Abstract
Development of two-digit place value understanding in the elementary grades has been the subject of some study; however, research at the pre-kindergarten (Pre-K) level is limited. This two-part paper begins by providing an overview of two-digit place value instruction in Pre-K and describes the component parts of a research-based math curriculum, MyTeachingPartner Math (MTP Math). Part two presents the results of a video analysis of classroom interactions across four MTP Math place value activities facilitated by two high quality teachers. Particular attention is given to the primary conceptual hurdles faced by students, as well as the scaffolding strategies employed by teachers. Results indicate that students possess a conceptual understanding of the ones place prior to the tens place and initially struggle the concept of unitizing groups of ten. Considerations are discussed for improving the quality of teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten that can best support children’s thinking and learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Access Center. (2004). Concrete-representational-abstract instructional approach. The access center (pp. 1–6). Retrieved September 24, 2012 from http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/documents/CRAApplicationFinal_000.pdf.
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131–152.
Alibali, M. W., & Dirusso, A. A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.
Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 16(2), 14–18, 46–47.
Baroody, A. J. (1990). How and when should place value concepts and skills be taught? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 281–286.
Baroody, A. J. (2009). Fostering early numeracy in preschool and kindergarten. Encyclopedia of language and literacy development (pp. 1–9). London, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network. Retrieved June 24, 2012 from http://literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?topId=271.
Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct, and sequential. The American Educator, 25(1), 24–28.
Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carpenter, T. P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J. M. (1981). Problem structure and first-grade children’s initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 27–39.
Clement, L. L. (2004). A model for understanding, using, and connecting representations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(2), 97–102.
Cobb, P., & Wheatley, G. (1988). Children’s initial understandings of ten. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(3), 1–28.
Copley, J. V. (2000). The young child and mathematics. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. London, England: Hutchinson Education.
diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Children’s meta-representational expertise. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(2), 117–160.
Fischer, F. E. (1990). A part–part-whole curriculum for teaching number in kindergarten. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 207–215.
Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach subtraction with regrouping to students at risk for failure. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195–207.
Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing number sense, addition, and subtraction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392.
Fuson, K. (1990). Conceptual structures for multiunit numbers: Implications for learning and teaching multidigit addition, subtraction, and place-value. Cognition and Instruction, 7(4), 343–403.
Fuson, K., & Briars, D. (1990). Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first- and second-grade place value and multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 180–206.
Ginsburg, H. P., Greenes, C., & Balfanz, R. (2003). Big math for little kids: Classroom set. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour Publications.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 98–122.
Ho, C. S., & Cheng, F. S. (1997). Training in place value concepts improves children’s addition skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 495–506.
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74, 1368–1378.
Hunting, R. P. (2003). Part-whole number knowledge in preschool children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 217–235.
Kamii, C. (1986). Place value: An explanation of its difficulty and educational implications for the primary grades. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1, 75–85.
Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher “Math Talk”. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 59–69.
McClain, K. (2003). Supporting preservice teachers’ understanding of place value and multidigit arithmetic. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(4), 281–306.
Murata, A. (2004). Paths to learning ten-structured understandings of teen sums: Addition solution methods of Japanese grade 1 students. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 185–218.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA. Retrieved April 7, 2012 from http://standards.nctm.org/document/chapter4/numb.htm.
National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. C. T. Cross, T. A. Woods, & H. Schweingruber (Eds.), Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O’Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52–56.
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). The classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405–435.
Ross, S. H. (1986). The development of children’s place-value numeration concepts in grades two through five. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2007). Manual for classroom observation (COEMET)-version 3. Unpublished version.
Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26, 9–15.
Van de Walle, J, (2003). Developing early number concepts and number sense. In Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (pp. 115–134). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wood, T. (1998). Funneling or focusing? Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics class. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini-Bussi, & A. Sierpinski (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGuire, P., Kinzie, M.B. Analysis of Place Value Instruction and Development in Pre-Kindergarten Mathematics. Early Childhood Educ J 41, 355–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0580-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0580-y