Abstract
The present research is an examination of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in Science Education using the Multi-complementary Approach (McA). This incorporates multiple analyses: i) Pre-complementary: meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis, ii) Post-complementary: an experimental design with a pre- and post-test control group and iii) Complementary: Merging the results of the first two stages, making it possible to work through the effectiveness of AR in science education more comprehensively and from a wider perspective. After initially providing information on the McA, the study presents the methodological process, the results and the conclusions in a step-by-step format within this framework. The literature review based on document analysis in the context of Science classes and carrying out instruction on “refraction, lenses and prisms” topics in Science education using AR applications, indicated that AR has both positive and meaningful effects on academic achievement, and on various variables that promote the teaching of Science. The complementary results that emerged in favour of AR shed light on its utilization in Science classes, and provide an incentive for a more widespread and systematic use of such methods in the teaching environment, in line with the need now increasingly expressed for these types of technologies in this digital age.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Note: The studies included in the meta-analysis are shown with one asterisks (*), while the reference to those included both in the meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis are referred with two asterisks (**). The ones without an asterisk are the sources used in the text
Ab Aziz, N., Ab Aziz, K., Avijit, P., Yusof, A. M., & Noor, N. S. M. (2012). Providing augmented reality based education for students with attention deficit hyperactive disorder via cloud computing: Its advantages. Advanced communication technology (ICACT), 2012 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICAAT) (pp. 577–581). IEEE. PyeongChang, South Korea. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/6170041/proceeding
**Abdüsselam, M. S. (2014). Teachers’ and students’ views on using augmented reality environments in physics education: 11th grade magnetism topic example. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction, 4(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2014.004
Achcar, J., Fortulan, V., & Mazucheli, J. (2001). Meta-analysis: A Bayesian approach. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 15(1), 33–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43600983
**Akçayır, M. (2016). The effect of augmented reality applications on university students’ laboratory skills, attitudes and task loads [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Åkerblad, L., Seppänen-Järvelä, R., & Haapakoski, K. (2021). Integrative strategies in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
*Akkiren, B. (2019). The effect of augmented reality applications on sixth grade students’ achievement on human circulatory system and attitudes towards science course [Master’s thesis, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
*Altınışık, D. (2021). Development, implementation, and evaluation of augmented reality applications for energy conversions unit in living beings [Doctoral dissertation, Trabzon University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Anderson, K. C., & Laverie, D. A. (2022). In the consumers’ eye: A mixed-method approach to understanding how VR-Content influences unbranded product quality perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102977
*Arici, F. (2021). Investigation of the effectiveness of problem based learning method of enhanced with augmented reality in the teaching of cell and divısions subject [Doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University], YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş, & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647.
Ateş, H., & Garzón, J. (2022). An integrated model for examining teachers’ intentions to use augmented reality in science courses. Education and Information Technologies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11239-6
Avcı, ŞK., Çoklar, A. N., & İstanbullu, A. (2019). The effect of three dimensional virtual environments and augmented reality applications on the learning achievement: a meta-analysis study. Education & Science, 44(198), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7969
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. http://cierto.org/pdf/ARpresence.pdf
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Rudner, L. M. (1991). Meta-analysis in educational research. Paper presented to ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, Evaluation, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339748).
Batdı, V. (2016). A new trend in methodological pluralism: multi-integrated approach. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Science, 50, 133–147. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dpusbe/issue/26797/283001
Batdı, V. (2017). Smart board and academic achievement in terms of the process of integrating technology into instruction: A study on the McA. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 19(3), 763–801. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i3.2542
Batdı, V. (2018). A new trend in education: Mega-multi complementary approach and sample application of brain-based learning. Iksad Publishing House.
Batdı, V. (2019). Meta-thematic analysis. In V. Batdı (Ed.), Meta-thematic analysis: sample applications (pp. 10–76). Anı Publication.
Batdı, V., Doğan, Y., & Talan, T. (2021). Effectiveness of online learning: a multi-complementary approach research with responses from the COVID-19 pandemic period. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1954035
Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect size (ES). A paper retrieved from https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/EffectSizeBecker.pdf
Berryman, D. R. (2012). Augmented reality: A review. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.670604
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400
Buesing, M., & Cook, M. (2013). Augmented reality comes to physics. The Physics Teacher, 51(4), 226–228. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4795365
**Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., & Wang, X. (2013). Using the augmented reality 3D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 856–865.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018
*Çankaya, B. (2019). The effect of the augmented reality applications on the success, attitude and motivation of secondary education students [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
**Chang, R. C., Chung, L. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.982131
*Chen, C. H., Chan, W. P., Huang, K., & Liao, C. W. (2022). Supporting informal science learning with metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality: Effects on science knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2032629
**Chen, C. H., Huang, C. Y., & Chou, Y. Y. (2017). Effects of augmented reality-based multidimensional concept maps on students’ learning achievement, motivation and acceptance. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0595-z
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
**Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.352
**Chien, Y. C., Su, Y. N., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4
**Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Ustunel, H., & Aydın, M. K. (2014). Effects of a haptic augmented simulation on k-12 students’ achievement and their attitudes towards physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1122a
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Çetin, H., & Türkan, A. (2022). The effect of augmented reality based applications on achievement and attitude towards science course in distance education process. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1397–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10625-w
**Çömen, H. (2018). Investigation of a hybrid design book based on the writing to learn activities supported learning environment in the seventh-grade electrical energy unit [Master’s thesis, Uşak University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
*Coşkun, H. (2019). The effect of using augmented reality technology by teaching cell and divısion on 7th grade students’ academic success and attitude towards technology [Master’s thesis, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
*Coşkun, M., & Koç, Y. (2021). The effect of augmented reality and mobile applicatıon supported instruction related to different variables in 7th grade science lesson. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(2), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N2.21
Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of Educational Policy (pp. 455–472). Academic Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Davies, P. (2000). Contributions from qualitative research. In H. T. Davies, M. N. Sandra, & P. Smith (Eds.), What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (pp. 291–316). Policy Press.
Delello, J. A. (2014). Insights from pre-service teachers using science-based augmented reality. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0021-y
*Demirel, G. (2019). The effect of a scġence lecture taught using augmented reality applicatġons on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and attitudes toward augmented reality applications [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
**Demirel, T. (2017). The effect of augmented reality activities supported by argumentation approach on academic achievement, critical thinking skills, motivation towards science and technology course and argumentation skills [Doctoral dissertation, Çukurova University], YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
Doğan, Y., Batdı, V., & Yaşar, M. D. (2021). Effectiveness of flipped classroom practices in teaching of science: a mixed research synthesis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909553
Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). Springer.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
Engelbrecht, P., & Savolainen, H. (2018). A mixed-methods approach to developing an understanding of teachers’ attitudes and their enactment of inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(5), 660–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1410327
**Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350
*Eren, A. A. (2019). The effect of using augmented reality practices ın the teaching of elements and compounds on the academic achievements of the students and the permanence of the knowledge [Master’s thesis, Erciyes University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013). An augmented reality environment for astronomy learning in elementary grades: an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine (p. 14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534903.2534907
Freitas, R., & Campos, P. (2008). SMART: a system of augmented reality for teaching 2nd grade students. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 2 (pp. 27–30). BCS Learning & Development Ltd.
*Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635
**Fidan, M., (2018). The Impact of problem-based science teaching assisted with augmented reality applications on academic achievement, retention, attitude and belief of self-efficacy [Doctoral dissertation, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309
Gaffney, H., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2019). Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: Mixed-method systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 6(10), e14166. https://doi.org/10.2196/14166
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
Gnidovec, T., Žemlja, M., Dolenec, A., & Torkar, G. (2020). Using augmented reality and the structure–behavior–function model to teach lower secondary school students about the human circulatory system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 774–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09850-8
**Gopalan, V., Zulkifli, A. N., & Bakar, J. A. A. (2016). Conventional approach vs augmented reality textbook on learning performance: a study in science learning among secondary school students. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería, 31(5), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21311/002.31.5.03
Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Application of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: A review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9734-4
Greenland, S., & O’Rourke, K. (2001). On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics, 2(4), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/2.4.463
Guo, Q., Zheng, Y., Shi, J., Wang, J., Li, G., Li, C., Fromson, J. A., Xu, Y., Liu, X., Xu, H., Zhang, T., Lu, Y., Chen, X., Hu, H., Tang, Y., Yang, S., Zhou, H., Wang, X., Chen, H., … Yang, Z. (2020). Immediate psychological distress in quarantined patients with COVID-19 and its association with peripheral inflammation: a mixed-method study. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 88, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.038
*Güler, T. (2020). The effect of augmented reality-supported argumentation method on the academic achievement of primary school 7th grade students regarding the particular structure of substance and pure substances [Master’s thesis, Erciyes University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Hedges, L. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimates. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 237, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., & Wang, Y. Z. (2016). Weather observers: A manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.834829
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747
**Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
**Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, A., Villaran-Molina, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2016). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: The effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behaviour patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2445761
Iordache, D. D., Pribeanu, C., & Balog, A. (2012). Influence of specific AR capabilities on the learning effectiveness and efficiency. Studies in Informatics and Control, 21(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.24846/v21i3y201201
Irwanto, I., Dianawati, R., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Trends of augmented reality applications in science education: A systematic review from 2007 to 2022. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(13), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.30587
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Janssen, A., Fletcher, J., Keep, M., Ahmadpour, N., Rouf, A., Marthick, M., & Booth, R. (2022). Experiences of patients undergoing chemotherapy with virtual reality: Mixed methods feasibility study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(1), e29579. https://doi.org/10.2196/29579
Jerry, T. F. L., & Aaron, C. C. E. (2010). The impact of augmented reality software with inquiry-based learning on students’ learning of kinematics graph. In 2010 2nd international conference on education technology and computer (Vol. 2, pp. V2–1). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529447
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Kalemkuş, J., & Kalemkuş, F. (2022). Effect of the use of augmented reality applications on academic achievement of student in science education: Meta-analysis review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.202745
*Karadavut, Z. (2021). The effect of augmented reality applications on the academic success of 11th grade students in the circulatory system [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
**Karagozlu, D. (2018). Determination of the impact of augmented reality application on the success and problem-solving skills of students. Quality & Quantity, 52(5), 2393–2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0674-5
*Karakaş, M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality applications on the levels of academic achievement, motivation and self-efficacy of high school students [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
Keçeci, G., Yildirim, P., & Zengin, F. K. (2021). Opinions of secondary school students on the use of mobile augmented reality technology in science teaching. Journal of Science Learning, 4(4), 327–336. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1321133.pdf
Keegan, R. (2016). Action research as an agent for enhancing teaching and learning in physical education: A physical education teacher’s perspective. Physical Educator, 73(2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2016-V73-I2-6236
Kehoe, J. (1994). Basic item analysis for multiple-choice tests. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 4(10), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.7275/07zg-h235
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. In A. Farley, & D. Holt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2008 (pp. 484–492). (ASCILITE 2008 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education). https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/melbourne08/procs/kennedy.pdf
Kirkley, S. E., & Kirkley, J. R. (2004). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends, 49(3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763646
*Kızılca, G. (2019). The effect of the use of mobile augmented reality applications in teaching the unit “structure and properties of the matter” to 3rd grade middle school students within science course on their academıc achievement and attitudes towards science [Master’s thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Kress, B. C. (2020). Optical architectures for augmented-, virtual-, and mixed-reality headsets. SPIE Press.
*Kul, H. H. (2019). Augmented reality applications in science education [Master’s thesis, Niğde Ömer Halis Demir University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
Lin, H. C. K., Chen, M. C., & Chang, C. K. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817435
Lin, K. C., & Wang, S. C. (2012). Situated learning for computer fabrication based on augmented reality. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Future Computers in Education. Lecture Notes in İnformation Technology, 23/24, (pp. 249–254). Shangai, China.
**Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behaviour patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011
Little, C. W., Clark, J. C., Tani, N. E., & Connor, C. M. (2018). Improving writing skills through technology-based instruction: A meta-analysis. Review of Education, 6(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3114
Lund, T. (2012). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: Some arguments for mixed methods research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
Mack, C. A. (2012). How to write a good scientific paper: Acronyms. Journal of Micro/nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 11(4), 1–124. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.11.4.040102
Matcha, W., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2013). Exploratory study on collaborative interaction through the use of Augmented Reality in science learning. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.018
Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 159–176). Sage Publication.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Miller, J. P. (Ed.). (2005). Holistic learning and spirituality in education: Breaking new ground. State University of New York Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Moorthy, K., Yee, T. T., T’ing, L. C., & Kumaran, V. V. (2019). Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4432
Moro, C., Birt, J., Stromberga, Z., Phelps, C., Clark, J., Glasziou, P., & Scott, A. M. (2021). Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(3), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2049
Nechypurenko, P. P., Stoliarenko, V. G., Starova, T. V., Selivanova, T. V., Markova, O. M., Modlo, Y. O., & Shmeltser, E. O. (2020). Development and implementation of educational resources in chemistry with elements of augmented reality. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2547, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3751
*Onur, M. (2021). The effect of augmented reality-supported teaching on students’ academic achievement, level of learning permanence, and learning motivation in the solar system and beyond unit [Master’s thesis, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Ozdemir, M., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S., & Demir, M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in the learning process: a metaanalysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 165–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9
*Özyalçın, B. (2020). The effect of jıgsaw activities enriched with augmented reality on success and technological awareness relating to the “particulate structure of matter” [Master’s Dissertation, İstanbul Cerrahpaşa University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Exploring users’ behavioral intention to adopt mobile augmented reality in education through an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2062551
*Peder Alagöz, Z. B. (2020). The effects of the mobile augmented reality applications on secondary school 7th grade students’ anxiety towards science and academic achievements. Master’s Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rauschnabel, P. A., Babin, B. J., tomDieck, M. C., Krey, N., & Jung, T. (2022). What is augmented reality marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future. Journal of Business Research, 142, 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.084
**Renner, J. C. (2014). Does augmented reality affect high school students’ learning outcomes in chemistry? [Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University]. ProQuest, UMI Number: 3628589.
Ried, K. (2006). Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: a practical guide. Australian Family Physician, 35(8), 635–638. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.362585655517469
Rosenberg, M., Adams, D., & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2.0, Sinauer Associates Inc.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900505
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. J. (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2021). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: A literature review. Virtual Reality, 25(1), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
**Şahin, D. (2017). Effect of science teaching with the augmented reality technology on secondary school students’ achievement and their attitude towards the course [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
*Sarıyıldız, S. (2020). Effect of use of augmented reality technology on student achievements and motivations against the course in science education. [Master’s thesis, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Schroder, K. C. (2012). Methodological pluralism as a vehicle of qualitative generalization. Participations, 9(2), 798–825. https://www.participations.org/volume%209/issue%202/42%20Schroder.pdf
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I.-S., & Hayes, T. L. (2009). Fixed- versus random effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X255327
**Şentürk, M. (2018). The investigation with Solomon four-group design on the effect of using mobile augmented reality(AR) applications in the unit titled solar system and beyond in the seventh-grade on the students’ academic success, motivation, science and technology attitude. [Master’s thesis, Kocaeli University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Sırakaya, M. (2015a). Artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının öğrencilerin akademik başarıları, kavram yanılgıları ve derse katılımlarına etkisi. [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
**Sırakaya, M. (2015b). Artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının öğrencilerin akademik başarıları, kavram yanılgıları ve derse katılımlarına etkisi. [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. Proceedings of Second İnternational Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications (pp. 461–465).
Song, P., Yu, H., & Winkler, S. (2008). Vision-based 3D finger interactions for mixed reality games with physics simulation. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (p. 7). ACM.
Sterne, J. A., & Harbord, R. M. (2004). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 4(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400204
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rücker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schimid, C. H., Tettzlaf, J., Deeks, J. J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343, d4002–d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002
Talan, T., & Batdı, V. (2020). Evaluating the flipped classroom model through the multi-complementary approach. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 31–67. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803351
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
**Tarng, W., Ou, K. L., Yu, C. S., Liou, F. L., & Liou, H. H. (2015). Development of a virtual butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Virtual Reality, 19(3–4), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0265-5
Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism learning environment in augmented reality science laboratory to enhance scientific literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2108–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.009
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research, 1, 1–9. https://paulogentil.com/pdf/How%20to%20calculate%20effect%20sizes%20from%20published%20research%20-%20a%20simplified%20methodology.pdf
Timur, B., & Özdemir, M. (2018). Fen eğitiminde artırılmış gerçeklik ortamlarının kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018(10), 62–75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/goputeb/issue/36631/354239
*Timur, S., Dogan, F., Cetin, N. I., Timur, B., & Isik, R. (2019). Artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin hücre konusundaki akademik başarılarına etkisi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(30), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.218.8
Turan, Z., & Atila, G. (2021). Augmented reality technology in science education for students with specific learning difficulties: Its effect on students’ learning and views. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1901682
*Türksoy, E. (2019). The effect of teaching methods integrated with augmented reality and online materials on achievement and retention in science lesson: mixed design [Doctoral dissertation, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
URL-1 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bX6AliC6DCIqxLMt4l_lZeuGGZSAfFzO
URL-2 https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/12tye6rBOYkgn9l6aUw2GrBjbDfkNXxvo
Venkatesan, M., Mohan, H., Ryan, J. R., Schürch, C. M., Nolan, G. P., Frakes, D. H., & Coskun, A. F. (2021). Virtual and augmented reality for biomedical applications. Cell Reports Medicine, 2(7), 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100348
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unifed theory of acceptance and use of technology. Mis Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2015.7167037
Wilson, D. B. (2009). Systematic coding. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159–176). Russell Sage Foundation.
**Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Yang, M. L., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1294608
Xiong, J., Hsiang, E. L., He, Z., Zhan, T., & Wu, S. T. (2021). Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light: Science & Applications, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8
Xu, W. W., Su, C. Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C. H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z
Yavuz, M., Çorbacıoğlu, E., Başoğlu, A. N., Daim, T. U., & Shaygan, A. (2021). Augmented reality technology adoption: Case of a mobile application in Turkey. Technology in Society, 66, 101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101598
Yen, J. C., Tsai, C. H., & Wu, M. (2013). Augmented reality in the higher education: Students’ science concept learning and academic achievement in astronomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103(26), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.322
*Yetişir, H. (2019). The impact of increased reality applications on mobile devices on students’ academic achievement, attitude and retention [Master’s thesis, Niğde Ömer Halis Demir University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
*Yildirim, I., & Seckin-Kapucu, M. (2021). The effect of augmented reality applications in science education on academic achievement and retention of 6th grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 7(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.744351
*Yıldırım, İ. (2020). The effect of augmented reality applications in science education on academic achievement and retention of 6th grade students [Master’s thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
**Yıldırım, P. (2018). The impact of science teaching made with mobile augmented reality technology on science and technology attitudes and academic achievement of secondary school students [Master’s thesis, Fırat University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Zagoranski, S., & Divjak, S. (2003). Use of augmented reality in education. A conference Paper at the IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2003. Computer as a Tool, 2, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1109/EURCON.2003.1248213
Zanin, L. M., Stedefeldt, E., & Luning, P. A. (2021). The evolvement of food safety culture assessment: A mixed-methods systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 118, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.013
Zhou, Y., & Wu, M. L. (2022). Reported methodological challenges in empirical mixed methods articles: A review on JMMR and IJMRA. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820980212
Acknowledgements
We confirm that the co-author had access to data supporting the manuscript. This research was not supported by any foundations, institutions or any others.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
We confirm that the study was approved by national research ethics committee of “National Defence University of Turkey” and we certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Anil, Ö., Batdi, V. Use of augmented reality in science education: A mixed-methods research with the multi-complementary approach. Educ Inf Technol 28, 5147–5185 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11398-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11398-6