–5. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A., Isler, I., & Kim, J. (2015b). The development of children's algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo, V., & Rodríguez, P. (1993). Children’s understanding of the commutative law of addition. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Howson, A. G. (2013). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & K. S. F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education research (pp. 949–978). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. (Research Report No. 00–2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.

  • Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Berman, P., & Pligge, M. (2005). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 81–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerezci, B. (2020). Measuring the quality of early mathematics instruction: A review of six measures. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, R., & Leali, S. A. (2012). Using problem solving to assess young chidren’s mathematics knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(6), 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, B. H. H., & Nunes, T. (2017). Children’s understanding of the commutativity and complement principles: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Carraher, T. N., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Characteristics of Korean students’ early algebraic thinking: A generalized arithmetic perspective. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 141–165). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. Advances in Mathematics Education Monograph Series (pp. 303–322). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, L. (2009). Sobre las nociones de representación y comprensión en la investigación en educación matemática. PNA, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. M., Dubé, A. K., & Beatch, J. A. (2017). Children’s understanding of additive concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Developing algebraic thinking in the context of arithmetic. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 43–69). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (2009). Educating the young mathematician: The twentieth century and beyond. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(4), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K. (2003). What children’s play tells us about teaching mathematics. Young Children, 58(1), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. (2009). Representation-based proof in the elementary grades. In D. A. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective (pp. 71–86). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Van Hemel, S. B. (Eds.). (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why, what and how. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L., & Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principals and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, A., Ellis, A., Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ureña, J., Ramírez, R., & Molina, M. (2019). Representations of the generalization of a functional relationship and the relation with interviewer’s mediation. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 42(3), 570–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1996). The theory of conceptual fields. In L. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 219–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–108). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been developed within the project with reference EDU2016-75771-P, financed by the State Research Agency (SRA) from Spain, and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the grant “Jose Castillejo” funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. This research study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-1415509. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Ramirez Uclés.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: typo in author name Rafael Ramírez Uclés has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez Uclés, R., Brizuela, B.M. & Blanton, M. Kindergarten and First-Grade Students’ Understandings and Representations of Arithmetic Properties. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 345–356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01123-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01123-8

Keywords

Navigation