Abstract
Gramsci’s vision of the national-popular and counter-hegemonic struggle offers an insightful framework for a more systematical and synthetic reading of the Bolivarian revolutionary process in Venezuela. In contradistinction to the simplistic accounts that draw on pure anti-capitalist and/or anti-imperialist struggles, a Gramscian lens can sharpen the perspective into internal colonial relationships with regard to squattering, race and gender as well as the contradictory nature of socialism. A Gramscian lens can also help us formulate a coherent critique of prevailing hegemonic leadership types from a participatory-democratic perspective. With this in mind, I contend that Chávez bequeathed two major legacies that need to be carefully taken into account by the revolutionaries and other socialist intellectuals and scholars of the twenty-first century. The first is that the task of the national-democratic revolution has become more pressing than ever for Third World revolutions and needs to be successfully incorporated into the struggle for socialism. Interestingly enough, this legacy brings to the table what Gramsci understands by the “national-popular.” Following Schiller’s (Dialect Anthropol 35(3):255–260, 2011) assertion that a comparative outlook on Venezuela is necessary in order to offer a more nuanced and sophisticated analysis of the complexity of the Bolivarian process, this paper also presents a comparative/historical analysis of Gramsci’s Italy and Venezuela. Chávez’s second legacy arises from the recognition that socialism is to be understood as a long protracted process replete with inner contradictions and risks embedded in the political-cultural transformation of daily life. This legacy underlines institutional innovation and cultural struggle, which exhibit astonishing similarities with Gramsci’s vision of counter-hegemonic struggle. As such, this paper touches on the challenges and contradictions of the post-Chávez era as they pertain to the transformation of daily life via counter-hegemonic tools and leadership mechanisms. Indeed, any genuine social transformation toward socialism excludes race- and gender-blind approaches, hence the necessity of rigorously analyzing the limitations of the Bolivarian process in race and gender relations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azzellini, Dario. 2010. Constituent power in motion: Ten years of transformation in Venezuela. Socialism and Democracy 24(2): 8–31.
Barreto, Daisy J. 2011. The indigenous question: Winning and losing with Bolivarian socialism. Dialectical Anthropology 35(3): 261–263.
Barrett, Patrick, Daniel Chavez, and Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito. 2008. The new Latin American left: Utopia reborn. London: Pluto Press.
Beasley-Murray, Jon, Maxwell Cameron, and Eric Hershberg. 2010. Latin America’s left turns: A tour d’horizon. In Latin America’s left turns: Politics, policies, and trajectories of change, ed. Maxwell Cameron, and Eric Hershberg, 1–22. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Bellamy, Richard, and Darow Schecter. 1993. Gramsci and the Italian state. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bowen, Katie, and Caitlin McNulty. Moving beyond representation: Participatory democracy and communal councils in Venezuela 2009 [cited November 29, 2011. Available from http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4766?page=2.
Burbach, Roger, Michael Fox, and Federico Fuentes. 2013. Latin America’s turbulent transitions. London: Zed Books.
Burbach, Roger, and Camila Piñeiro. 2010. Venezuela’s participatory socialism. Socialism and Democracy 21(3): 181–200.
Buxton, Julia. 2009. Venezuela: The political evolution of Bolivarianism. In Reclaiming Latin America: Experiments in radical social democracy, ed. Geraldine Lievesley, and Steve Ludlam. London: Zed Books.
Cabot, Elisa Nuria, and Miguel Riera. 2008. De consejos y comunas. El Viejo Topo 4(4): 32–35.
Cammett, John M. 1967. Antonio Gramsci and the origins of Italian communism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cannon, Barry. 2008. Class/race polarisation in Venezuela and the electoral success of Hugo Chavez: A break with the past or the song remains the same? Third World Quarterly 29(4): 731–748.
Casanova, Pablo González. 1965. Internal colonialism and national development. Studies in Comparative International Development 1(4): 27–37.
Castañeda, Jorge. 2006. Latin America’s left turn. Foreign Affairs 85(3): 28–43.
Ciccariello-Maher, George. 2007. Dual power in the Venezuelan revolution. Monthly Review 59(4): 42–56.
de la Barra, Ximena, and Richard Dello. 2009. Latin America after the neoliberal debacle. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Ellner, Steve. 2008. Rethinking Venezuelan politics: Class, conflict, and the Chavez phenomenon. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Ellner, Steve. 2010. Hugo Chávez’s first decade in office: Breakthroughs and shortcomings. Latin American Perspectives 37(170): 77–96.
Fernandes, Sujatha. 2008. Barrio women and popular politics in Chávez’s Venezuela. Latin American Politics and Society 49(3): 97–127.
Fernandes, Sujatha. 2010. Who can stop the drums?: Urban social movements in Chávez’s Venezuela. Durhan: Duke University Press.
Fernandes, Sujatha. 2011a. Everyday wars of position: Social movements and the Caracas barrios in a Chávez era. Colombia International 73: 71–90.
Fernandes, Sujatha. 2011b. Radio Bemba in an age of electronic media: The dynamics of popular communication in Chávez’s Venezuela. In Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics, and culture under Chávez, ed. David Smilde, and Daniel Hellinger, 131–156. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fernández, Norcka, Francys Delgado, and Nora Belloso. 2009. Participación ciudadana, consejos comunales, educación: Tres ejes significativos de la gestión pública local. Omnia 15(2): 125–143.
Ferrándiz, Francisco. 2009. Open veins: Spirits of violence and grief in Venezuela. Ethnography 10(1): 39–61.
García-Guadilla, María Pilar. 2011. Urban land committees: Co-operation, autonomy, and protagonism. In Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics, and culture under Chávez, ed. David Smilde, and Daniel Hellinger, 80–103. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1926. A study of the italian situation [cited May 21, 2013. Available from http://marxism.halkcephesi.net/AntonioGramsci/1926/08/italian_situation.htm.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1959. The modern prince and other writings. New York: International Publishers.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1994. Pre-prison writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1995. Further selections from the Prison Notebooks. Minneapolis: Lawrence & Wishart.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1999. The Gramsci reader: Selected writings 1916–1935. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Gramsci, Antonio. 2012a. Selections from cultural writings. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Gramsci, Antonio. 2012b. Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Gramsci, Antonio, and Palmiro Togliatti.The Italian situation and the tasks of the PCI: “The Lyons theses” 1926 [cited May 9, 2013. Available from http://marxism.halkcephesi.net/AntonioGramsci/1926/01/lyon_congress/lyon_thesis.htm.
Gulbas, Lauren E. 2013. Embodying racism: Race, rhinoplasty, and self-esteem in Venezuela. Qualitative Health Research 23(3): 326–335.
Gürcan, Efe Can. 2010. The evolution of Turkish nationalism: An unconventional approach based on a comparative and international perspective. In Beyond imagined uniqueness: Nationalisms in contemporary perspectives, ed. Joan Burbick, and William Glass, 141–168. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gürcan, Efe Can, and Onur Bakiner. Forthcoming in 2013–2014. Beyond neoliberal hegemony in Latin America: Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América (ALBA). In Gramsci and Foucault: A Reassessment, ed. David Kreps. Farnham: Ashgate.
Hall, Katherine. 2009. Differences of perspective: An examination of racism and ethnic minorities in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Glendon Journal of International Studies 5(1): 45–50.
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Who mobilizes? Participatory democracy in Chávez’s Bolivarian revolution. Latin American Politics and Society 52(3): 31–66.
Henríquez, H.Ochoa. 2010. La política de promoción de la participación ciudadana del gobierno de Chávez. Espacio Abierto 19(4): 681–695.
INE. The official website of the National Statistics Institute of Venezuela 2012 [cited August 7, 2012. Available from http://www.ine.gob.ve.
Irazábal, Clara, and John Foley. 2010. Reflections on the Venezuelan transition from a capitalist representative to a socialist participatory democracy: What are planners to do? Latin American Perspectives 37(170): 97–122.
Kingstone, Peter. 2011. The political economy of Latin America. New York: Routledge.
Lander, Edgardo. 2008. Venezuela, populism and the left: Alternatives to neoliberalism. In The new Latin American left: Utopia reborn, ed. Patrick Barrett, Daniel Chavez, and César Rodríguez-Garavito, 69–98. London: Pluto Press.
Levitsky, Steven, and Kenneth M. Roberts. 2011. Latin America’s ‘left turn’: A framework for analysis. In The resurgence of the Latin American left, ed. Steven Levitsky, and Kenneth M. Roberts, 3–30. Baltimore: The John Hopins University Press.
Levy, Marc. 1986. Max Weber and Antonio Gramsci. In Max Weber and his contemporaries, ed. Wolfgang J. Mommsen, and Jürgen Osterhammel, 382–402. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
López-Maya, Margarita, and Luis E. Lander. 2011. Democracy in Venezuela: Ideas and achievements. In Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics, and culture under Chávez, ed. David Smilde, and Daniel Hellinger, 58–79. Durham: Duke University Press.
Macdonald, Laura, and Arne Ruckert. 2009. Post-neoliberalism in the Americas: An introduction. In Post-neoliberalism in the Americas, ed. L. Macdonald, and A. Ruckert, 1–20. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meltzer, Judy. 2009. Hugo Chávez and the search for post-neoliberal policy alternatives in Venezuela. In Post-neoliberalism in the Americas, ed. Laura Macdonald, and Arne Ruckert, 89–104. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Min, Eungjun, Jinsook Ju Joo, and Han Ju Kwak. 2003. Korean film: History, resistance and democratic imagination. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Moreno-Brid, Juan Carlos, and Igor Paunovic. 2010. Macroeconomic policies of the new left: Rhetoric and reality. In Latin America’s left turns: Politics, policies, and trajectories of change, ed. Maxwell Cameron, and Eric Hershberg, 193–208. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Petras, James. 2011. Latin America’s twenty-first century socialism. In 21st Century socialism: Reinventing the project, ed. Henry Veltmeyer, 11–32. Fernwood: Black Point.
Petras, James, and Henri Veltmeyer. 2011. Social movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and popular resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rakowski, Cathy A. 2003. Women’s coalitions as a strategy at the intersection of economic and political change in Venezuela. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 16(3): 387–405.
Rodríguez-Garavito, César, Patrick Barrett, and Daniel Chavez. 2008. Utopia reborn? Introduction to the study of the new Latin American left. In The new Latin American left: Utopia reborn, ed. Patrick Barrett, Daniel Chavez, and César Rodríguez-Garavito, 1–41. London: Pluto Press.
Rosengarten, Frank. 2009. The contemporary relevance of Gramsci’s views on Italy’s “Southern question”. In Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics, culture and social theory, ed. Joseph Francese, 134–144. London: Routledge.
San Juan Jr, Epifanio. 2009. Antonio Gramsci’s theory of the “national-popular” and socialist revolution in the Philippines. In Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics, culture and social theory, ed. Joseph Francese, 163–198. London: Routledge.
Schiller, Naomi. 2011. Points of departure for a constructive critique of the Bolivarian revolution. Dialectical Anthropology 35(3): 255–260.
Sepulveda, Maria Angelica, Gloria López, and Yuherqui Guaimaro. 2001. Crecer en las ciudades: Caracas, Venezuela. Caracas: Centro de Investigaciones para la Infancia y la Familia, Universidad Metropolitana.
Silva, Eduardo. 2009. Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Cott, D.L. 2003. Andean indigenous movements and constitutional transformation: Venezuela in comparative perspective. Latin American Perspectives 30(1): 49–69.
Veltmeyer, Henri. 2011. The Latin American left in the face of the new imperialism. In The new Latin American left: Cracks in the empire, ed. Jeffery R. Webber, and Barry Carr, 49–74. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Webber, Jeffery R., and Barry Carr. 2013. The Latin American left in theory and practice. In The new Latin American left: Cracks in the empire, ed. Jeffery R. Webber, and Barry Carr, 1–30. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weyland, Kurt. 2010. The performance of Leftist governments in Latin America: Conceptual and theoretical issues. In Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings, ed. Kurt Weyland, Raúl L. Madrid, and Wendy Hunter, 1–27. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilpert, Gregory. The meaning of 21st century socialism for Venezuela 2006 [cited November 29, 2011. Available from http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1834.
Wilpert, Gregory. 2010. Venezuela: Participatory democracy or government as usual? Socialism and Democracy 19(1):7–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gürcan, E.C. Hugo Chávez’s unwritten testament: national-democratic struggle and contradictions of socialism. Dialect Anthropol 37, 341–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-013-9317-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-013-9317-y