Skip to main content
Log in

How do L2 learners of Turkish read texts with graphics? An eye-tracking study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the variables affecting the eye-movements of second-language (L2) learners of Turkish in Türkiye while solving a test consisting of questions that included graphics. A total of 115 L2 learners participated in the research (21 in the pilot study and 94 in the main study). We presented a test consisting of five multiple-choice questions with graphics (GT) as a stimulus on the screen and investigated the following variables to see whether participants’ eye-movements were affected by age, gender, native country, mother tongue, reading direction in the mother tongue, department at the university, education level, opting to have questions with graphics in the Turkish Learning, Research and Application Center (TÖMER) and the Language Teaching Research and Application Center (DİLMER) exams and success on the GT. We investigated whether these independent variables had an effect on the eye-movement measurements and examined the relation between the GT success and success on the TÖMER/DİLMER comprehension exam. Results indicate that gender, education level, opting to have graphic questions in the TÖMER/DİLMER exams, and GT success had significant effects on various eye-movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abegg, M., Pianezzi, D., & Barton, J. J. (2015). A vertical asymmetry in saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acarturk, C., Habel, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2008). Multimodal comprehension of graphics with textual annotations: The role of graphical means relating annotations and graph lines. In J. H. J. Lee & G. Stapleton (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 335–343). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Acarturk, C., Habel, C., Cagiltay, K., & Alacam, O. (2008). Multimodal comprehension of language and graphics: Graphs with and without annotations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.1.3.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acartürk, C. (2015). Referring expressions in communication through line graphs: A comparative analysis of verbal descriptions [Paper presentation]. Workshop on Discourse Structure in Turkic Languages, Ankara, Türkiye.

  • Acartürk, C. (2014). Towards a systematic understanding of graphical cues in communication through statistical graphs. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2013.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acartürk, C., & Habel, C. (2012, July 2). Eye tracking in multimodal comprehension of graphs [Paper presentation]. The Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Diagrams Research. Canterbury, United Kingdom.

  • Ainley, J., Nardi, E., & Pratt, D. (2000). The construction of meanings for trend in active graphing. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(2), 85–114. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1500187/1/Ainley2000Construction85.pdf

  • Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydoğan, H. (2018). Students’ attitudes toward blended learning in EFL context. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Edaily, A., Al-Wabil, A., & Al-Ohali, Y. (2013). Interactive screening for learning difficulties: Analyzing visual patterns of reading Arabic scripts with eye tracking. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 3–7). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anıl, D., Özer-Özkan, Y., & Demir, E. (2015). PISA 2012 araştırması ulusal nihai raporu [National final report of the PISA 2012 survey]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

  • Arif, M. M., & Hashim, F. (2010). Young learners’ second language visual literacy practices: Does gender make a difference? International Journal of Learning, 17(4), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i04/46975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ay, S., & Bartan, Ö. Ş. (2012). The effect of topic interest and gender on reading test types in a second language. Reading, 12(1), 62–79. https://readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2012/ay_bartan.pdf

  • Ayhan, E. (2019). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde okuma metinlerinin seviyelerinin tespiti: Okuma sırasında göz izleme bulguları [Benchmarking the levels of the reading passages used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: Eye tracking findings during reading] [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Baştuğ, M., Keskin, K., & Şimşek, İ. (2019). Aloud and silent reading in eye movements: An eyetracking study. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Social Sciences Journal, 20, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.548375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak-Karslı, M., Demirel, T., & Kurşun, E. (2020). Examination of different reading strategies in paragraph questions with eye tracking metrics. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 35(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019051160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berzak, Y., Nakamura, C., Flynn, S., & Katz, B. (2017). Predicting Native Language from Gaze. The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 541–551. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.07398.pdf.

  • Biedert, R., Buscher, G., & Dengel, A. (2010). The eyebook–using eye tracking to enhance the reading experience. Informatik-Spektrum, 33(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-009-0381-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojko, A. (2013). Eye tracking the user experience: A practical guide to research. Rosenfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylu, E. (2019). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminde ölçme değerlendirme uygulamaları ve standart oluşturma [Measurement assessment practices and standardization i̇n teaching Turkish to foreigners] [Doctoral dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Bruski, D. J. (2011). Do they get the picture?: Visual literacy and low-literacy adult ESL learners [Unpublished Capstone Project, Hamline University]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/468

  • Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Geliştirilmiş 19. Baskı). [Scientific research methods (Enhanced 19th ed.)]. Pegem Academy.

  • Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(2), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, H., & Koh, S. (2019). Age differences in eye movements during reading [Paper presentation]. The 17th Conference of the Japanese Cognitive Psychology Association, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Christopherson, J. T. (1997). The growing need for visual literacy at the university. Paper presented at the Visionquest: Journeys Towards Visual Literacy 28th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, Wyoming. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED408963.pdf

  • Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35), 12629–12633. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506162102

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, I., & Kakizawa, T. (2002). Intra-individual variations in reading at different levels of interest: Analysis of eye movements of children who are hearing-impaired. The Japanese Journal of Special Education, 39(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.6033/tokkyou.39.31_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20262

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4

  • Dehaene, S. (2017). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. (2nd Ed., O. Karakaş, Trans.). [Beyin nasıl okur? Okumanın bilimi ve evrimi (2. Basım)]. Alfa Bilim.

  • Dolgunsöz, E. (2015). Measuring attention in second language reading using eye-tracking: The case of the noticing hypothesis. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology theory and practise (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, S. A. (1992). Eye movements and complex comprehension processes. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition scene perception and reading (pp. 462–471). Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dussias, P. E. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051000005X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalante-Talavera, J. M. (2018). ESL students' reading behaviors on multiple-choice items at differing proficiency levels: An eye-tracking study [Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University]. BYU Scholars Archive. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8424&context=etd

  • Gedik, E. (2017). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde ölçme ve değerlendirme [An assessment and evaluation in teaching Turkish as a foreign language] [Unpublished master’s thesis, Istanbul Arel University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Goldberg, J. H., & Helfman, J. I. (2010). Comparing information graphics: A critical look at eye tracking. Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop: Beyond time and errors: Novel evaluation methods for information visualization, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110203

  • Goldberg, J., & Helfman, J. (2011). Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: Reading values on linear versus radial graphs. Information Visualization, 10(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611406623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gültekin, C. (2009). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin çözeltiler ve özellikleri konusu ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin incelenmesi [Examining 9th grade students' abilities on drawing reading and interpreting of graphs about solutions and their properties] [Master's thesis, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Gültekin, C. (2014). Ortaöğretim öğrencileri ile üniversite öğrencilerinin hal değişimi, çözeltiler ve çözünürlük konuları ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of abilities on drawing, reading and interpreting of graphs of the secondary education students and university students in change of state, solutions and solubility subjects] [Doctoral dissertation, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2007). On reciprocal improvement in multimodal generation: Coreference by text and information graphics [Paper presentation]. MOG 2007: The Workshop on Multimodal Output Generation, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

  • Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2009). Eye-tracking evidence for multimodal language-graphics comprehension: The role of integrated conceptual representations [Paper presentation]. NODALIDA: The Workshop on Multimodal Communication - from Human Behaviour to Computational Models, Odense, Denmark.

  • Habel, C., & Acartürk, C. (2011). Causal inference in graph-text constellations: Designing verbally annotated graphs. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 16(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(11)70002-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-95198-000

  • Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, B., & Heuer, S. (2005). Eye tracking evaluation of Clipart versus carefully designed images in multiple-choice image displays for comprehension assessment [Paper presentation]. Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Sanibel Island, USA.

  • Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low-and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harada, F. K. (1988). The effect of different orthoraphical presenrtation of a text upon the reading behaviours of native and non-native readers of Japanese: An eye-tracking study. [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303582891?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

  • Hayashi, H., Maeno, T., & Kunifuji, S. (2002). Eye movement tracking to support the second language learners' self-learning in comprehension of English texts [Paper presentation]. The IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia.

  • Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Işıkoğlu, M. (2015). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde kullanılan yeterlik sınavlarının madde yazımı bakımından incelenmesi (Mersin ve Sakarya üniversiteleri örneği) [Analysis of proficiency exams developed for teaching Turkish as a foreign language in terms of item writing (Samples of Mersin and Sakarya Universities)] [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Jian, Y. C. (2017). Eye-movement patterns and reader characteristics of students with good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams. Reading and Writing, 30(7), 1447–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9732-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian, Y. C., & Wu, C. J. (2015). Using eye tracking to investigate semantic and spatial representations of scientific diagrams during text-diagram integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9519-3

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. (2012). Effects of discourse structure graphic organizer on EFL reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84–105. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/66669

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

  • Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2019). Examining the questions asked in the 2018 KPSS educational sciences exam within the scope of instructional technology and material design by eye tracking method [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Congress on Science and Education, Afyon, Türkiye.

  • Kıranda, S., & Akpınar, M. (2020). Students’ views about difficulties they are experienced with graphic reading and drawing. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019050634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Lombardino, L. J. (2015). Comparing graphs and text: Effects of complexity and task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.3.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P., Becker, S., Küchemann, S., & Kuhn, J. (2021). Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C. (2004). Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner, C. (2005). Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Choi, W. (2019). Predictability effects modulated by age during sentence reading: An eye-tracking study. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 31(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.1.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. J. (2017). Exploring test takers’ cognition in a high-stakes reading test: An eyetracking study. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 482–500. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE08971069

  • Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Thoma, G. B., Dalehefte, I. M., Ihme, J. M., & Köller, O. (2014). Tracking the decision-making process in multiple-choice assessment: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 738–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, G. L. (1993). A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(4), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_3

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Maden, S., & Altunbay, M. (2016). The use of graphs and tables as tools of visual presentation and visual reading in Turkish language education. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 5(4), 1971–1983. https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013a). Effects of picture labeling on science text processing and learning: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2015). Integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during re-reading predicts learning from illustrated text: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9552-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, P. (2019). Multiple choice questions: Answering correctly and knowing the answer. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted-Hawala, E., Holand, T., & Quach, V. (2014). Usability testing. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 49–80). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oruç, S., & Akgün, İ. H. (2010). The level of gaining graphic reading skills of primary school social studies 7th grade students. International Journal of Eurasian Social Sciences, 1(1), 51–58. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijoess/issue/8541/105988

  • Özçelik, D. A. (2010). Test hazırlama kılavuzu (4. Baskı). [Test preparation guide (4th Ed.)]. Pegem Academy.

  • Özer, E. (2019). Yetkin ve zayıf okurların okuma becerileri ve göz hareketleri arasındaki ilişkinin karşılaştırılarak incelenmesi [Comparative examination of the relationship between reading skills and eye movements of good and poor readers] [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Özer, E., Özdemir, S., & Kara, M. (2020). Examining reading skills with eye tracking technique. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 18(1), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.714158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parodi, G., Julio, C., & Recio, I. (2018). When words and graphs move the eyes: The processing of multimodal causal relations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.11.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73–126). Erlbaum. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8b751ec40e1a5721a6e745eaaacccdbde79ed977

  • Plass, J. L., & Jones, L. C. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acqusition. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 467–488). Cambridge University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (2010). Thinking visually. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sajka, M. (2017). Visual attention while reading a multiple choice task by academics and students: A comparative eye-tracking approach [Paper presentation]. CERME 10 European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Dublin, Ireland.

  • Sajka, M., & Rosiek, R. (2015). Discussion of visual attention for solving multiple choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis [Paper presentation]. The 1st International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2015), Šiauliai, Lithuania.

  • Schall, A. J., & Romano Bergstrom, J. (2014). Introduction to eye tracking. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 3–26). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, M. (1998). Designing graphic presentations from first principles. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304422988?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

  • Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezgin-Memnun, D. (2013). Examining of line graphic reading and drawing skills of secondary school seventh grade students. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(12), 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, D., & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030004353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoerger, S. (2018). Writing without words: Designing for a visual learning experience. Education for Information, 34(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-189002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, B., Saß, S., Lindner, M. A., & Köller, O. (2016). Do graph readers prefer the graph type most suited to a given task? Insights from eye tracking. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.9.4.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, R. H., Loehr, J. F., & Brigham, F. J. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye-gaze tracking to study problem-solving on standardized science assessments. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270600891614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., & Pienta, N. (2012). Eye-tracking study of complexity in gas law problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200644k

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepgeç, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2019). A content analysis study on the use of eye tracking method in the evaluation of learning-teaching processes [Paper presentation]. 6th International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Ankara, Türkiye.

  • Tobii studio User’s Manual Version 3.4.8. (2017). Tobii AB.

  • Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2011). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (2006). The visual diplay of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuninetti, A., Warren, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). Cue strength in second-language processing: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.961934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winke, P. M., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. M. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Eyemovement recordings in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200085X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W., Barthels, M., & Chrobot, N. (2014). E-commerce websites. In J. Romano Bergstrom & A. J. Schall (Eds.), Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 187–216). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yurtman-Kaçar, H. (2018). Validating multiple-text reading tasks in foreign language proficiency tests through verbal protocols and eye tracking [Master’s thesis, Boğaziçi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  • Zhan, Z., Wu, J., Mei, H., Wu, Q., & Fong, P. S. (2020). Individual difference on reading ability tested by eye-tracking: From perspective of gender. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2019-0082

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the students learning Turkish as a foreign language at Gazi University and Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, where we obtained the data of this study, to the managers and teachers of the language teaching centers.

Funding

The first researcher was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey with a scholarship called BIDEB 2011-A General Domestic Doctorate Scholarship Program 2017/2 during his doctorate education, which also included the data collection process of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Methodology: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Formal analysis and investigation: [Mustafa ARMUT], Writing—original draft preparation: [Mustafa ARMUT]; Writing—review and editing: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Resources: [Mustafa ARMUT, Mehmet KARA], Supervision: [Mehmet KARA].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Armut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study was based on the data of the doctoral thesis titled "Investigation of Learners' Reading Skills in Graphic Questions with Eye Tracking Technique in Teaching Turkish to Foreigners" conducted by the first researcher under the supervision of the second researcher.

The data of this study were obtained at Gazi University Turkish Learning, Research and Application Center in Ankara-Turkey.

Mustafa Armut is responsible for all stages of refereeing and publication, as well as post-publication correspondence.

Appendix

Appendix

Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

Fig. 1
figure 1

The first multiple-choice question that students solved

Fig. 2
figure 2

The second multiple-choice question that students solved

Fig. 3
figure 3

The third multiple-choice question that students solved

Fig. 4
figure 4

The fourth multiple-choice question that students solved

Fig. 5
figure 5

The fifth multiple-choice question that students solved

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armut, M., Kara, M. How do L2 learners of Turkish read texts with graphics? An eye-tracking study. Educ Inf Technol 29, 4699–4743 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12017-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12017-8

Keywords

Navigation