Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The research field of CSCW has always been interested in technology supporting collaborative practices in work contexts. Many of the early studies focused on manufacturing settings and examined the impact of computing technology on collaborative work and, conversely, how collaborative work and organizational circumstances shape IT development (Carstensen et al., 1995, 1999; Schmidt and Bannon, 1992; Schmidt and Simone, 1996).
Retrospectively, the industrial and manufacturing (r)evolutions can be divided into four classes. While the first industrial revolution involved the appropriation of water and steam power for mechanization, the second used electric power for mass production. Within the third industrial revolution, which introduced electronics and information technology (Schwab, 2017) to manufacturing process, the first CSCW issues emerged. How are IT and cooperation related? How is IT used for articulation work? How must IT be designed in work contexts to serve as coordination artifacts? What are the organizational causes to and effects of IT use?
The vision of interconnected small computers, which Weiser (1991) described in the early 90 s as Ubiquitous Computing, coupled with the penetration of the Internet as well as the miniaturization of computers and electronic assemblies is now commonly known as the Internet of Things (IoT). When looking at the interconnected mix of physical hardware and digital software spheres within increasingly sophisticated value chains and digital transformations of industrial work settings (Industrial Internet of Things), the developments are commonly described in Europe as “the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0)”.
The first three revolutions had far-reaching effects on cooperation relationships, division of labor, coordination processes, and power relations within companies. However, we see that the current developments within Industry 4.0 will have, again, far-reaching effects not only on the actual manufacturing and applied production goods, but also on the internal organization, and external cooperation between companies and the human workers. Developments such as autonomous, but connected and ubiquitous cyber-physical systems (CPS), and the connection of data-, technology- and process-driven manufacturing shift cooperation processes as well as human-technology interaction.
While the early vision of Industry 4.0 was oriented toward technocratic and fully automated concepts and forms of work design, the practical design of the first Industry 4.0 concepts showed a completely opposite picture. Thus, it can be seen that human labor and the employees themselves still play the central role in manufacturing settings and that Industry 4.0 is nothing more than a new form of technology-induced work design, which enables a paradigm shift in human-technology interaction (Brödner, 1986; Ludwig et al., 2018; Wurhofer et al., 2018). With this insight, established CSCW concepts and approaches are now becoming more relevant than ever.
Even though modern technology and machines will indeed bring a great deal of automatization to industry and therefore offer new possibilities and functionalities that have come along with (and will continue to come along with) the interest in the IoT, they will also support the complexity of the cooperative practices and work arrangements associated with the ecologies of technology they encompass (Ludwig et al., 2014, 2017a; Stein et al., 2016). This will be a result of: (a) increasingly complex devices; (b) an increasing number of less obvious connections and dependencies between IoT devices; (c) more and more changes that ensembles of IoT technologies will need to undergo to fully integrate the most recent technological options and advances; and (d) a new interweaving of the ‘digital’ and the ‘physical’ world (Ludwig et al., 2017b).
In line with the mindset that humans are at the center of Industry 4.0 efforts, this special issue contributes, through case studies, to developing a better understanding of the complex and cooperative interplay between people, machines, and organizational structures in practice. The selection of papers demonstrates the relevance of coordinative practices and expertise sharing within the current technological era, and shows how technology can support current manufacturing practices through concrete interventions. The studies range from peer-creation processes in the manufacturing process to new technological ways of expertise-sharing and maintenance work. In conclusion, we hope the design and research community will find this special issue to be a useful collection of papers that examine how cooperative work and working structures have (not) changed within manufacturing settings over the last years. With our special issue we hope to provide an informative foundation for further research in this field.
References
Brödner, Peter (1986). Skill based manufacturing vs. “unmanned factory” - which is superior? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 1, no. 2, 1986, pp. 145–153.
Carstensen, Peter H.; Carsten Sørensen; and Henrik Borstrøm (1995). Two is Fine, Four is a Mess: Reducing Complexity of Articulation Work in Manufacturing. In COOP ’95. International Workshop on the Design of Cooperative Systems Antibes-Juan-les-Pins, France, 25–27 January 1995. Sophia Antipolis, France: INRIA Sophia Antipolis, pp. 314–333.
Carstensen, Peter; Kjeld Schmidt; and Uffe Kock Wiil (1999). Supporting shop floor intelligence. A CSCW approach to production planning and control in flexible manufacturing. In S. C. Hayne (Ed.), GROUP’99: International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 14-17 November 1999, Phoenix, Arizona. New York: ACM Press, pp. 111–120.
Ludwig, Thomas; Alexander Boden; and Volkmar Pipek (2017a). 3D Printers as Sociable Technologies: Taking Appropriation Infrastructures to the Internet of Things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 24, no. 2, 2017.
Ludwig, Thomas; Christoph Kotthaus; Martin Stein; Volkmar Pipek; and Volker Wulf (2018). Revive Old Discussions! Socio-technical Challenges for Small and Medium Enterprises within Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers, 4 -8 June, Nancy, France. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
Ludwig, Thomas; Oliver Stickel; Alexander Boden; and Volkmar Pipek (2014). Towards Sociable Technologies: An Empirical Study on Designing Appropriation Infrastructures for 3D Printing. In DIS ’14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 21–25 June 2014. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 835–844.
Ludwig, Thomas; Peter Tolmie; and Volkmar Pipek (2017b). From the Internet of Things to an Internet of Practices. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Exploratory Papers. Sheffield, UK: Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies.
Schmidt, Kjeld; and Liam Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1, 1992, pp. 7–40.
Schmidt, Kjeld; and Carla Simone (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 5, no. 2-3, pp. 155-200.
Schwab, Klaus (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Random House LCC US.
Stein, Martin; Alexander Boden; Dominik Hornung; and Volker Wulf (2016). 2016 Third Spaces in the Age of IoT: A Study on Participatory Design of Complex Systems. International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI), Proceedings of the COOP 2016 - Symposium on Challenges and Experiences in Designing for an Ageing Society, vol. 13, no. 3, 2016, pp. 69–76.
Weiser, Mark (1991). The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, vol. 265, no 3, September, 1991, pp. 94–104.
Wurhofer, Daniela; Thomas Meneweger; Verena Fuchsberger; and Manfred Tscheligi (2018). Reflections on Operators’ and Maintenance Engineers’ Experiences of Smart Factories. In GROUP’18: International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 7-10 January, Sanibel Island, Florida. New York, USA: ACM, pp. 284–296.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank all authors who contributed and the set of capable reviewers who helped us selecting and shaping the manuscripts that compose it.
Thomas Ludwig, Myriam Lewkowicz and Torkil Clemmensen, guest editors.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwig, T., Lewkowicz, M. & Clemmensen, T. Cooperation on the Shopfloor: CSCW in Manufacturing and Industry Settings. Comput Supported Coop Work 32, 1–4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09446-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09446-3