Skip to main content
Log in

An Observational Study of Print Literacy in Canadian Preschool Classrooms

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of print literacy in preschool classrooms. There were seven preschool teachers working in central Canada who were observed over three sessions. The process of analytic induction was used to formulate categories based on interviews, classroom observations and documents. The following categories were identified from the data: book engagement and availability, writing engagement, and print displays and materials. There were some consistencies across centres in the availability of print materials; however, variation often existed in the types of interactions with print. For example, in some preschool classrooms, teachers had a more structured approach toward writing development while in others, they did not. Such differences in practice may be attributed to different beliefs and knowledge of early literacy development. The results of this study offer insight on the role of print literacy in preschool classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowman, B., Donovan, M., & Burns, M. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. (1997). The role of shared reading in the development of phonological awareness: A longitudinal study of middle to upper class children. Early Child Development and Care, 127–8, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabel, S., Justice, L., Vukelich, C., Buell, M., & Han, M. (2008). Strategic and intentional shared storybook reading. In L. Justice & C. Vukelich (Eds.), Achieving excellence in preschool instruction (pp. 198–220). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casbergue, R., McGee, L., & Bedford, A. (2008). Characteristics of classroom environments associated with accelerated literacy development. In L. Justice & C. Vukelich (Eds.), Achieving excellence in preschool instruction (pp. 167–181). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1996). Learning to read: The great debate. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, J. (2008). The scientifically based reading research approach to early literacy instruction. In L. Justice & C. Vukelich (Eds.), Achieving excellence in preschool instruction (pp. 25–40). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. (2001). Book reading in preschool classrooms. Is recommended practice common? In D. Dickinson & P. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 175–203). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., Shaw, D., Moretti, S., & Bell, M. (2001, June). Parental coaching during shared reading: A bidirectional process. In M. Evans (Chair), More than classroom curriculum and cognition in learning to read. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

  • Gest, S., Holland-Coviello, R., Welsh, J., Eicher-Catt, D., & Gill, S. (2006). Language development subcontexts in Head Start classrooms: Distinctive patterns of teacher talk during free play, mealtime, and book reading. Early Education and Development, 17, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A., & Wasik, B. (2008). Head Start teachers’ beliefs about language and literacy instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L., Mashburn, A., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2008). Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2009). Preschool teachers’ beliefs about children’s print literacy development. Early Years, 29, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makin, L. (2003). Creating positive literacy learning environments in early childhood. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 327–337). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2003). Early childhood literacy and popular culture. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 112–125). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Beck, M., & Zaslow, M. (2006). Introduction: The context for critical issues in early childhood professional development. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 1–16). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, E. (2003). Gender and early childhood literacy. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 22–33). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L. (2007). Developing literacy in preschool. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. (2006). Standardized observation and professional development: A focus on individualized implementation and practices. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 231–250). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., Diamond, K., Bojczyk, K., & Gerde, H. (2008). Head start teachers’ perspectives on early literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 422–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell-Gates, V. (1995). Other people’s words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell-Gates, V. (1996). Stories, coupons, and the “TV Guide”: Relationships between home literacy experiences and emergent literacy knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 406–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemary, C., & Roskos, K. (2002). Literacy conversations between adults and children at childcare: Descriptive observations and hypotheses. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 16, 212–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskos, K., & Christie, J. (2001). On not pushing too hard: A few cautionary remarks about linking literacy and play. Young Children, 56, 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskos, K., Rosmary, C., & Varner, H. (2006). Alignment in educator preparation for early and beginning literacy instruction: A state-level case example. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 255–282). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickedanz, J., & Casbergue, R. (2009). Writing in preschool: Learning to orchestrate meaning and marks (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M., LeFevre, J., Thomas, E., & Daley, K. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S., Edwards, C., Marvin, C., & Knoche, L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process, issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20, 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spodek, B. (1988). The implicit theories of early childhood teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 38, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. (2004). Teaching practices in kindergarten and first grade: Different strokes for different folks. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 548–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., Taggart, B., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Totsika, V., Ereky-Stevens, K., Gilden, R., et al. (2007). Curricular quality and day-to-day learning activities in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teale, W., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent literacy as a perspective for examining how young children become writers and readers. In W. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. vii–xxv). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonyan, H., & Howes, C. (2003). Exploring patterns in time children spend in a variety of child care activities: Associations with environmental quality, ethnicity, and gender. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ure, C., & Raban, B. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and understandings of literacy in the pre-school: Pre-school literacy project stage 1. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleeck, A. (2006). Fostering inferential language during book sharing with prereaders: A foundation for later text comprehension strategies. In A. van Kleeck (Ed.), Sharing books and stories to promote language and literacy (pp. 269–317). San Diego, CA: Plural.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kleeck, A., Stahl, S., & Bauer, E. (Eds.). (2003). On reading books to children: Parents and teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, M. (1996). Hidden literacies: Children learning at home and at school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukelich, C. (1994). Effects of play interventions on young children’s reading of environmental print. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B., Bond, M., & Hindman, A. (2006). The effects of a language and literacy intervention on Head Start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, K., Martens, P., Goodman, Y., & Owocki, G. (2004). Critical lessons from the transactional perspective on early literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4, 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltz, N., & Klein, E. (2001). What do you do in child care? Children’s perceptions of high and low quality classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

My thanks to the preschool teachers for their participation in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Lynch.

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Questions (Lynch 2009)

Part I

  1. 1.

    How long have you worked in ECE?

    What levels do you teach/work with?

    What is your educational background in ECE?

  1. 2.

    Please describe a typical day at the preschool.

  2. 3.

    Has your educational (academic program) prepared you for your work as a preschool teacher? If so, how (practice)?

  3. 4.

    What would you like to know more about when working in/teaching preschool (supporting literacy)?

  4. 5.

    How important is print literacy (reading/writing development) in preschool?

  5. 6.

    Are there any changes in an ECE preparation program you would like to see (in literacy)?

Part II (Ure and Raban 2001)

  1. 1.

    What concerns do you have about children’s early reading and writing?

  2. 2.

    Are there any children in your group(s) that are reading and writing? How do you know this?

  3. 3.

    What (if any) role do you consider you play in encouraging preschool children to read and to write?

  4. 4.

    What role (if any) do you consider parents play in encouraging the preschool age children to read and to write?

  5. 5.

    What curriculum experiences (if any) do you currently offer to foster reading and writing development?

  6. 6.

    At what age should children be encouraged to read and write?

  7. 7.

    What resources (if any) are currently available for children in your group(s) to experiment and learn about (a) reading, (b) writing?

  8. 8.

    When are these resources (if ever) used by the children: (a) reading materials, (b) writing materials?

  9. 9.

    How do you think young children learn to read and write?

  10. 10.

    Is there anything you would like to know more about young children and how they learn to read and write?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, J. An Observational Study of Print Literacy in Canadian Preschool Classrooms. Early Childhood Educ J 38, 329–338 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0414-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0414-0

Keywords

Navigation