Akach, J. A., Osanjo, L., & Maina, S. (2021). Co-Design: Tools, Methods and Techniques for Designing with Users. Africa Habitat Review Journal, 15(1), 2145–2156. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://uonjournals.uonbi.ac.ke/ojs/index.php/ahr
Akama, Y. (2009). Politics makes strange bedfellows: addressing the ‘messy’power dynamics in design practice. In Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference 2008 (pp. 1–12). Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/451/1/fulltext.pdf
Andersen, P. V. K., & Mosleh, W. S. (2021). Conflicts in co-design: Engaging with tangible artefacts in multi-stakeholder collaboration. CoDesign, 17(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1740279
Atlee, T. (2003). The Tao of Democracy: Using Co-Intelligence to Create a World that Works for All. The Writers Collective.
Barberá, E., Garcia, I., & Fuertes-Alpiste, M. (2017). A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 18(6), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2805
Blackler, A., Zelenko, O., Chamorro-Koc, M., Rittenbruch, M., & Sade, G. (2018). Design research: Methodological innovation through messiness. In New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2-Methodologies (pp. 131–154). Springer, Cham. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/117558/8/33303862.pdf
Bonsignore, E., Ahn, J., Clegg, T., Guha, M. L., Hourcade, J. P., Yip, J. C., & Druin, A. (2013). Embedding Participatory Design into Designs for Learning: An Untapped Interdisciplinary Resource?. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M.J. Nathan, S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 549–556). https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2013.1.549
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2012). Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference (pp. 41–50). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347642
Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2016). Unpacking the notion of participation in participatory design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25(6), 425–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9259-4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Bønnelycke, J., Sandholdt, C. T., & Jespersen, A. P. (2018). Co-designing health promotion at a science centre: Distributing expertise and granting modes of participation. CoDesign, 15(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1434547
Calle, M., Narváez, E., & Maldonado-Mahauad, J. (2020). Proposal for the Design and Implementation of Miranda: A Chatbot-Type Recommender for Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Environments. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3059/paper2.pdf
Clarke, R. E., Briggs, J., Armstrong, A., MacDonald, A., Vines, J., Flynn, E., & Salt, K. (2021). Socio-materiality of trust: Co-design with a resource limited community organisation. CoDesign, 17(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349
Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H. S., & Könings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Official Journal of the European Union. Accessed 6 March 2022. Retrieved from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
Design Council. (2007). Eleven lessons: Managing design in eleven global companies-desk research report. Design Council.
DiSalvo, B., Yip, J., Bonsignore, E., & DiSalvo, C. (Eds.). (2017). Participatory Design for Learning: Perspectives from Practice and Research. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630830
Druin, A. (2014). Inclusive ownership of participatory learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
Durall, E., & Kapros, E. (2020). Co-design for a competency self-assessment chatbot and survey in science education. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 13–24). Cham: Springer.
Durall, E., Leinonen, T., Gros, B., & Rodriguez-Kaarto, T. (2017). Reflection in learning through a selfmonitoring device: Design research on EEG self-monitoring during a study session. Designs for Learning, 9(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.75
Durall Gazulla, E., Virnes, M., Leinonen, T., & Gros, B. (2020). Ownership of learning in monitoring technology: Design case of self-monitoring tech in independent study. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), (45), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-045-006
Ehn, P. (1988). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artefacts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ertner, M., Kragelund, A. M., & Malmborg, L. (2010). Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (pp. 191–194). https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900475
Feenberg, A. (2017). Critical theory of technology and STS. Thesis Eleven, 138(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689388
Fernández-Ferrer, M., Durall, E., Cano, M. E. (2021). Chatbot for self-regulation in complex tasks: Co-designing feedback in learning processes. Edulearn21 Proceedings, 9433–9438. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.1902
Fleischmann, K. (2015). The democratisation of design and design learning–how do we educate the next–generation designer. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8, 101–108. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0806/pdf/B5R188.pdf
Griol, D., Molina, J. M., & Callejas, Z. (2017). Incorporating android conversational agents in mlearning apps. Expert Systems, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12156
Gros, B., & López, M. (2016). Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0026-x
Gros, B., & Durall, E. (2020). Retos y oportunidades del diseño participativo en tecnología educativa Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (74), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1761
Harrer, A., & Lingnau, A. (2018, July). Designing TEL-Tools for Thinking Skills: Learning to Learn Together in a CSCL Environment. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 301–303). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00076
Hendriks, N., Huybrechts, L., Slegers, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2018). Valuing implicit decision-making in participatory design: A relational approach in design with people with dementia. Design Studies, 59, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.06.001
Hillgren, P. A., Seravalli, A., & Emilson, A. (2011). Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign, 7(3–4), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630474
Iversen, O., S., Smith, R. C., & Dindler, C. (2017). Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on interaction design and children (pp. 27–37). https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079725
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Koutamanis, A., Heuer, J., & Könings, K. D. (2017). A visual information tool for user participation during the lifecycle of school building design: BIM. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12226
Kumar, J. A. (2021). Educational chatbots for project-based learning: Investigating learning outcomes for a team-based design course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00302-w
Laanpere, M., Pata, K., Normak, P., & Põldoja, H. (2014). Pedagogy-driven design of digital learning ecosystems. Computer Science and Information Systems, 11(1), 419–442. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1820-0214/2014/1820-02141400015L.pdf
Leinonen, T., & Durall, E. (2014). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar Media Education Research Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-10
Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12224
Luck, R. (2003). Dialogue in Participatory Design. Design Studies, 24(6), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00040-1
Malinverni, L., Mora-Guiard, J., & Pares, N. (2016). Towards methods for evaluating and communicating participatory design: A multimodal approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 94, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.004
Martin-Hammond, A., Vemireddy, S., & Rao, K. (2018). Engaging older adults in the participatory design of intelligent health search tools. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 280–284). https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240972
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
Ogunyemi, A. A., Lamas, D., Lárusdóttir, M. K., & Loizides, F. (2019). A systematic mapping study of HCI practice research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(16), 1461–1486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1541544
Pedersen, S. (2020). Staging negotiation spaces: A co-design framework. Design Studies, 68, 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.02.002
Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing Formative Assessment Software with Teachers: An Analysis of the Co-Design Process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206807000300
Pirinen, A. (2016). The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. International Journal of Design, 10(3), 27–42. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/viewFile/2575/749
Prieto-Alvarez, C., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2020). LA-DECK: A card-based learning analytics codesign tool. Proceedings of the 10th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK ’20), 23–27 March 2020, Frankfurt, Germany (pp. 63–72). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375476
Robinson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge.
Sanders, E. B. N., Brandt, E., & Binder, T. (2010). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference (pp. 195–198). https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476
Sanders, E .B. N. (2006). “Design serving people”. In Cumulus Working Papers, Edited by: Salmi, E. and Anusionwu, L. 28–33. Helsinki, Finland: Copenhagen, University of Art and Design.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanoff, H. (2011). Multiple views of participatory design. Focus, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.15368/focus.2011v8n1.1
Sanoff, H. (2021). Participatory Design: a Historical Perspective. Journal of Arts & Architecture Research Studies, 2(3), 12–21. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://jaars.journals.ekb.eg/article_177154.html
Scheu, S., & Benke, I. (2022). Digital Assistants for Self-Regulated Learning: Towards a State-Of-The-Art Overview. ECIS 2022 Research-in-Progress Papers, 46. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rip/46
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books.
Song, D., & Kim, D. (2021). Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1767525
Spiel, K., Brulé, E., Frauenberger, C., Bailley, G., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2020). In the details: The micro-ethics of negotiations and in-situ judgements in participatory design with marginalised children. CoDesign, 16(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722174
Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Maldonado, H., & Pea, R. (2009). Integrating co-design practices into the development of mobile science collaboratories. In Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp.393–397). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2012.22
Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.
Stelzle, B., Jannack, A., & Noennig, J. R. (2017). Co-design and co-decision: Decision making on collaborative design platforms. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2435–2444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.095
Swann, C. (2002). Action research and the practice of design. Design Issues, 18(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360252756287
Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2019). Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: A 4-year design study. Instructional Science, 47(4), 423–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09486-1
Treasure-Jones, T., & Joynes, V. (2018). Co-design of technology-enhanced learning resources. The Clinical Teacher, 15(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12733
Treasure-Jones, T., Dent-Spargo, R., & Dharmaratne, S. (2018). How do students want their workplace-based feedback visualized in order to support self-regulated learning? Initial results & reflections from a co-design study in medical education. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2193). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/136454/
Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In The International Society for Professional Innovation Management Conference Proceedings (p. 1–20).
Villatoro, S., & de Benito, B. (2021). An Approach to Co-Design and Self-Regulated Learning in Technological Environments. Systematic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
Warwick, L. (2017). Designing Trust: The importance of relationships in social contexts. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3096–S3105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352817
Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/254848/
Wolniak, R. (2017). The Design Thinking method and its stages. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji, 6. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from: https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-81d700a1-e4ea-4257-87cf-d0b790873bc8/c/wolniak2_SWwIP_2017_6.pdf
Zhou, X., & Hall, J. N. (2018). Mixed methods papers in first-person and third-person: Writing voices in dialogue. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816652755
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 1–37). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2