Distribution of histone H4 modifications as revealed by a panel of specific monoclonal antibodies
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Hayashi-Takanaka, Y., Maehara, K., Harada, A. et al. Chromosome Res (2015) 23: 753. doi:10.1007/s10577-015-9486-4
- 1.4k Downloads
Post-translational histone modifications play a critical role in genome functions such as epigenetic gene regulation and genome maintenance. The tail of the histone H4 N-terminus contains several amino acids that can be acetylated and methylated. Some of these modifications are known to undergo drastic changes during the cell cycle. In this study, we generated a panel of mouse monoclonal antibodies against histone H4 modifications, including acetylation at K5, K8, K12, and K16, and different levels of methylation at K20. Their specificity was evaluated by ELISA and immunoblotting using synthetic peptide and recombinant proteins that harbor specific modifications or amino acid substitutions. Immunofluorescence confirmed the characteristic distributions of target modifications. An H4K5 acetylation (H4K5ac)-specific antibody CMA405 reacted with K5ac only when the neighboring K8 was unacetylated. This unique feature allowed us to detect newly assembled H4, which is diacetylated at K5 and K12, and distinguish it from hyperacetylated H4, where K5 and K8 are both acetylated. Chromatin immunoprecipiation combined with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed that acetylation of both H4K8 and H4K16 were enriched around transcription start sites. These extensively characterized and highly specific antibodies will be useful for future epigenetics and epigenome studies.
KeywordsChromatin Epigenetics Histone modification Monoclonal antibody
Transcription start sites
In eukaryotic nuclei, ∼150 bp of DNA is wrapped around the histone octamer, which consists of two copies of four core histones (i.e., H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) to form a nucleosome, the fundamental unit of chromatin. Post-translational modifications on these histones play a critical role in genome function, including the regulation of transcription and the maintenance of genome integrity (Bannister and Kouzarides 2011; Greer and Shi 2012; The ENCODE Project Consortium 2012; Jørgensen et al. 2013). Since H3 and H4 are more stably integrated into nucleosomes compared to H2A and H2B (Kimura and Cook 2001), the modifications on H3 and H4 can act as long-term memory of epigenetic regulation. Among various H3 modifications, trimethylation on H3 lysine 9 and 27 (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3) that is associated with silenced genes can be inherited over cell generations (Martin and Zhang 2005; Greer and Shi 2012; Kimura 2013). Other modifications, such as trimethylation on H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and acetylation are associated with transcriptional activation (Heintzman et al. 2007; Shilatifard 2008; Stasevich et al. 2014). Modifications on histone H4 are also known to be involved in gene regulation and genome maintenance (Shahbazian and Grunstein 2007). Lysine residues in H4 N-terminal tail (i.e., H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, and H4K16) are major acetylation sites (Turner et al. 1989; Johnson et al. 1998; Lang et al. 2013; Taylor et al. 2013; Zheng et al. 2013). These acetylations are predominantly associated with euchromatin, contributing to chromatin decondensation and transcriptional regulation (Turner 1991; Dion et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2008; Bannister and Kouzarides 2011). H4K16ac is also known to be associated with DNA damage repair and cell senescence (Dang et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010; Sharma et al. 2010; Krishnan et al. 2011). In addition, H4K5ac and H4K12ac are associated with newly assembled chromatin since H4 in predeposition complexes is diacetylated at K5 and K12 by a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) (Sobel et al. 1995; Chang et al. 1997). Although the diacetylation of H4 is not a prerequisite for histone assembly (Ma et al. 1998), these modifications may stimulate nuclear import (Ejlassi-Lassallette et al. 2011) and contribute to the recovery from replication block-mediated DNA damage (Barman et al. 2006). After being assembled into chromatin, H4 becomes deacetylated in heterochromatin (Taddei et al. 1999). In contrast to these four lysines that are acetylated, H4 lysine 20 (H4K20) is subject to methylation (Jørgensen et al. 2013). Monomethylation of H4K20 (H4K20me1) may play multiple roles in genome regulation, including transcriptional control, DNA replication licensing, DNA damage response, and chromosome segregation (Wu and Rice 2011; Beck et al. 2012; Kapoor-Vazirani and Vertino 2014). Dimethylation of H4K20 (H4K20me2) is one of the most abundant modifications in mouse fibroblasts and HeLa cells (Pesavento et al. 2008; Schotta et al. 2008), and is involved in DNA damage repair signaling (Greeson et al. 2008).
Trimethylation on H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me3) is also involved in heterochromatin formation, correlated with H3K9me3 (Schotta et al. 2004; Sims et al. 2006). The levels of some histone H4 modifications, like H4K16ac and H4K20me3, are reported to be altered in cancer cells, suggesting these marks can possibly be diagnostic markers (Fraga et al. 2005; Ellis et al. 2009; Rodriguez-Paredes and Esteller 2011; Yokoyama et al. 2014).
To analyze histone modifications, specific antibodies have been valuable tools with a variety of applications, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting detection, and immunofluorescence (Turner et al. 1992; Peters et al. 2003; Kimura et al. 2008). The quality and reproducibility of these immunochemical analyses rely on antibody specificity and affinity, but commercially available antibodies have not been validated extensively (Clayton et al. 2006; Kimura et al. 2008; Rothbart et al. 2012; Kimura 2013). For example, 20–25 % of histone modification-specific antibodies failed to pass the validation by the ENCODE project (Egelhofer et al. 2011). To facilitate chromatin and epigenetics studies, we have developed histone H3 modification-specific antibodies (Kimura et al 2008; Hayashi-Takanaka et al. 2009, 2011, 2014; Chandra et al. 2012). We here report the generation and validation of a panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against histone H4. These highly reliable and fully characterized mAbs will be useful for future work.
Materials and methods
All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed. All animal care and experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Hokkaido University Animal Experiment Committee (approval number: 11-0109) and carried out according to guidelines for animal experimentation at Hokkaido University, where Mab Institute Inc is located. Animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility at Hokkaido University. Humane euthanasia of mice was performed by cervical dislocation by individuals with a demonstrated high degree of technical proficiency.
Generation, selection, purification, and dye conjugation of monoclonal antibodies
Summary of monoclonal antibodies
Hybridoma cells were routinely grown in GIT medium (Wako). For antibody purification, cells were grown in CD Hybridoma medium (Life Technologies) and the supernatant (250 ml) was filtrated through a 0.45-μm pore filter, as previously described (Hayashi-Takanaka et al. 2011). For IgG1 subclass mAbs, NaCl was added at a final concentration of 4 M before applying to a HiTrap Protein A HP Sepharose column (1 ml; GE Healthcare), which were pre-equilibrated with Protein A IgG1 binding buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After washing the column with Protein A IgG1 binding buffer, IgG1 was eluted using Mouse IgG1 Mild Elution Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For IgG2b mAbs, the filtrated supernatant was directly loaded to a HiTrap Protein A HP Sepharose column (1 ml; GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After washing with PBS, IgG was eluted using IgG Elution buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the buffer pH was immediately neutralized using 1.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 8.8). IgG was concentrated up to ∼2 mg/ml in PBS using an Amicon Ultra filter (50 k-cut off; Millipore).
Purified IgG was conjugated with a fluorescent dye (Hayashi-Takanaka et al. 2014). Dried Alexa Fluor 488 5-SDP ester (1 mg; Invitrogen), Cy3 N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (for labeling 1 mg protein; GE Healthcare), and Cy5 N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (for labeling 1 mg protein; GE Healthcare) were dissolved into 100 μl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Wako) and stored at −20 °C. IgG (100 μg) was diluted into 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8.3) in 100 μl. After addition of a dye solution (1, 1.5, and 4 μl for Alexa488, Cy3, and Cy5, respectively), the mixture was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with gentle rotation. The sample was passed through a PD-mini G-25 desalting column (GE Healthcare), which was pre-equilibrated with PBS, to remove unconjugated dyes, and dye-conjugated IgG was concentrated up to ∼1 mg/ml using an Ultrafree 0.5 filter (10 k-cut off; Millipore). The IgG concentration and dye:protein ratio were calculated from the absorbance at 280 and 494, 552, or 650 nm, using the extinction coefficient of IgG and correction factor at 280 nm provided by the manufacturers. Fluorescent dye-labeled IgG samples that yielded dye:protein ratio ∼3–9 were used for live imaging.
hTERT-RPE1 (purchased from Clontech; September 22, 1999; the pseudodiploid karyotype occasionally checked with most recently in February 2015) and HeLa cells (obtained from Peter Cook; ref. Pombo et al. 1999) were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with l-glutamine/penicillin/streptomycin (2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin; Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS), as previously described (Hayashi-Takanaka et al. 2009).
For ChIP experiments, mouse embryonic stem cells (ZHBTc4 cell line) were obtained from RIKEN BRC on January 11, 2011 (Niwa et al. 2000). Cells were maintained on culture dishes coated with 0.1 % type-A gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) in Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Equitech-Bio, Kerrville, TX), 1× nonessential amino acids (Nacalai Tesque), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Nacalai Tesque), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Nacalai Tesque), and 2000 U/ml Murine LIF.
Acetylated H4 tagged with NHis was produced by an in vitro translation system and purified as described (Mukai et al. 2011). Methylation mimic histones were purchased (Active Motif). HeLa histones were purified using the Histone Purification mini kit (Active Motif). H4 proteins (100 and 10 ng for Coomassiee-staining and immunoblotting, respectively) were separated in 15 % SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Wako), and either stained with Coomassiee Brilliant Blue (Wako) or transferred onto PVDF membranes (Pall) for immunoblotting using a semi-dry system (ATTO; 192 mM glycine, 100 mM Tris, and 5 % methanol; 70 min). PVDF membranes were washed with TBST (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05 % Tween 20), blocked with Blocking One-P (Nacalai Tesque) for 20 min, and incubated in mAbs (0.1–0.2 μg/ml) in TBST containing 10 % Blocking One-P for 1 h. After washing with TBST four times over 30 min, membranes were incubated in peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (GE Healthcare; 1:1,000 in TBST) for 1 h, washed with TBST four times over 30 min, and soaked in chemiluminescent reagent (Perkin-Elmer). Chemiluminescent signals were captured using a LAS-3000 (Fuji film).
Expression vectors for lysine-to-alanine substitution mutants were constructed based on pBOS-H4-N-GFP (Kimura and Cook 2001) using a Quickchange kit (Stratagene) with specific primers containing single mutations. The resulting constructs were verified by nucleotide sequencing. HeLa cells grown on a 60-mm dish were transfected with plasmid DNA (2 μg) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies; 10 μl) and further grown for a day. Cells were lysed using 2× SDS-gel loading buffer (0.5 ml) and boiling for 5 min, and 5 μl of lysate was separated in 10–20 % SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Wako) for immunoblotting.
Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked as described previously (Kimura et al. 2006; Hayashi-Takanaka et al. 2009). To label replication foci, cells were incubated in 10 μM EdU for 7.5 min before fixation, and the signal was detected with Alexa Fluor 647 azide using a Click-iT EdU Imaging Kit (Life Technologies).
Cells were then incubated in labeled mAbs (0.2–1 μg/ml) with Hoechst 33342 (100 ng/ml in PBS) in PBS containing 10 % Blocking One-P (Nacalai Tesque) for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS, coverslips were mounted in Prolong Gold (Life Technologies). Fluorescence images were collected using a confocal microscope (FV-1000; Olympus) operated by the built-in software (ver 2.1-4.1) with a PlanSApo 60× (NA = 1.35) or a PlanApoN SC 60× (NA = 1.4) objective lens (512 × 512 pixels; 12.5 μs/pixel; 4 line Kalman; 12-bit; pinhole 110 μm). Hoechst 33342, Alexa488, Cy3, and Cy5/Alexa647 signals were acquired by sequential scanning using laser lines at 405, 488, 543, and 633 nm, combined with emission dichroic mirror/barrier filter SDM490/BA430-470, SDM560/BA505-525, SDM640/BA560-620, and none/BA650IF, respectively, with a main dichroic mirror DM405/488/543/633.
Cells (ZHBTc4) were cross-linked in 0.5 % formaldehyde and suspended in 250 μl ChIP buffer (5 mM PIPES (pH 8.0), 200 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 % sucrose, 0.5 % NP-40, and protease inhibitor cocktail; Nacalai Tesque). Samples were incubated for 15 min on ice, sonicated for 5 s three times, and digested with micrococcal nuclease (1 μl; New England Biolabs) and Ribonuclease A (1 μl; Nacalai Tesque) at 37 °C for 40 min. The digested samples were centrifuged at 15,000×g for 10 min. Supernatant containing 4–8 μg DNA was incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody against H4K5ac, H4K8ac, H4K12ac, or H4K16ac, pre-bound to magnetic beads at 4 °C overnight with rotation. The immune complexes were washed twice with ChIP buffer and twice with TE buffer. After, cross-links were reversed by incubating in TE containing 1 % SDS at 65 °C overnight with proteinase K, and DNA was purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
ChIP-seq data analysis
Sequenced reads of chromatin immunoprecipiation combined with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) data were mapped onto the mouse genome (mm9) with Bowtie (version 0.12.8) using the parameter “-n 3 -m 2”. Estimation of normalized ChIP-seq signal intensities were calculated as follows. First, we counted mapped reads at 10,000 bp (Fig. 4a, b), 200 bp (Fig. 4c), or 100,000 bp (Fig. 4d) intervals (bins) on the genome. The counts were normalized as RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) (Mortazavi et al. 2008). Net ChIP-seq signal intensities were obtained by subtracting the input RPKM in each bin (Accession number, DRA002438 for H4 acetylation data; and SRX185820 for H3K7ac data).
mRNA-seq and data analysis
Sequencing was performed using a Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina). PolyA+ RNA was enriched from 100 ng of total RNA by two successive rounds of oligo(dT) selection. The polyA+ RNA was fragmented and first-strand cDNA was synthesized by random hexamer priming. Following second-strand cDNA synthesis, dsDNA was repaired using T4 DNA polymerase, Klenow enzyme, and T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK) (New England Biolabs), followed by treatment with Klenow exo- to add an A base to the 3′ end. After ligation of the adaptor using TaKaRa Ligation Mix (TaKaRa), the adaptor-ligated DNA was amplified using PCR primers for 12 cycles, and the amplified library was isolated using the E-gel Electrophoresis System (Life Technologies). The samples were purified using a QIAquick MinElute Kit (Qiagen). Sequenced reads were mapped onto the mouse genome (mm9) using Tophat (version 2.0.10). Gene expression levels (FPKM; Fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped sequence reads) were estimated by Cufflinks (version 2.1.1) using the parameters “-u -b (on cuffdiff)”. We classified genes into 11 groups based on the expression levels: Silent (FPKM = 0) and 10 groups with different expression levels separated at 10 percentile intervals (q0–10 %, q10–20 %, … and q90–100 % of genes from the lowest to the highest FPKM).
For a close look at ChIP-seq results, IGV_2.0.34 was used, as in Fig.4a, b.
Results and discussion
Generation of mAbs directed against modified histone H4
We generated mAbs directed against unmodified and specifically modified forms of histone H4, including acetylation at K5, K8, K12, and K16, and three levels of methylation at K20 (Table 1). The specificity was evaluated by ELISA and immunoblotting using synthetic peptides and recombinant proteins, respectively.
Pan-H4 antibody for immunoblotting
ELISA and immunoblotting also revealed that modification-specific mAbs reacted exclusively with the corresponding peptides and recombinant H4 harboring the target modifications (Figs. 1 and 2). For example, CMA416 reacted with all peptides containing K16ac, regardless of the neighboring modifications such as K12ac, K20ac, and K20me1-3 by ELISA (Fig. 1). The specific binding of CMA416 to H4K16ac was confirmed by immunoblotting using recombinant H4; it highlighted H4 proteins harboring K16 acetylation and K5/K8/K12/K16 tetra-acetylation (Fig. 2a). In addition to the endogenous H4, exogenously expressed GFP-tagged H4 and mutant proteins, except H4K16A, were detected by CMA416 (Fig. 2b), indicating that H4K16 is required for CMA416 binding. From these data, it is concluded that CMA416 specifically binds to H4K16ac. Similarly, CMA408 and CMA412 specifically reacted with H4K8ac and H4K12ac, respectively, regardless of the neighboring modifications (Figs. 1 and 2).
Interestingly, CMA405 was specific to H4K5ac combined with unmodified K8, distinguishable from diacetylated H4 at K5 and K8 (Figs. 1 and 2). In ELISA, CMA405 reacted with monoacetylated peptide at K5 but not with diacetylated peptide at K5 and K8 (Fig. 1). Immunoblotting also showed that CMA405 exclusively reacted with K5-acetylated H4, but not with tetraacetylated H4 at K5/K8/K12/K16 (Fig. 2a), or H4K8A and H4K5A mutants (Fig. 2b). These results indicate that both acetylated K5 and unacetylated K8 are required for CMA405 binding. In Fig. 2b, CMA405 reacted more with H4K12A and H4K20A mutants, suggesting that CMA405 reactivity depends on these residues. To examine whether K12 acetylation influences the antibody recognition, we used recombinant histone H4 that harbors both K5 and K12 acetylation. As shown in Fig. 2c, CMA405 reacted equally with K5-acetylated and K5/K12-diacetylated H4, but not with K5/K8-diacetylated and K12-acetylated H4, indicating that CMA405 reactivity is not affected by K12 modification state. The differential reactivity to transiently expressed H4K12A mutant can be explained by the interplay between the modifications of different residues in living cells, as also observed in H4K12 acetylation (Fig. 2b; CMA412 blot) and in a previous study (Sasaki et al. 2009).
ChIP-seq with acetylation-specific antibodies
We showed that mouse mAbs directed against histone H4 and its modifications are highly specific to the targets and are applicable to immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, and ChIP-seq. While histone modification-specific antibodies are now widely available from different vendors, most of them are rabbit polyclonals and therefore associated with lot-to-lot variation of the specificity and affinity. Furthermore, a systematic study revealed that 20–25 % of histone modification-specific antibodies were disqualified for ChIP-seq application (Egelhofer et al. 2011). As the property of mAb remains constant over time, new H4-specific mAbs described here will be useful for future epigenetics and epigenome studies. In fact, some of these antibodies have already proven useful for immunofluorescence with mouse tissue sections (Eberhart et al 2012, 2013), histochemistry with human patient specimen (Yokoyama et al 2014; Shinchi et al 2015), and ChIP-seq using chicken DT40 cells (Hori et al 2014).
Among the mAbs described here, H4K5ac-specific mAb CMA405 has a unique specificity. It recognizes acetylated K5 with unacetylated K8. This combination is typically found in newly assembled H4, which is diacetylated at K5 and K12, and CMA405 indeed highlights structures that resemble DNA replication foci in S phase cells. Thus, CMA405 will be particularly useful for detecting newly assembled chromatin and also for highlighting cells in S phase by microscopy and flow cytometry.
We thank Hitoshi Niwa (RIKEN CDB) for ZHBTc4 mouse embryonic stem cells and Timothy Stasevich (Colorado State University) for proofreading the manuscript. This work was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization of Japan, grants-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25116005 and 26291071), and the Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Y.H.-T. was supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science fellowship and by the Naito Foundation.
Conflict of interest
N.N. is a founder of MAB Institute Inc. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.