Two conclusions can be drawn from the results of the present study. First, undiagnosed clinically significant, severe deficiency of vitamin B12 (serum level <150 pM) is surprisingly prevalent in hospitalized elderly cardiovascular patients in The Netherlands but this prevalence corresponds with present literature data that a clinically significant deficiency of vitamin B12 occurs in 5%–20% of people aged 60 or over in Western populations in general [1–3]. However, in our study population, with a mean age of 65 years, we found that nearly half of the patients (45%) were vitamin deficient or had serum levels of vitamin B12 at least lower than 250 pM.
Second, low vitamin B12 levels seem to be related to ACG in a small but a noteworthy subgroup of patients. The present observations suggest that approximately one-fifth of the cardiovascular patients with severe vitamin B12 deficiency in The Netherlands have ACG as a background factor. However, the majority of patients do not seem to have malabsorption of vitamin B12 due to ACG, and they probably have a poor diet and low vitamin intake as likely causes of the deficiency.
This study has some limitations. The serum values for gastrin and pepsinogen are a model for gastric histology. Although the validation process is well described [8–12], histology is still the golden standard. Moreover, we can only compare the vitamin B12 deficiency rates with the literature, because the relation between gastric status and vitamin B12 deficiency was not studied in a control group. Information about patients’ medication was not assessed. Acid suppressive medication, e.g., proton pump inhibitors, are causal factors in the development of atrophy. It would be interesting to study the effect of these drugs on vitamin B12 levels.
The present study is an observational one and was designed only to elucidate the commonness of vitamin B12 deficiency in coronary heart patients. It does not say anything about whether the low vitamin B12 levels in cardiovascular patients influence the disease itself, or its outcomes, or whether the low vitamin levels are only reflections of vitamin deficiencies in elderly people in general. The causal associations may be, however, because of the surprising commonness of the low (<150 pM) and low-normal (150–250 pM) serum vitamin B12 levels among the present patients. It would be of interest to know whether correction of the low vitamin levels would improve the prognosis of the patients. Anyhow, the supplementation of the vitamin deficiency hardly has any drawbacks or negative influences.
The above conclusions suggest that it may be important to clear up the etiopathogenic causes (i.e., dietary versus malabsorption) if a vitamin deficiency is found or suspected. Even though a poor diet is is obviously the most prevalent cause of vitamin deficiency, deficiencies due to ACG and vitamin malabsorption seem to be so common as well that they must be taken into account in clinical and therapeutic considerations. In cases with ACG and malabsorption, vitamin supplementation will succeed most effectively with intramuscular injections only, whereas in other patients treatment of the deficiency may be possible by simple correction of the diet.
It would also be interesting to correlate vitamin B12 blood levels with those of homocysteine and folic acid and, also, with cardiovascular risk factors to ascertain whether the found vitamin B12 deficiency could further worsen the underlying coronary heart disease. This can be investigated in future research. The design of this study did not allow examination of this question, because we did not assess the cardiovascular diagnosis and risk profile.
In conclusion, our study shows that a surprisingly high number of patients with cardiovascular disease have low levels of vitamin B12, which may often remain undiagnosed and may, subsequently, remain uncorrected in proper way. ACG is a cause of the deficiency in a relatively small but remarkable subgroup of patients with low vitamin B12.