Abstract
We present a study that explores Kindergarten and first-grade students’ understandings and representations of arithmetic properties. The 16 students participated in a classroom teaching experiment designed to explore children’s algebraic understandings, including their understandings and symbolic representations of three arithmetic properties: additive identity, additive inverse, and commutativity. We characterized students’ understandings in terms of Skemp’s framework of instrumental (rules without reason) and relational (knowing what to do and why) understandings. Following Vergnaud, we analyzed the types of additive relationships (transformation, comparison, or combination) and representations used by students. Our findings show that students’ understandings developed in sophistication over time. We observed the least sophisticated understandings for the commutative property, particularly among Kindergarten students who exhibited instrumental understandings even after instruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
10 November 2020
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01128-3
References
Baroody, A. J., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Young children’s understanding and application of subtraction-related principles. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 2–9.
Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2017). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra and the Elementary Classroom: Transforming Thinking, Transforming Practice. Portsmouth, NA: Heinemann.
Blanton, M., Brizuela, B., Gardiner, A., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015a). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558.
Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. (2011). Developing essential under-standing of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3–5. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A., Isler, I., & Kim, J. (2015b). The development of children's algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87.
Bermejo, V., & Rodríguez, P. (1993). Children’s understanding of the commutative law of addition. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 55–72.
Cai, J., & Howson, A. G. (2013). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & K. S. F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education research (pp. 949–978). New York: Springer.
Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. (Research Report No. 00–2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Berman, P., & Pligge, M. (2005). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 81–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cerezci, B. (2020). Measuring the quality of early mathematics instruction: A review of six measures. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 507–520.
Charlesworth, R., & Leali, S. A. (2012). Using problem solving to assess young chidren’s mathematics knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(6), 373–382.
Ching, B. H. H., & Nunes, T. (2017). Children’s understanding of the commutativity and complement principles: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47, 65–79.
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nunes, T., Carraher, T. N., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179.
Pang, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Characteristics of Korean students’ early algebraic thinking: A generalized arithmetic perspective. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 141–165). Cham: Springer.
Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. Advances in Mathematics Education Monograph Series (pp. 303–322). New York: Springer.
Rico, L. (2009). Sobre las nociones de representación y comprensión en la investigación en educación matemática. PNA, 4(1), 1–14.
Robinson, K. M., Dubé, A. K., & Beatch, J. A. (2017). Children’s understanding of additive concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 16–28.
Russell, S., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Developing algebraic thinking in the context of arithmetic. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 43–69). Berlin: Springer.
Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (2009). Educating the young mathematician: The twentieth century and beyond. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(4), 305–312.
Seo, K. (2003). What children’s play tells us about teaching mathematics. Young Children, 58(1), 28–33.
Schifter, D. (2009). Representation-based proof in the elementary grades. In D. A. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective (pp. 71–86). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95.
Snow, C. E., & Van Hemel, S. B. (Eds.). (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why, what and how. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Steffe, L., & Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principals and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stephens, A., Ellis, A., Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Ureña, J., Ramírez, R., & Molina, M. (2019). Representations of the generalization of a functional relationship and the relation with interviewer’s mediation. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 42(3), 570–614.
Vergnaud, G. (1996). The theory of conceptual fields. In L. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 219–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–108). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Acknowledgements
This work has been developed within the project with reference EDU2016-75771-P, financed by the State Research Agency (SRA) from Spain, and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the grant “Jose Castillejo” funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. This research study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-1415509. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: typo in author name Rafael Ramírez Uclés has been corrected.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramirez Uclés, R., Brizuela, B.M. & Blanton, M. Kindergarten and First-Grade Students’ Understandings and Representations of Arithmetic Properties. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 345–356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01123-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01123-8