Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eye-movement patterns and reader characteristics of students with good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the cognitive processes and reader characteristics of sixth graders who had good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams. We first measured the reading ability and reading self-efficacy of sixth-grade participants, and then recorded their eye movements while they were reading an illustrated scientific text and scored their answers to content-related questions. Finally, the participants evaluated the difficulty of the article, the attractiveness of the content and diagram, and their learning performance. The participants were then classified into groups based on how many correct responses they gave to questions related to reading. The results showed that readers with good performance had better character recognition ability and reading self-efficacy, were more attracted to the diagrams, and had higher self-evaluated learning levels than the readers with poor performance did. Eye-movement data indicated that readers with good performance spent significantly more reading time on the whole article, the text section, and the diagram section than the readers with poor performance did. Interestingly, readers with good performance had significantly longer mean fixation duration on the diagrams than readers with poor performance did; further, readers with good performance made more saccades between the text and the diagrams. Additionally, sequential analysis of eye movements showed that readers with good performance preferred to observe the diagram rather than the text after reading the title, but this tendency was not present in readers with poor performance. In sum, using eye-tracking technology and several reading tests and questionnaires, we found that various cognitive aspects (reading strategy, diagram utilization) and affective aspects (reading self-efficacy, article likeness, diagram attraction, and self-evaluation of learning) affected sixth graders’ reading performance in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2), 131–152. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 285–311. doi:10.1080/09541440340000123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90, 1073–1091. doi:10.1002/sce.20164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., Carter, G., & Wiebe, E. N. (2008a). The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 239–261. doi:10.1080/09500690601187168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2008b). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92, 848–867. doi:10.1002/sce.20262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 59–74. doi:10.1080/104132001753149883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, L., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Role of text and student characteristics in real-time reading processes across the primary grades. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 389–408. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. B. T. (2007). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–287. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec, A., & Gril, A. (2003). Students’ understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227–1245. doi:10.1080/0950069022000038231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1970). An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41(3), 907–917. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177696968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harber, J. N. (1983). The effects of illustrations on the reading performance of learning disabled and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(1), 55–60. doi:10.2307/1510866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1084–1102. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. S. (2001). Chinese character recognition test. Psychological Publishing Company (in Chinese).

  • Jian, Y.-C. (2016). Fourth graders’ cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 93–109. doi:10.1002/rrq.125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jian, Y. C., & Wu, C. J. (2015). Using eye tracking to investigate semantic and spatial representations of scientific diagrams during text-diagram integration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 43–55. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9519-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian, Y. C., Wu, C. J., & Su, J. H. (2014). Learners’ eye movements during construction of mechanical kinematic representations from static diagrams. Learning and Instruction, 32, 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. doi:10.1037/a0026923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, T., Lesaux, N., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Parrila, R., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Research in Reading, 34(3), 263–280. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, H. W. (1999). Reading comprehension-screening test (in Chinese). Psychological Testing, 46, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of the visual design. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebfreund, M. D. (2015). Success with informational text comprehension: An examination of underlying factors. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 387–392. doi:10.1002/rrq.109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. C., Lee, C. S., Huang, N. T., Chang, Y. T., & Tsai, S. F. (2008). Living science and technology textbook. Kang Hsuan Company Press.

  • Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ariasi, N. (2013a). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 356–384. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.727885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrated text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers and Education, 60(1), 95–109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2015). Integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during re-reading predicts learning from illustrated text: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 851–872. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9552-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McTigue, E. M. (2009). Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTigue, E. M., & Flowers, A. C. (2011). Science visual literacy: Learners’ perceptions and knowledge of diagrams. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 578–589. doi:10.1598/RT.64.8.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. W. (2015). Using reading times and eye-movements to measure cognitive engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 31–42. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P. J., & Scevak, J. J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: A developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(3), 205–223. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. R. (2012). Reading the graphics: What is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 25(3), 739–774. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–72). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (pp. 53–83). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. J., & Beveridge, M. (1986). Effects of text illustration on children’s learning of a school science topic. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 294–303. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb03042.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusted, J., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Facilitation of children’s prose recall by the presence of pictures. Memory and Cognition, 7(5), 354–359. doi:10.3758/BF03196939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 877–896. doi:10.1037/a0023731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects of children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93–105. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, E., Verhoeven, L., & Hulstijn-Hendrikse, N. (2008). Cognitive processes in children's multimedia text learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slough, S., & McTigue, E. (2010). Introduction to the integration of verbal and visual information in science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 206–212. doi:10.1080/02702710903241397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. Y., Lovett, S. B., & Scher, M. S. (1993). Pictures facilitate children’s recall of unillustrated expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 520–528. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. T., Wu, M. D., Chen, C. K., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Examining the online reading behavior and performance of fifth-graders: Evidence from eye-movement data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unrau, N. J., & Quirk, M. (2014). Reading motivation and reading engagement clarifying commingled conceptions. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 260–284. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.684426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behavior and Information Technology, 22(5), 339–351. doi:10.1080/0044929031000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & Van Lieshout, E. C. M. D. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665–1690. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., et al. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445. doi:10.1002/pits.20307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Grants MOST103-2511-S-003-065-MY3 and MOST105-2628-H-003-002-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 162, HePing East Road, Section 1, Taipei, Taiwan

    Yu-Cin Jian

Authors
  1. Yu-Cin Jian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Cin Jian.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Z-value matrix of the first-pass sequences for good- and poor-performance groups
Full size table
Table 4 Z-value matrix of the total-pass sequences for good- and poor-performance groups
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jian, YC. Eye-movement patterns and reader characteristics of students with good and poor performance when reading scientific text with diagrams. Read Writ 30, 1447–1472 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9732-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9732-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation