Skip to main content

Self-directed Learning: Readiness of Secondary School Students in Mauritius

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radical Solutions for Education in Africa

Abstract

Open education and technology are transforming the journey of schooling. The way students prepare themselves for learning is becoming more challenging in the global educational environment. In the wake of technology integration in the learning process and the current trend to embrace online learning, self-directed learning (SDL) skills have drawn the attention of many researchers in the field. Technology-savvy students are ready to embrace new techniques for learning but how far are they inspired to learn on their own, acquire the necessary skills and take initiatives when they are still young and lack experience? This chapter unveils the findings of a study on the levels of SDL skills of upper secondary school students in Mauritius. A mixed-method approach collected data from 108 students involving both genders of varying learning performance. Primary data was collected using a validated questionnaire based on the four constructs—self-discipline, self-motivation, self-management and collaboration. A Cronbach’s alpha test was used to test the reliability of the 32-items in the questionnaire. It was revealed that the mastery of SDL skills was not gender biased and did not depend on the learning performance of students, but was found to be significantly dependent on the level of computer skills, thus purporting that those who were proficient users of computing tools were well-poised to embrace self-directed learning. Additionally, students with higher learning performance and those who had prior exposure to online courses demonstrated high collaborative skills. And thus, these students were found to be more apt and motivated to adopt self-directed learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appavoo, P., Soyjaudah, K. M. S., & Armoogum, V. (2015). Assessing young learners’ readiness to embrace ICT for pedagogical gain. International Journal of E-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media, 1(3), 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appavoo, P., Sukon, K. S., Gokhool, A. C., & Gooria, V. (2019). Why does collaborative learning not always work even when the appropriate tools are available? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askin Tekkol, I., & Demirel, M. (2018). An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. J. (2012). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekele, T. A. (2010). Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. W. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on self-directed learning. 21st Century success skills (pp. 1–31). National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (2016). Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than frequency of use of the learning management system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (2009). Self-directed learning. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 2615–2627). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, N., & Bower, M. (2012). Learning through social networking sites—The critical role of the teacher. Educational Media International, 49(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. (1997). Gender bias in education. Critical cultural in pavilion. Retrieved February 16, 2021 from http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html.

  • Cho, M.-H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, P.-N., & Chen, W.-F. (2008). Exploratory study of the relationship between self-directed learning and academic performance in a web-based learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Self-directed learning readiness, Internet self-efficacy and preferences towards constructivist internet-based learning environments among higher-aged adults. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 15, 2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.

  • Drain, T., Grier, L., & Sun, W. (2012). Is the growing use of electronic devices beneficial to academic performance? Results from archival data and a survey. Issues in Information Systems, 13(1), 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakomogbon, M. A., & Bolaji, H. O. (2017). Effects of collaborative learning styles on performance of students in a ubiquitous collaborative mobile learning environment. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(3), 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., Jennifer, K., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(1), 516–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook. Jossey-Bass, Wiley. ISBN 0-7879-5955-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. (2005). Reliability & validity information. Learning Preference Assessment. Retrieved from www.lpasdlrs.com.

  • Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2010). Transitions in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R. (2018). Significance of self-directed learning. Retrieved February 12, 2021from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335096519_Significance_of_Self-Directed_Learning#fullTextFileContent.

  • Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. (2011). Fostering self-directed learning through guided tasks and learner reflection. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(4), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleden, M. A. (2015). Analysis of self-directed learning upon students of mathematics education study. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The relationships between computer and information technology use, selected learning and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasfeto, D. B., & Ulfa, S. (2020). The relationship between self-directed learning and students’ social interaction in the online learning environment. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Tsai, P. S., Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Students’ perceptions of self-directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, P. (2020). Transforming our world by 2030. UNDP. https://undp.medium.com/17-ways-youth-are-changing-the-world-505a489e91dc. Accessed on November 22, 2020.

  • Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4.00), 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. (2015). Exploring collaborative learning: Theoretical and conceptual perspectives. In Investigating Chinese HE EFL classrooms (Vol. XXVII, pp. 11–28). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losh, E. (2014). The war on learning: Gaining ground in the digital university. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 403–437). Simon & Shuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksana, T. (2018). Are we consuming too much information? https://medium.com/@tunikova_k/are-we-consuming-too-much-information-b68f62500089. Accessed on December 5, 2020.

  • Palmer, D. (2007). What is the best way to motivate students in science? Teaching science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 53(1), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, H. D. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piskurich, G. M. (2003). Preparing students for e-learning (1st ed.). Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2010). “Digital Natives” and learning with the ICTs. The “GenY @ work” research in Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 449–479). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, D., & Sadker, M. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. Simon & Schuster Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, I., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Transfer skills and their case-based assessment. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 691–710). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. A., & Reagin, J. M. (2013). Individual versus collaborative problem solving: Divergent outcomes depending on task complexity. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1153–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, R. B. (2013). Comparison of readiness for self-directed learning in students experiencing two different curricula in one medical school. Gulf Medical Journal, 2, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet & Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. A. (2007). Investigating the link between self-directed learning readiness and project-based learning outcome: The case of international masters students in an engineering management course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabassum, R., & Hanan, M. A. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63, 604–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., & Koh, J. H. (2014). Self-directed learning: Learning in the 21st century. Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, K. (2010). Supporting self-directed learning: A framework for teachers. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, K. (1983). Effects of a self-directed learning project and preference for structure on self-directed learning readiness. Nursing Research, 32(1), 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuan, Y. L., Razali, A. B., & Samad, A. A. (2018). Self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) among foundation students from high and low proficiency levels to learn English language. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the educators who helped in the collection of data. A note of thanks is also due to Ms. S. K. Heerah Aisha for her assistance in the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vandanah Gooria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Survey

Appendix: Survey

Dear participants (students)

You are invited to participate in this survey being carried out by a group of Academics at the Open University. Please spare some few minutes of your precious time to fill this survey. You may rest assured that all the information provided will be kept confidential and anonymous and shall be used only for the purpose of this study. The aim of this study is to gauge students’ experience of self-directed learning* at the lower/upper secondary level.

figure a
  

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

1

Section B: Awareness and readiness

1.1

I identify my own learning needs

     

1.2

I keep up to date on different learning resources available online

     

1.3

I am responsible for identifying my areas of deficit

     

1.4

I find interactive teaching–learning sessions more effective than just listening to lectures

     

1.5

I rehearse and revise new lessons

     

1.6

I like to ask question(s) to the teacher

     

1.7

I self-assess before I get feedback from teachers

     

1.8

I stick to my teachers’ explanation and notes only for my learning

     

1.9

I find both success and failure inspire me to further learning

     

1.10

My interaction with others helps me to develop the insight to plan for further learning

     

2

Section C: Self-directed learning skills

 

Self-discipline

2.1

I am responsible for my own learning

     

2.2

I need to keep my learning routine separate from my other commitments

     
 

I set specific times for my study online

     

2.3

I arrange my self-learning routine in such a way that it helps develop a permanent learning culture in my life

     

2.4

I keep annotated notes or a summary of all my ideas, reflections and new learning

     

2.5

I identify the need for interdisciplinary links for maintaining social harmony

     

2.6

I am not distracted by other online activities (e.g. instant messages, Internet surfing) when learning online

     
 

Self-motivation

2.7

I always need people to motivate me

     

2.8

I enjoy exploring information beyond the prescribed course objectives

     

2.9

I feel that I am not learning when the teacher is not around

     

2.10

My inner drive directs me towards further development and improvement in my learning

     

2.11

I seek assistance to address problems I face when learning online

     
 

Self-management

2.12

I am able to plan and set my learning goals

     

2.13

I am able to monitor my learning progress

     

2.14

I make sure I complete all homework and coursework

     

2.15

I often get confused between time for learning and time for entertainment

     

2.16

I like to evaluate what I do

     

2.17

I dedicate adequate time for each subject

     

3

SDL—technology use

3.1

I am able to use information technology effectively

     

3.2

I find modern educational interactive technology enhances my learning process

     

3.3

I am confident in using online tools

     

3.4

I rarely discuss technological matters with my friends

     

4

Openness and other supports for the SDL process

4.1

I consider teachers as facilitators of learning rather than providing information only

     

4.2

I often initiate online group discussions

     

4.3

I keep an open mind to others’ point of view

     

4.4

I am open to criticism if it can improve my learning

     

4.5

I do not appreciate when my work is peer-reviewed

     

4.6

I am able to identify my role within a group

     

4.7

I am open to new ideas

     

4.8

I find easy to work in collaboration with others

     

4.9

I find it challenging to pursue learning with peers coming from different cultural backgrounds

     
  1. 8.

    Do you have any recommendations on how you may improve your self-directed learning?

  2. 9.

    How far has the pandemic COVID-19 impacted on your self-directed learning skills?

  3. 10.

    What should be done to encourage students improve their self-directed learning skills?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gooria, V., Appavoo, P., Bhunjun, U., Gokhool, A.C. (2021). Self-directed Learning: Readiness of Secondary School Students in Mauritius. In: Burgos, D., Olivier, J. (eds) Radical Solutions for Education in Africa. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4099-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4099-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4098-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4099-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics