Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-directed learning with knowledge management model on academic achievement and digital literacy abilities for employees of a Thai energy organization

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously, we described a self-directed learning with knowledge management (SDL-KM) model (Silamut and Petsangsri 2020), to motivate learners in an organization to learn from internal-and-external knowledge management resources to enhance their Academic Achievement and Digital Literacy Abilities. In this paper, we aimed to demonstrate the value of this model by comparing these abilities in a controlled experiment with employees of an energy regulatory organization in Bangkok, Thailand. 40 employees were randomly selected, using stratified sampling, and divided into an experimental group (20) and control group (20), who participated in learning activities on two energy topics. The research instruments were data collection at the end of the lessons, which included information on Academic Achievement and Digital Literacy Ability assessment. Means, standard deviations and one-way MANOVA statistics were computed. As the results, the experimental group had higher Digital Literacy Abilities than the control group (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups for Academic Achievement. SDL-KM model encourages learners to learn by themselves, knowing how to use Digital Literacy Abilities to support KM. This will lead to success in their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, S A, Bridges, M W, DiPietro, M, Lovett, M C, & Norman, M K. (2010). How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Library Association. (2013). Libraries, and public policy: report of the office for the information technology policy’s digital literacy task force. http://www.districtdispatch.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/2012_OITP_digilitreport_1_22_13.pdf.

  • Anderson, LW, Bloom, BS, & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2019). Self-directed learning: a four-step process. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/tips-students/self-directed-learning/self-directed-learning-four-step-processhttps://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/tips-students/self-directed-learning/self-directed-learning-four-step-processhttps://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/tips-students/self-directed-learning/self-directed-learning-four-step-process.

  • Anthonysamy, L, Koo, A C, & Hew, S H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: a one decade review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3677–3704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Fernandez, I, & Sabherwal, R. (2014). Knowledge management: systems and processes. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belshaw, D. (2011). What is ‘digital literacy’. A pragmatic investigation doctorate in education. Durham: University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdrow, I, & Lane, H W. (2003). International joint ventures: creating value through successful knowledge management. Journal of World Business, 38(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, BS, Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, RG, & Hiemstra, R. (2018). Self-direction in adult learning: perspectives on theory, research and practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C C. (2006). Development of competency-based web learning material and effect evaluation of self-directed learning aptitudes on learning achievements. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonpracha, S. (2014). The development of instruction to strengthen nature self-directed learning of graduate students community development program, department of education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus. Journal of Education Prince of Songkla University, 25(3), 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, RM, & Donaldson, JA. (2012). Continuing to engage the online learner: more activities and resources for creative instruction, vol 35. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, TH, & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynan, L, Cate, T, & Rhee, K. (2008). The impact of learning structure on students’ readiness for self-directed learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, MJ, Seifried, P, & Röpnack, A. (1999). Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel (pp. 371–389). Springer.

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, T, Chai, Y, & Liu, Y. (2018). A review of knowledge management about theoretical conception and designing approaches. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilster, P, & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R V D, & Martins, M F. (2017). Knowledge management process: a theoretical-conceptual research. Gestão & Produção, 24(2), 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J F, Black, W C, Babin, B J, Anderson, R E, Tatham, R L, & et al. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, vol 5. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen, J. (2019). Digital literacy in the workplace: deciphering the gobbledygook. https://www.jaluch.co.uk/hr-blast/digital-literacy-in-the-workplace-deciphering-the-goobledygook/.

  • Hiemstra, R, & et al. (1994). Self-directed learning. The sourcebook for self-directed learning, pp. 9–20.

  • Jones, C, & Pimdee, P. (2017). Innovative ideas: Thailand 4.0 and the fourth industrial revolution. Asian International Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 4–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A, Vanhala, M, & Heilmann, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, MS. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M S, Holton, EF III, & Swanson, RA. (2012). The adult learner. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R A. (1995). Digital literacy. Scientific American, 273 (3), 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmetty, S, & Collin, K. (2020). Self-directed learning as a practice of workplace learning: interpretative repertoires of self-directed learning in ict work. Vocations and Learning, 13(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management: learning from knowledge engineering. Florida: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, CA, & Reinhart, RV. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: practical application and interpretation. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molinillo, S, & Japutra, A. (2017). Organizational adoption of digital information and technology: a theoretical review. The Bottom Line.

  • Nielsen, J, & Landauer, TK. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 206–213).

  • Nonaka, I, & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nontikorn, C. (2009). Learning system: learning achievement enhancement. Thai Health Promotion Foundation.

  • Omotayo, F O. (2015). Knowledge management as an important tool in organisational management: a review of literature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1(2015), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panich, V. (2016). New horizon in knowledge management. Foundation for the Promotion of Knowledge Management for Society.

  • Petsangsri, S. (2002). The effects of embedded scaffolding strategy in a cognitive flexibility-based computer learning environment. In International conference on computers in education, 2002. Proceedings (pp. 75–79). IEEE.

  • Phuttasorn, E. (2014). Trends in enhancement of 21st century learning skills for adult learners. An Online Journal of Education, 9(4), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatip, P, Chantana, V, & Paitoon, P. (2015). Elements of digital literacy skill. In The 13th international conference on developing real-life learning experiences: lifelong learning skills in the 21st century (pp. P12–1–P12–8).

  • Ritcharoon, P. (2013). Principles of measurement and evaluation of education. Bangkok, Thailand: House of Kermyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saechan, T, & Sompong, N. (2019). The web-based instruction model by using problem—based learning to enhance digital literacy for undergraduate students. Journal of Information Science, Khon Kaen University, 37(2), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawatsky, A P, Ratelle, J T, Bonnes, S L, Egginton, J S, & Beckman, T J. (2017). A model of self-directed learning in internal medicine residency: a qualitative study using grounded theory. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, PM. (2006). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency and Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, PM. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency and Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silamut, AA, & Petsangsri, S. (2020). Self-directed learning with knowledge management model to enhance digital literacy abilities. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4797–4815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, L, & Hill, J R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Techataweewan, W, & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B, Zheng, W, & Viere, C. (2009). Holistic views of knowledge management models. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M, Bonk, C J, & Doo, M Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in moocs: exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2073–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our panel of experts in Academic Achievement test, Dr. Prasit Siritiprussamee, Dr. Chanchai Amornvipas, and Pimnipa Sipongam (Energy Regulatory Commission, Thailand), and our experts in digital learning ability assessment, Assoc. Prof. Jintavee Khlaisang (Chulalongkorn University, Thailand), Asst. Prof. Nanta Palitawanont (Burapha University, Thailand), Dr. Suchitra Keawsri (Ratchasuda College Maidol University) for their contributions to our work. Asst. Prof Sirirat Petsangsri (King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand) and Dr.John Morris (King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand) for their help with the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand

    Aime-acha Silamut & Thanongsak Sovajassatakul

Authors
  1. Aime-acha Silamut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thanongsak Sovajassatakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanongsak Sovajassatakul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silamut, Aa., Sovajassatakul, T. Self-directed learning with knowledge management model on academic achievement and digital literacy abilities for employees of a Thai energy organization. Educ Inf Technol 26, 5149–5163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10484-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10484-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation