Abstract
Mobile learning has gained significant recognition for its beneficial effects on learning across various dimensions. Nonetheless, ensuring consistent learner acceptance of mobile learning remains a critical factor to address. This meta-analysis study is the first comprehensive examination of critical antecedents impacting learners’ perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of mobile learning within the Technology Acceptance Model. This study undertook a comprehensive analysis of prior research conducted in both English and Chinese languages during the last 22 years. The aim was to build the Integrated Mobile Learning Acceptance Model utilizing a one-stage meta-analysis structural equation model. Five major antecedents of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were identified, and the moderating effects of education level, region, and culture were revealed. The resulting model provides a cohesive framework for understanding the factors that influence learners’ intention to use mobile learning across various contexts. At the same time, the results of the study contribute to the advancement of theory in mobile learning acceptance and have practical implications for the design and evaluation of mobile learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2011). Education level as a technology adoption moderator. 2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development (pp. 324–328). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCRD.2011.5764029
Adjust. (2022). Explore what makes a good app user retention rate. Adjust. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.adjust.com/blog/what-makes-a-good-retention-rate/
Afacan Adanır, G., & Muhametjanova, G. (2021). University students’ acceptance of mobile learning: A comparative study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. Education and Information Technologies,26(5), 6163–6181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10620-1
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer Verlag.
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education,125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. (2019). Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters. Education and Information Technologies,24(2), 1433–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9840-1
Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies,24(1), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9810-7
Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2013). A meta-analysis of critical success factors affecting mobile learning. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 262–267). https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2013.6654443
Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: A meta-analysis approach. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,14(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.04288
Alsharida, R. A., Hammood, M. M., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review of the technology acceptance model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,15(5), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.18093
Bajorek, M., & Nowak, J. (2011). The role of a mobile device in a home monitoring healthcare system. Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS),2011, 371–374.
Bernacki, M. L. (2017). Examining the cyclical, loosely sequenced, and contingent features of self-regulated learning: Trace data and their analysis. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 370–387). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-24
Ceci. (2022). Mobile app user retention rate by category 2020. Statista. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/259329/ios-and-android-app-user-retention-rate/
Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., Ibrahim, N. H., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Review of mobile learning trends 2010–2015: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, Society,20(2), 113–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/90002168.
Cheng. (2015). Towards an understanding of the factors affecting m-learning acceptance: Roles of technological characteristics and compatibility. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(3), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2014.12.011
Choi, G. W., Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2018). Investigating children’s deep learning of the tree life cycle using mobile technologies. Computers in Human Behavior,87, 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.020
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of M-learning. Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118764.ch1
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science,35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (2006). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,22, 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems,19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Demir, K., & Akpınar, E. (2018). The effect of mobile learning applications on students’ academic achievement and attitudes toward mobile learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology,6(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.02.004
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers,21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
Fang, Y., Zhao, J., Gao, M., & Ibrahim, N. M. (2023). Dropout factors of English mobile learning among Chinese college students based on UTAUT2 model. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 129–138). https://doi.org/10.1145/3625704.3625763
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education,14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P. (2019). irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement (0.84.1). Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr
Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Mobile technology in the classroom: What drives student-lecturer interactions? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,34(7), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1380970
Gong, Z., & Wallace, J. D. (2012). A comparative analysis of iPad and Other M-learning technologies: Exploring students’ view of adoption, potentials, and challenges. Journal of Literacy and Technology,13(1), 2–29.
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology,50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864. eric.
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine,21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Hii, P.-C., & Chung, W.-Y. (2011). A comprehensive ubiquitous healthcare solution on an Android™ Mobile Device. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland),11(7), 6799–6815. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110706799
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,10, 301–320.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, institutions and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, L., Lu, M.-T., & Wong, B. K. (2003). The impact of power distance on email acceptance: Evidence from the PRC. Journal of Computer Information Systems,44(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2003.11647556
Huang, C. S. J., Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, T. H. C., & Su, A. Y. S. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology, Society,19(1), 263–276. Retrieved July 12, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.263
Hung, J.-L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9
Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology,42(4), E65–E70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
Iglesias Rodríguez, A., García Riaza, B., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2017). Collaborative learning and mobile devices: An educational experience in primary education. Computers in Human Behavior,72, 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019
Jak, S., & Cheung, M.W.-L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods,25(4), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000245
Jak, S., Li, H., Kolbe, L., de Jonge, H., & Cheung, M.W.-L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one-stage MASEM. Research Synthesis Methods,12(5), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1498
Kambourakis, G. (2013). Security and privacy in M-learning and beyond: Challenges and state-of-the-art. International Journal of U- and e- Service, Science and Technology,6(3), 67–84.
Kay, A. (1972). A personal computer for children all ages. In Proceedings of the ACM National Conference. Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https://mprove.de/visionreality/media/Kay72a.pdf
Khan, F. M., Singh, N., Gupta, Y., Kaur, J., Banik, S., & Gupta, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of mobile learning adoption in higher education based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 3 (UTAUT3). Vision,1–20, 097226292211011. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221101159
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management,43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability. Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43
Kumar, B. A., & Chand, S. S. (2019). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies,24, 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9783-6
Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: Framing research questions. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–175). WLE Centre, IoE. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10000627/1/Mobile_C6_Laurillard.pdf
Lee, J.-M., & Song, Y.-S. (2015). Mobile information-seeking behavior: A comparative study. IFLA Journal,41(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215583501
Liu, C., Correia, A.-P., & Kim, Y.-M. (2022). An innovative mobile learning acceptance model for out-of-classroom learning. In M. Simonson & D. Seepersaud (Eds.), 45th Annual Association for Educational Communications and Technology Proceedings: Volume 1 - Research and Development Papers (pp. 210–219). Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).
Liu, C., & Correia, A.-P. (2021). A case study of learners’ engagement in mobile learning applications. Online Learning,25(4), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2827
Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving M-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems,27(4), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741011073761
Navarro, C. X., Molina, A. I., & Redondo, M. A. (2016). Factors influencing students’ acceptance in M-learning: A literature review and proposal of a taxonomy. International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE),2016, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751840
Noel, D., Stover, S., & McNutt, M. (2015). Student perceptions of engagement using mobile-based polling as an audience response system: Implications for leadership studies. Journal of Leadership Education,14(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.12806/V14/I3/R4
Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology,43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
Peng, H., Su, Y.-J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,46(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843828
Pramana, E. (2018). Determinants of the adoption of mobile learning systems among university students in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,17, 365–398. https://doi.org/10.28945/4119
Qiu, J. (2019). A review of mobile learning research at home and abroad in recent 20 years. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.24
Quinn, S., & Oldmeadow, J. (2013). The Martini effect and social networking sites: Early adolescents, mobile social networking and connectedness to friends. Mobile Media & Communication,1(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912474812
Sabah, N. M. (2016). Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving M-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior,65, 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management,44(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
Sefferman, A. (2021). 2021 Engagement Benchmarks for Education Apps. Apptentive. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.apptentive.com/blog/2021/04/21/2021-engagement-benchmarks-for-education-apps/
Senaratne, S., & Samarasinghe, S. (2019). Factors affecting the intention to adopt M-learning. International Business Research,12(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n2p150
Shelby, L. B., & Vaske, J. J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences,30(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701881366
Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,16(3), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1984
Sinaga, R. A., Febrianti, K. V., & Candra, D. (2022). The benefits and drawbacks of adopting mobile learning as perceived by junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2036200
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior,27(6), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,64(2), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education,94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education,89, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.004
Tao, D., Wang, T., Wang, T., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., & Qu, X. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Computers in Human Behavior,104, 106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.023
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior,41, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020
Turner, A. (2023). How Many People Have Smartphones Worldwide? BankMyCell. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology,52(5), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences,27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field Studies. Management Science,46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly,27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly,36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wang, R.J.-H., Malthouse, E. C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015). On the go: How mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing,91(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.01.002
Wu, M.-Y., Chou, H.-P., Weng, Y.-C., & Huang, Y.-H. (2011). TAM2-based study of website user behavior-using web 2.0 websites as an example. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 4(8), 133–151. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/economics/2011/53-665.pdf
Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education,59(2), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Chenxi Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Yixi Wang: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization. Marvin Evans: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. Ana-Paula Correia: Conceptualization; Writing—Reviewing & Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, C., Wang, Y., Evans, M. et al. Critical antecedents of mobile learning acceptance and moderation effects: A meta-analysis on technology acceptance model. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12645-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12645-8