Skip to main content
Log in

Designing Curriculum-Based Mathematics Professional Development for Kindergarten Teachers

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the influence of a year-long mathematics professional development program on Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs, content knowledge, instructional practices, and their students’ achievement. The professional development program is grounded in the theoretical construct of learner-centered professional development and focuses on supporting teachers’ integration of standards-based pedagogies aligned with the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. Data analysis included examining 15 Kindergarten teachers’ mathematics content knowledge, their beliefs about mathematics, their enactment of student-centered pedagogies, and student achievement on curriculum-based assessments. Findings indicated that teachers adopted more student-centered pedagogies and embraced more student-centered beliefs about mathematics teaching during their time in the project. Further, Kindergarten teachers also demonstrated gains in their mathematical content knowledge, and those content knowledge gains were linked to gains in student achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P., & Murphy, P. (1998). The research base for APA’s learner-centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools (pp. 33–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, M. (2013). Engaging with mathematics in the Kindergarten: Orchestrating a fairy tale through questioning and use of tools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(4), 502–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, M., Claessens, A., & Finch, M. A. (2013). Teaching students what they already know? The (Mis)alignment between mathematics instructional content and student knowledge in Kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Briman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2003). Professional development that works: What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 748–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, D. J., Banilower, E. R., Weiss, I. R., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 113–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 55, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like. Oxford, OH: Author. http://www.nsdc.org/library/policy/npeat213.pdf.

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.

  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plank, S. B., & Condliffe, B. F. (2013). Pressures of the season: An examination of classroom quality and high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1152–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D. (2012). Supporting mathematics instruction with an expert coaching model. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2010). Reexamining technology’s role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 557–571. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9146-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polly, D., Wang, C., McGee, J. R., Lambert, R. G., Martin, C. S., & Pugalee, D. K. (2014). Examining the influence of a curriculum-based elementary mathematics professional development program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 327–343. doi:10.1080/02568543.2014.913276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. J. (2012). CCSSM: Keeping teaching and learning strong. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(1), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–370). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2006). Designing and using research instruments to describe the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers. Research in Education, 75, 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TERC. (2007). Investigations in number, data, and space (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (USDE). (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Panel. http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/finalreport.pdf.

  • Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Learning to notice in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Polly, D., LeHew, A. J., Pugalee, D. K., & Lambert, R. (2013). Supporting teachers’ enactment of an elementary school student-centered mathematics pedagogies: The evaluation of a curriculum-focused professional development program. New Waves-Educational Research and Development, 16(1), 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T.; Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved December 31, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a U.S. Department of Education Mathematics Science Partnership Grant Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drew Polly.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Teacher Beliefs Questionnaire

figure a

This questionnaire was adapted from Swan (2006). Permission for use was obtained on May 29, 2009.

Appendix 2: Sample of Content Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics (CKT-M)

Ms. Dominguez was working with a new textbook and she noticed that it gave more attention to the number 0 than her old book. She came across a page that asked students to determine if a few statements about 0 were true or false. Intrigued, she showed them to her sister who is also a teacher, and asked her what she thought.

Which statement(s) should the sisters select as being true? (Mark YES, NO, or I’M NOT SURE for each item below.)

 

Yes

No

I’m not sure

(a) 0 is an even number

1

2

3

(b) 0 is not really a number. It is a placeholder in writing big numbers

1

2

3

(c) The number 8 can be written as 008

1

2

3

Appendix 3: Teacher Practices Questionnaire

Indicate the frequency with which you utilize each of the following practices in your teaching by circling the number that corresponds with your response.

Practice

Almost never

Sometimes

Half the time

Most of the time

Almost always

1. Students learn through doing exercises

0

1

2

3

4

2. Students work on their own, consulting a neighbor from time to time

0

1

2

3

4

3. Students use only the methods I teach them

0

1

2

3

4

4. Students start with easy questions and work up to harder questions

0

1

2

3

4

5. Students choose which questions they tackle

0

1

2

3

4

6. I encourage students to work more slowly

0

1

2

3

4

7. Students compare different methods for doing questions

0

1

2

3

4

8. I teach each topic from the beginning, assuming they don’t have any prior knowledge of the topic

0

1

2

3

4

9. I teach the whole class at once

0

1

2

3

4

10. I try to cover everything in a topic

0

1

2

3

4

11. I draw links between topics and move back and forth between topics

0

1

2

3

4

12. I am surprised by the ideas that come up in a lesson

0

1

2

3

4

13. I avoid students making mistakes by explaining things carefully first

0

1

2

3

4

14. I tend to follow the textbook or worksheets closely

0

1

2

3

4

15. Students learn through discussing their ideas

0

1

2

3

4

16. Students work collaboratively in pairs or small groups

0

1

2

3

4

17. Students invent their own methods

0

1

2

3

4

18. I tell students which questions to tackle

0

1

2

3

4

19. I only go through one method for doing each question

0

1

2

3

4

20. I find out which parts students already understand and don’t teach those parts

0

1

2

3

4

21. I teach each student differently according to individual needs

0

1

2

3

4

22. I tend to teach each topic separately

0

1

2

3

4

23. I know exactly which topics each lesson will contain

0

1

2

3

4

24. I encourage students to make and discuss mistakes

0

1

2

3

4

25. I jump between topics as the need arises

0

1

2

3

4

This questionnaire was adapted from Swan (2006). Permission for use was obtained on May 29, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polly, D., S. Martin, C., McGee, J.R. et al. Designing Curriculum-Based Mathematics Professional Development for Kindergarten Teachers. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 659–669 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0810-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0810-1

Keywords

Navigation