Abstract
This study aimed to determine the variables affecting the eye-movements of second-language (L2) learners of Turkish in Türkiye while solving a test consisting of questions that included graphics. A total of 115 L2 learners participated in the research (21 in the pilot study and 94 in the main study). We presented a test consisting of five multiple-choice questions with graphics (GT) as a stimulus on the screen and investigated the following variables to see whether participants’ eye-movements were affected by age, gender, native country, mother tongue, reading direction in the mother tongue, department at the university, education level, opting to have questions with graphics in the Turkish Learning, Research and Application Center (TÖMER) and the Language Teaching Research and Application Center (DİLMER) exams and success on the GT. We investigated whether these independent variables had an effect on the eye-movement measurements and examined the relation between the GT success and success on the TÖMER/DİLMER comprehension exam. Results indicate that gender, education level, opting to have graphic questions in the TÖMER/DİLMER exams, and GT success had significant effects on various eye-movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abegg, M., Pianezzi, D., & Barton, J. J. (2015). A vertical asymmetry in saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.3
Acarturk, C., Habel, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2008). Multimodal comprehension of graphics with textual annotations: The role of graphical means relating annotations and graph lines. In J. H. J. Lee & G. Stapleton (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 335–343). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_30
Acarturk, C., Habel, C., Cagiltay, K., & Alacam, O. (2008). Multimodal comprehension of language and graphics: Graphs with and without annotations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.1.3.2
Acartürk, C. (2015). Referring expressions in communication through line graphs: A comparative analysis of verbal descriptions [Paper presentation]. Workshop on Discourse Structure in Turkic Languages, Ankara, Türkiye.
Acartürk, C. (2014). Towards a systematic understanding of graphical cues in communication through statistical graphs. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2013.11.006
Acartürk, C., & Habel, C. (2012, July 2). Eye tracking in multimodal comprehension of graphs [Paper presentation]. The Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Diagrams Research. Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Ainley, J., Nardi, E., & Pratt, D. (2000). The construction of meanings for trend in active graphing. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(2), 85–114. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1500187/1/Ainley2000Construction85.pdf
Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydoğan, H. (2018). Students’ attitudes toward blended learning in EFL context. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.1.5
Al-Edaily, A., Al-Wabil, A., & Al-Ohali, Y. (2013). Interactive screening for learning difficulties: Analyzing visual patterns of reading Arabic scripts with eye tracking. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 3–7). Springer.
Anıl, D., Özer-Özkan, Y., & Demir, E. (2015). PISA 2012 araştırması ulusal nihai raporu [National final report of the PISA 2012 survey]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Arif, M. M., & Hashim, F. (2010). Young learners’ second language visual literacy practices: Does gender make a difference? International Journal of Learning, 17(4), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i04/46975
Ay, S., & Bartan, Ö. Ş. (2012). The effect of topic interest and gender on reading test types in a second language. Reading, 12(1), 62–79. https://readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2012/ay_bartan.pdf
Ayhan, E. (2019). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde okuma metinlerinin seviyelerinin tespiti: Okuma sırasında göz izleme bulguları [Benchmarking the levels of the reading passages used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: Eye tracking findings during reading] [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Baştuğ, M., Keskin, K., & Şimşek, İ. (2019). Aloud and silent reading in eye movements: An eyetracking study. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Social Sciences Journal, 20, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.548375
Bayrak-Karslı, M., Demirel, T., & Kurşun, E. (2020). Examination of different reading strategies in paragraph questions with eye tracking metrics. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 35(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019051160
Berzak, Y., Nakamura, C., Flynn, S., & Katz, B. (2017). Predicting Native Language from Gaze. The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 541–551. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.07398.pdf.
Biedert, R., Buscher, G., & Dengel, A. (2010). The eyebook–using eye tracking to enhance the reading experience. Informatik-Spektrum, 33(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-009-0381-2
Bojko, A. (2013). Eye tracking the user experience: A practical guide to research. Rosenfeld.
Boylu, E. (2019). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminde ölçme değerlendirme uygulamaları ve standart oluşturma [Measurement assessment practices and standardization i̇n teaching Turkish to foreigners] [Doctoral dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Bruski, D. J. (2011). Do they get the picture?: Visual literacy and low-literacy adult ESL learners [Unpublished Capstone Project, Hamline University]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/468
Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Geliştirilmiş 19. Baskı). [Scientific research methods (Enhanced 19th ed.)]. Pegem Academy.
Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014
Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(2), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.75
Choo, H., & Koh, S. (2019). Age differences in eye movements during reading [Paper presentation]. The 17th Conference of the Japanese Cognitive Psychology Association, Kyoto, Japan.
Christopherson, J. T. (1997). The growing need for visual literacy at the university. Paper presented at the Visionquest: Journeys Towards Visual Literacy 28th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, Wyoming. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED408963.pdf
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35), 12629–12633. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506162102
Chung, I., & Kakizawa, T. (2002). Intra-individual variations in reading at different levels of interest: Analysis of eye movements of children who are hearing-impaired. The Japanese Journal of Special Education, 39(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.6033/tokkyou.39.31_3
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288400
Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637401
Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20262
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
Dehaene, S. (2017). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. (2nd Ed., O. Karakaş, Trans.). [Beyin nasıl okur? Okumanın bilimi ve evrimi (2. Basım)]. Alfa Bilim.
Dolgunsöz, E. (2015). Measuring attention in second language reading using eye-tracking: The case of the noticing hypothesis. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.4
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology theory and practise (2nd ed.). Springer.
Duffy, S. A. (1992). Eye movements and complex comprehension processes. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition scene perception and reading (pp. 462–471). Springer-Verlag.
Dussias, P. E. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051000005X
Escalante-Talavera, J. M. (2018). ESL students' reading behaviors on multiple-choice items at differing proficiency levels: An eye-tracking study [Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University]. BYU Scholars Archive. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8424&context=etd
Gedik, E. (2017). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde ölçme ve değerlendirme [An assessment and evaluation in teaching Turkish as a foreign language] [Unpublished master’s thesis, Istanbul Arel University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Goldberg, J. H., & Helfman, J. I. (2010). Comparing information graphics: A critical look at eye tracking. Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop: Beyond time and errors: Novel evaluation methods for information visualization, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110203
Goldberg, J., & Helfman, J. (2011). Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: Reading values on linear versus radial graphs. Information Visualization, 10(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611406623
Gültekin, C. (2009). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin çözeltiler ve özellikleri konusu ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin incelenmesi [Examining 9th grade students' abilities on drawing reading and interpreting of graphs about solutions and their properties] [Master's thesis, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Gültekin, C. (2014). Ortaöğretim öğrencileri ile üniversite öğrencilerinin hal değişimi, çözeltiler ve çözünürlük konuları ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of abilities on drawing, reading and interpreting of graphs of the secondary education students and university students in change of state, solutions and solubility subjects] [Doctoral dissertation, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2007). On reciprocal improvement in multimodal generation: Coreference by text and information graphics [Paper presentation]. MOG 2007: The Workshop on Multimodal Output Generation, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2009). Eye-tracking evidence for multimodal language-graphics comprehension: The role of integrated conceptual representations [Paper presentation]. NODALIDA: The Workshop on Multimodal Communication - from Human Behaviour to Computational Models, Odense, Denmark.
Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2011). Causal inference in graph-text constellations: Designing verbally annotated graphs. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 16(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(11)70002-5
Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-95198-000
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5
Hallowell, B., & Heuer, S. (2005). Eye tracking evaluation of Clipart versus carefully designed images in multiple-choice image displays for comprehension assessment [Paper presentation]. Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Sanibel Island, USA.
Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low-and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0987
Harada, F. K. (1988). The effect of different orthoraphical presenrtation of a text upon the reading behaviours of native and non-native readers of Japanese: An eye-tracking study. [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303582891?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Hayashi, H., Maeno, T., & Kunifuji, S. (2002). Eye movement tracking to support the second language learners' self-learning in comprehension of English texts [Paper presentation]. The IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia.
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University.
Işıkoğlu, M. (2015). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde kullanılan yeterlik sınavlarının madde yazımı bakımından incelenmesi (Mersin ve Sakarya üniversiteleri örneği) [Analysis of proficiency exams developed for teaching Turkish as a foreign language in terms of item writing (Samples of Mersin and Sakarya Universities)] [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Jian, Y. C. (2017). Eye-movement patterns and reader characteristics of students with good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams. Reading and Writing, 30(7), 1447–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9732-6
Jian, Y. C., & Wu, C. J. (2015). Using eye tracking to investigate semantic and spatial representations of scientific diagrams during text-diagram integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9519-3
Jiang, X. (2012). Effects of discourse structure graphic organizer on EFL reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84–105. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/66669
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2019). Examining the questions asked in the 2018 KPSS educational sciences exam within the scope of instructional technology and material design by eye tracking method [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Congress on Science and Education, Afyon, Türkiye.
Kıranda, S., & Akpınar, M. (2020). Students’ views about difficulties they are experienced with graphic reading and drawing. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019050634
Kim, S., & Lombardino, L. J. (2015). Comparing graphs and text: Effects of complexity and task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.3.2
Klein, P., Becker, S., Küchemann, S., & Kuhn, J. (2021). Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102
Körner, C. (2004). Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.997
Körner, C. (2005). Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.003
Lee, H., & Choi, W. (2019). Predictability effects modulated by age during sentence reading: An eye-tracking study. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 31(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.1.002
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.12
Lim, H. J. (2017). Exploring test takers’ cognition in a high-stakes reading test: An eyetracking study. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 482–500. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE08971069
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Thoma, G. B., Dalehefte, I. M., Ihme, J. M., & Köller, O. (2014). Tracking the decision-making process in multiple-choice assessment: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 738–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3060
Lohse, G. L. (1993). A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(4), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_3
Maden, S., & Altunbay, M. (2016). The use of graphs and tables as tools of visual presentation and visual reading in Turkish language education. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 5(4), 1971–1983. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.671
Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013a). Effects of picture labeling on science text processing and learning: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.41
Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011
Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2015). Integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during re-reading predicts learning from illustrated text: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9552-5
McKenna, P. (2019). Multiple choice questions: Answering correctly and knowing the answer. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0071
Olmsted-Hawala, E., Holand, T., & Quach, V. (2014). Usability testing. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 49–80). Elsevier.
Oruç, S., & Akgün, İ. H. (2010). The level of gaining graphic reading skills of primary school social studies 7th grade students. International Journal of Eurasian Social Sciences, 1(1), 51–58. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijoess/issue/8541/105988
Özçelik, D. A. (2010). Test hazırlama kılavuzu (4. Baskı). [Test preparation guide (4th Ed.)]. Pegem Academy.
Özer, E. (2019). Yetkin ve zayıf okurların okuma becerileri ve göz hareketleri arasındaki ilişkinin karşılaştırılarak incelenmesi [Comparative examination of the relationship between reading skills and eye movements of good and poor readers] [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Özer, E., Özdemir, S., & Kara, M. (2020). Examining reading skills with eye tracking technique. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 18(1), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.714158
Parodi, G., Julio, C., & Recio, I. (2018). When words and graphs move the eyes: The processing of multimodal causal relations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.11.1.5
Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73–126). Erlbaum. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8b751ec40e1a5721a6e745eaaacccdbde79ed977
Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. C. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acqusition. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467–488). Cambridge University.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_3
Reed, S. K. (2010). Thinking visually. Psychology Press.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
Sajka, M. (2017). Visual attention while reading a multiple choice task by academics and students: A comparative eye-tracking approach [Paper presentation]. CERME 10 European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Dublin, Ireland.
Sajka, M., & Rosiek, R. (2015). Discussion of visual attention for solving multiple choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis [Paper presentation]. The 1st International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2015), Šiauliai, Lithuania.
Schall, A. J., & Romano Bergstrom, J. (2014). Introduction to eye tracking. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 3–26). Elsevier.
Schiff, M. (1998). Designing graphic presentations from first principles. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304422988?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037054
Sezgin-Memnun, D. (2013). Examining of line graphic reading and drawing skills of secondary school seventh grade students. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(12), 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6026
Simkin, D., & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289447
Spence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030004353
Stoerger, S. (2018). Writing without words: Designing for a visual learning experience. Education for Information, 34(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-189002
Strobel, B., Saß, S., Lindner, M. A., & Köller, O. (2016). Do graph readers prefer the graph type most suited to a given task? Insights from eye tracking. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.9.4.4
Tai, R. H., Loehr, J. F., & Brigham, F. J. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye-gaze tracking to study problem-solving on standardized science assessments. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270600891614
Tang, H., & Pienta, N. (2012). Eye-tracking study of complexity in gas law problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200644k
Tepgeç, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2019). A content analysis study on the use of eye tracking method in the evaluation of learning-teaching processes [Paper presentation]. 6th International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Ankara, Türkiye.
Tobii studio User’s Manual Version 3.4.8. (2017). Tobii AB.
Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2011). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.012
Tufte, E. R. (2006). The visual diplay of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics.
Tuninetti, A., Warren, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). Cue strength in second-language processing: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.961934
Winke, P. M., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. M. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Eyemovement recordings in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200085X
Wong, W., Barthels, M., & Chrobot, N. (2014). E-commerce websites. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 187–216). Elsevier.
Yurtman-Kaçar, H. (2018). Validating multiple-text reading tasks in foreign language proficiency tests through verbal protocols and eye tracking [Master’s thesis, Boğaziçi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Zhan, Z., Wu, J., Mei, H., Wu, Q., & Fong, P. S. (2020). Individual difference on reading ability tested by eye-tracking: From perspective of gender. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2019-0082
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the students learning Turkish as a foreign language at Gazi University and Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, where we obtained the data of this study, to the managers and teachers of the language teaching centers.
Funding
The first researcher was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey with a scholarship called BIDEB 2011-A General Domestic Doctorate Scholarship Program 2017/2 during his doctorate education, which also included the data collection process of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Methodology: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Formal analysis and investigation: [Mustafa ARMUT], Writing—original draft preparation: [Mustafa ARMUT]; Writing—review and editing: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Resources: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Supervision: [Mehmet KARA].
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study was based on the data of the doctoral thesis titled "Investigation of Learners' Reading Skills in Graphic Questions with Eye Tracking Technique in Teaching Turkish to Foreigners" conducted by the first researcher under the supervision of the second researcher.
The data of this study were obtained at Gazi University Turkish Learning, Research and Application Center in Ankara-Turkey.
Mustafa Armut is responsible for all stages of refereeing and publication, as well as post-publication correspondence.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Armut, M., Kara, M. How do L2 learners of Turkish read texts with graphics? An eye-tracking study. Educ Inf Technol 29, 4699–4743 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12017-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12017-8